This is not nom, this is bowling, they're a rule. - Hey, hey, hey, junior, America! (upbeat music) - Stake. - Four. - That's it! - So, stand by. - All right, everybody, welcome back to the Stakes of Records podcast. I'm Roan, I've got Noah here with me. If you're a first-time listener, welcome to the show, if you're a long-time listener, welcome back to America's fastest growing, and quickly becoming favorite political podcast. We're getting things started in our second edition of the podcast today with an interview. We're sitting down right now with the Congressman who represents Florida 7, always a pleasure we can catch up with. Representative Corey Mills, welcome back to the show. - Hey, thanks for having me. - No, always a pleasure, Congressman. Listen, there's a lot of stuff going on involving the investigation into the assassination attempt on President Trump. A few weeks ago up in Butler, Pennsylvania, we saw the latest in the long series of committees with the Senate taking their swings at the FBI and Secret Service today, figuratively, obviously. Speaker Johnson announced the bipartisan task force. We kind of rolled our eyes at the roster. You might want to comment on that a little bit as well. But we know this is something that you've been very hands-on with since it happened. You and Representative Eli Crane from Arizona also traveled up to Butler, Pennsylvania to survey the scene and kind of formulate your own opinions or begin to on it. And maybe you can catch our listenership up on the latest. - Yes, as you kind of mentioned, the bipartisan task force was put together by Speaker Johnson, myself and Eli Crane, we're not fortunate enough to be on that task force. And per and simply, we're just not yes meant for leadership. We're not going to give our cards blindly for these out of control spending bills and we're going to push back for the American people whenever push comes to shove, we'll always stand but we the people, not we the government. And I think that has a factor in the business. I think politics is certainly something that was into it, but I can't say for sure. I'm not sure why I would not have been deemed as qualified whenever Speaker Johnson himself actually texts me, telling me that I was uniquely qualified, that he regretted that I didn't make the team, that he would in the future try to find a way to make it up to me not sure what that means. But I just wish his task force well, text a couple of the members there and offered my support and at the end of the day for me, this is about getting answers, this is about transparency, accountability to the American people. This is about ensuring that this never happens again regardless of Republican or Democratic regards or your political affiliation at no point in time as a elected official or as our nominee for president, should we have to be concerned with violence to the extent where we're having attempted vaccinations. You know, you kind of alluded to it, you know, you like Korean, he's a former U.S. Navy SEAL sniper, myself, I'm an Army combat veteran, plus I work with the State Department, another agencies, ran counter sniper teams, ran advanced teams that would have been responsible for this type of thing. And, you know, I confirmed it just the other day with my former team leader, Dining Commissar Major, Ken Christo, who was a former Marsok and JSOC guy, who was our team leader and I said, you know, just like your awesome, how many of these advances do you think that we've done? And he said, I'd be comfortable in saying we've done a week or a thousand of these advances. And so, you know, I have the relative experience to, you know, be able to try and ask the right questions, look at what was going on with regards to counter snipers, request them to subpoena their data log books, look at their range fan, look at where they were actually perceiving any current threats. And I can tell you, if you don't have a full presidential package, like President Trump did not have on the day for the Butler PA incident at six o'clock on July 13th, I would not have recommended that venue. I would have recommended another venue or I would request additional assets and resources because it's not just the building that crooks took the shot from. There's buildings that are exactly through the 12 o'clock of the stage at around 400 yards. That was an easier shot that you could have made. A lot easier, but easy shot that you could have made. There was about 12 different buildings on the other side that you could have looked at as potential shooting spots. I mean, the entire area had many elevated positions that kind of funneled down into that fairground area, which looked like it used to be an old parking lot of sorts, but we got on the counter sniper positions, try to see what their vantage points were. I laid exactly where Thomas Crooks took the shot and found out exactly what type of a silhouette I would have presented for those on the ground. Even those on the ground would have given me a four to six-inch silhouette or portfolio platform. And so they would have been able to see it from the ground where the president was, not to mention the vantage point where the countersmipers were, would have had a much better shot site. We talked to a couple of whistleblowers who come forward with us. They were watching crooks up to 15, 20 minutes ahead of the actual shooting itself, watching them go around and one of the whistleblowers had even made a comment and text message. I didn't realize that Antifa was invited to these things because of the way that Crooks's kind of, I guess, appearance was. And so a lot of things were going on. I mean, look, there's a tremendous amount of mistakes here that was made. I mean, even to the extent that we, there was supposed to be three police officers and I believe they were all in yes, you, that was gonna be staged in that second four window, which would have been able to overlook the building that Crooks took the shot from. And one had to go home unexpectedly and who I've confirmed is a good guy, a good law enforcement officer, had a family emergency, he had to rush home for. But then you had one of the officers who came downstairs because they'd gotten reports of a suspicious activity, suspicious person. And apparently the data card that he had that allows him to go back upstairs didn't work or he had forgotten it. And the other law enforcement officer during that exact time had to go down to let him in. And that's when Crooks accessed a rooftop and then took a shot that were being sold. And so, kind of a perfect storm scenario, but as we all know from the military and rail, so you never leave your post and so properly relieved. And there should have been an understanding of the communications platform for a consolidated comms plan that all of our law enforcement, local, state, and the Secret Service themselves could have coordinated on, but it is my understanding that it's been confirmed multiple times that the Secret Service didn't even show up to the morning briefing and morning meeting prior to the actual event. And that's where your last men in coordination and your actual checks and your checklist should have been gone through. And it appears to me that they basically took a shortcut and didn't do what was necessary. So there needs to be transparency, needs to be accountability, but I can tell you, this is gonna get to a stage. And this is all the listeners. You're gonna hear me say this multiple times 'cause this is a firm belief. This would get to a stage of gross negligence that it would be indistinguishable from purposeful intent and vice versa. So we would get the fact to make sure it doesn't happen again in the future. There definitely has to be accountability held. The American people are tired of just listening to hearings. - Sure. - But, you know, director Cheetoh resigning or, you know, the acting director trying to just, you know, be more combative isn't the solution that we need. We don't need me at couples and I'm responsible. We need accountability to ensure that it doesn't happen again in the future. - You know, there's so much there that you unpack for our listenership. Congressman, it sounds like at the end of the day and having talked with so many of your congressional counterparts, obviously none has experienced as you are in the field of sniper work and counter sniper work, et cetera, but it just sounds like incompetence and ego were the two biggest factors and how this was able to carry, you know, happen. And the fact that, you know, people knew and they ignored it, whether they didn't think it was a credible threat, whether they didn't respect state and local law enforcement and Pennsylvania and the other collaborative agencies outside of the federal ones who, you know, just dropped the ball in every single aspect. And that's kind of the argument and I see the, you know, narrative that a lot of people in Congress are starting to build. This is either completely out of control and competence and ego or this is negligence on a point to where it looks like, you know, they wanted this to happen and at this point I'm getting so many different, you know, takes from people in the political spirit. Now it's hard to disseminate, you know, which one is the correct narrative? They might at the end of the day and at the conclusion of this investigation both be proven true. - Well, and here's the other thing that we have to go ahead and acknowledge, which is that whether it's at the local state or federal level, you know, DEI stands for didn't earn it. - Correct. - And, you know, I tell people all the time that DEI equals DEI, we have to be very cautious in the fact that, you know, like Director Cheetah with her 30 for 30, where she wanted 30% of her workforce on the Secret Service to be female or to have a certain minority level. This is not, you're talking about protecting the most important person on, I would say, not just the US soil but in the world when you talk about someone like President Trump or a US, you know, head of state. And so the fact that we're prioritizing DEI over being qualified in meritocracy is absurd to me. And this is why in every National Defense Authorization Act, I have pushed every single time to pass a amendment that would eliminate DEI from our military to ensure that we get back to true meritocracy. That same thing has to go across the board and the federal government. That has to be the same thing in our university. That's the same thing in our state and local law enforcement, our first responders. It needs to be about who is the most qualified and who is best to do the job. Not your skin color, not your gender, not your religion. It has to be based on meritocracy. And that's what we have to get back to the American Society. - Yeah, you're absolutely right. Tell us a little bit about the emotional level it was for people as close to the president as you are a congressman to have gone through the RNC. - You see President Trump show up on the first night and by the end of the week have completed the ticket by selecting J.D. Vance to be his vice president and then joining wife Melania and the rest of his family on stage after delivering an address that was one of the most broad and, you know, I think party expanding messages probably in the history of American politics. - Well, look, it was a very shocking moment where I received the text that the president shot. And I immediately reached out to those who were close to the family and those in the family with Eric and Don and the others. And, you know, I've gotten a glimpse of what was going on. Obviously we saw the president rise, not in fear, but in defiance, to yell fight, fight, fight. And, you know, what he's talking about there truly is fighting for the American people, fighting for our constitutional rights, liberties and freedoms, and fighting for American exceptionalism. And this is a guy who, you know, I have to quote him, you know, he's taking a bullet for democracy. So I don't wanna hear the left talk to us about how they're protecting democracy or democracies on the ballot or any of this nonsense because we've seen quite the contrary of what's actually going on in the country, but I was honored to be there with the president at the RNC. I'm one of the seriatist for him. And, you know, it was nice to be able to sit behind him in the family box, to be invited up there to talk with him a little bit. JD Vance and I share a very similar background coming from a family that was riddled by addiction. And, you know, I was raised by my grandmother as well, which I didn't call her mama, I called her a nana, more southern thing for me. But she, ultimately, was my mom. And, you know, from the time I was nine years old, we grew up in poverty, you know, we grew up kind of in the rural areas. And so being able to rise even to my level as a United States congressman or, you know, having served in the military and wore that uniform or JD who's ascended to, you know, the senator position and now into the vice presidential nomination, it just shows the greatness of America that our socio-economic backgrounds don't define us. But, I'll tell you, I think that it's a great ticket. I think it's a winning ticket. I'm very positive for November, but I don't think we can rest on our goals. We're gonna have to get out there and flag and we're gonna have to go ahead and make sure that we turn out in vote. That's gonna be more important than ever because that's what lost us, that race. That this has to be too big to rig. That the president talks about, we're making large gains, large steps toward election integrity. But we need to ensure that, you know, the big fix isn't in we can actually go ahead and ensure our American president is Donald J. Trump on November 5th. - You know, and we're gonna stick in that as the last point I wanna make with you. I mean, the Democrats did what they did. Donald Trump is accused of being a coup. I mean, it looks like it's kind of played out that way in real time. I mean, legally, there's probably some parameters that they stayed in, which Joe Biden's stepping down and elevating Kamala Harris as the presumptive Democrat nominee. But as the score gets leveled to zero to zero, 98 days out from election day, Congressman. And everyone that's done so much work over the course of, listen, if you've been on the Trump terrain since day one, for the last nearly nine years, it's time to like, you know, pull up our bridges and tighten our belts and buckle bootstraps and hit the ground running. Just stress to our listenership a little bit more. What needs to be done? Not just in congressional districts, not just at the senator and the governor to a real level, not just in the case of Donald Trump, but nationwide what we need to do to make sure that we win on November 5th. - Well, look, we need to make sure we had poll observers, poll watchers, we need to have volunteers and we need to also make sure that we're not neglecting our down ballot votes. We have to start thinking about the importance of our justices that are being elected, our school board members, our city council, our commissioners, our mayors, our state legislators, which plays such an vital part in things, especially when it comes to certification of elections, et cetera. And so, you know, we really need to start understanding that every single person, even those down ballot votes are exceptionally important. I would even argue those down ballot votes are outside of the president are the most important. So, we got to get out there. We got to ensure election integrity, if you need to go out and people don't have a ride or they're having a bad day, go pick them up, go offer to take them to lunch if they go and vote with you. Go wave signs, go help with, you know, the different polling stations or whatever you can do. But, you know, we have to understand that we're in a very, very difficult position right now. And for the first time in American history, we're gonna spend more on servicing our national debt interests than we will spending in our entire national defense spending. We're gonna now join only 28 empires and nations in the world's history who's ever exceeded 130% of GDP expenditure. We have to understand this is, you know, we continue to say it's the most important election. This could be the very last election that we recognize America as America. I think that if you truly love this country, if you've ever won that uniform or you respect those who fought to defend this country, then get out there and do your part. - Can't frame it any better than that, Congressman. Listen, no one's been busier than you up on Capitol Hill over the course of the last couple of weeks. We usually get you in and out of here quite frequently, but we were so thankful to catch up with you today. We've got your congressional website. Yeah, your reelection website because you guys are out in district live linked in the show description today. Anybody that wants to follow me on social media, where can they check you out? Well, I think that as well. - Well, we can go ahead and follow me on Twitter at, or @CoryMillsFL. You can follow me at TruthSocial at Mills, Florida. And you can follow me on Instagram and all the others on the same handles. - Absolutely fantastic. As it is, every time we can catch up with the congressman who represents Florida 7, Representative Corey Mills, thanks for joining us on the show today. Sir, have a great rest of your week. - Thanks so much. - Jumping back into the news portion of the show here, and it's always great catching up with the Florida Representative, Congressman Corey Mills. And we're gonna be talking about Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, who consequently, we're out on the campaign trail this week. Not together, Kamala Harris, dumping for her now presumptive nomination as the Democrat, I guess, breadwinner at the top of the ticket, and Joe Biden, believe it or not, talking about, well, SCOTUS reform. I don't know what he was there, speaking on behalf of, because he took all 11 minutes that he appeared to deliver remarks on, to stump on reforming the Supreme Court. Have you heard about this, Noah? - Mm-hmm. - Yeah, Joe Biden wants to pass legislation before election day. - You're not having to do that, yeah. - Yeah, before election day, which can do everything like put, I guess, personal restrictions and parameters like an ethics guidelines on all of the Supreme Court justices, make everyone's term no longer a lifetime appointment, but only for 18 years, and pack the court. Of a president's choosing, what up to nine additional justices, which would double the bench, and remember, we only have a six, three margin now, so if we added nine judges that Joe Biden wants to pick, what that would look like for America. He wants Roe v. Wade restored. He wants presidential immunity, believe it or not, eliminated. And I guess out of all the things that Joe Biden probably agreed to behind closed doors, and no matter how much evidence will in long-term be provided or presented to the American public, Joe Biden will never be held accountable for anything that he's ever done criminally as a public figure and a politician. His family won't be either, and that is why he is stumping on reforming the Supreme Court and eliminating presidential immunity. You got a couple clips of him, unfortunately, but yeah, we're gonna hear where he's going with this. Let's check it out. - We've had term limits for presidents in the United States for nearly 75 years after the Truman administration. - What? - And I believe we should have term limits for the Supreme Court justices in the United States as well. (audience cheering) (audience applauding) - In fact, the United States is the only major costals of democracy that gives lifetime seats in their high court determinants. (laughing) - Very tough. - The court membership changes with some regularity. That would be timing for the court's nomination more predictable unless it's over. - Oh, that's water. - Reduce the chance that any single president imposes undue influence in generations to come. - Oh, God. It's not like he's going to be able to read it to the American people, so he would go out and do the speaking event and then a lot of the major media outlets unpacked it in a much more coherent way yesterday evening. But yeah, like I said, ethics guidelines for Supreme Court justices, adding as many justices up to doubling the bench and no longer making it a lifetime appointment. I thought it was pretty wild. I mean, I don't know if you saw the media hit Joe Biden when he got off his plane in Austin, Texas yesterday and they're like, Joe Biden, did you hear that Speaker Johnson said that your proposed Supreme Court legislation is dead on arrival? - And Joe Biden's just standing there and he's like, well, Speaker Johnson's dead on arrival. And the media's like, what? And he's like, yeah, dead on arrival. And they're like, yeah, that's what we said. - No Speaker Johnson said it's dead on arrival. Listen, Jack, he's dead on arrival. And then he just like smiled and put on his Ray Benson got into the limousine. I was like, what the hell is he even touched? Listen. - That actually happened? - Donald Trump almost got assassinated two weeks ago and he's saying that Speaker Johnson is dead on arrival. Is that a soft thread? Is that just him being? - Nah, it just shows that they've totally hung him out to dry. They don't give him any ammunition. They're just like, whatever dude, just go out there. Whatever happens happens, it can't get any worse. As long as you can still walk, you're good. - Well, I'll tell you what it did get to. It got to yelling as Joe Biden usually gets to during his speaking events. I've got more clip from him talking about Supreme Court reformist here. - The court made a ruling for one, a former president. No other president of our history has asked for this kind of immunity for criminal actions. And no president, no former president, not me, not one, not one, has and should have been given an exception because it was such a... - God. - I think you're right Noah. They're just like, all right old man, you know what to do? Try your best on the prompter. And let's see where this goes. Speaker Johnson put out a post that was a direct response to Joe Biden and what he said on the tarmac in Austin yesterday, I'm gonna read it real quick. You know, and again, it's this kind of rhetoric that not only is divisive, but it can become inflammatory. We saw the nth degree of what happens when people take things the wrong way or take it to heart. On a personal level, a couple of weeks ago up in Butler, Pennsylvania, the fact that we almost lost Donald Trump. And I think when, you know, the Democrats are just gonna roll out Joe Biden and let him kind of say stuff like this, it doesn't help and here's the thing, it is dead on arrival. This will never pass in the house and even less so in the Senate because for it to become law, you have to get to 16, it's 5149 Democrat control. Here's Speaker Johnson from his official account yesterday afternoon, President Biden's proposal to radically overhaul the U.S. Supreme Court with tilt the balances of power and he rode not only the root of law, but the American people's faith in our justice system. The proposal is the logical conclusion to the Biden-Harris administration and congressional Democrats' ongoing effort to delegitimize the Supreme Court. We talked about this years ago, state of reckless listenership. When Joe Biden challenged Donald Trump legally by weaponizing the DOJ and the FBI against them, the more cases that Donald Trump would win himself or the Supreme Court would ruin, let's just say appearing on the ballots, the more Democrats would segue towards packing the court and delegitimizing the institution that has judicially held this country together for nearly 250 years, that's me talking, not Speaker Johnson getting back to this here. His proposal is the logic conclusion to the Biden-Harris administration and the congressional Democrats' ongoing efforts to delegitimize the Supreme Court, their cause to expand and pack the court will soon resume. It is telling that the Democrats want to change this system that has guided our nation since its founding simply because they disagree with some of the court's recent decisions. The dangerous gambit of the Biden-Harris administration is dead on arrival in the House. And that's where them asking Joe Biden about it came from. So Chuck Schumer did the Sunday morning new circuit this weekend and he was very quick to weigh in on getting ahead of this proposed legislation that Joe Biden wants to get rolling. - Before he leaves office, let's listen to him. - The Supreme Court is a morass. First, it's an ethical morass. The idea that wealthy individuals, many of them right-wing, can both have paid for cases before the court and at the same time, give justices gifts or trips, is outrageous and frankly, Chief Justice Roberts isn't doing enough to curb it. But it's a morass in even a worse way. This is a MAGA right-wing court. It's already taken the right, away the right to choose. It could very well go further on that. I fear it will. It's siding with the wealthiest of individuals and the powerful interests over the average working family. And it even threatens democracy when it says that a president can get immunity even for certain acts in the presidency. So this court is just a morass, both ethically and substance. - Noah? What's a morass? A morass? - Yeah. - Fuckin' yeah, I don't even know what that one is. It sounds like somebody got the thesaurus out this morning and was just like fucking picked a page. - And then picked a word and said it six times in 54 seconds. - Is that a mor, what? - Yeah, it's good for him. Hold on, I'm lookin' it up. - Well, that's why I tasked you with it. - Morass, it's a city in Peru. I know Moross, maybe he's sayin' the same thing with his upper east side accident there, Morass. Yeah, all I'm gettin' is like MS 13 shit. - Perfect. Well, maybe he's not wrong. But anything that Joe Biden is promoting right now is something that the Democrats have in store for their agenda. If Kamala Harris is able to win the White House. And if anyone thinks that she will not do exactly what they're promoting right now in the next four years, well, you probably need your head examined. I just think it's interesting that for something as inflammatory as this, and again, Chuck Schumer did exactly what the Democrat talking points instruct him to do, all of the gatekeepers and the masters of the narrative behind the scenes. Listen, you don't have to explain everything. Use a word that nobody knows, and then take it, and when you're saying this word over and over again, talking about packing the Supreme Court, and just say Magga Republicans, just throw one, oh, this is a Magga Republican Supreme Court. And Chief Justice Roberts has no control over it. So then you get people thinking like, really, is this what's going on here? And listen, there are a lot of politically uneducated or casual pastors by of politics out there who hear Chuck Schumer talk. They've always been around forever. They see his, the Chiron at the bottom of the screen, leader Schumer. And now we say, oh, you know, Magga Republicans. Well, dammit, we have to vote for Kamala Harris because, you know, she's gonna save democracy and put nine additional radical progressive Marxists can't identify a gender or a race. Let's go to judges on the bench with these Magga ones to counter it. It would be absolutely disastrous for our country. - So I think I found it morass. An area of low-lying, soggy ground. A tract of soft, wet ground, a marsh, a fen. Or something that hinders engulfs or overwhelms. - So he's saying like the current buildup of the Supreme Court is the Magga Trump Republican version of the swamp, essentially, possibly. - Yeah, maybe inadvertently. - He's an idiot. And the wool has been pulled over the eyes of a lot of people in America, especially with what happened regarding Joe Biden and him getting removed from the ticket to be the presumptive nominee in the Democrat party. You know, it's gonna be interesting. We're getting ready to catch up with Harmet Dillon. You know, she's a civil litigation attorney. She does a lot of work for President Trump. She's dialed into this stuff. We're gonna ask her about it. So maybe we could move on from this talking point in the future on the constitutional level and how much does this kind of throw everything to the wind with what they did with Joe Biden? Maybe it doesn't. Maybe this is just the Democrats use legal avenues to rig their elections. And this is just doing what they did to Bernie Sanders and a lot more condensed version. We'll get to the bottom of it 'cause we're gonna ask her. Ron Clayne, who is the former chief of staff for Joe Biden, a spot that is now currently held by a man that we don't regard in any highness here on the show, but Noah likes to say his name, Jeff Zients. Zients! Was on MSD and C yesterday. And he basically said the quiet part out loud. A lot of people miss this. You might not hear it anywhere else, I guess technically other than MSD and C. Let's check it out. - You sounded a little different than the president in both his letter and his speech. Are you speaking only for yourself? Are you speaking about something that he is too gracious to say out loud, that this was to some degree a disloyal or unfair push by elected and donors, as you called them, after the primary voters had spoken? - I speak only for myself there, Ari. And I do think what happened to the president was unfair. - So without saying the words, he called it a coup. - I, yeah, we have to understand the cards we've been given are the ones, I don't wanna say because it sounds very cliché, are the ones that have been dealt. But this is what we have to roll with here. Kamal Harris was out on the campaign trail yesterday. She was doing an event, I believe in Philadelphia. She was flanked by top dogs in the Democrat party, both who of which are probably being considered for vice president. I don't know if either one of them will get it. That's Pennsylvania governor Josh Shapiro, who's got a little bit more chance of possibility of being her VP or Gretchen Whitmer, who essentially said she's not looking to be attached to the ticket. I've got clips on both of them, let's hear it. (audience applauding) - And let's be clear, Kamal Harris has more experience than the Trump bands ticket combined. (audience cheering) - Between the two of those dudes, they're only at five and a half years and it's not public service. It's self-service that they're in the business. (audience cheering) - Now no one can stand here, but get ready for her to get shoved down everyone's throat next election cycle, because she's gonna be like the second coming of Hillary Clinton for sure. And you know, saying stupid shit like she did just there is to gain an applause, but the angle that they're looking to take in this upcoming election cycle, the very short nature of it as well, public defender, district attorney, prosecutor Harris versus criminal, slimy, convicted felon, Donald Trump. Here's what I'm saying just that. - As district attorney, she put crooks, crooks and sex offenders behind bars. (audience cheering) And it makes me think maybe that's why Donald Trump's so scared of her. (audience cheering) (audience cheering) - Shut up bitch! - I literally can't stand her. You know, whether it was the fake kidnapping attempt honey pot that they tried to get those people up in Michigan and with the FBI saying that they were gonna kidnap her, like the FBI agents were literally having sex with regular people as an attempt to try and get them to it. Well, yeah, I don't really like the decisions that are going on with COVID, but, you know, I don't know about kidnapping the governor. Oh no, we should totally kidnap her. Yeah, I don't know if that's a good idea. If I slept with you, would it be a better idea? It might be. What's to see? And this is literally what was going on behind the scenes during that whole debacle that went on up there in Michigan where Gretchen Wotmer wanted to put attention, not so much on herself because she was jet setting all over the country while she kept her own state lockdown to party in Georgia, to party in Florida. I believe she went to Europe one time as well. And this will be the next and the second coming of Hillary Clinton in the form of the current Michigan governor in the next election cycle as well. But, you know, like I said, someone who's got a little bit more political capital at the moment and is being looked at and I guess vetted more heavily as a potential completion of the Democrat. Take it presumptively and ahead of their national convention is Pennsylvania governor Josh Peril, let's hear him. I've never seen this guy like when he's on a stage, he like kind of meanders over, you know, can't really walk well and he goes over to the flag and he like hugs the flag and I love the flag, but it's a weird thing he does, right? But while he's hugging the flag, you know what he's doing? He's ripping away our freedoms. That's what he's all about because here's what I know. It's not freedom to tell our children what books they're allowed to read. That's not freedom. (audience cheering) It is not freedom to tell people they can go to work but they can't join a union, that's not freedom. (audience cheering) It is not freedom to tell women what they're allowed to do with their bodies, that's not freedom. (audience cheering) Oof, there it is. So stupid. Nothing about securing the border, nothing about bringing down the price of inflation, nothing about energy independence, nothing about making the streets safer. Donald Trump's crazy, Donald Trump's old, Donald Trump's weird and he wants to take away a woman's right to abortion, that's what they have to campaign on right now. Nothing policy-wise at all, it's an embarrassment. So Segway in here, and actually, let's check in one more time. Guys, wherever you're listening to the show today and no matter what platform it's on, please make sure you're subscribed to the State for Records podcast. You can find us on Apple, Spotify, iHeart, Samsung, Amazon, or wherever you're listening to your shows. Just do us one favor. You click on the podcast and then it's gonna have another clickable button, follow, plus follow, subscribe. It's free. You click that, the show downloads to your electronic device, whether it's your laptop, your PC, your phone, tablet, et cetera. Helps us out big time, doesn't cost you a dime. Then you can find us on social media as well. Twitter, get our true social, Instagram, TikTok. We have accounts on all them. Find them, follow them, hit the notification bell. You'll never miss out on all the great stuff we've got here on the show. Like in a moment when we catch up with the woman who heads the Dylan Law Group, pardon me, Dylan. I didn't pull anything from this 'cause it was just, hey Philadelphia, you guys ready to beat Donald Trump? But actually when Kamal Harris landed in Pennsylvania yesterday, they caught her on the tarmac and they were talking to her about border stuff. And when you hear the unscripted, unprepared for answer, she was able to deliver before she went over to, I guess now, Harris HQ and talk to 70 supporters there. Here's what she told the press on some things related to the border. - You've got a great DOP leader. - I am meeting with a lot of folks and the work that we have begun is the work that is gonna be ongoing. There is no question, and I said this from the very beginning, that our approach to this issue has to be with a commitment to a long-term investment. - Don't say unburdened. - The commitment to consistency, the United States has to be consistent. There were times when we were more engaged and we saw good results, less engaged, and we can see where the work and the partnerships then deteriorate. So I am committed to ensuring that we engage in an active way on the root causes, on addressing the cause and effect, and also being partners in the Western Hemisphere, understanding that we have a responsibility, and if we ignore that responsibility, it will visit itself upon us in a very domestic way. - You wanna know what's funny? She also came out today and said, she supports a nationwide mandatory buyback program. Not talking about for used cars, no, you know what she's talking about. - Yeah. - Good luck with that, lady. - Yeah, no. (laughs) - Donald Trump took particular notice and had issue with the fact that she was getting so much coverage this week on Fox News since her rollout. He put out a post on True Social, stating just as such, I'm gonna read it right now. Why is Fox News putting crazy Kamala Harris rallies on? Why do they allow perverts at the failed and disgraced Lincoln Project to advertise on their network as well? Even Mr. Kellyanne Conway, a man so badly hurt and humiliated by his wife in parentheses, she must have done some really nasty things to him because he is crazy, is now advertising on Fox News. We have to win without Fox News. And that comes on the heel of, no, you saw that they were trying to scrub the internet of everything assassination related to Donald Trump, whether it be on Google, Facebook, Instagram, et cetera, this week? Yeah, of course, why would anything change? Why would they not continue to do the same fucked up shit that they're doing? Because even though we catch 'em doing it, they're just like, whatever, we're just gonna keep doing it. - Yeah, you could put in any multiple combinations that filled the search bar with something looking to find information on the Trump assassination and the only thing that came up was positive articles for Kamala Harris on Google. And then on Facebook and Instagram, both owned by Meta and Mark Lizzardberg. The iconic picture of Donald Trump putting his fist up, face bloodied at the rally in Butler, Pennsylvania two weeks ago, has now, well, it was briefly, it's been taken away, labeled sensitive material and blurred out on the platform. Gotta love it. - I don't love it. - Well, you know what I love is the fact that we're often right here on the show. And like I had mentioned in our first podcast today, - I've been right a lot. - Yeah, Pocahontas herself, Elizabeth Warren, jumped on with, well, Jake Tappers, CNN, fake news, state of the fake union on Sunday to talk about one of the big policy points that they're already pushing in a presumptive Harris administration. I'll give you a clue. We got over 10 million reasons to be scared shitless, let's hear it. Recognize, and I know that Kamala Harris knows this, this is a problem that ultimately has to be solved by Congress. We need the tools in order to have more resources at the border, to have more resources in the states and cities that are supporting migrants. And I believe we need to create a pathway to citizenship. All of that is part of what we need to do for comprehensive immigration reform. Kamala Harris will work with Congress and get that done. - Makes my stomach hurt. When she said, when she went down that path of amnesty right there, Jake Tappers eyes opened up and then he looked down at his papers real quick to see if that was one of the talking points that he would be prepared to ask a follow-up question on. And then he looks sideways at his producer and then back at her real quick voice, that's just something Elizabeth Warren ran with. But listen, we've given you so many different instances of where the Democrats, albeit, they're fucking deranged and want nothing more than see this country burn itself down to the ground. But they will tell you exactly what they're doing, exactly what they're doing. And I don't want anybody to be surprised or you guys have to rely on other avenues out there to say like, oh my God, I never heard about this before. We've been talking about it for years. When Joe Biden knew that there would be no path to a second term or he was able to remain so popular that Donald Trump couldn't beat him in a head-to-head matchup, the biggest amnesty package in the history of the galaxy would be the final piece of his legislative legacy. We're not going to see it via Joe Biden now, but it's something on the other side of Kamala Harris winning on November 5th that American needs to be prepared for and make sure at the ballot box we stop. So we'll leave it at that as we're getting ready to jump in with Harvey Dillon, but before we do another check-in with one of our partners. It's an unpleasant truth that 42% of Americans are obese and 79% of Americans are overweight. That's practically one in every two Americans living day to day with every minute counting down to the end of an unhealthy existence. It's time to change that and make Americans healthy again. You've probably heard about weight loss injections that can help you get back into that right mindset and help curb those cravings so you can focus on what's really important. New Hope Wellness has changed thousands of lives and maybe it can change yours too. They are American family owned and operated with the goal of saving lives. With convenient telehealth options, you can speak to a licensed professional from the comfort of your own home and all products are delivered discreetly to your front door. Visit newhobellness.com/state and start your journey to a better you. That's newhobellness.com/state to get your free consultation and a hundred bucks off your first order. 1-800-527-2150. Make America healthy again. - All right, joining us next on the show today to speak Tuesday edition of the "Stake to Breakfast" podcast. She's the founder of the Dillon Law Group. She's joining us again and welcoming back Miss Harmee Dillon. Thanks for coming on the show. - Happy to be here. - Well, listen, we've had a really busy couple of weeks. There's a lot of stuff going on in and outside of the media that shaped the political spectrum and what it's gonna look like between now and November. And we're glad to hear to get some of your commentary and insight on. And I do wanna start off with the fallout from the RNC convention. I thought it was a great convention, probably one of the best one in decades. Lot of good messaging, widening of the tent, broad stroke of speakers. I'm sure you'll agree that bring a lot of perspective into, you know, this year's convention wasn't just about Donald Trump and wasn't just about Republican politics. It's about how the radical progressive agenda of the left has kind of shaped America over the course of the last nearly four years. And we saw a lot of examples of not just aspects from political figures, but those who are directly affected by it. And I wanna kind of get your perspective on how you thought it shook out. - Well, I thought it was great. I've been to a few conventions over the years. Three is RNC committee woman or committee woman elect. And I thought this was by far the most united. I've seen the party ever. You know, the energy in the room was really just kind of vibrating. Everybody was on one wavelength. And, you know, what was really exciting was to see all these people who never would have been on the stage of a Republican convention before come and share their viewpoints with us. And so the party's big tent has actually broadened. And that's really important for winning elections. And I know that upsets a few Republicans who have their nickers and a twist about Amber Rose and, you know, some different kinds of speakers there. But ultimately the party is about winning elections. And the fact that we've been able to add people from different walks of life, blue collar workers, union officials, entertainment figures to our body politic is really going to help us win in November. And so I'm excited about it. It shows also that Donald Trump has consolidated sort of his change, his mark on the party. And we're now looking towards the next generation. I thought JD Vance is a great choice to sort of carry on that mantle. - Agreed. - And it is not your parents' GOP anymore. - No, how important do you think it was for at the beginning of Donald Trump's speech to kind of lay it out there for, you know, a lot of people, the hardliners in the Republican party. Listen, we like the America First Agenda, those bullet points in Agenda 47 that he promotes so well out on the campaign trial about immigration, making the streets safe, getting our refooting geopolitically, closing down the border, et cetera. Like those are the things that are going to help this country prosper, get the economy back on track and all the things that I just aforementioned. But the fact of the matter is that he said he was running to be the president of the United States, not the president of the Republican party. And I think it's that consistent and constant widening of the tent that Donald Trump tries to do. You see it a lot in his retail politicking, whether it's at a UFC event or a Bodega in New York City, at a Chick-fil-A in Atlanta, Georgia, et cetera, that he wants to be able to bring in more people to understand like, I'm not just trying to make my friends or my party or those closely aligned with me, more prosperous in my next term. I really want to get this country back on the right track. And I thought by him outlining that was a good, I don't want to say shots fired or, you know, shot across the bow of the hardliners in the Republican party, but listen, America is hurting right now. We've inched towards World War III. The border is something that's going to take a very long time to repair. And then when you talk about all of the, you know, ways that this has led to other things failing in our country right now, it seems like it's the correct time to kind of lay that out there. - Yeah, I totally agree. And this needs to be the tone going forward. He's won the Republican party. That's been done for months now. And it is his party. We need to focus on expanding that majority to margins beyond cheating, quite frankly. We need to energize voters to register and vote. I mean, Scott Kressler has been out there telling us that there's hundreds of thousands of gun owners in Pennsylvania, for example, an important swing state who weren't registered to vote at the beginning of the cycle. And so getting those people to vote and communicating with them the importance of the selection and the turnout is a critical part of our success. And it isn't just about getting Donald Trump elected people. - Everyone was frustrated with the sort of, you know, I don't know how to put this politely, the sort of, you know, sort of parliamentary rhetoric that we see in Congress and the Senate with hearings being held. I mean, that's like strongly worded letters and hearings are held and nothing ever happens. We actually need better and more members of Congress and Senate who are with this America First Agenda and who will advance it. Not just talk about it on television and talk shows and podcasts, but actually do something. And so the coattails of Donald Trump in that regard and him bringing more voters in to help us win some of those pickup seats is incredibly important. - No, that's a great point you put out there. And then when you talk about the legislative aspect of it, you know, it's great to have Congressman and women, both in the House and Senate who get endorsed by Donald Trump, but it's their ability to not only get out on the campaign trail and talk about the widening of the 10 and the expansion of that message, but actually following through legislatively when they get up to Capitol Hill, it seems like there are very few in Congress right now who have the fortitude to be doing that. We have seen more move in the direction of wanting to get this country back on track, I think in the last session or two, it's definitely better than it was in 2018, but moving forward and with the opportunity to have Donald Trump in office for another four years, this is a make or break time for Congress to really show that they're gonna have to make the hard choices, everything from budgetary cuts to passing that America First Agenda. I mean, obviously the law is where you practice, it's obviously the strongest tool that you bring to the table as well. And, you know, there's a lot of people who saw what happened over the course of the last week, which Joe Biden's stepping down and then the pushing of Kamala Harris towards the presumptive nomination, you know, constitutionally, there is a lot of questions on how this is legal, how Kamala Harris could, you know, just kind of slide into the nomination presumptively for the DNC ahead of their virtual, you know, delegate sorting and then the Democrat National Convention later in August. But how is, you know, you are able to be elevated to the presumptive nominee, the Democrat Party, without a single ballot being cast and how can, you know, moving forward, America say that the party that is supposedly transparent and historic and the protection of all things election related is now basically taking, well, essentially people off the street and allowing them to be the nominee for the highest office in all of the, well, essentially the world. - Right, I agree with you. However, this isn't really a constitutional issue because our constitution relegates to the states, the, you know, sort of criteria and qualifications, how they run their primaries or caucuses or what have you, how they in the states select their electors, of course, but how they select their nominees even before that. And so most states allow the Democratic National Committee to decide who the nominee is going to be. They have a process of sending delegates to the committee, but those delegates have all been pledged now by Joe Biden, who's withdrawn from the race, he's released his delegates to support Kamala Harris. So I think it's a foregone conclusion that that's gonna be an appropriate method under state law to do that. Is it appropriate to the voters in ignoring 14 plus million voters? I mean, that's the point we have to make as Republicans that this is a installation of a candidate, not an election of a candidate or a nomination of a candidate from the party. And, you know, it's kind of an empty talking point, however. We've seen time and time again over the last few election cycles, Democrats will elect Joe Biden, Democrats will elect John Federman, Democrats will elect, you know, empty vessels to office. It doesn't really matter. And that's the beauty of their system. They can install any puppet with extreme views and they have a machine to get that person elected. I'm envious of that as a Republican. I wish I had a machine to get my candidates installed. I don't have a machine. We have a process where we respect the voters, we have to persuade them that's kind of old fashioned in a way, but we have to understand that the new realpolitik is machine politics. And so I'm glad to see some Republicans stepping up there. The RNC is with the program. We have outside groups like Turning Point Action and some others, some large donors are supporting ballot gathering and ballot chasing efforts in the States. We have to build our own machine on the Republican side to do that. I'm not saying we should ever ignore the will of the voters the way the Democrats have done this election cycle, but hey, it's early days. And I think that a lot of Democrats are going to be uncomfortable with Kamala Harris if we do our job as Republicans to show the radical she is. And I suggest to your viewers to take a look at my piece in the Hill this week published on Monday about how I'm a civil rights lawyer. I've litigated against Kamala Harris. I've done this work for over 30 years. And Kamala Harris is a civil rights disaster. She repudiates every principle and every norm in our constitution. But whether you're right or left, she was in favor of prison overcrowding and refusing to let people go who had proven their innocence in murder cases. So she's a terrible bad news on that front. And if liberals are honest, I think they're going to agree with that. - Yeah, I think you make some good points there. I didn't want it to continue to remain a talking point. You see it a lot in the media on how we got to this point to what Kamala Harris, I'm glad you could lay that out there for our listenerships or at least we can move on from it as well. And I want to talk about the media and the pollsters who have now kind of tried to rationalize Kamala Harris. Over the course of the last month, we've seen so much stuff happen on the Republican side. Obviously there was the assassination attempt on President Trump to fall out from that. And then you had the RNC and Donald Trump and JD Vance have gone out and hit the campaign trail doing like damn close to 10 events total between the both of them since the RNC concluded last weekend. But you also had Joe Biden who was completely fit and doing cartwheels behind the scenes in one of the sharpest people that any of the Democrats had ever known behind the scenes just a few weeks ago. And a lot of talk of Kamala Harris dragging the ticket down. It wasn't Joe Biden's problem. It wasn't his delivery or his debate performance or anything like that. It was Kamala Harris that was making him like an unappealing complete ticket for Democrat voters. And now you've elevated her to the presumptive nominee and she's the greatest thing since sliced bread. You know, all of the polls have kind of been astroturfed out from what Joe Biden's abysmal numbers looked like to ones that were similar to Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump back in 2015. You know, you have all the media singing her praises and things of that nature. It seems like they've moved on because they've got a new shiny object to play with. They've also got their talking points and marching orders from the elites within the party, the donor class, the Obama's, the Clintons, et cetera. But how is it that the media is able to just, you know, perform these theatrics on almost a weekly basis now and say that she was an awful candidate and should be dropped as the Democrat vice presidential pick less than a month ago. And now she's, you know, the strongest thing that Donald Trump will ever face in his political career. - Well, we know the answer to that, it's a rhetorical question. The media is part of the Democratic establishment and they can reliably be counted on to propagate those talking points. We've seen this time and time again, be it a Russia gate, be it January 6th, insurrection, be it whatever the talking points are of the left, Democrat media, happily, parents, those back. However, you know, you have to, in this case, rely on voters to spending their own judgment. And you look at Kamala Harris and her, you know, she's kind of an out of sight for the most of the three and a half years of the Biden presidency. And that's for good reason, because she's a terrible presence for the Democrat. She's awkward, weird, you know, talk about the word weird that they use on JD Vance. She's weird, she tackles uncomfortably, she's fake. And now she's having to rapidly retreat from some of her most extreme positions that she's taken. Mark'sism, contributing to bail funds that have allowed murderers and other criminals to get out and so forth. So it's our job to hold her accountable, to use those Alinsky tactics, if you will, to, you know, focus on her and really tell the story of Kamala Harris. And so, you know, we cannot have squeamish Mitt Romney slash Bush era type Republicans clutching their pearls if you hit hard. There's plenty to hit hard about above the bell with her terrible record. I think we just need to tell that record over and over again and contrast it with our record and what we propose to offer to Americans. If Americans want San Francisco, I'm looking out the window here in my San Francisco home and, you know, within probably a block, we've got people passed out with fentanyl and, you know, no matter if you're a multi-million dollar neighborhood, it doesn't matter. There are drug addicts everywhere. There's homelessness everywhere. There's sex trafficking and human trafficking in our city. If you want that in your city, then vote for Kamala Harris because she brought that as the Attorney General of California. She wrote a deceptive title and summary for Prop 47, the crime measure that loosened up our criminal justice and allowed people to get away with literal murder here with little or no consequences. And so that's Kamala Harris and we need to tell that story. Those of us here in California have a lot to say about it and we cannot let her and the Democrats escape their radical record. And look, do I think that if Barack Obama were able to design this election cycle, he would want either Kamala Harris or Joe Biden to be the nominee at this point. I think they'd rather have a clean slate, but they can't. I think they've realized that they would alienate too much of their base. So they're trying to hold onto that base. I'm not sure what their scheme is to elect Kamala Harris, but, you know, honestly, she's so unpopular. It's ours to lose, not that I give Republicans too much credit and, you know, we might very well find the ball, but I think people are pulling together and they're realizing like this may be the last opportunity to vote for the America that we know and love. And if you let a Marxist, open Marxist get in there, we're installed by a Democrat machine, a billionaire, globalist, America as we know it is done for. I mean, just you don't have to speculate about that. Joe Biden is wheeling out this measure to alter the Supreme Court, which the founders installed as one of our three important branches of government. They're going to undercut that. What happens when you have a stool with three legs and you cut off half of it? You know what happens. The whole thing collapses. And so we really have to protect that. We have to protect our way of life. And we have to vote like our life depends on it 'cause it does. - And then, you alluded to campaigning with the gloves off. I mean, I want you to just double down on that a little bit. You know, it was so easy to take shots at Joe Biden. I mean, just based off of his physical and mental acuity over the course of the last couple of years, he can't read off a teleprompter the amount of times he's fallen, obviously his performance against Donald Trump in the debate, et cetera. But now you have people on the Republican side saying like, oh yeah, you really can't do the same things with Kamala Harris, you know, even though her laugh is atrocious for the fact that the last three years, Joe Biden has literally sent her to the most obscure corners of the globe to do literally nothing when she's ever had the opportunity to, you know, stand before organizational bodies like the G7 or NATO. She's been an absolute disaster not knowing what she's talking about, making awful references and talking points as well. But, you know, it's like the Republicans want to play nice just because she's a woman or maybe a person of color, maybe both. I mean, I really don't know where this commentary is coming from, but it's a lot of the big pundits and in the mainstream, I'm sure you saw, I mean, listen, we all know he's a never-trumper and just a, you know, a little robot for the Murdochs. But Neil Cavuto yesterday, what he did to Senator Kennedy saying that none of that stuff should even be considered. You should talk about other things, like the bad poll numbers for Donald Trump. It's like, I can't believe that's on a conservative news outlet. But the fact of the matter is, it looks like Donald Trump's got the gloves off, but in my opinion, I think Republicans are a little squeamish to see him go up against Kamal Harrison. And when you look at the numbers and the tail of the tape, as you've so elegantly laid out over the course of the last 15 minutes now, it seems like it's, you know, an absolute home run for Republicans. They should be able to destroy her based on her record. The fact that her previous record is what it is, her current record is everything that Joe Biden was. And Donald Trump was absolutely doing fantastic in the polls and in favorability, just, you know, like two, three days ago. - Look, I do think there's a valid point to be had that with such a wealth of substantive critique that can be brought to bear about her record. She's been in public office for 30 years. All the whole time I've been, you know, here in San Francisco, she's been almost 30 years in public office. So there's a lot to talk about with her failures that every single job she's failed and failed up. So talking about shallow stuff about, you know, I think her personal background or what have you, I think people are more interested in the substance. And I think that's actually going to win us more votes. And we don't want to turn off any voters if we can avoid it. But I think if we just stick to terrible record as, first of all, getting her first job and how did she get that crummy-ism, that's fair to talk about how do you make your way into cushy government appointed jobs and then parlay that into district attorney. And by the way, I haven't even had a chance to tell that story yet, but when she became the district attorney, she was corrupt in the sense that her patrons who got her there specifically, Willie Brown, he had business before the DA's office. He had partners who were being prosecuted by the DA's office. Those prosecutions were dismissed by Kamala Harris's office. Okay, so that's corruption. That's a story that needs to be told. There's the gross failures of observing the basic premises of civil rights due process that allowed criminals to be released into our streets convicted criminals, 600 of them. That's Kamala Harris. Kamala Harris, the attorney general who tried to force conservative and other nonprofits to disclose their donors in violation of the United States Supreme Court precedent, which the court slapped her office on, refusing to obey federal court orders on prison overcrowding, denying civil rights and due process to people. Let's not forget her record as Senator, trying to humiliate Brett Kavanaugh, otherwise being completely unremarkable, other than having the most liberal voting record of any United States senator. And given some of the senators, we have Elizabeth Warren and some other complete clowns. That's a pretty impressive factor to mention. And then of course, her record as a vice president. I do think it's appropriate to talk about things like her management style. She's had a huge amount of turnover in her staff because she's a jerk. She's an egomaniac. She makes people, you know, when she was the attorney general, stand up and address her as general Harris when she walked into the room. I mean, who does that? You know, that's crazy. And so these are, you know, you have to look, understand who are you talking to, understand that your message is gonna be plagued in front of all kinds of audiences and focus. I could talk all day about Kamala Harris' failures on the record as an elected official or an appointed official. And that's what we should be focusing on. And I think if we stray into gender politics too much or who she slept with, I think that does turn off some voters and I don't think it's material, but there's plenty of things adjacent to that that are absolutely material. Like the corruption I mentioned with Willy Brown. Like things like that, I think those are all appropriate and fair games. So everyone should do what they think is right here, but understand that we have a country to save here and we should be disciplined and mature and not go for the low hanging fruit. Let's do the work and tell the story of Kamala Harris. The story that her people are actively trying to whitewash and erase from the internet. It's our job to dig deep. And I've got SFPD cops who dealt with her back then and who know her record of releasing drug dealers into our community here in San Francisco. They're telling that story. The media is not telling that story. It's our job to tell that story. - No, it certainly is. And that's a great amount of information that you've laid out for our listenership. Just real quick, tell us about the next 98 days. I mean, it is no time other than now. There are some people who are so compelled to get involved, but they don't know what to do. They don't know how to do it. They fear in their community, if they decide to come out for a certain candidate or maybe they even start to talk people outside of their close groups about like, I always tell people, you should never lead into a conversation into politics talking about abortion rights. Talk about like how expensive everything is and that could be a slippery slope that takes you to some other items that are, you know, at the top of the ticket for people that are making considerations still on who they're gonna vote for for November 5th. But I mean, this is not your first rodeo. Obviously, it sounds like you're more than prepared to go out and fight for the America First Agenda and get Donald Trump back to the White House. But tell our listenership right now, what are some of the things that they absolutely have to do between now and November 5th? - Yeah, okay. So first of all, you and I are kind of perpetually, we're part of the perpetually online class and I see a lot of those influential people. They think that, you know, owning the lives and shitposting and rage tweeting is campaigning. It's interesting and fun, it really isn't. It kind of moves the needle for a few people, but not many. - Sure. - What we need to do is just what you said. I've started having conversations, even here in San Francisco with every Uber driver or taxi driver, and you can say, oh my God, can you believe how expensive this is? Oh my God, look at that person who had spent no poisoning on the street. This is terrible. They'll usually agree with you 'cause they're normal people. They're working people and like nobody wants to see that. These are people with families and lives. And so then you get into it and you realize that we've been afraid as Republicans because the left has demonized our candidate and demonized us so much. With January 6th, of course, there was an official demonization of conservatives. We have been demonized since we're afraid to talk about who we are and what we believe. No, we're actually in mainstream normal people. We believe in families. We believe in small government. We believe in economic opportunity. We believe that people who come here to this country legally and work hard, they're part of this country and we love them. We believe in growing opportunity and we believe in America first. That's natural, that's normal. The rest of the world, France. People in France believe in France first. That's normal. We should not be ashamed of that. So that's what we need to do. If you're antsy and you're wanting to help, contact some of these outside groups, like Scott Presser's group or Turning Point USA or Turning Point Action, rather, I should say, or your state party and find out what are they doing to get out the vote? What are they doing to get their neighbors to register to vote? The key to winning this election for Republicans is going to be converting low propensity or non-registered voters into Republican voters. So that means multiple points of contact. It isn't one door hanger, boom, and you're done. It's calling these people. It's talking to these people. It is influencing these people. It is making that your job for the next 98 days. And if we all do that and leave it all on the field-- and by the way, if you can't do that and you can write checks-- do write checks. And again, people out there to these fundraisers write those checks. I wrote my big check to the campaign. And I think everyone should give what they can, but more importantly, roll up their sleeves and put in the elbow grease and do that. No. I mean, you brought the big commentary today to Harmony. We really appreciate it. We got the Center for American Liberty, live linked in our show description and anywhere else that we could find you on social media or your handles, we'll live link that as well. @PNJABAN on Twitter and Instagram. And I'm speaking here in my capacity as the Republican National Committee woman from California, but I also do have this nonprofit and the law firm, which does election law and we're proud to represent the Trump campaign and President Trump personally. So thanks for following. Doing a lot of great work and an absolute warrior for America versus the founder of the Dylan Law Group. She does outstanding work for the RNC in California as well. Ms. Armie Dylan, thanks for joining us on the show today. Have a great rest of your week. Thanks you too. Susan Lert, this just in half past the hour. We are now learning that Speaker Johnson and Leader Hakim Jeffries have announced that members will be leading a bipartisan task force to investigate the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. Charing that task force will be Rhett Mike Kelly. He is the chairman from Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania's 16th District. He has longstanding ties to the local law enforcement community. There, Mark Green will be on the committee, US Army major, combat veteran, ER physician, David Joyce from Ohio. Will also be on the task force among the Democrats on the force. Jason Crow from Colorado, decorated former Army Ranger, served in Iraq and Afghanistan. Also, Chrissy Hulahan from Pennsylvania, veteran of the US Air Force. So this is a bipartisan group, a task force that is coming together to investigate the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump. So we're just learning about this. Seven Republicans on that task force, six Democrats. All right. Jumping back into the news portion of the show here. Last news segment on the back end of two big Tuesday editions of "Stake for Breakfast." And as always, an honor and a pleasure catching up with harmee Dylan. And we're going to be looking into the best of the rest and biggest headlines that are crossing the wire today from the Beltway and beyond. So they announced yesterday Noah, this bipartisan group of Congress people, to investigate the assassination attempt on Donald Trump's life in Butler, Pennsylvania, a few weeks ago. The one thing that really didn't move the needle for me actually kind of took a little bit of the wind out of my sails and angered me a little bit was there were two people notable who were not added to this task force. And that's Florida congressman, former combat veteran and sniper. Great friend of the show, Corey Mills. And former Navy SEAL Eli Crane, who both went out on their own and did part of an independent investigation into what went down in Pennsylvania a few weeks ago. What do you think? Yeah. I was listening to Tim Poole, and he keeps calling Eli Crane a harmee sniper or something like that. I was like, yeah, he got that one wrong, but-- Yeah, it really bothers me. Congresswoman Corey Mills put out a statement yesterday that he'll be looking to, along with Eli Crane, do an independent investigation on his own dime and provide results to the American people, the conclusion of said investigation at a point in the near future. So we'll keep tabs on that. We're also trying to catch up with the Florida congressman. He's been busy. He's been all over the place. And we're going a lot behind the scenes. I talked to him frequently almost daily. And we're looking to get him back here in the show as soon as possible. So while this investigation and task force takes off, we have ongoing today, the Senate version of the congressional oversight into the breakdown of all things intelligence related at the Trump rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, a few weeks ago. Listen, a lot of grandstanding, a lot of yelling and screaming. We didn't get-- well, we got the new, I guess, acting director of the Secret Service. And then a top surrogate. You've seen him. He looks like a cookie cutter, like state trooper from the FBI, the number two man there, under Christopher Ray, who is never really available for anything unless they subpoena him or drag him in by his shirt collar. So I did pull one clip from that. As the committee is now over for the day, very few questions were answered, even though a lot of them were asked, but emotions spilled over onto the committee room floor. And you'll hear it in this exchange between the acting secret service director Ronald Roe Jr. and Texas Senator Ted Cruz. [VIDEO PLAYBACK] -Ronald Roe Jr., is there a decision-maker? -It's not a bureaucracy, senator, it's a process. -Give me the person that's a decision-maker. Is there one? -Senator, it's a conversation. It's not just an absolute-- -So let me tell you what I believe. I believe that the secret service leadership made a political decision to deny these requests. And I think the Biden administration has been suffused with partisan politics. Did the same person who denied the request for additional security to President Trump also repeatedly denied the request for security to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose father was murdered by an assassin and whose uncle was murdered by an assassin? Did the same person make that decision? -Senator, what I will tell you is that secret service agents are not political. -Okay, you're not answering my question. -I'll get to your answer, Senator, if you allow me to. -The leadership appointed by the president is political. I have a simple question. Yes or no. Did the same person deny the Trump request that also denied the RFK request? That's a yes or no question. -Senator, that is not a yes or no question. One, there is a process for a candidate nominee to receive protection. -Does the buck stop and will-- -Does the buck stop any way? -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any way. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Do the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. -Does the buck stop any. [BLANK_AUDIO]
