Daf A Week
Nedarim 7Aa: R' Yosef Greenwald-בגדרי התפסת שם הפקר והפקעת בעלות בהפקר
The "noisei ho ikri" over here in the Gamoris, of the bias of Yodos, first we had "pea" after the whole Gamoris, the Sistreitario of Caduchen and Gittin. "Yeshi ad la pei" "Yeshi ad l'estok" "Yeshi ad la hefker" "Yeshi ad la bezakise" So what we really discussed the last time was to understand that Yodos is a "shai'ik" when we're talking about something which is a sometimes call obviously be debuts, a "shai'la" whether it's called in Gansner Eischusok, if it's a debut it's a "camping" the "micei" the gidorm could be different, that's the "shai'la Gittin" "Yeshi ad l'estok" "Yeshi ad l'estok" "Yeshi ad l'estok" "Yeshi ad l'estok" "Yeshi ad l'estok" "Yeshi ad l'estok" "Yeshi ad l'estok" "Yeshi ad l'estok" "Yeshi ad l'estok" "Yeshi ad l'estok" "Yeshi ad l'estok" and then before that "pea" and then "hefker" and "l'chairo" like we said by stalker there's a "nikuduho ikris" of stalker is the actual "miserial" of the moment let's learn him and that's why even though there's "nidre" it's stalker but it's not exactly the same thing as an "edder" "pea" certainly is not exactly the same thing as an "edder" the "hatrosa" shame over here in "pea" is not "nidre" the same way "troom" is a "miserial" even though it's also "hald be debur" "hald" the "hatrosa" "troom" is "shai" to "mufla" "sama" "klicher" "12 year old" the same way "nidre" is so there are "denum" that "halds" a "halds" shame in "be debur" but it's not an "edder per se" it's "nitvas" in a "kalloys" that's in the "crea" of "tevel" we discussed the last time so "pea" also "l'chohairo" there's a "crea" shame yes it's "hald be debur" but it's not exactly "pascist" in the "dorm" and that's where it fits in as again "yeshi" "hald" "lepe" or not and of course "heffker" is a big question what does "heffker" exactly have to do with "nidder" and with "yodos" in the "denum" of "hafla"? so what's "l'chohairo" "b'chohairo" the starting point is "I've had a "heffker" becomes "heffker" "aide" debur" that we know that a person can be "mafker" something he says "my car is now "heffker" his car is "heffker" and that itself should make us think what does that mean that a person could be "moitsi" something "mishus" "be debur" or "ba alma" what's "taka" the "chat" and the real truth of the matter is that "hazal" can appear "heffker" to "pea" there's a "shailer" is a "shailer" to be "mafker" something "l'anibhala l'chohairo" "b'shamé" learns out from "pea" that there's such a thing as "heffker" "l'anibhala l'chohair" "b'shailohal" no "pea" is "pea" "heffker" is "heffker" so we have to ask ourselves "of course, what's the suge of y'all that's been again "heffker" so now let's start where we left off with "pea" we said over that "rabbi seinu hach hainim" have a hakira it's fun to tell you what I'm talking about this by rikus kenzain de pea bakal is not a hakphosa shame maybe "pea" is not more than just an "aziva" the person has a field Terry says that part of the field has to be left over so he leaves it over and because he's not claiming "bailus" to it or he's "mazni'a'chit" so now the Terry turns it into "moman'anibh" and it was a "moman'anibhosa" needs a "shailer" so "shailer" has to be "shailer" that moment or that's what it's thought for so "kenzain de pea" really isn't a "kriya" shame it's not a "shailer" shame of "pea" so "kenzain" has to be left over it's clear that it's not just an "aziva" it's a "shailer" shame it's a "din" that's "kal" but "dib" and it's "kal" in the field that this part of the field is "pea" otherwise very hard to read it tomorrow so Terry's rhyme speaks out enough to me if it's a "mazni'a'chit" if it's just "masni'a'chit" you're just leaving it over the mitzvah is the part of the field should be left over so "din" that's part of the field you shouldn't claim as an owner ok, it's what "shailer" broke you just left it over so "kenzkansklor" from algomora of "yodos" with that "vosa" shame that we're talking about something which is actually "kal" in the field now it would be possible to say such a concept legabe hefker that hefker is talking not more than being "oisive" if I leave something out on the street I take something out on garbage pickup day to the curb or even on a garbage pickup day and I put it by the curb it's not anybody coming along and taking it, right? it's "afka" what is it? it's "kuri" shame I made up a "calusive" of hefker "kuri" "my" mice is "a'chit" then now the "hef" is "nez" in the front yard it's on the curb and now somebody can take it now it's "bylumless" "a'fkuri" "mafkeluhu" "my" is "a'chit" "a'chit" it's "a'chit" "zuta shalyam" is "a'chit" I lose my slit over now it's "hefkeluh" it's "oneless" so what is that? that's "a" "calusive" shame well that's just right now since there's nobody who's exercising battles over it so it's "takka" oneless the same way the rain water that comes down from Shamaim is "oneless" in the same way grass that grows outside town is "oneless" so also "my" "hef" it if it's left in an "oneless" state is "oneless" now "buhrer" these are going to love this to that that just means that right now there's no "bylus" like "a" "nixae" "a ger" "shemace" and now it's "oneless" anybody go pick it up "nez" "f" "hefkeluhu" has nothing to do with our "sugu" "washtepe" "unse" "sugu" is "givisahat" "fossa" shame hefke "washtepe" "sugu" is "givisahat" "fossa" shame hefke "washtehefke" hefke "washtehef" has nothing to do with the "sugu" look at the "munchola" "tysus" "tysus" says "what's the "sushtel" and now it's "sugu" a person's "mafke" is something where it says "hefke" is "dumu" with "stalka" it's "la nih" it's "la khazi al la nih" "la hefke ben la nih" "baen la nih" "baen la nih" "baen la nih" does it all say the same thing? so "tysus" says "what's the" what's the "a" "hefke" is "stalka" the reason why he's "mafke" is because he wants somebody to pick up something now think about it if I take something out to the curb and I'm leaving it there I'm not leaving it there for anybody to take I'm leaving it there because I don't want it the fact that the garbage man is the one who takes it that's just an attempt to get rid of it the fact that somebody who's an "onim" would come along and would be the one to take it because "bidehkhla" the one who's picking through the garbage is not an "oisha" otherwise he really has a problem it's an "onim" who doesn't have what he eats he's going through the garbage he's trying to find something edible so he pulls out something that fact makes it "domulat stalka" so "heru" what we're talking about over here is a "hatvossa" shame of "momananim" and that's "taka" I saw a "brought down" from the "hasnition" or "law" in Seminole live that is a "hatvossa" shame of "hefke la rabe" "hefke" is the "shat" that now becomes "momanrabim" we'll see this we'll discuss from the "rabam" that there's an "isir" for a person who's "mafka" and "isir" what's said "isir" to take it back? what's the "isir?" the "isir" is that's "hefke" it's "onalis" the "isir" is because I'm taking it from the "rabim" now again the "musik" of something being "onalis" but it's the "onim" is a "kiddish" that we pass in is only true by prayer it's not true generally by "hefke" but the "idea" is the same there's definitely a "noise" over here called a "krya" "shaym" a "hat" "flossa" "shaym" in the "k" "fit" called "hefke" "krodish data" and this "rabasi" is the "pessach" to the famous "rayed" of the "rambam" and "hooks" the "dormpeg" based "I love you" "hafke" "hafke" "hafke" "hafke" "hafke" "hafke" "hafke" it's not an "ether" could you be sure you're Could you be sure you're on Hefkir? That's not an Eddir. But Haril Kimoin Eddir, she also likes her boy. Isn't it? Sounds like it'd be the same as N'Dor. Well, now we're Hefkir. We're going to go to the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side. The case is that I didn't have her. What happened? So, we're going to go to the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side. I feel like she didn't have her in the side of the side of the side of the side of the side. So, you can take it back. But it's also likes her boy. So, you can take the money back, because it's Hefkir. He can be circle like anybody else. I'm going to have to say, because a second ago, he said, "It's not a little bit crazy." What would that look like in being crazy? And what does it mean that it's the Eddir, not an Eddir? But it's like an Eddir. It's not an Eddir, but it's like an Eddir to the extent she also likes her boy. And others need to work. So, Le Myser. The mortgage might do as a choice in relation to what a choice has in a recourse. And it's a state, not an Eddir, and it's called Gantt Club. It brings us a little bit of a cash-in that the cadmina of Dinshe tells us, "What's the Macquarie, the Ramam?" "I really like the Eddir, the Hareo, the Macquarie, the Macquarie is our Gomara." The Gomara is an Hefkir, the Baja Shem, the Ullov-e-Shas. Hefkir is a very widespread Indian Ullov-e-Shas. For instance, Mafkir, all sorts of things, all sorts of things are Hefkir. The only place where we have Hefkir in the Durham-Dic raid is our Suge. It's quite clear that the Macquarie. And what the state now Gomara is, is like we said, that Hefkir is not just a circumstance, that when a person renounces ownership, so now it's on a list because I've said that I have nothing to do with it. So now, by definition, it's on a list of milli, anybody can take it. Obviously, it's more than that. There's a givissa when a person is Mafkir, something, it's a givissa debur that makes a chalois in the cave, as they stay. So that's what it means. It's not part of Parchus in the Durham-Lochaira, but it's Dummul and Edda. So the choice takes this step further, he says it's Mafkir, part of Parchus in the Durham. He says, when a person's Mafkir, something, all he's doing is creating on himself and in the Hefkir that's a donna note that he's not allowed to take it. It's a personal commitment, and the Hefkir that the Hefkir that's his Hefkir. But maybe anybody's allowed to take it, but until the point where anybody is taking it, it belongs to the owner. Hefkir is not what you thought it was, that a person's making the Hefkir's owner list. Maybe there is such a thing as a Hefkir's being Hefkir, Zutoshiyam swept away, the Bailam loses ownership over it, or a Navader. He's Miyayish, you're talking that Pshari is, and now there's Miyayish, he's Bailus. He's being there, he has no control, he doesn't know where the Hefkir is, and now he relinquishes Bailus, are you daily Yush? Okay, so now it's Hefkir. But when we talk about being Mafkir with the Yashiyad, what we're talking about is a Kriya Shreem, with a Dibur, and it's not exactly an Edda, which you have to know that the K'tos is learning up the Ramanamamish is an Edda. Vahal Salaamu al-Aqsa wa mratabhashi is the Dorm. The belt is Mafkir, you could look at everybody who writes after the K'tos, is Mafkir, a pek kadashiyam, how could you say that Hefkir all overshans when a person's Mafkir is something that still is? And by the way, if it's a Mafkir, you'll be able to be able to come later on, in the fourth Perik, when it's the Kefid's Yachtsum Mishusah bible. But to say that the Etsum Musik of Hefkir is just an Edda, but it creates absolutely no change in the ownership, just somebody else has a lot to take it, so the Hefkir, the Nader of the Hefkir is in the sky, my day, somebody else taking it, and that's how it becomes the Ennis, but really, it's not relinquished. It's rice, lorov, not that way, to look at that, for instance, going to Shita Stasis, bidikaskram, sorry, bidlram, it's within Hefkir, what do you mean, it's 11 by 11 by 11, he must take it, he relinquished between his Nader of the Hefkir, and he's not allowed to take it, and he's not allowed to take it, but it's still his, the Umar says there's somebody as an animal, and it was lent out to a gun, he can't get it back for Shabbas, and the guy who's going to work with the Beham on Shabbas is going to be over on Shvis's Beham. He says, "Mafkir the Beham, a vyster, he said it becomes Nader's." McCain Harbe, because his camera rises, it also did more of a yoy sir, so he brings to say his shtickle, he says that that's takwa rash didn't look like Tasis, that bidlram, it's Hefkir, a vyster, it's the mafkir the Beham, it's the mafkir the Beham. Lamayse, he brings another idiot, but he says he's not allowed to take it, because the Nader, I'm sorry, the mavatu, is like an Edd. The mafkir is like an Edd. Similarly, you can do the Eddish lift, if it's a hakno, so then he'll be a hakno, then he'll be a hakno, so obviously it's not a hakno, all it is a tvasa shame that you can do Eddish lift. That's Tasis position, so if you lose the direct choice, it's a vadi you have to name on that, right? There is Roy Mezneri, who is in payor, shariaish, others, they name him for a double portion, they have other sinish, that's right. There is a hakfosas shame in the shavits, this that the Ramam says also laksa, but you look the shrimmin brings that the goyin is gyris in the lasha of the Ramam, not also laksa, but any Yohul laksa. Any Yohul laksa with your matchments, it didn't moment, that the havits is no longer his, therefore he can't back off on it. He can be kind of like anybody else in FK, he could grab before anybody else comes along, but he can't be, he can't be crazy on it. Namal, all the series in chance would be Makiach, that on the one hand, hefke does create and now the kavits is on our list, not like Tasis, Tasis is learning, dalamais, when somebody else picks it up, he learns up in a rash above and sees that if he basits dasakas makna ki yulu, the mafke is makna to the zaikha, it's coming from the rishus of the mafke, and then I've had the... Rabe Senua says to that approach from the Gomars, so the fact with the Gomars gives any Yohul laksa music can't be caused by that's on our list. At the same time, the ossa laksa, by the way the kazish explains, is because now it's mom and harabu, so you can go easily so that it's not matchment that way in the Ramam, it's matchment that's any Yohul laksa moment didn't pass just in the dorm. So what is it, it's any kinet, they never have a kinet, so what does that mean? That means, look where the chat in the Ramam is that, is that bevison, when a person relinquishes ownership verbally, it shouldn't work. We explain this mostly, come of the come of times, the gabikkinian. Lama Zogan Rubein wants to give his card to shimmin, wants to give his house to shimmin. The etsum vikmir's dance would be enough for it to be cal, however, the basic pal. The house is bishu se show Rubein, metalthani could even hear it sharper. I have an apple sitting by me in my fridge and I want to give it to you. Lama Zogan Rubein says, much as I think that I want to give it to you and that would be enough to create the act no, but Lama Zogan Rubein is the apples by me. So what works? Has it worked? When there's a misa kinyan, the misa kinyan is actualizing the change in ownership because there's a misir miyadliad. What makes the chaloys is abadadamakshava. But the misa, the misa kinyan is very, very different from the way the vilt says that the misa kiny expresses community's dance. L'choravizalza. The misa kinyan creates the reality that now the kafits that was in my rishus is in your rishus. But what defines that there's a hakno that being in your rishus means it's yours. The chaloys that I want to be makin it to you. That is not good. That's the way Dasa hai is makin it works, we've explained. L'choravizalza is the martial mikhila, we've explained. Mikhila scroive, the way the rishanam said. Tasis has a discussion back and forth. Do you need mikhila to be mikhila or kroive? Maybe you need to do a misa kinyan. So the misa tasis comes out of the nats, the vilt says over, the tasis says that mikhila doesn't need a kinyan, it's not what tasis says. Tasis says that mikhila is a hakno that doesn't need a misa kinyan. Viratvar. When rumin is Michael's shimmin money, that shimmin owes to rumin, rumin doesn't have to transfer it to shimmin. Cause the money that is being mikhila is the money by shimmin, rumin has a scroose. Gabok. Rumin has by shimmin $100, as soon as rumin is going to be died, the shimmin doesn't owe him the money, the money licked shimmin. It's there anyways. So when melo, all he's letting go of is a scroose, he doesn't need the misa kinyan to define it as a jim zushus. So it's a hakno that doesn't need a misa kinyan. So where if a person has a car in his garage, where does it come off that a person could be mafkere? And the car becomes always his. The car in his garage, the misa you have to put it out of your shoes. And the answer to that is, is that the misa of hefkere. Again, not the mitzis of hefkere. The mitzis of hefkere means something is not, it's not, it's not owners. It's not ownership. It could be to show yam, it could be something, you're not MacPit, it could be something that won the role. It could be an avaide after years, and then there's another type. There's a kriya shim hefke, taket to learn that a payer. There's a kriya shim called a ha'tvossa shim, it's not kadushu, it's ha'tvossa shim in the hefits, that the hefits is now shaykh lakur. There's a shaykh, could I, could it, does it have to be shaykh lakur? Or could I make it shaykh lanyim, valor la shir? Okay, we're passing the has to be lakur. It's only my payer, it's the shaykh lanyim. But there's a ha'tvossa shim, the misa nether is that. That mimeila creates it, if you have a ha'tvits that's oimid to be picked up by anybody. By definition, that's defined as built-y owned by anybody individually. So mimeila hefkur is maitin, the misa of a hefkur is avaide a debur without fossa shim, that's ha'tvossa debur. Again, if the point is to make the ha'tvossa no, that's not yours, a silica vousa would not work with debur. The ha'tvossa makes this point in Raishain and Gimmel. In that way, it operates like a nether, the operating agreement that hefkur is similar to a nether. It's a kriya shim, it's a debur with a ha'tvossa shim. But that ha'tvossa shim creates that's completely not the owners anymore. It could be that any ha'tvossa, if you guys like to go into any ha'tvossa, it just means that now he can't be heuser because even if you'd say he could be heuser mitzad, the etsim ha'tvossa shim. Not part of Paishas and dawn. Maybe it could be heuser ha'tvossa shim. Who said this in this, sir? But any ha'tvossa because once there was that ha'tvossa shim in Maile, it's not owned. If it's not owned, it could be heuser, but misa, it left my resource. You could read it that way. Or, if you want to say that also, what that means is, is that you have to add a knej. The first step in ha'tvossa shim, and maybe it's the ramam lishitossi, that we guys read out that the ramam holds that a nether is not just an emsori. I'm making a color is an emsori. If it's a nether primarily, it's nasiakas to the person. So here, you'll say that when a person is mafkur something, there's a allaya. Give it a lie to keep it that way. He has to keep his debut. It's not part of pashas in the dorm, but there's a lot more for a person to be emsori. If he'd be hauser, if he'd say, "No, I'm hauser on the ha'tvkur," he's not being emsori. But it's not really part of pashas in the dorm. There's no biacal. There's no krullen la cradish. There's none of that. There's a tversa shim that's image for anybody to take. In the middle, there's no bialus. Also laksa, but it would mean a fart I'm backing out of what I said. Look, I would be the way to read it. Now, of course, it needs a little bit work that lamaisa is a mafkur lady on. Like we said, "I'm a biacal biacal." "Lagabe mooder hano." When something is hefkur, when do we look at the hefits as having left the reshoots of the mafkur? So I've said the mafkur likes like this. They had some dinner hefkur that a person with the burro could be mafkur. Like we said, that's a tversa shim in the hefits. It could be that that's not mafkur if from ownership until the point where somebody else takes it. Which is similar, by the way, in Yush. Yush, mighty talking, belongs to the owner, but there's a certain weakening of ownership that somebody else picks it up. Now it's tacky yachtsimishu's owner. So, remember, what you'll say is, as well, by hefkur, that when somebody else picks it up, that's when it's yachtsimishu's abain but until then that. And that's the mafkur yachtsimishu's abain. Now, if you name one, we don't pass on that way. But if you never liked bishamai, then we learn from pay that a hefkur could be non-linium valle la shirum. So, we have to ask ourselves. A person was mafkur shim hefkur. And now, look, it's yachtsimishu's abain. And it becomes an ownerless. If it's an ownerless, why can't the Yush take him inside that? Not inside the hefkur. But are you doing the hefkur? It's rendered ownerless so let an Yush pick it up. Because the mafkur is an ownerless. So, look, it's in the dema lane. Is one of the, is in the kudha of bishamai mizil. Bishamai holds that the hefkur is only that vassa shayum. So, according to bishamai, it's poshid that if a person's mafkur only la nim, then he's not completely making an ownerless. What he's doing is he doing that vassa shayum. Step one, the step two of it being ownerless. Since this is a givisic paid off my bylaws, that it's only hutvass boy shayum, to be able to take Al-Yidea nim. So, my shmoy is still all of this hefkur. It was not nostalgic from my bylaws. So, look, it's in the kudha of the kudha of the bishamai you have to say. Then hefkur lah nim, below la shayum. And with that, I know it's not kudha of the la nim. There would be poshid, there would be no maflur extra nim. That the hefkur is not yachtsu from the rishus of the owner until somebody else actually picks it up. Liddy Dan, according to bishilu. Hefkur has to be complete. There's a complete hutvassa shayum in the cave. It's that it's pick-up-able. With that, the ownership is nostalgic. And then, we have the bishak, that the ownership is nostalgic as soon as he's mafkur. And then, it would be namfkur. That has to be the tourist of the shmoy. It would just be maisif, that drubkiva ege lahr clearly didn't understand this haban. That there's two things going on. There's a hutvassa shayum, which is not an edder, but it's like an edder. It operates the mechanical operation of it, works like pashas nadon. A dibu with a hutvassa shayum. And then, there's a secondary stage in the process where, since there's a hutvassa shayum, then anybody could take it. That's hoofka la coil. So, then, by definition, it's ownerless. Kyvege didn't have these two steps. Where, Kyvege, in chuvus, in kufmam hay, has a problem with a musig. The gamara, like we mentioned before, has an idea that somebody could be mafkur his behemoth. With that, he's not even sure he's tempted when the goi works. Now, what happens if a young girl has a behemoth, and he realizes that Boris borrowed the behemoth, and the other one would be, obviously, he's mafkur. Once he's mafkur it, haloib boris is in the village. Another year, who knows, is going to go down to the village. He's going to have it right after Shabbos. So, what he can do is, state, what he can do is, he can make a heftkur lisman. She's in the postcard. He's mafkur lisman. That means my heftkur, young girl, right before Shabbos, is mafkur behemoth. From the second before Shabbos, till the second after Shabbos. And by the time, Shmero, who knows a little bit loud, goes to Bizakh and the behemoth, the behemoth was already hoiser to the resource of Yaku. Factum Kyweger. Lamysez mafur over there, that it's a heftkur. Heftkur means that anybody could take it. And it's mafur also, he has a Yoshalmi, that if somebody would be coinid in the interim, Shmero can't do it, but the behemoth could be going to do it. If the guy would know, the guy would be Zecha, the guy would be Zecha Lagerme. He wouldn't be Zecha for the rest of Shabbos. It's not a heftkur lisman, where then somebody else could be coinid lisman. It's like a person rents out, he leases out a building for two years. So in those two years, the tenant could sublise into somebody else, because he has an ownership of Scus Perres, whatever you want to go. Scus Stompsch is for the next two years, but he can't sell after that. It doesn't have now for these two years that he could sublise it forever. So over here, he had a heftkur lisman, to heftkur for 24 hours, called 25 hours. And in those 25 hours, whoever would be Zecha Lagerme, how do you slice that? What does that mean? So the Bihr had to wear a miz, the husband, obviously Greg, he didn't hold that way, is that the etsim had to trust the shame, the same way a person could ask for a chocolate cake, and he could make it into another 25 hours. So he could be much for shame in this Bihr for 25 hours. What Stelza Vex stepped to, that it's ownerless, is the fact that it has a heftkur lisman or her lois that it's only for anybody to pick up. That her lois, the ownerlessness, is clape that. That means Aviva had somebody else could pick it up, so clape that it's ownerless, only ownerless, in the context of that Tfossa shame. So after 25 hours, it takka that Tfossa shame goes off, and now it's owned by the original owner. But if somebody else were to be kind to it, in those 25 hours, it's only to be kind to somebody else, it's takka ownerless, Bihr has to those 25 hours. So if somebody else were to pick it up, he'd completely be might see it from the rushers of the owner. Look at that, that has to be the husband. Atfossa shame, which is the partial of the owner, the whole partial of the deburrin, being cal in the heft, operates differently than I know. Yeah, give you a much of the example. A much of the example. There's a suge, everybody knows there's a gamart, that a person can't be magna, something that's not chaloy, and he also can't be magna, something that's the end to be chusoy. Lamyza, when you learn the gamart above a camera, that's samajas, that's samajas, the one has to make a posuk, ishky agneshe, it's basic. Obrach, one of my basic chaloy, he can't be magna or something, which is not chaloy, which is not bit chusoy. That's posh, that I can't sell you a car, Ruben can't sell you a car. So why would there be a heaven in there, Ruben can sell a car, that there could be magna or car, that's not is. What the family is that? And the answer has to be, that a van de Hakna has to do with Bihrless, a transfer of ownership, needs ownership. I can only transfer ownership to you if it's ownership of mine. If I don't own it, it's an Obrainer, I can't be magna, magna. Magna is a giveesa halocha that bidibur ishkyau, a shame hegdish, it's atrosa shame. And that atrosa shame has a life of its own. It can't create e-ownership with hegdish, by the way, it's also, it's atrosa shame hegdish. The ownership, the fact that there's a hakno is a secondary step, but the etsum didn't hegdish is atrosa shame hegdish. We explained this like having stalker, that atrosa shame stalker, love daftka makes the hakno. In hegdish, it happens. We made it like hegdish, we made it like mom and hegdish. But the etsum shame of hegdish is atrosa shame. Who said you can't do that, on somebody else's hegdish? It's cuts really to the heart and patches and don't know. Where a person can ask you up, you're in his chocolate cake. What do you mean? Hegdish is atrosa shame hegdish chocolate cake. You can't sell hegdish chocolate cake. No, atrosa shame. Hegdish is atrosa shame, hegdish needs more explanation of a daftka. So the partial atrosa shame in hegdish is atrosa shame hegdish. Maybe you can do it on somebody else's. Maybe even if hegdish is atrosa? That's where the hakno has to come from. So the fact that the dimple of hegdish is atrosa shame hegdish is atrosa shame hegdish. Hegdish says you can't do megdish leg, because you can't make an ademish legus. Just means that the etsa mysa of being mafki or something is a mysa of a debu withoutrosa shame in the hegdish. What is the end result of that? That that mamele renders the hegdish outrosa shame open to anybody else taking it and therefore it's onalis? But it's not a hakno. The mysa of making a hafka is like the mysa of an adem. The hakno has to shoot to the ramma. She logs it with the ramma. The ramma pulls the sad thing about it. This is where the ramma reads the ramma. It's like the alternative to the ksace. Again, like we pointed out, kiva aigal heard didn't hold that way. It's tough if it isn't. But we'll hear that's the mahal hakno on the feed the ramma.