Hypatia vs the Millennial Kingdom PDF: https://unexpected-cosmology.nyc3.dig... Article page: https://theunexpectedcosmology.com/hy... Ministry and Widow Fund: https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-suppo... Website: The Unexpected Cosmology Link: https://theunexpectedcosmology.com/ Archives page: https://theunexpectedcosmology.com/ar... Patreon Support: / membership Contact: noelhadley@yahoo.com Facebook: / theunexpectedcosmology
The Unexpected Cosmology Podcast
371 | Hypatia vs the Millennial Kingdom
It actually kind of fits within my 7,000 year timeline deception thesis right on the timeline. And you can see here that I originally wrote this back in May of 2018. So it's an oldie, but goodie, the original draft. Now, I want to stress to everyone new here at this channel that I put a big emphasis on reading. And of course, I'm a writer and so here at the unexpected cosmology, I basically go through my own writings. At the end of this, I hope to show you, if you make it to the end, where you can go find just all of my articles linked or all free, all of my papers, my research papers, years and years and years worth that I hand out for free. And of course, you can read along with this one right underneath this very video that should be posted under there. Now, when I originally wrote this back in 2018, I was going after the space mythos back then and showing how the Copernican universe ultimately came out of the occult. And it was a big Renaissance idea. And back in those days, it's almost ironic going back and reading my original draft now, which no longer is public because now I've gone back and did a huge overhaul of it. But I talked about how the Copernican revolution, if you want to call it that, started apparently with Hepatia, I always want to say Hypatia, but Hepatia, and that it died with her. Like she invented it, it died with her, the dark ages began. And then when the dark ages come to a close, amazingly, it comes into play again. And I always thought that was really weird. But now I'm looking at it going, wow, this actually fits really well with my my thesis that the thousand years of the dark ages was, in fact, the physical embodiments of the millennial kingdom of scripture that we see in Revelation. So let's go right into this. Some say the dark ages began that very day. On the streets of Alexandria, a mob of Christians led by Peter the Lecture apprehended a college professor as she boarded her chariot, having only finished the day's lecture at the local university, and dragged her into a nearby church where they stripped her naked and barbarically murdered her with oyster shells. Afterwards part of her body were reportedly scattered across the city. The rest was burned. Lovely. Polyamity strikes again. You figure they must have grown bored of blackmailing all the Sabbath keeping Judaizers. That's kind of an inside joke if you don't get that, or you could follow the link right there. Perhaps they had simply run out of Nazarene to hound out of town if they were finally turning against the pagans. Her name was Hepatia. Now if I pronounce it Hypatia at any time in here, just do forgive me. I'm a self educated man. I like to read. I read a lot. And I read all these old books and I have nobody to pronounce these names for me. So I kind of phonetically come up with how I think it should be pronounced. And I've always known her as Hypatia. So it's really hard for me to try to translate like almost, it's almost a foreign language saying Hepatia or Hepaticakes. So anyways, her name was Hepatia, by the way. She was described by her students as exceptionally exquisite to behold. Men gazed from afar. Now she was a very, she was on the older side. I mean, I think 60s, 70s by this age, and she was still considerably, considerably beautiful at this time. And the year was 414. And at the moment of her death being perhaps 60 years old at the time, as I said, nobody really knows how old she was. She was heralded as Egypt's trophy intellectual, which begs the question is to Hypatia's crime. See, I just did it. Hypatia's crime, so I'm 1600 years later, and I'm still confused by the charges. But I will make it go at it anyway. The typical explanation has the Alexandrian professor clinging to occultism in a generation when Christianity sought to purge certain influences from their Latin empire, though you and I know paganism was all the rage. Even what has just been stated, a truer answer might have Hypatia embracing the wrong flavor, or rather the losing side of occultism rather than the winning side of occultism, if you get my drift. After all, didn't did Constantine not mince, Mithrius and Geisus as two sides of the same coin. You see how it works? And we'll be talking more about covering some of that paganism in there. The acceptable kind, one of which was the Copernican universe. The last sentence would be a reference to my recent reworking of Constantine versus the Millennial Kingdom. I gave that probably two or three months ago now, but there is a link to the paper to read it, or you can just search for the video on YouTube, I'm sure it's out there somewhere. Another much needed revision to a classic paper, seeing as how I still believe the official narrative to be mostly true upon its initial publication, FTFY. Perchance, you've noticed the distance between the date of publication and this present revision as well. Originally, the timestamp says 52918, which would be May of 2018, still several months before I began keeping Sabbath and eating clean in February of 2019. I so had much to learn about the Torah of Yahuwah, that's the Peyweo for Yahuwah or Yahuwah, as well as the mysteries of heaven and more. So much more. Once again, I was under the assumption that history was mostly factual, that nobody took a magic eraser out on his story, and that the Dark Age, I need more copy, I'm not starting out well tonight, and that the Dark Ages were actually dark, rather than the thousand-year reign of Mashiach that I have come to know it as, which is why my original conclusion was so ironic. I will give it away this early in the game if you are willing to hear it, and here it goes. Sometime in the late fourth or early fifth century, Hepatia invented the Copernican universe. Of course, I said this in the intro. And at the time, nobody bought it, not even the Tolumé fans. The Alexandrian college professor and her ridiculous heliocentrism then went away during the Dark Ages, only to be rediscovered afterwards in a dusty Midisi book by a certain Nicholas Copernicus, whereby he was named after him in his honor, rather than the Hepatian universe. The woman who he stole his ideas from. Amazing, no. The Millennial Kingdom was right under my nose, and I didn't even see it. And so you can see why getting around to another update, more like a complete revision top to bottom, was in order. It's not simply a flat earth versus a Copernican globe trotter narrative, which I'm after anymore, though that was the original poll. Her entire story has been thrown into question. The typical entirely feminist narrative would have her killed on the mere basis that she was an independent and strong-willed woman of intelligence, always putting men in their place. Sure. But then there is also a religio-political explanation, which I intend to explore. This isn't our first rodeo. We've seen enough of these regurgitated stories to suspect the mob was powered by professional torch lighters, its ranks fueled with spooks, and even Hepatia's death as a potential hoax from the typewriter of the Intel department. In the intervening centuries, and depending, of course, upon the 33 flavors of Psyop, Hepatia has been given so many facelifts that I am severely questioning if the woman, as we have come to know her, even existed at all. Thank you. This is my editor, by the way, and she's always on top of me. She just picks out all my words. She did look it up, and I am actually pronouncing it correctly, so thank you, Rebecca. Anyways, it's hard because I want to say, can I just let it out and say, "Hi, Patience," I really want to. Hepatia, just, it's not, whatever, those are my issues. Tapping into her Wikipedia article, and you can see right there, I took a snippet out for you, there is no hiding the fact that the media of Hepatia's day propped her up as a billboard for propaganda, immediately transforming her into a martyr for philosophy. The early 5th century Neoplatonists and historian Demaschius employed Hepatia on a platform of opposition to Christianity. If he or others were deliriously dizzy, I'm sorry, if he or others were deliriously dizzy for her spinning globe theory, then the history writers forgot to tell us about it. But then quite suddenly, medieval storytellers, so nobody is really talking about the whole movie of centristism idea with Hepatia. They're all basically talking about how she was a pagan going up against Christianity. But then quite suddenly, medieval storytellers co-opted Hepatia as a symbol of Christian virtue, only to have her flip-flop and oppose the Catholic Church during the Enlightenment, favoring "science" and the Copernican Revolution. Not only that, but modern scholars believe the legend of St. Catherine of Alexandria was a fictional medieval creation based upon Hepatia. Say what? I will ask you to repeat that last sentence again, thinking long and hard about it. Will the real Hepatia, or should I say St. Catherine, please stand up? Have you ever looked into Catherine of Alexandria, quoting from her Wiki article, you can follow along if you hit that link, Catherine was a Greek origin, the daughter of Cipanela and Constas, the governor of Alexandria, during the reign of Emperor Maxmian, bad dude. I've read some of him in the past. Like Hepatia, Catherine was devoted to a life of study, the divergent being, that the Virgin Mary and the child Yaisus persuaded her to become a Christian. Interesting thing about a lot of people at this time period is they're claiming to see the resurrected Yaisus, but he comes to them either as a baby or a little child. They don't always see him as a full-fledged adult. That's a very different, almost seems very foreign to Protestant thinking. When Maxmian's persecution of Christianity took flight, she went to the Emperor and rebuked him to his face regarding his cruelty. The Emperor summoned 50 of the greatest pagan philosophers and orators, hoping to refute the 18-year-old's arguments, only to be crushed in the young woman's debate. People for adversaries, conquered by her eloquence, declared themselves Christians and were at once put to death. Furious at her accomplishments, the Emperor gave orders to subject the governor's daughter, St. Catherine, to terrible torture. During her confinement, she was fed daily by a dove from heaven. Her wounds were tended to by angels, and Christ also visited her, encouraging bravery with the crown of everlasting glory as an added promise. It was during that imprisonment that more than 200 people came to see her. Included in that list was Valeria Maximela, Roman Empress, and wife of the Emperor Maxentius. She and the others were all put to death, so now the Emperor's wife is put to death. I'm still talking about St. Catherine here in case you're confused. It appears as though the Emperor was back on the market again, which is why Catherine was offered a marriage proposal. When she refused, declaring that her spouse was Jesus Christus, to whom she had consecrated her virginity, the furious Emperor condemned her to death on a spiked breaking wheel. When she touched it, the wheel shattered, which is why Maxentius then ordered her to be beheaded. His second attempt only appears to be a success because she ordered the execution to commence, meaning the executioner couldn't even take the axe to her neck. We do hear a lot of stories like this. This is not a one-off. There are quite a number of other women from that time period who were given the axe treatment to the neck, and for whatever reason the executioner couldn't follow through with it unless if the woman gave her consent, just throwing them out there, in which a milk-like substance rather than blood flowed from her neck. To this day, the spiked breaking wheels referred to as St. Catherine's wheel. She has a university named after her in Cambridge of all places. The wheel is on the gate of the city university and also on its coat of arms. In fact, Catherine was one of the most important Virgin martyrs according to what records we have of the Middle Ages, a group including Agnes of Rome, Margaret of Antioch, Barbara, Barbara of what I'm not quite sure. Lucia of Syracuse and Valerie of, I guess that's Limogus, Limogus, I don't really know. That entire lot sounds like the 144,000 cities all over the world have been named after them. Santa Catalina, for example, was supposedly named after Catherine and off the coast of California, and not far from Santa Catalina, we have Santa Barbara. And of course, you guys know my thesis, and I stress this as a thesis, is that the 144,000 were women. People don't like that because they want to think of the 144,000 as like centering guards, you know, whatever, what have you, or they hope that they will be the 144,000. But I have my reasoning, you can go check that out. Why I am working under the presumption that the 144,000 were women, in fact, or it that actually seems to be, by the way, a very, a lot of the ancients were what we would call today "preterous," they actually did believe the revelation was fulfilled on its day. And I'm also convinced that the whole nun tradition of in the Orthodox and the Catholic Church came out of the 144,000 tradition, the brides of Christ, and in fact, it seems like a lot of the early references I can find, they're saying that, they're women. So it's not, it may be a completely abandoned idea today, but it wasn't an ancient idea. Now these women I mentioned, they're referred to as intercessors, a naughty no no in Protestant thinking. Because, you know, apparently we have no intercessor but Christ, right? But aside from the obvious feminine divine connotations at play here, which medieval architecture is saturated with, perhaps we are staring at the empty vessel once, material reality, but the idea of intercessor, whereby the 144,000 had an active role in the kingdom. So you know, I want to talk more about this, but when you look at, I think all these women mentioned have a feast day. And so the idea is that within the Orthodox Church, the Orthodox Church might very, very well be the bones of the kingdom. And you know, in the West, everybody knows about Catholicism. You try to talk to people about America, about Orthodoxy, and they're like, what, like they don't even know, like to them, it's all Catholicism. But the Orthodoxy is a very real thriving church to this day, they are very opposed to Catholicism, and yeah, they have a bunch of issues with the worship of the saints. And to the point of idolatry, and my thesis that I'm putting forward on this, my understanding at present is that these are kind of the, it came out of attrition of the Malinucina, these feasts, when they were actually physically there. And it basically became idolatry afterwards, just like we see all the idols in the cathedrals to this, that were put there during the Enlightenment era. Not sure when it started or how far it goes back, but for the longest time, Catherine Net was a traditional French label for women who was still unmarried at 25, win the feast of St. Catherine rolled around, which landed every year on November 25th. A special celebration was offered to them on this day, and everyone wished them a swift end to their single status. Not sure that's how Catherine intended her, Batula status, that means her Virgin status, but there's Renaissance culture for you. So here you see actual Catherine Netts in Paris, and they're bemoaning the facts that they are 25, unmarried, looking for a man. And so if you're on that sidewalk, as these Catherine Netts are parading down, look out. You might want to duck dodge, run around the building to avoid them if you're not looking to get married. So 1,100 years after Catherine's martyrdom, it says right here that Joan of Arc, and I'm quoting from Catherine's wiki page, Joan of Arc had a vision of her, of St. Catherine. Testifying before Charles the 7th and 1428, Joan stated that the Archangel Michael and St. Margaret were her other two visitors, aside from Catherine. So what's going on? To be fourth right, I haven't gotten around to investigating Joan of Arc, and will therefore refrain from commenting until I do. I mean, I really don't know. Is she control opposition? Is she a rebellion against the kingdom? I have no clue. I haven't even gone there. I don't even want to comment on it. But now I'm curious, if the scholars are correct, and St. Catherine was an invention based upon Hapacia, then Joan of Arc has just been included in the scyop, which will be a dove for many to most of you. Really, though, I honestly have no opinion on Joan of Arc at the moment. Stay tuned. What I'm at least suggesting at the moment is that the scholars are saying Catherine is Hapacia's fictional doppelganger, but then who is to say it isn't the other way around? What if Hapacia is actually based on St. Catherine? With that, I will proceed with Hapacia's bio, including her various faces and her ties to the occult, according to the history storytellers, doing my best to relay official history as it is told to us. Here we go. Get ready for some official history. Your history lesson, boys and girls. Geopolitical, religious, I'm just going to do it with Hapacia, you guys can argue amongst yourselves how we're supposed to pronounce our names. I'm going with Hapacia, and I'm not going to be apologetic about it. Hapacia was perhaps 45 years old when, in 395 AD, history informs us that the Roman Empire was divided into two halves, whereas Rome maintained the West, Egypt became part of the Byzantine Empire, which you can see right there. If you guys have been paying attention, I've been commenting upon this a lot recently, when I went through the legend of Pristor John, and also when I went through the presentation on the war of the suns of light against the sun's darkness, and interestingly enough, with the legend of Pristor John, the letter was written to the Emperor of Byzantine Empire and Constantine Noble, and the Western Roman Emperor and the Pope both received letters and the ideas as they were, you know, it was like a scyop, right? They were hoaxing that we don't even know if the Emperor of Constantine Noble even received a letter, it was really just propaganda, but then it kind of builds from there, and it's a mystery. Did Pristor John really exist? Was he based on some historical person, and so on and so forth? So check that out if you haven't seen it. And thus, for the remainder of her life, she and the rest of Alexandria found themselves under the sanction of Constantine Noble. So Hypatia is in Alexandria and she is not born in the Eastern Roman Empire, but for the most of her life, that's what she was raised in when they finally took over. Founded by Alexander the Great in 331 B.C., the city which was given his name, Alexandria, soon swelled into a metropolis of occult sciences. The heart of Alexandria was its library at its height or at its peak. These report anywhere from 40,000 to 400,000 papyrus scrolls housed in its collection, though I have seen other numbers speculate as high as 700,000 scrolls. That's a lot of books that apparently no longer exist. Associating the burning of the library of Alexandria with the murder of Hypatia, or Hepaticakes, is yet another oddity in her ever-changing bio, as the medievalists were all over that one. I checked. The library was reportedly first burned in 48 B.C. under Julius Caesar, again by Theophilus, the patriarch of Alexandria, in around 391, and finally by the Muslim, Caliph Omar in 640. And by the way, Theophilus, who he did a lot of instruction in 391, would play a prominent role in Hypatia's bio. 400,000 texts of antiquity, though. Think about all those eggs in one basket. It would be a total shame if somebody pulled a Pearl Harbor and did away with the entire fleet of ancient knowledge. We are told the people of the Middle Ages were confused on the timing of the library's destruction, but then what assurances do we have that his story has not been repeatedly layered with composite imaging and script revisions, in fact, I've seen evidence of that. There may be residue. So the idea is that the further away from the event we get in the law of these cases, the more sure we are of when it happens. And then we look to the people in the past who had a very different dates or circumstances around the event, and we say, "Oh, they were the misguided ones. They were the ones with the lack of knowledge." Like really? Seriously? And it's like that with the Library of Alexandria. And so you see these medievalists and they're saying that the burning of the library and Hypatia, Hypatia, coincided with each other. And so modern historians are like, "No, that's not true. They don't know what they're talking about." The last person to rule over the Eastern and Western House of the Roman Empire was Theodosius I. And before dying in 395, he is said to have brought an end to paganism. Right. Huumangus is still buying that one. His top of the hour news story occurred in April of 390, when Roman soldiers massacred civilians in Thessalonica. The massacre of Thessalonica, as it's called, was most likely a response to an urban riot that led to the murder of a guy named Butheric, a Roman official. The way it went down is that a celebrity chariote, attempted to rape a cupbearer or alternatively Butheric himself. So I mean, yeah, so this this knobish celebrity, right? Know it all. He gets whatever he wants. The dude wants to rape another dude, and apparently a government official. And in response, Butheric arrested and had him jailed. The populace demanded the chariote eraser's release, which is odd considering his charges. Makes you wonder what really happened and why the public didn't believe the story put out by the government. All those things lost to us. When Butheric refused to release him, a general revolt rose up costing Butheric his life. Now, keep in mind at this time that much of the Byzantine Empire, it's going Christian. And so you still have all these people revolting over apparently a gay rapist. That's the government story. As a response in the demonstration of imperial disfavor, Theodosius decided to punish the city by way of random arrest, followed by selective executions in the Hippodrome, to which the citizens objected, objected naturally. Realizing that the crowds were turning on them, they were now turning on the Romans. Or I should say, the Byzantines, the soldiers panicked, forcibly clearing the Hippodrome with the cost of several thousand lives, apparently. I don't know if we really know how many people really died, but several thousand seems like a big, big count. That's a lot of slaughtered people. I wasn't there. We're just reading this in the history books. Not the best public image for a Christian emperor. Afterwards Ambrose, yes, Ambrose comes into the St. Ambrose. He did not allow field DCS into his church, nor offer him the cup of communion until he repented of the massacre. You actually see a picture of him up here. I included a painting. There's Ambrose right there, and he's holding his hand up, not allowing the emperor into his church. And over here is the massacre where you see Romans just apparently brutalizing people and dragging them out of their homes and throwing them into the ring. I mean, it's hard to know what propaganda is more to be believed or not. Anyway, he refused to give him the cup of communion until he repented of the massacre. Though even that is admittedly, that story right there is admittedly another much later addition to the propaganda books. And you see what I'm saying? You could look back through the layers of history and you could just see things added and added and changed, and then the historians come in, and they say, "Well, we're going with this or that over here," and how many times have the books been changed and altered, and there's residue left behind, you guys get to drift by this point. Now that same year, Theodosius I, the anti-pagan, the Christian emperor, had the obelisk of Pharaoh, the third transported from Alexandria, Hepatia's city, only to be erected in Constantinople. Wait, wait, hold on. Only a moment ago, this was the same guy who was passionate about ending paganism, L-O-L. Well, there it is right there. Apparently, the obelisk that this very emperor had erected in his town. Meanwhile, under his rule, the ancient mystery schools are said to have perished. Again, weird, considering you would take the very emblem of the mystery schools and erected in your capital city. Excuse me while I roll my eyes. That's the official story, anyhow, confusing as how I know. If the obelisk has any clues to offer, and it does, then the priest simply swapped out one cloth for another, a decree promulgated in 391 that, "No one is to go to the sanctuaries or walk through the temples, resulted in the abandonment of many pagan institutions throughout the empire." But again, all that's happening here is that the priests are swapping out one robe for another, and this is pretty standard for many of you who have looked into, say, the Roman Catholic church. The Roman state gave free reign to Christian extremists to destroy pagan shrines and commit violence against its priest. It's all like just the illusion of choice here, right? Arson was a favorite tactic. Mox downed out as primary aggressors. Bishops were called to exercise the immense powers conferred upon them by the emperor. Charges of political corruption, ill will, evil nature, and irreverence, abuse became a staple of their regime. Some are not above murder. Some of these mocks. Again, this could all be propaganda, right? This could be the Millennial Kingdom being estrogen. I don't really know. I wasn't there. And the pagans referred to these priests as "black shirts". Now it's starting to sound very fascist, isn't it? A few short years later, black shirts in partnership with Visigoth Barbarians, an odd pairing for sure that you would actually have Barbarians teaming up with Mox, a black shirt priest working for the Orthodox Church. They advance upon the school of the Illicinian mysteries near Athens. It too was decimated. The sanctuary of Ellusius, one of the grandest buildings in the ancient world, the outer courts of which could reportedly hold 300,000 worshipers, was reduced to ruins, another striking blow to the old boys' club. Fourth-century historian, Unapius, remarked that these mocks look like men but behaved as pags, and openly did and allowed countless unspeakable crimes, bitterly adding, for among them every man is given the power of a tyrant who has a black robe and is prepared to behave badly in public. Here's a prime example of what happens when Polianity does away with the Torah, and it's interesting that I'm sure all these people were free to eat pigs, and they're being told that they act like pigs, which is, you know, if you ever read the epistle of Barnabas, that's what it's all about, that there is an identity with the what we eat we become. Anywho, now this is the city of Alexandria here. This is what remains supposedly of Patia's school where she taught, interesting that they erected this big old pillar here, and it's ruins. Anywho, paganism was apparently no longer in fashion, bad news for Alexandria and their vast group of buildings known as the Serapium, though the Temple of Serapis, which, where we get the word Serapium, though the Temple of Serapis had been converted into a group at the University, it still has a vast collection of books, supposedly some of these books came from the Library of Alexandria, as I say here, books which had assumedly derived from the Library of Alexandria, something would need to be done about that. Also, it was at the University where Patia taught the old religions and sciences, and so it is here, and keep in mind that the sciences were going in a direction, really I think that if it was not for the dark ages, but let's, you know, beat around the bush, the millennial kingdom, if that hadn't come in, the Copernican Revolution would have taken off in the 500s, 80 at that time, because that's the direction this was going in. So she's obviously leading, and that's the whole thing, the Copernican Revolution comes out of the occult, comes out of the dark recesses, the tombs of the mystery schools, and so they were trying to, the new people in charge were trying to do away with that, and so it is here, the history tellers often declare that the mysteries as a public institution would make their final stand, that is until the Enlightenment rolled around, but I'm getting ahead of myself. I mean, clearly the Enlightenment was them bringing the occult and the mystery religions out of the woodwork, and, you know, putting in art form and back into the Roman Catholic Church and so on and so forth. It was the year of the emperors Edich when Phil Phyllis, the 23rd pope of Alexandria, having already begun confiscating abandoned temples and restructuring them into churches, which is interesting, right, just exchanging one cloth for another, discovered a hidden pagan temple within the Serpium, to which he and his followers mockingly displayed the pagan artifacts in within. I should have titled this, like, clickbait, like, wait till you discover what was discovered in this temple or something like that, and then I'd get like all these views, so wait till you discover what was discovered in here. Concluded was the phallus of Priapis, the fertility god with a sausage-sized schlong to match. I'm not recommending it, certainly not for the ladies, but if you do go look just Wikipedia article of who Priapis was, he was definitely the schlong god. They made that out in the artwork. We could still see some of it, like, in ruins, which he carried through the midst of the forum. So this guy, you know, being just totally immature with you, I know people like, I see him online, just totally immature. He's like breaking into these temples, into these sacred places, and instead of destroying it, he's like actually just marching it around town, mocking it, really enjoying himself, which is now upsetting the pagans because he's being very sacrilegious to their religious artifacts. Real mature, right? The offense was enough to provoke an attack, the pagans against the Christians, though the Christian faction counterattacked, forcing the pagans to retreat to their Serapium stronghold. Apparently, Theophilus bribed the slaves of the Serapion to steal some of its coveted books, which he then sold to foreigners at exorbitant prices. Again, real mature. How much of our ancient knowledge was destroyed by buffoons masquerading as wise men? I think that's really the lesson here. Really, we don't really know with all the propaganda out there by all sides in the history books, really don't know what's going on, but just looking at this just as we wouldn't, you know, an event happening today, this guy sounds like a total buffoon masquerading as a wise man. And unfortunately, our world is still surrounded by those types today. The philosopher Olympus, a contemporary of Apatia, attempted to defend the temple, but to no avail. Under orders of the emperor, men, quote, sack the temple, broke the statue of Serapists and pieces, dragged it through the streets of the city, and finally burned it to the ground, unquote. The library was eliminated. While some historians frame its destruction against a long-term backdrop of frequent mob violence in the city, particularly a 400 year conflict between the Greeks and the Jews who inhabited those quarters, most agree its final demise came with the Christian Christian's rejection of paganism, or rather their politically incorrect version of paganism, which is a big difference, right? It's the illusion of choice, only even the platonic school remains. With Apatia, the apple did not fall far from the tree because her father Theon was a noted astronomer and mathematician devoted to divination, astrology, and the mysteries. He has said to have penned commentaries on the books of Orpheus and Hermes, as well as poems relegating the planets as forces of Mora, a Greek word which translates to fate or destiny. Above all else, Theon is probably best known for having edited the existing text of Euclid's elements, which I'm showing you here. Not his actual copy, but one of the oldest copies of Euclid we have. So, technically, this is a ninth-century manuscript from the Vatican Library telling us that Theon's handwriting is found nowhere on the page. It is simply a copy or a copy of a copy of a copy of his in it, not that I'm doubting his existence or anything, because I'm not. I am simply attempting to describe his known accomplishments and be precise at it. I'm trying to give you, you know, the official history here apparently that he was responsible for. We only have these copies today because apparently he helped to play the part of the scribe and copy them for us. Now, FYI, Theon was also the last man whose name is recorded as a professor at the Alexandrian Museum. I don't know about you, but I think that's an important piece of the puzzle. We are repeatedly told that Haapatia sat in the chair of philosophy and that the people of Alexandria saw her about town wearing the cloak of the philosopher. Oh, sure they did. Though not even the museum for where she is claimed to have tenured thought their genius professor, whom they loved, worth registering, meaning we have no registration at all, no documented evidence that she was ever there at that university, even though all the historians say she was, and that she was the most brilliant freaking genius ever, and they all loved her. Call me a conspiracy theorist, but isn't that strange? Did they cook the books and scrub her name, which is totally likely or also likely was she an invention of a later hour? You see what I'm getting at? Perhaps what needs to be done in this situation is that we look at Haapatia's accomplishments. A guy named Sudas, the mysterious 10th century author of the Byzantine Encyclopedia, claims Haapatia wrote commentaries on Dialphantis on the astronomical canon of Tolum May and on the conics of Apollonius of Pergav, which we no longer have, as none of Haapatia's works have survived to the present day. So we do have a guy in the 10th century claiming there was a woman with that name who translated these books. Adding to the picture, the letters of Synesius indicates that the Chaudean oracles and Pythagorean numerological mysticism figured into her teachings, and like her father, Haapatia saw astronomy as the highest science, opening up knowledge of the divine. How about them apples? Ironically, Aristosthenes, the man who was said to have calculated the circumference of the earth using a friend and a couple of sticks who afterwards tilted the globe on its axis and whom Haapatia would no doubt pull inspiration from real important ground breaking work, which is now missing from time as well. Of course, I'm questioning whether Aristosthenes ever lived to begin with as well, and it seems as though he wasn't really taught even in the schools of until recent decades, which makes you wonder. Aristosthenes was the chief librarian at the Library of Alexandria, you know. Time and again, the scholars will claim the true academics of the Middle Ages were globe trotters, rather than flat-earthists, and that the common folk were too stupid to read about it, but all the same. Why didn't they preserve the books? I mean, you could say Haapatia feel victim to a fascist mob and a cold night, in which case they required a book burning to keep their bums warm. But what of the others? Even as the official narrative unfolds, nobody seemed interested in preserving this stuff. So it is really interesting that the original fathers of Globe Earth have missing books. I mean, we hear them talked about the most important pieces of evidence in history, and it doesn't exist. And all we have is many cases, quote, referring to these books. So isn't that convenient? There's one crucial piece of evidence put forward regarding Haapatia's existence, while writing a commentary on Ptolemy's syntaxis, Theon, that would be her father, happened to acknowledge his daughter by name. So there's that. Assuming the handwriting is a match, then this Theon fellow had a daughter named Haapatia, or Haapatia. But then there is also one surviving work, a commentary on Ptolemy's almagist, which they will tell you as explicitly of her doing. By they I mean to imply the scholars. The problem with their claim is that the name of the edit is described to Theon, her father, as well as some other guy named, Papos. Haapatia's name is never once placed upon it. All that tells me is that there was a collaborative effort between Theon and Papos. Ask a scholar, I dare you to. And they will tell you it is her work through though it isn't, but it is though it isn't, which has me just as confused though, likely less confused than they are on the subject. Now, if you're following here, the whole point of this is that there's all these claims out there that of who she was and what she wrote and her contributions to science, and they don't exist. There's just people claiming that they exist, but it doesn't exist with perhaps one exception, which we'll get to at the end. Now, of the little that is known about Haapatia, the following account by Socrates Scholasticus. What a fun name Scholasticus is considered the best and most substantial. This is what he says. There was a woman at Alexandria named Haapatia, daughter of the philosopher Theon, who made such attainments in literature and science as to far surpass all the philosophers of her own time. Having succeeded to the school of Plato and Plotinus, she explained the principles of philosophy to her auditors, many who came from a distance to receive her instructions on accounts of the self possession and ease of manner, which she had acquired in consequence of the cultivation of her mind, she not infrequently appeared in public in presence of the magistrates. Neither did she feel abashed and coming to an assembly men, for all men on account of her extraordinary dignity and virtue admired her the more, yet even she fell evicted to the political jealousy which at that time prevailed. For as she had frequent interviews with Orestis, it was Calumneously reported among the Christian populace that it was she who prevented Orestis from being reconciled to the bishop. What he's describing here is that there's two political powers in Alexandria wrestling for control. One is a pagan, which means he is with the mystery religions and probably the Isis mysteries. And then you have this Christian kind of, you know, black robe, kind of, I guess, fascist according to the official narrative. Don't really know, but they're going at it back and forth, right? Trying to get control. And Orestis found political backing in none other than a patio. And so now they're blaming it that it's because of her that this other guy in control was not being reconciled to the bishop, the church. Some of them therefore hurried away by fierce and bigoted zeal, whose ringleader was a reader named Peter. Remember, this is the guy that murdered her with the scallop shells, waylaid her returning home and dragging her from her carriage. They took her to the church called Caesirium, where they completely stripped her and then murdered her with tiles. Now, it says roofing tiles there. And if you look into this, a lot of people will say roofing tiles. However, there is a big argument put forward, which I agree with. The roofing tiles doesn't really make much sense that you would take tiles off of a roof and murder who thinks about that, like taking, I'm going to take tiles off a roof and murder someone scallop shells though, oyster shells, whatever shells can be very sharp. This is a coastal town. They would be all over. They would actually use them for the road. And so that would make total sense that they would take these shells and jagged shells and rip into so-and-skin. And so basically, it's a translation error is what they're saying. After tearing her body in pieces, they took her mangled limbs to a place called Cineron and there burnt them. This affair brought not the least operabrium, not only upon Cyrell, but also upon the whole Alexandrian church. You would think so. That sounds like quite the scandal. I mean, we really want to sit in the pews with those people. And surely, nothing can be farther from the spirit of Christianity than the allowance of massacres, fights, and transactions of that sort, obviously then. Seems like a given, reading the teachings of YAHushah Hamashiach. This happened in the month of March during Lent. In the fourth year of Cyrell's Episcopate, under the 10th Consulate of Honorius in the 6th of Theodecius, 80-415. That comes from ecclesiastical history, 715. So Socrates' scholasticus was writing from Constantine Noble. He was born in 380 and died in 439, living the entirety of his conscious life under the Theodecian dynasty. There were several successive Theodecius rulers, the longest of which was Theodosius II, raining from 402 to 450, when this entire episode went down. His ecclesiastical history was intended to continue the work of Eusevius from the period from 305 to 439. If you recall, Eusevius was Constantine's official biographer. So he's hoping to continue his work. And noting the religio-political blame being placed upon Cyrell, it is certainly interesting that the account is being told only after the council of Ephesus in 431. All right, so remember now this is all propaganda probably being put forward. We need to learn more about the Cyrell person. The blame is being put on him. And in the council of Ephesus in 431, Cyrell attached the poop smell to his name. Take a mental note of that because we will turn there shortly. All right, we're going to return to what he did there. Another antidote to the story is Hepatia's astonishing beauty. And so they always have, you know, really pretty girls play her in movies. They never have her as an old woman. They always portray her as a young kind of 30-ish, you know, woman. But obviously at the time of her death, she was 60, maybe going on 70. Like St. Catherine, the devoted neoplaseness is never thought to have married. Though as many as several men were said to have courted her, she was a bride to something all right, science maybe, but it wasn't Christ. Her so-called virginity was likely a mystical metaphor. Come to think about it. There are words attributed to her in what she was quote, already being married with the truth, unquote. Actually, there are many various quotes associated with her. They are floating around on the internet, always coming up short on citations. But seeing as how she never published a book of quotations, I am still at loss, figuring out where they derive from. Here are some other perfectly preserved Hepatia quote, one liners from, for those of you who like to frame inspirational quotes with nature photos. So these are all attributed to her. And we'll see how many of these are, I'll just read these off to you. And you can figure out if this really sounds like it comes from this woman from 15 1600 years ago. The pursuit of knowledge is the noblest quest. To question is to grow. Education is the key to unlocking one's true potential. Curiosity fuels the flame of intellect. The true measure of intelligence is the ability to adapt. Opinions should be based on facts, not emotions. Truth should never be sacrificed for comfort. The greatest danger of all is the fear of failure. There is no such thing as a mistake, only lessons learned. Ignorance is the root of all evil. Challenges are opportunities in disguise. The road to greatness is paved with perseverance. The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be kindled. True knowledge exists in knowing that you know nothing. The pursuit of truth is a lifelong journey. Knowledge shared is knowledge multiplied. Failure is not an option. It is a stepping stone. Success is not a destination, but a continuous evolution. Hapeshia came up with all those quotes on her own. No wonder why Peter the Lecter put her down. Rather than fortune cookies, he wanted to start writing inspirational message on scallop shells, and she put him out of business. Apparently, call me a conspiracy theorist, but I seem to recognize many of those quotes as deriving from other people. But what does it really matter anymore? Let's just run with her legendary inspirational quotes for every educational occasion, and see what else we can dig up about her. I'm seeing these quotes floating around the internet. I'm like, where in the world are you guys pulling these from? They're just making them up. They're just attaching the things you would see in your school counselor's office framed on the wall there with a rainbow in the background or like waves or something like that. The Greek historian Damascus has something to say. He is interesting because he lands in Justinian first territory, reminding us of the plague of Justinian and 431 year of the apocalypse. I've covered that. I have videos on that. I have papers on that. In my position, I'm sorry. That's a mispron. It should be 531. No. Wait, that is totally off. The whole number is off. It should be 541. I need to go back and edit that. It should be 541 year of the apocalypse. I am under the opinion. I fall under the opinion that that was the start of the apocalypse, not 431 541. I have my reasons for you can follow that whole series. The train of thought, why I'm coming to that conclusion. He was also called the last of the Athenian neoplatonist, this historian Damascus, being the last scholar of the neoplatonic Athenian school after Justinian had it shut down in 529. And of course, remember, 536 is the year of the fire reset. There's a lot of things kind of culminating at this time. Well, anyways, Hepatia, Hypatia was a neoplatonist and Damascus was a neoplatonist. They both were. And so it is not surprising to learn that he had the hots for her. Apparently, the historian notes two different and potential responses were delivered after one of her students professed his unresolved love for her. The more polite version, which he size is the less likely, is that she told him that music was the antidote for love, the less polite version is that she handed him a bloody menstrual rag and said, this is what you really love, my young man, but you do not love beauty for its own sake. Yeah, that's not even stoic. It's just straight up gross, TMI. I don't even, I was thinking about that quote repeatedly, and I don't even, that doesn't even make sense to me at all. That's what he would really love, but whatever, let's just go with the two versions of Hypatia there. Another potential lover boy was a guy named Synesius of Cyrene, Hypatia's most adoring pupil. So these are copies of supposed letters that he, and I'm not doubting that he did write these letters, but these are copies of the letters that he wrote to her. He has described for us as a convert from Christianity to wait for it science, and worse, he was a bishop ironically consecrated by Phil Phyllis himself. So you can imagine this isn't going well. He was, he was a bishop consecrated by the guy running Alexandria, the Christian running Alexandria, and then he gets to be, he falls in love with Hypatia becomes a convert to science back into paganism, not looking good. Seven letters addressed to Hypatia still survive, though it is said that he refers to her in several more. I admit to not having read them, but Cliff's notes tells me he laments not hearing from her for she is. And I quote, the only good thing that remains in violence along with virtue, you always have power, and long may you have it and make a good use of that power. Perhaps we can make a frame out of that one as well. Another inspirational quote, about the time of his death, I am told a year or two before her own. He dictated a letter calling her, quote, mother, sister, teacher, and whittle, benefact, benefactress, and whatsoever is honored and named indeed, unquote. She is the one quote who legitimately presides over the mysteries of philosophy, and my most revered teacher, unquote. More than just a philosopher, mathematician, astronomer, and scientist, Hypatia was clearly regarded in the light of a spiritual leader. For Synesius, the Cyrene, she was quote, the most holy and revered philosopher, a blessed lady and divine spirit with oracular utterances. His teacher, Synesius contemplated was beloved by the gods. In a broader picture, Synesius, though perhaps still clinging to a Christian title, was in direct conflict with the Cappadocian fathers. Now Basil, the great Bishop of Caesarea, for starters, he would be one of them. Basil's younger brother, Gregory of Nisa, Bishop of Nisa, was another and a close friend of theirs, Gregory of Nazianzus, became patriarch of Constantine Noble. Though already dead by the division of Rome and Constantine Noble when the two split, I doubt his elk would have been too pleased to hear of Hypatia's lover boy. The church fathers may have already ditched the commands, found on the first two thirds of the Bible, something I take issue with, in favor of a gentile lifestyle, which is already pagan. So how can you find what is pagan when you're already embracing a pagan lifestyle? That's what I don't get. But their political theology couldn't be any more different. So again, this is one of the things I was kind of going at originally, as I was starting to realize, like 10 years ago, how pagan the church truly was, became a vacuum for me of loss of identity, because I'm like, how are you guys going out there and accusing all these other people being pagan when I just see paganism in the church? You're just pagan. That's all you are. You're a pagan. You have no moral ground to say, to declare what is pagan and what isn't, because you've just thrown out two thirds of the Bible. Surviving fragments of letters and affectionate correspondences indicate a mystical orientation. Glimpses of her spiritual views describe and assign the eye buried within us as a divine guide. Furthermore, as the soul journeys towards divinity, this hidden spark which loves to conceal itself grows into a flame of knowing. Now, I'm pointing this all out there for all the, originally, again, I wrote this for for Christianity, which is embracing the Copernican Revolution. And they would have the goal to say that Hebrew cosmology is pagan. It's like, no, I'm pretty sure the Copernican Revolution is it as pagan as it gets. This came from pagans. It didn't come from Christians. They didn't come from the Bible. Hypatia is not reading the Bible and coming up with this. All right, well, let's just jump down here. Truly, our history writers would have us know that Hypatia was adored by many, but the admiration was not quite universal, writes will gerunds in the age of faith, the story of civilization. He writes, "The Christians of Alexandria must have looked upon her a scance, for she was not only a seductive unbeliever, but an intimate friend of Orestes, the pagan prefect of the city, or the pagan perfect." Excuse me. There he is again, Orestes. I mentioned him earlier. We first learned of him when hearing Socrates' scholasticus account of the situation. Among her many alter egos and facelifts, some painted Hypatia's demise is a love triangle. Everybody wanted a piece of that, that filthy rag, apparently. All right, well, in 412 St. Cyrell, this naughty nephew, there he is right there, St. Cyrell. The snotty nephew of Philphelus succeeded as patriarch of Alexandria. Upon taking his uncle's place, Cyrell needed his own conquest against paganism. There were many to be had, and in a short time, he would set his gaze upon Hypatia lovingly, unlike the St. Catherine version we aren't outright told. So remember when St. Catherine remember she went up against the emperor and he proposed to her? To make the situation even more of a toxic one, her pagan friend, Orestes, resisted ecclesiastical authority wherever it enroached upon his civil jurisdiction. Meanwhile, riots between Christians and Jews persisted. After a brawl in the theater, Orestes had one of Cyrell's followers arrested and tortured. You can see where this is going. When Christians were killed and yet another riot, the Archbishop led a mob which resulted in the expulsion of Jews from Alexandria. A lot of times when they're talking about the expulsion of Jews, they're lumping in here, Jew geysers. They're lumping in people who are what we know with the Nazarene research. They're lumping in people who obey the commands, who believe that the Jesus Christus is their Messiah, that they're also keeping the commands, now they are Jews. They're being expelled. Even their possessions were looted. No sooner had Orestes objected when he himself was assaulted by monks of a very fiery disposition. So it's interesting here this pagan is standing up for the Jews being expelled. And again, this might all be propaganda. I mean, it could be completely reversed. It could be the so-called pagans as far as I'm concerned, they could be, you know, some of the good guys. They're being declared pagans. You see what I'm saying? We really don't know. One such assailant was tortured to death. In turn, Cyrell made a martyr of him. According to other assessments, the situation outgrows even their triangle. Though remaining an occultist in an ever widening Christian empire, her political influence remains strong. It is said that many students from wealthy and influential families came to Alexandria forsaking the newly endorsed religion of the land to study privately with Hypatia. Those same students, whoever they were, went on to attain high post and government in the church. That would be a problem since Emperor Theodecius, the second excluded pagans from all public office. And as the story goes, some of her students even attended Cyrell's Alexandria in church, as evidenced by the fact that attendance began to slip. And Hypatia was blamed for their lousy sermons. Cyrell's supporters charged Hypatia with drawing many believers to her, while also preventing Orestes from being reconciled to the bishop. Which is why she was apprehended by mob, led by Peter the Lecture, after finishing up her lectures for the day, pulled from her chariot, stripped naked, and dragged into a church, which was a pagan temple at one time, where her skin was flayed with jagged pieces of oyster shells, her limbs pulled from her body, and paraded through the street. Lovely picture. It was the last day. The mysteries we are told ended on that day. With Hypatia gone, her students scattered, giving way to reason, as well as plumbing. Because as you know, everyone sat around in piles of poop during the dark ages, but I digress. That was of course sarcasm. John of Nick who wrote, "All the people surrounded the patriarch Cyrell, and named him the new Theophilus, for he had destroyed the last remains of idolatry in the city." Ironically, she was killed in a former pagan temple, and her remains were burned in a mockery of pagan sacrifice. That's not a coincidence. Something more is going on there than we are told. Very little attention has been given in my research towards St. Catherine's in Egypt. It's in Egypt's Sinai Peninsula, which is a shame because it was named after you know who, Catherine, the woman whom we are told is a fabrication of Hypatia. Said to be the world oldest continuously, you can see a picture of it there, said to be the world's oldest continuously inhabited Christian monastery, which should tell us something. It was constructed officially between 548 and 565, pitting us in the dawn of my Millennial Kingdom timeline. Adding to my interest is the portrait of the Patocrator Yessus, which you can see right here. It's a very famous portrait. It's really where we get our, there's a lot of, you know, research out there saying we get our idea of what you who should look like based on the enlightenment of a particular figure in there. And I don't agree with that. Actually, it comes from this portrait right here. The thing about this portrait though, is that I have shown that this portrait amazingly, amazingly, and it matches the Shradda Turin. The man in the Shradda Turin, that is the most like controversial thing. People are divided down the middle of it. Some people are like, I don't care what research you throw at me. I will not agree that that man in the Shradda is Yuhusha Amashiyyaka Messiah. Fine. I used to, I kind of went down that road at 1.2. I looked at that option that it was a forgery. It's not. I mean, it is an unbelievable document of Messiah in his resurrection. And again, this portrait right here is a perfect match as far as I'm concerned with the man in the Shradda. We see this image circulated in money. We see this image circulated all over the place. I think that this is the closest we have ever come to the image of Messiah. So anyways, adding to my interest, of course, is this portrait, which just so happens to be an exact image of the man in the Shradda Turin. So in comparative news, the seventh century Egyptian Coptic bishop, John of Nikhil served as a general administrator of Egypt's upper monasteries in and around 696. Now, I'm reading that he's Upper Egypt. So remember in Egypt, everything is in reverse. When we think of North, that's actually Lower Egypt for them. So where the Nile River empties out, that's Lower Egypt. Upper Egypt would be, you know, kind of closer to the source of the Nile. So I'm not really sure if Upper Egypt includes the sign up what they call today, the Sinai Peninsula. And yes, I am well aware that directions are opposite Egypt, as I just said. Alright, John of Nikhil chronicled a historical narrative which extended from Adam to the end of the Muslim conquest in Egypt. And in it, he described Hypatia or Hepatia as a pagan philosopher devoted at all times to magic, astrology and instruments of music, who beguiled many people through satanic wiles, not a great descriptor of her. Orestes, the imperial perfect of Egypt and Alexandria's governor, honored her exceedingly for she had beguiled him through her magic. That's quite a different tale than what Socrates Scholasticus had offered. Her relationship with Catherine of Alexandria comes across more like a checkerboard of duality at this point. So it's almost like there were these, yeah, I don't even know what's going on. But just, you know, I do believe that Catherine of Alexandria, I think there's more evidence that she existed. And I mean, she's honored all over the world. What places are named after Hepatia? I mean, I've never been to a city. Maybe there's a city named after in the world. I don't really know. Catherine is everywhere. And so, now that the historians are coming along saying Catherine is a figment of our imagination based on Hypatia, I beg to differ. I think that probably the opposite is true. Dropping by Hypatia's wiki page again, and we come to learn that early 18th century, the early 18th century was still tinkering with her story. In the case of John Toland, while occupied with his anti-Catholic tracks, the diascolar portrayed Hypatia's death in the worst possible light by changing the story and inventing elements not found in any of the ancient sources. So this is what I was talking about earlier, these onion peels, and they just keep adding and adding and adding and adding and scrubbing history. And sometimes they get caught. Sometimes they don't. His framing of the narrative resulted in a 1721 response by a controversial, controversial verse zeolist Thomas Lewis defending Cyrell without having hunted down Toland's tracks or Lewis's response. How do we know that Toland is wrong or that the Jesuits don't have it out for him? Basically, the Jesuits are framing one or the other of them. Or perhaps, contrary, Toland was another link in the web of lies, dabbing his colorful flavors into the canvas of history only to fall out of favor with or get overruled by the propaganda department. What I'm saying is that we see this too where the historians, the writers in history, they start adding their colorful flavors. Sometimes they become official history. Sometimes they fall out of favor and the scholars or whoever's in charge attacks them and says they're wrong, right? They got their information wrong. All I know is the Catholic Encyclopedia has this same Cyrell fellow, the early 1st century patriarch of Alexandria, the one that lead Peter the lecturer to murder Hypatia as presiding over the council of Ephesus in 431. I said we would get to this. The issue was over a notorious patriarch of Constantine Noble who held that the Virgin Mary could be called the Christotokos, meaning Christbearer, but not the Theotokos, meaning Godbearer. No, mind you, this was a huge controversial issue. No, mind you, Cyrell wasn't simply on the invite list. He presided over the council and in fact, the Nestorian heresy as it became known only came about through a dispute between the two dudes. In the old days before the 1000 year reign and again afterwards, but particularly before, you see this a lot with the church fathers. When the church fathers were claiming a apostolic succession, so as to topple the ministries of Sabbath keepers, running the revolution 1412 people out of town, all they had to do was grab their pen pal buddies and form a church council. So as to decide quote unquote theology and condemn their opposition, get the popes backing. All the enough in this particular instance, Nestorius is said to have pleaded with the Eastern Roman Emperor Theodosius II in Constantine Noble to call the council in which all grievances could be aired, hoping that he would be vindicated and have Cyrell condemned. It didn't turn out that way. At the council, 250 bishops were present and accounted for. The proceedings were conducted in a heated atmosphere of confrontation, creating severe tensions between Cyrell and Theodosius II. Though by all accounts, Cyrell's argument won the day. By all accounts, he promoted Marian, the mother of Jesus, from mother of Christos to mother of Theos. Nestorius was decisively outplayed by Cyrell and removed from his seats. And he had a set of teachings named after him, which were officially anathema, anathema or anathema ties. And so again, so if you have a teaching named after you, that's usually not a good thing, because it's how you defeat an idea by naming it after someone. So now from this point on, there is Nestorius, the Nestorian heresy, where he dared to say that Mary was the mother of Christ versus the mother of God. You see what I'm saying? So at this point in history, Cyrell, the guy who had Hypatia killed, murdered, he's the one responsible for doing this right here. So I had started out saying Mystery Religion, priests swapped out one cloak for another. Never is that more evident than the claim, which has Cyrell capping off his mother of Theos win by introducing the image of Isis, pictured nursing the infant Horus at her breast, into the Christian church under the guise of Mary. So the Nestorians now, who are completely against this idea that Mary is the mother of God, are now outmatched, now they are now they're the heretics, and they're watching the Roman church just put up these idols everywhere, basically swapping out the cloth, now the priests have their way, and now they have their Isis, their semi-remists, with their Nimrod child, whatever, in their Trinity, and it all came through, according to the official history through this guy. Was he in Hypatia in the same phallus club? Remember that time when Freemasons went to war with basically, you see what I'm saying there, like, so the very guy who had Hypatia killed over paganism, was he in the same club as her? Remember that time when Freemasons went to war with Freemasons during the Civil War, both sides read from the same Bible, prayed to the same God, visited the same lodges, and all that jazz. Was something similar happening here? Was he even Hypatia an agent of Rome? Could have been. All right, so here's a bunch of pictures, interestingly enough, of St. Catherine, and a familiar theme here, we see her with baby Yessus and Mary, but then at the risk of confusing you further, here are a series of Madonna and child paintings depicting St. Catherine. I was originally thinking he was a one-off, and had the faintest clue how many there were until I started looking. Sometimes she's even paired with St. Barbara, yikes, let's see if I could find, oh, that would, no, let's see if I could find one with what was St. Barbara, right here. So you see, on the right here, my mouse, that is, I'm not sure which one is St. Barbara and which one is St. Catherine, but they were quite the pair. Another piece of information, we gleaned from Cyrell before closing out for the day, is that he ultimately held on to few friends, even in the church. Historian bishops at the Council of Ephesus declared the man who became a saint, a heretic, labeling him, monster, born, and educated for the destruction of the church. Upon learning of Cyrell's death, Bishop Theodoric of Cyrus wrote to Domness, Bishop of Antioch, and said, "At last, and with difficulty, the villain has gone, the good and the gentle pass away, all too soon, the bad prolong their life for years. Nobody but the mob and others suspect professionals cared for the man, and it wouldn't surprise me the least to learn that he wasn't actuality a spook from the western leg of Rome." So in review here, I mean, we're seeing so many different versions of Hypatia, and hopefully I didn't confuse you. It is interesting to see some propagandists hype up this guy Cyrell into a saint. He got rid of the witch Hypatia, and then you see others are going, "No, this guy Cyrell was a villain. He was an awful dude who was actually bringing in paganism into the church, and so it makes me wonder if Hypatia was actually an agent, like she would just, you know, was she even killed, right? Was this whole situation even made up, and we've seen situations like that in our own lives, you know, it makes you wonder. Now here's apparently another quote from Hypatia. This one is the only one that's apparently credible. Fables, I don't know where it's coming from, by the way, since we have no books from her, "Fables should be taught as fables, myths as myths and miracles as poetic fantasies, to teach superstitions as truths is a most terrible thing. The child mind accepts and believes them, and only through great pain and perhaps tragedy can he be in after years relieved of them." And of course, she's not saying this about her own religions, obviously, as she's talking about Christianity. Finally, a Hypatia quote, which great men can get behind to, you know. What I'm saying is that it finally comes across as being in character. It is also credited with being genuine, though I don't have a source on it, but what it does, but what does it really matter by this point when the entire quote leads like projection, even a confession to her 15 minutes of fame, and part in the intel script. If only I could go back and verify before handing in my report. Where is Belinted's phone booth when you need it? So anyways, the Dark Ages commence without the guiding hand of Hypatia, so sad. And then one day, the thousand-year reign of Michioc came to an end and everyone's favorite astronomer, Nicholas Copernicus, went rummaging about in a library in Florence. Read all about it in Michelangelo or Michelangelo the divine. Florence was a hotbed of kingdom rebellion. By the way, the library had a name. Are you ready for this? It went by the name of Medici. And now, guess what he found tucked away on its shells there. I dare you. Before his new conception of the Heliocentric universe was published posthumously in 1543. Copernicus was by the pupil under Dominico Maria de Noveira, an astronomy professor in Lona. While in Florence, it is extremely likely that Copernicus checked out Ptolemae with his library card. Included within Medici Library's catalog was a copy of Ptolemae's almagist. Actually, the only copy of Ptolemae's work could be found in the Medici Library. The almagist that I am thinking of also happened to contain Theon and Hypatia's comments scribbled within. Ptolemae embraced geocentrism, whereas Hypatia's notes were of the heliocentric nature. Nicholas Copernicus, meet Hypatia, queen of the occult, mother of heliocentricism. If it is true as they say that the murder of Hypatia swept humanity into the medieval cauldron, the dark ages, then it is hardly a stretch of fantasy to imagine that it was her very ghost once excavated, which certified our arrival into this modern age of enlightenment and science. Hypatia had enemies, and then one day she'd return to haunt them all. Thank you everyone who hung in there with me to the end. That was, you know, a bit of the academic read that, you know, I kind of touched on a lot of different subjects. So that one was, yeah, definitely more academic, a lot of names. I've been doing a lot of those recently. Hopefully, you guys aren't getting frustrated with them. And I do want to point out, so here's my website right here. And I've been covering a lot of the Trump shooting in Pennsylvania recently. But if you go up here to the top of the unexpected cosmology, you can see, well, there's article updates, but here's the article archives. I'm going to show you this really quickly. This right here is just all the research papers that I've come out with on so many different subjects. This is just a lifetime worth of work, and it's all free. Just come out here, check them out, download them, upload them, read them, and have fun. And it's all free. Of course, you know, I'm always looking for ministry partners. So I put under the link here, if you want to support my work and what I'm doing, you want to support this ministry, please be a patreon subscriber. We need your support. I am supporting not only myself, my family, but also others, widows and such. We are whales ministry, which I talked about a lot. So I mean, the 1849 California gold brush was a hoax. The Chicago, Chicago will fare was a hoax. Just looking at some of these here. The Anunnaki, I gave that one last week, the atomic bomb hoax, time travel and scripture, baseball and the sonic ritual, the black dahlia murder hoax, the Boston marathon bombing hoax. There's just a lot of stuff in here, giant trees, the Donner party hoax. That's one of my favorites I wrote. Yep, the JFK assassination hoax, the Pruder film, all that kind of stuff. All right, well, that's it for tonight, guys. And we'll do this again next week. I try to make it a little less academic for you guys in the future, but like this channel. I've liked this video if you haven't yet. Subscribe to the channel. Just leave a comment, please. If you're not watching this live, you know, just say hello, whatever that really helps the videos and I love you guys. Bye, everybody.