Archive.fm

Gemara Markings Daf Yomi

Bava Basra 26b, 27

Duration:
50m
Broadcast on:
24 Jul 2024
Audio Format:
mp3

I don't know how many people I have, but I'm going to tell you how many people I have. I'm going to tell you how many people I have. So you have neighbors, and one person who's got Al has a tree in his section, and Bob, his neighbor, is digging a bore Chia formara, some sort of underground thing. And he's allowed to cut through the roots which have grown into his property, the Ha Itzim Shilai. That's what we're going to be focusing on now. The pieces of the roots belong to him. Who's the him? Is it Al or is it Bob? So, well I mean, the question was asked by Yaakov Hadiva, his name where he's from, and he asked Rufrista, "Itzim Shilmi, who gets the roots?" So, Rufrista wants to answer that from a snake source that we're going to see in Mihila. Mihila is misuse of holy property, or cultist property, and the issue is going to be if you have two neighbors, Alan Bob, and one has a tree, Al. And Bob, let's say, dedicated his property to the base of mikdosh, meaning anything that grows in it, is Hekdash. So, Amar Lay Tanisuha, we have a snake source. I boxed it off, it goes for a line and a half, and actually called it the Raisha. I wrote it in Raisha, and squiggle underlined that. And the reason I did this is because about three and a half lines later, the second to last word in the line is Safa. Ugh, Rufavramoliski, just like I remember in the old days. My mum was 40 years ago, it was the same thing. Ama Safa, a squiggle in line Safa, and then I boxed off that, next line and a half. So, we're going to have a Raisha and a Safa from this teneic source in Misecha's Mihila. Where's the Safa? Safa is three and a half lines after the Raisha, so I'll tell you when we get there. So, let's box this off, it's a line and a half. Darshay Ilan Shalhejie, let's see if you have a person, he's got a tree, he's a hegio. And his roots are growing, they're growing, they're growing until they are now in the land that is Hechtish's land. Okay, what can somebody do with those roots? We're not going to necessarily say who's it is, but this is what can be done. Lo Neheni, you can't get hung off from them. Not me, all right, but just Derabannan, because they're kind of like growing in Hechtish land. Vilomoele, and that's the more important point for us, I underlined Vilomoele, but there would be no Mihila if the person got hung off from him. Let's say he used it as a, for a barbecue, fuel to heat up his hot dogs, it would not be Mihila. Now, they were in Kaddosh ground. It sounds very much like, that you don't follow the ground they're in, but rather the tree they came from. So, Yomris Bishlamay, squiggle on Nani, this is the Khmer's analysis, if you want to say the following all as well, if the roots, well, you look where the tree is, and the tree is in some person, not Hechtish property. That's why I've used the roots, even though the roots were found in Hechtish properties. Nani, Ela, squiggle on Nani, Ela, Ela Yomris Bishaka, Slingon, wherever you've found it, that's the status they have. It's in Hechtish ground, and why would there be Nani, Ela? Okay, so it must be at this point that it would be, as far as the question, who gets the Aidsim, the Aidsim, apparently belong to the owner of the tree. And that's why there also, there's no Mihila. So, the Khmer turns right around and says, well, one second, LMI, so then what did you just conclude? Question mark, Kama, Basar, Ela, Naslingon, that you follow wherever the tree is. Well, then, aim a Safa, and here I squiggle on to land a Safa, this is the Safa, it goes about a line and a half, and it's a continuation of that snake source in Mihila. It says like this, Shao Hechtish, habai and Vishal Hejut, the other way around. Let's see, the tree is in Hechtish property, and its roots are growing into Hejut property. Lone Nihanin, you can't get hung off from it, which kind of sounds right. Philomol in, but there would be no Mihila. How you imagine, there's the Hejut tree, there's the Hechtish property with the roots growing in. And this is the flip case that we just did, here's the Hechtish property with the roots growing into Hejut. Now, these roots, what we're talking about over here, you can't get hung off from them, but there's also no real Mihila. Really? But the tree is in Hechtish, and those roots are coming from a Hechtish tree that's in Hechtish property. If you want to say that, we just wanted to conclude two lines ago, that you, whatever the tree is, that's what the roots follow. Am I like Mihila and why is it no Mihila? Okay, so the one has two approaches to deal with this. The first approach essentially says that these snake sources that we're trying to prove something from themselves, Mihila, they're a different case. You can't bring them in, and the second approach will not be that drastic. So the first approach, I put a number one here. Midi Iria. Midi Iria, does it really shed any light? In other words, we've been now six, seven lines, bringing this case of Hechtish property with the tree on it, or Hejut property with the tree on it. Does that shed any light? The whole discussion there is, what's the status of the roots that grow afterwards after the property was machtish? We're talking about things that grow after the property was consecrated after just the land or after the land and the tree. The kasavar and the whole issue is, you know why there's going to be Mihila either way? This opinion, there's a few shittas on this, but this shita holds that whatever's going to be Hechtish had to be around at the time the Hechtish was made. It can't be that it grew afterwards. Even a Hechtish tree, even in Hechtish property, if you're going to talk about stuff that grew after you were machtish, there's no kadusha. That's why in both these cases there's no kadusha, but that one shed any light on Yaakov Hadiva's question. Ravina is a second approach, and Ravina does come to some sort of conclusion. Ravina says, "No, these two Teneic sources are valid to learn from. Why did we have contradictory conclusions? Ravina Amar Loikasha." It wasn't so clear the roots that we were discussing. How far away from the tree are they? Ravina explains that colon, "con" in the ratio, it's Bisoy Shesa Surama. It's roots that are 5 Amas, 10 Amas, 15 Amas away. Those take on the status of the tree. So if you're in the tree, and you want to know the roots, the tree is a hedgehope, 5, 10, 15, 15.8, 15.9 Amas away, it's still hedgehope. That's the reason why, whereas Khan, the Safa, which seemed to indicate that we follow the land that it's in, is because the roots that we're discussing there are further than 16 Amas away from the tree, Chutz Leshas Surama. Which basically implies that the roots belong to the land owner if they're more than 16 Amas away from the tree. If it's less than 16 Amas away from the tree, even though it might be in my land, it still follows the status of the tree. Amar Ula, a firebox Ula, is going to be a sheet that we'll deal with until we flip the sign on the bays. And he says, "Ilan has some with the maidsar." So let's have a tree, it could be a tree that has fruit, it could be a tree that doesn't have fruit. But Ula tells me if I have a tree and it's closer than Bisoy Shesa Surama, it's 15 or 14 or 13 Amas away from the border between me and my neighbor. Ghazlan, who, I am considered a Ghazlan, the main main main of the Mina Bikurin, and there would not be if it's a fruit tree Bikurin brought from it. Okay, you wouldn't have to bring Bikur from it. Normally, if I have a fruit tree, I have a Kyiv, the rice would bring Bikurin here, there would be no Kyiv to bring Bikurin from it. Why? It has to be, the puzzle says. If I have a tree that's next to, within 16 Amas in my border, Ghazlan, who I'm considered a Ghazlan, because part of the sustenance from my tree is coming from my neighbor. I assume this would have to be a case where the neighbor didn't agree. If the neighbor said, "Oh, I don't care, that's fine." Then maybe you still, you would bring it, but you still wouldn't say, because it wasn't coming totally from your land. Let's say it was 14 Amas away. So the two Amas of the roots that are underneath your neighbor's land, he could even have given you permission. But you can't say it's coming from your land individually. May art sachah, specifically one person of that. Now let's try to figure it out. Where does Ula know this from? Let's try to figure it out. It's the 16 Amas here. Where does he know that from? Ile m'idits naan, if you want to say it's from this Mishnah. It's about a two-line, plus a word, quote, from a Mishnah in Massaras, Shfias. We know when the Shmiti'er starts, Rosh Odesh Tishrei starts in the Shmiti'er. Every halafel of Shmiti'is kept m'idaraysa. Just like we have shabbas, when the sun sets, shabbas starts. But we take in shabbas, 18 minutes before, 40 minutes before, an hour before, what's that? Shfias shabbas. So to an Shmita, this Shmita, this certain things that we don't do to the land, a month before, already shfua, is paisa. So the Mishnah there is discussing when you have Essar Natiya, it's 10. I don't say baby trees, but trees that are just starting, sapling trees, hamifuza rais paisa. They are spread out in an area that is a Baisa. Baisa is essentially 50 Amas by 50 Amas. A nice picture of this picture of 4 or 12. Little sapling trees in a 50 Ama by 50 Ama area. Now little trees need a lot of work much more so than when they're grown trees. And therefore, you can horse and call Baisa. You can plow, which is beneficial for the trees. The entire area of this Baisa, the entire 50 by 50 Ama area, Bishvilan, on account of these 10 saplings, Adrosa shan, until literally the day before shmita starts. But normally it's going to be all sorts of restrictions that you plan to do with a month before, even three months before, but here you can. Which seems to indicate that these trees, 10 of them, need the entirety of the 50 by 50 Ama area. Because you can plow the entire area. Okay, so let's do a little bit of math. Kamahavuza who asks the Gomorrah. So what is the hushman that you get over here? They say, how many square Amas is there? Trey alphin bhamesh meyagarmidi. 2500 Amas. Because 50 by 50 is 2500. Now, how many trees did we say had to be spread out? 10, which sounds like the ratio of land that you need for each tree. If there's 10 trees and you need 2500 square Amas, so for each tree you need 250 square Amas. The whole hadvachad kamahmatu. So then for each tree, which we're assuming that's going to be the sheer unique. Because that's the area that you can plow, because that's the area that will be beneficial for these trees. Kamahmati lay. So how much does each tree get? Apparently Masan vachamshin, 250. So you get 10 trees spread out. You want to take each tree, each tree is essentially getting 250 square Amas. Okay, let's say you have a square. 250 square Amas gets you a square of what? Is it 10 by 10? It's 100. So that's got to be more than that. 20 by 20. It'll be 400, it's got to be less than that. It's about like 13.38 by 13.3, plop a tree in the middle. Oh, one second. A tree in the middle has like six or seven Amas in each direction. We used to say the sheer unique is 16 Amas. So the good morning answer is ha, lay ha vedulah, which I think a picture 13 reads it best. A picture 13 is Ula. Ula says 16 Amas in all directions. You would need a square 32 by 32, which is essentially 1,024 square Amas. We're only giving you 250 square Amas. That's not enough. So if we're looking for, how do we know that Ula says that the sheer unique is 16? Can't come from here. I always had an issue with this, and I'm sure they'll be sharing about how to discuss it. These are Natios. I don't think we're saying Natiya needs 16 square Amas. 16 square Amas is once the tree has fully grown. Maybe it sucks moisture from 15 and 14 Amas. There's no way when you plant this happening that the roots are out there. It might be, it's drawing it in from there. Not so sure. But anyway, the more it is, L.M.E. distance. We try another today, as we're looking for, where do you get this 16 Ama in each direction? Shiroshiroshiro. Meiditsan. This is a little bit better because we're going to be talking about fully grown trees over here. Within the same context of, you're before Shmitir, what can or can't be done how soon before the Shmitir. So I boxed off this Mishnah. It goes into the first line of cosigna. Meiditsan Shleisha Illinois. So let's see. Three trees. Three, I don't know, fig trees. Fully grown, not Natios. And even though that they belong to Shleisha Bneadam, three, one belongs to Al, one belongs to Bob, one belongs to Carl. Hooray Elu Midstarfen. They will join together. Same thing, if Abesah saws, that's an area that is 50 by 50 Amas and there's only three trees there. Which kind of, I guess that's picture 414, one, two, three trees in that area. It's Midstarfen. The Horshen-based saw. You can plow the entire area, that's 50 by 50, area Bishvilan. And there's a little two words that I know which is important. Adateris. Up until Shuus. So it's not up until right before, but it's up until Shuus as opposed to a typical tree field, which you can only do up until Pesach. So you got like an extra, almost two months, an extra seven weeks, that you could plow the entirety of this field. Okay, so let's work out a hushman over here. We're not dividing ten into the fifth passage, but I know only three. So Kamahavu Lehu, if you take each tree, they're going to be spread out equally and assume each one, how much area is it taking? Well, total area is Trjalfi, the Kameh, Meyadarmedi. 2500 square Ameth, this is a 50 by 50 Ama area. So let's do each tree then, the Kolkad, Kamahmati Lehu. What's 2500? Divided by three. Tamne Meyad, the Talsen, the Talsa, the Tilsa. 833 and the third. 833 and the third is, if you divide 2500 into three, that's what you get. I think this is picture 414, which is one that we just saw over here, 50 by 50. Each one would be 833 and a third. Well, one second. Akati Nefishi Leh Dula. It's still, though, a different shear than Ula gave. Ula said 16 by 16, which would be 16 all directions. A total square round, like picture 413 of 32 by 32. We already saw that was 1000 and 24, square Amas. Here we have 833. It's not correct. So the good answer is, well, okay, it's close enough, low dock. It wasn't necessarily being precise. The problem with low dock, and we have this numerous Soviets throughout the Gomara. And those common is, like, how much wind you need for, let's say, our bakosas on Sedernite. If I tell you that you need four fluid ounces, that's the shear you need, and really you need like 4.2, well, then it's a big problem. I can say I'm being low dock. 4.2, I said 4, low dock. Yeah, but you're not going to be out sick because you need 4.2. Let's see what you really need is 3.8 fluid ounces. And I say 4. So then that's fine. I'm low dock, but say 4, like you're going to get, you're 3.8. So in each one of these scenarios that we get in the Gomara, when you say low dock, low dock is fine as long as within the shear that you're giving the person will be, you would say, or the issue will be taken care of. Here it won't be because the issue is, we're saying this guy is going to be potter from bringing bikurim. Bikurim is a Mitsudarisa. He's potter from it. If his tree is this far away, well, Amor, I'll tell you, Jarminan, we say this concept of low dock. If it's Lehomra, however, Lekula, Lehomra, and over here, you're basically pottering him from bringing bikurim. He really should bring bikurim. So answers the Gomara. We keep using this very basic picture, 4.13. Six numbers in all direction. Therefore, we make a square 32 by 32. But as we know from Aravin and Soka, let's see if we're on the diagonal. And it's 16 on this. Well, it really shouldn't be a square which is around the tree. It should really be a circle. And therefore, we're going to now work with a circle. The Gomara says, "Mea Savers, who says that when Ula gave his shear of the 16 namas in each direction, beri vuha karmrina, and it's a square, bei vuha karmrina." It's a circle. We draw a circle around a basic 16 namas in any direction that you go. Now, we know this from, again, other. So he has mithti. Kamam meruva yoy sir al-ha igu. This is a rough estimate, but if you have the area of a square, that's 32 by 32, as opposed to the area of a circle that has from one into the other 32, how much bigger is it? It's a rivia. The most basic way of looking at that is if you have a square, that is 2 by 2. So that's how many square amas I say? 4. If, let's say you draw a circle around the thing in the middle, then you basically have a cross where it is 2 across, and the area would be, literally like 3.14, but it's about 3. So it's basically 1/4 more. The next six words are taken out. If that's the case, then you don't have to get to 1024. What's number you have to get to? 768. 3/4 of 1024 is 768. The problem is, though, then really, to have a problem, you have to have an area that's not 16 in all directions. You have to have an area that's 16.5 in all directions. Akati, Pashle, Palga de Amsa, half an ama around a strip, which is a great picture picture for 18. 16 amas is enough. You'd have to have the additional strip around of approximately half an ama, and that fits perfectly. That's why it's a low dock, but it's low dock because you're pottering from Bekurim when you really should be pottering from Bekurim. Okay, so now we at least figured out this shear of 16 amas at Ula says. We're going to now have the door center bring five today's sources of question on it. The first one is here, Tashma. Put a triangle in this Tashma. Two lines later is a Tashma. That gets a triangle. Three lines below that is another Tashma. That's the Rabbi Akiva one. That gets a triangle. Anamud Bay is on the third line. The third word is a Tashma. That gets a triangle, and then about eight, nine lines later. The first word line is asara ama vusulu, and this is vahatsnahn. That's nahn gets a triangle. The last one is going to be a slightly different issue, but they're all basically five questions on what we just said. So question on Ula. Ula, you said that if you have a tree, it's 16 amas in all directions. So, Tashma, a tiny quote from a mission of a Bekurim right at the beginning. Goes for five words. So if I bought from somebody, one tree with its land, I bring Bekurim from that tree, and I can read the bsokim. Sounds like it's a darissa. Tiv, how much land did I get? My love, koshu. Well, long as I got even a koshu of land. But one second, we had said you have to have like 16 amas in all directions. How can I bring me darissa and read the bsokim so that more answer is low. Shaciousar ama. That's pretty huge. 16 amas is like 20 to 25 feet in all directions. That's enormous. I can't imagine the people who are going to sell the trees to the Khlissar's people so they can be Yotse Bekurim are going to have that much space between trees. But bottom line, that's what it's talking about there. Even if you have one tree, but you have the entirety of the 16 ama land around it. OK, Tashma, another. Again, the problem would be if you don't have that land, then you can't bring it because the bsokim that you read when you bring Bekurim indicates it's in your land exclusively. Not from somebody else's land, even if that's somebody else is making permission to have your tree yonak from his land. Tashma, this one goes just over a line. It's another tonic source. This one's from later on in the Mezekta. Let's say kana-snei-ilana. Send a line to the word snei. Let's say I bought somebody else from somebody else's two trees, bsosho-chade-rei-rei-mavy-ve-enu-chade-rei. So I can bring Bekurim, but I can't say the bsokim because it's not apparently coming from my land. OK, let's make a basic deal. Kashloi-she, let's say I bought from somebody else, three trees, two is when they can't say the bsokim. If I brought three, maybe Vekura. So my love, Koshu, once again, it doesn't say anything about land, should we not say that what it means is three trees with a little bit of land on each one. So the Gomor answers again, low, ha-chanami, sixteen-ama. The three trees that we're talking about is about three trees, and each one has that sixteen-ama circumference around it that is purchased by me. That's when I could bring it and say the bsokim. Tashma, third tonic source. When you're trying with this, and this is a conic source, it goes until almost into the first line in Amralev. Excuse me, I'm a bsokim. Rabbi Yakeva Eimir. Karka Koshu, if a person owns a little bit of land. Doesn't sound like it's that much. There's a number of halakkuk requirements that come along with it. If it's a type of thing that I would have to leave pay you from, like a field, and I have to leave the corners of it. So, haiv bbpeya. Also, bbikurim. I still want to be kurim. Okay, seems like even from a Karka Koshu. I'd have to have a derisically to bring bikurim. Also, kaisvinalab-prosbol. Prosbolish, me too. Here comes everything being equal. The loans that a person owes will go free. They sought a certain time in history that people who had money were very reluctant to fund out their money, realizing that comes from it. You're basically going to all be gone. So, they instituted this thing called a prosbol, which essentially is a halakkuk workaround where basting takes control of being able to collect those loans. Or actually the person is collecting it on behalf of basting where basically it won't be. But it has to be that there's some sort of land shaykh to it. So, that karka koshu works with that also. And also, niknidimana khasim, she'in, lahhem, akhryas. There's different types of kinyonim. There's kinyonim for land. There's kinyonim for moveables. They have different types of kinyonim. But along with things that ain, lahhem, akhryas, you can acquire things that do have akhryas. And also, how much land do you have to have? Even a koshu. The bottom line for us is, the second thing listed up is bikorim. It sounds like the smallest piece of land you would ever hear bikorim. But how do you ever hear bikorim? We said if you got your tree, you need to have sixty namas in all directions. "Hakabamayaskinan" in the Gomorrah points out that, well, this is not much of a problem because over here, we've been thinking trees, our whole soggy the last day or two has been trees, trees. Okay, you know what else is haivin bikorim, midarisa? Hita! Now, hita is, nobody says that a wheat stock needs sixty namas in all directions. Bechiti! That's what we're discussing. And that's why, let's have a tiny piece of land. I don't know, one foot by one foot. And it's growing some wheat? That's enough to be mikaya of midarisa to bring bikorim from thenhita. Dakanami, precise reading, will also bring this out. Tiktani! Koshahoo! Is that pretty clear? I didn't say a little bit. Is that a Koshah with me? Literally, almost the smallest amount? Shmaminah. Tashma, another Tenaic source, which we're going to have the question on Ula. In this Tenaic source, which goes three lines plus a little bit, we're going to have the old tree right on the border, virtually, in Israel, partially, in Chlitzlarets. Now, things that grow in Israel have all sorts of huyuvan. Things that grow in Chlitzlarets, these mean they're right, so have no huyuvan on them. Ilhan Mitzasubar is Mitzasubar, so we have a tree that's partially in Erichisrael, partially in Chlitzlarets. Chlitzlarets? Excuse me, Tevelva Chlitzlarets. So, what's with the fruit? Well, here, like, picture 442, you have this tree. It's partially planted in Erichisrael, partially in Chlitzlarets. The fruit of the tree, well, you're going to have all the fruits that grow. It's partially from the ground in Israel, partially from the ground of Chlitzlarets. That's according to Deevre Rebi, I box Rebi's name. Reban Shumamengamli, who he also boxed. He says, "No. Haggad-o-be-hi-u-hi-of. Haggad-o-be-tuh-tuh-tuh-tuh-tuh-tuh." He looks at it, like, picture 443, as though, the stuff that grown in Erichisrael, you go directly up through the trunk, that stuff is scythe, the stuff that grew where the trunk was in Chlitzlarets, you go directly up, and that is going to be putter from Trumas and Maesris. That is the Mathlokus. Oddkahn notes the Gamarloi Plegi. What is the Mathlokus between the two of them? Basically, do you say that the fruits that grew above the area were getting their nutrients exclusively from that area or not? So, oddkahn-li-plegi-l-de-mar-so-var-y-j-pray-ra. There is retroactive determination. It turns out that the fruit on the Chlitzlarets side was getting its nutrients from Chlitzlarets, to Mar-so-var-ain-bray-ra that you don't have that. Aval, everybody seems to agree, both Rebi and Roshimicamliel, got a little bit petur, if the entire trunk was located in Chlitzlarets and got all of its nutrients from Chlitzlarets, Dibriak-ol putter, like, picture... over here, if the entirety of the tree was, in picture, let's see, 444 olive. The entirety of the tree was planted in Chlitzlarets. It would totally be potter. Now, that's interesting, because if you follow the roots under the tree, the roots could be more than... let's say the tree was tenamas away, so some of the roots are getting their nutrients from Erichistroel. That's the question. If you really say that roots, like Ula did, will suck nutrients up to sixteenamas away, how could you have this Mitzius, where it's getting part of its nutrients from Erichistroel, and yet you said the fruits are potter. It says the Gemora, "Hakla my eskinan." And we come back again, which is probably about seventy times, and it shook me as enchast. The old Sunama! We've got the rock, underground, dividing the tree completely. So the Maksic Sunama is a picture of 444 bays, where you have a Sunama right up over here. So literally everything that's coming from Erichistroel's side is going through the Erichistroel's side. They decide anything in the roots from Pusar, so coming from the Pusar's side. Well, one second then. Ihak, if that's the case, my time at the Rebi. Why is Rebi saying that you're going to have Holin, or you're going to have Pusar's produce, and Erichistroel's produce mixed in with one another, if you have all the roots coming from one side, shouldn't we say that that side of the tree has fruit just from the area the roots are getting it from? Well, Dehadri Arvi. You know what happens? This is below ground. It's totally separated. What happens from the time that the trunk pops up above the ground and starts going up the tree? Do we say the nutrients on the Erichistroel's side stay on the Erichistroel's side, and Chosar Chosar's, or do they get mixed as they're going up? That's the Maksic Sunama, that's the Maksic Sunama, that's the Maksic Sunama, that's the Maksic Sunama, that's the Maksic Sunama, that's the Maksic Sunama, that's the Maksic Sunama, that's the Maksic Sunama, that's the Maksic Sunama, that's the Maksic Sunama, it's not that there's like a direct path straight up like through these tiny little tubes that take the sustenance and the nutrients and the liquid and the water from one side and bring it straight up, he says this is my Balbel, and Mars offers you and we all says, "No, Hylokudekhaiba, Hylokudekha," the part of the tree that's planted in Chosar's, has its nutrients go directly straight up to its fruit and so to Erichistroel. One final question on Ula, the Chacia Stravitz, it's too low, now all the questions I think up until now seemed to indicate that it was less than 16 and we answered no each one is 16 Amis. In this case, we're going to say really 16 and only 16 Amis, Vaha Tanan, Yvette Triangle is Tanan, a just under aligned snake source and this might look somewhat familiar, it says, "Marikana-sai-yulan-minha-boor, 25 Amis, I double-indiline the kafhe, that was our Mishnah." It said you have a tree, your neighbor has a boar, his boar is like right on the border, you have to distance your tree 25 Amis. One second, Ula said, it's only 16 Amis, what's this additional nine Amis, where it was at 25? Well, Abai explains the following, this we saw at the beginning of the shear as well, that it's not that as far as the roots grow, that's the area that it sucks nutrients from the roots, might grow further, but explains Abai, Maisel Tuleosli, the roots might be further than 15 Amis, excuse me, 16 Amis, away from the tree, however, Ahushi Loy-mihachi, El-ah-chase-sra-ama, the sapping of nutrients from the ground is only when you're 16 Amis away, the roots might grow further, that's fine, but they're not sapping the nutrients, it's Fei Loy-mihachi, period. So, this is Ula Stan, it seems like Ula Stan's after all of that, and we're almost in the same place as we were in Africa, where Ula was, that's why he got his firebox. Kioso-Rov-Dimi, I circled Rov-Dimi, and Rov-Dimi is coming to Bovell, reporting from Aristotle, three lines later, is Kioso-Rov-en, and I circled Rov-en, these are the famous two second generation on the rhyme that would go back and forth between Aristotle and Bovell, with reports on these issues, what they said in Aristotle. So, when Rov-Dimi came, Ahmar, he said, [speaking in German] What do we say when it comes to a tree, that is, within 16 amas from a border of someone else, Ahmar lay, in order to be open, says, that fellow, who's got his tree, let's say 15 or 14 amas away, Ghazlan who, [speaking in German] is a Ghazlan, his tree will be sucking nutrients from that other person's land, and here is an even stronger lush. [speaking in German] However, we did get a different report from Rov-en, Kioso-Rov-en, I circled Rov-en, and he reported, apparently also in the name of her [speaking in German] if you have a tree that is close to the border, which would be, let's say, in a picture 445, where you literally have the border between the two people, and you have the tree about as close to the border as you can, with the things growing only on the side of the person who's the tree owner. [speaking in German] Or a tree that is known to, which is picture 446, you have Rov-en's tree, and it's leaning over into Schimman's property. [speaking in German] Which is interesting. This is, it's been like two, three doth, that we keep saying no, and God's London can't do it. You bring it, and your chai redpsokim. Well, one second, your tree was getting nutrients from somebody else's land. How could you make a declaration that you're getting from your land singular? [speaking in German] This is one of the conditions that Yoshua made with the Jewish people, that they will not be particular, even if their neighbor's tree is close to 16 omens and is getting nutrients from the land, that's not something they're particular on. Meaning it's totally fine, so you really can say it's getting its growth in my land, even though its roots might be. Now, truly, the trunk of the tree has to be totally in your land. But once the trunk of the tree is, we don't care about the roots, because everyone is not mapping one another, and even I'm getting nutrients in reality from my neighbor's land. The person was not particular on that. It was a great purpose, because this is a tree. This is a tree. You've got to say "meri tsecha," and, well, it's my land, because true, it might be, again, above ground, totally in my land. Even below ground, anything that I'm getting is all mine, because everyone is not particular on the other person on that. Okay, next mission. (speaks in foreign language) If there's a tree that's leaning over into a friend's property, now, my friend is going to be working his property, and he might be bringing his animals and plowing the land, and, therefore, how much, we actually have this run, with different people of trees or bushes that sort of go out into the sidewalk area, and a lot of times they don't cut it all the way straight up to the sky, they cut some of it, sometimes it seems like they're cutting it for a bunch of midgets, or dwarfs, because they cut like about four feet, which doesn't help at all, if you have someone who's tall. So, what do you have to do here? The tree owner's responsible, the coat states, or, if they want the other person, can a "malle haemarde al gavel makharecha." So, if you have a plow, and the person's leaning in the plow, and now, sometimes, the cow dollars a lot on a walk. So, what do you got to do? You got to give it a little weapon. So, it's the space that would be needed for a person, if he's going to be lifting up his little whip or stick, and he would be able to give a patch to the animal, like in picture, for 48. That much of the tree is to be cut. This is in your own property? So, this is two people's property. The tree is here. This is right. So, in the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the other person's property, that's what can be cut. In the top of the stick, that you're going to be hitting the animal, the macarachia. It's the entire web. You basically need the sun, the entire way up, which would get the sun. As soon as the sun comes over, you're going to sunlight to that field. Abasholuibachst, Eimer. He says, apparently something different than the Tanakama, "Kol Elon's rock." I double-end all in the word "Kol." Every Elon's rock that you're dealing with can make it a Michelos. If you have an Elon's rock, it doesn't make a difference. Apparently, always, you have to cut straight up from the bottom until the sky. Abasholuibachst, is he being makmer from the Tanakama being Mako from the Tanakama? It wasn't clear. There were two cases in the Tanakama broad, and then Abasholu comes in and says, "The whole tree is struck." So, you buy a little. Abasholuibachst is coming off of the ratio with the Tanakama that said you can cut as long as you reach the height with the top of the stick. You're going to beat the cow that's pulling the plow with, or a safe kair as you're coming off the safe with the Tanakama had said, that in the Beysasholuibachst, you go, "Can you call me Michelos?" So, "Tashma desanya." If it's an exhaust that pretty clear, it goes for just over a line. It says, "Beysasholuibachst, if you have a Beysasholuibachst, Abasholuibachst, Eimer. "Kol. Ha. Elon. Can you get that Michelos?" It's definitely coming off the safe there, because now it didn't say, "Kol. Ha. Elon. Strahk." It just said, "Kol. Elon. Can you get Michelos?" Then, they shut, sell, roll the Beysasholuibachst. Because, apparently, shade is detrimental for a Beysasholuibachst. Any type of field that needs water irrigation also needs as much sunlight as it could get. That is the Tanakasholuibachst. Mamina, that it must be a ratio kind. That Abasholuibachst is coming off of the ratio. Abasholuibachst is actually just reading the mission of precise. It will bring out that same point. "Masnissen amideka." Dick Katani, and here we kind of gave it away, because when Abasholu said his opinion, he didn't say, "Elon Strahk." He said, "Kol. Elon Strahk." So, Dick Katani had said, "Kol. Elon Strahk." I put that in right angles, those three words, and double and go on the call again. Now, Iyamishim, if you want to say, and this kind of makes sense, that Abasholuibachst is qualifying the Tanakama's ratio. Iyamishim, because the Tanakama said only in certain cases, and he's saying, "No, every case." Iyamishim is a "Safakai." If you want to say that he's coming off of the Safa, that Abasholuibachst is coming off the base of Shlokin case, then it should be every Elon Strahk. It should just be Elon Strahk. Without the word "kol.me" by L.A., L.A. Love, precise reading of the mission, and specifically Abasholu's opinion, where he uses the word "kol." Shmaminarashikai Shmaminar, which is a beautiful way of looking at Medaic and Mishnah, is you can actually figure out which opinion Abasholu is coming from from one word, just as he said, "kol." Where he's coming to be. Mahner, not Mako. It says the last mission in our second parrot. Elon shouldn't know until there's just a robin. You have a tree. It leans over to there's just a robin. Code says, "Well, there's just a robin. People have to get by." I think you have this in America with the city planners. You're going to build a bridge. How tall does the bridge have to be over the street? There's like a standard size of cars or trucks, and you're going to make sure it's at least that much higher, plus a little bit. So, how about when you have a tree out in a thrice of straw, and what's the standard acceptable size of things going by? How tall is the tallest thing that you could assume would be going by that you have to code states? Well, Kadei Shae-ga-mah-li-we-we-we-we-we-we-we-we-we. Camel, which was a common means of transportation, along with the person who was riding on the back of it. I think we got that in picture 451. There's the person riding on the camel, which I could be pretty tall. Camels are pretty tall, and then a standard size person on top. Rabbi Houdhu, who I bought, Stuymer, he says a different shear. He says a "gama-to-un-pisto-ne-kabule-es-mairos." I guess this is a common enough occurrence that you would have a camel laden up with flax or bundles of branches. That's the amount of space we need underneath the trees to have people pass through. Great question. We'll see. Rabbi Shiman, boy underlines, "Aemir kol-e-lung-kade-ga-mishkale-es-mairos." Shiman says something else. You people are going back and forth with Rishis Rabin. If there's going to be something hanging over the Rishis Rabin, you can have a big problem if there's a Tuma issue, because then I could act as an O-hell, and you definitely don't want to have a person's individual tree leaning over Rishis Rabin and making people's suffix, tame-suffic tuma, and therefore the entire tree has to be cut straight up to the sky. It says, "Gomorrah-mantana." By the way, who is that tame-k opinion, who says, "Dib-en-izak-en-basar-um-dunah-dah-sh-tazim?" And I double underline dah-hash-tah. That when it comes to potential damage to others, true, there might be something that would happen in six months, a year, two years, three years. We're worried about now. So what we require a person to do is to make sure that now the situation won't cause damage. Who is that tana who says when it comes to damages, as long as now it won't cause damage, all is okay. Well, I'm our Rish. He's the first opinion. I call him number one. Two lines later, near the end of the line, is Rbiyokonan. I underline Rbiyokonan and call him number two. So according to Rish Lakhish, that's not necessarily universally agreed upon. In other words, the one opinion would say, "What are you talking about? It's the thing that you have that might cause damage for six months. You've got to take care of all of it now, not just for now, for forever." So Rish Lakhish says, "That opinion that says, as long as you take care of it for now, it's good, it's been makhlokish nuya. Verebiyeliyyezer, he is. Verebiyeliyyezer, it's not. They mission the Gamura Brings, which is from later on the Masekta. Let's say you have your property. And you want to build, your property is lower than the Rishosa Robin, or even the same level as Rishosa Robin. You want to build, let's say, a storage area. And that storage area you want to build underneath the Rishosa Robin, which I think is a good picture of the area. It's a good picture of this, and a picture for .53. I don't know if this is exactly what it is, but your property is in the background. In the foreground is going to be this Rishosa Robin. You want to build a storage area. You have to build it so that it is strong enough so that whatever's going on there's Rishosa Robin. We would say now a fully-laden 18-wheeler can go over it and it would be totally fine. So it says the mission that we're quoting now from layman Masekta. (speaking in foreign language) You cannot make, even though it's in your property, an area underneath the Rishosa Robin. Namely, let's say you want to do borrows shishin umaros. You can't do it. Under any circumstances, you can't dig into underneath the Rishosa Robin. Whereas Rabbi Eliezer, and he's the one we're saying we're going to attribute our mission to Rabbi Eliezer, who I boxed. (speaking in foreign language) Now, according to Rabbi Eliezer, you've got to bring the engineers in and you've got to do it with a certain strength, but you can do it. (speaking in foreign language) So I guess the equivalent of the 18-wheeler filled with, I don't know, building material in those days was a car or a carriage filled with rocks or stones, which was very heavy. As long as it's strong enough today to be able to have, and here's, that's in the picture, why you got the donkey with a carriage filled with rocks to go over, that's good enough. And what's going to be in five years? Let's see, what's going to be in ten years? This could like weaken. We're not worried about that. Rabbi Eliezer says as long as it's strong enough today, that's good enough. So Rabbi Eliezer is that Tana, who holds as long as it's strong enough for now, as long as the situation now is okay, it's good. (speaking in foreign language) Now if you look at Rabbi Eliezer, you could even say our mission is according to the Rabana. Now what's our mission? You had a tree. What do we say you have to do? (speaking in foreign language) You got to cut the branches. One second. What's going to be in two or three years? It's going to have to have the branches cut again, but no, it's okay to cut it now. (speaking in foreign language) That could even be the Rabana. Why? When you have something that you can't really see, the nature of it is that people are much less likely to take care of it, which would mean. (speaking in foreign language) Unless you have city inspectors coming and checking the strength of that area that you're building. (speaking in foreign language) It could be there was some earth movement or something happened, and you won't realize it. That's why they're the Rabana and say you can't do it. (speaking in foreign language) I know this, I personally have a tree in my garden area, and I have an extra neighbor, and the extra neighbor rightfully says, listen, Horowitz, I don't want all of the flowers and all the leaves falling off your tree, so take your tree and cut it all the way up. Now, if I do that once, which I do, a year later, I have to do it again, and I'm going to see it, and my neighbor is going to come knocking on my door and asking for it, and that's the difference here. (speaking in foreign language) It's a tree above ground, (speaking in foreign language) It's not a problem, because you see it, and you'll know that you need to cut it again and cut it again. You don't have to take the tree out of your property, but you'll have to each time cut it so that it's not over your neighbor's property. (speaking in foreign language) Huh, this looks like a familiar question. (speaking in foreign language) (speaking in foreign language) Which one is the bigger shear? Is it the person on the back of the camel, or is it the load on the back of the camel? (speaking in foreign language) Well, says the Gomara, taking an extreme opinion. (speaking in foreign language) It's pretty obvious that the shear of the Rabbanan is nothing. (speaking in foreign language) By the way, do camels walk through the rusus robum with (speaking in foreign language) Sure, do they walk through with people? Sure, they walk through with both of them, and therefore, it's gotta be that the shear of the Rabbanan is bigger. (speaking in foreign language) If you were to think that the shear of Rabbanan, which is bigger, well, then what are the Rabbanan going to do when you have a camel that's laden up with flax or branches? (speaking in foreign language) How are those things going to get underneath the tree? Okay, so let's look at it the other way, though. The LMI. If you're going to see the Rabbanan, let's use your check to go to the Rabbanan. So the Gomara is answering that the shear of the Rabbanan has to be bigger, because the Rabbanan will tell you, as long as we're telling you that a guy sitting on the back of a camel can go underneath, we don't have to worry about the camel laden up, because that's going to be less. Well, then one second. Look at it the other way. The LMI. If you want to see the shear of the Rabbanan, it is a greater shear, a taller shear, a higher shear. Then what's Rabihudha going to do? Rabihudha, be sure to Rabbanan Mahati. Rabihudha knows that they transport flax and they transport branches, but they also have people running on camels. So what's going to be with each person? The answer to the Gomara is a big difference. When you have a big load, and you're going underneath a bridge or a tree, you can't tell the pieces of flax or the branches, "Okay, guys, lower your heads." But you can, like if you're riding a Rabihudha on bicycles, and there's low trees, you could say, "All right, everyone, you have to lower your head a little bit, after you dig off in Vethalif-Tute, the difference between people." And stuff is that people can lower their heads if there happens to be a bit of a lower branch area. (speaks in foreign language) The last thing we said is that you've got this tombish. You've got people who are just a Rabban. You, Mr. Mr. Mr. Shoshai, you're the owner with your tree that leans over. You can't put a situation where people walking through there's just a Rabban might become Tameh, because it's been a maze that might be there. Tana, and apparently the little Bryce that tells us a little of an explanation. Why? Three word Bryce, I box it off. (speaks in foreign language) The issue, now the mission should be set because of Tuma. The Bryce says, "Oh, hella Tuma. Oh, a lot of Tuma is you might be underneath the same overhang, you, and the piece of Tuma, and that would be a big problem." Well, like, what else would you possibly think? Shita, comma connector. You may have Tuma, it's not. That means Tuma means, "Oh, a lot of Tuma. What other type of Tuma is there? What would you be concerned about if there's some branch from a tree? It's because of an oil, right? Well, no, maybe not. If we only had our mission, and our mission said the issue was a Tuma issue, you must listen, we didn't say, "Oh, a lot of Tuma." We just said, "Tuma, have Amina Dilma, Mysi, Ayurif, Tuma, Vishadhi, Hassam." It's a great picture, picture. Four, fifty, four. Here we go, it's four fifty four. So you have a Ayurif. Pics up it 'cause Ayurif means a maze from somewhere, plops it in the overhang on the tree. Now, we're used to Tuma being by Kala Svaayla, but Tuma also goes down wherever there's a piece of Tuma. We usually have it on the ground. If you have it in the tree, that Tuma, that is the concern. And that is going to be a Tuma issue. You might have thought, if you only had the mission, that's not a case of being under the same oil, is it? That's a case of actual Tuma being on top of you. And you walked underneath the Tuma. It's not an oil, it's on top of you. And a piece of Tuma, it's that the piece of Tuma is on top of you directly. So if you only had the mission, I might have thought, Dilma Mysi Ayurif, Tuma Vishadihas. Some in places, they're like in picture four fifty four, Kamash Malan, that we don't say that from the fact that it's an oh-hell Hautuma issue. You might think if you cut your tree and it's got a bunch of branches and you cut every other branch so that there's no way any piece of Tuma would be able to place there. In picture four fifty four, it's because there's two branches near each other that can kind of get wedged there. But you might think if you thin it out, like in picture, I guess it's four fifty five, that that would be good enough because there'd be no piece of Tuma that would be able to stay there. Kamash Malan, even if there's one branch, like in picture, I guess four fifty six, and there's even one branch that is over something tummy and also over you. That would also be a problem. That's why you have to take the chainsun, go directly up until the sky so that there's no branches reaching out. It's the Rishasarabha. If you're interested in us, we'll ask for a hug.