Angie has made it easier than ever to hire high quality pros to get all your home service jobs done well. Whether it's routine maintenance and emergency repair or a dream project, Angie lets you compare quotes from multiple local pros, browse homeowner reviews, and even book a service instantly. Angie's been connecting people with skilled pros for nearly 30 years. So the next time you have a home project, bring it to Angie to get your job done well. Download the free Angie mobile app today or visit Angie.com. That's A-N-G-I.com. Hi, I'm Angie Hicks, co-founder of Angie. When you use Angie for your home projects, you know all your jobs will be done well. Roof repair, done well. Kitchen sink install, done well, deck upgrades, done well. Electrical upgrade, done well. Angie's been connecting homeowners with skilled pros for nearly 30 years. So we know the difference between done and done well. Buy your high quality certified pros at Angie.com. While the sprint for Harris is running mate, nears the finish line. We'll take you inside what is shaping up to be the most dramatic beep-stake ceremony ever. And the major news out of the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin was drawing a controversial plea deal for three alleged 9/11 terrorists, the abrupt reversal tonight on Laura Coates Live. ♪♪ Alright, so Kamala Harris is about to have one of the most interesting weekends in political history. And by the way, a long line of interesting weekends in political history recently. Hear me out on this. She became the official Democrat nominee for president today, as you know. You know the DNC convention is two weeks away, but she's got to pick her running mate. And she's got to do it pretty quickly. I mean, as in, like, this weekend, it is arguably the most important decision any candidate, let alone she, can make, and has to make, and soon. And no one really wants to rush it, right? I mean, you think about Trump taking, what, 20 months to actually announce who his running mate would be, but hey, it's the year 2024, and nothing is normal. So instead of taking weeks to think about that decision, Harris instead has to go and do it, the equivalent of a kind of political speed dating, doesn't she, to find the perfect match? Now, we're hearing from sources that she has six face-to-face interviews that she has got to get done between now and the big unveiling on Tuesday in Philadelphia. Now, you've got the party's rising star, the battleground governor of Pennsylvania, Josh Shapiro, the swing state astronaut Senator Mark Kelly of Arizona, the Midwest Minnesota nice dad, Governor Tim Walz, and her one-time political ex-rival turned Biden cabinet member, transportation secretary, Heat Buttigieg. Now, the Democratic governor of a deep state, he's all state, red state. He's also there, Kentucky is Andy Beshear, who seems to really want it. And then you've got the billionaire, Governor J.V. Pritzker of Illinois. Now, look, no one knows who'll get the kind of political rose, but her choice will be critical. So, what are you going to look for? Well, there's the electoral map to consider, of course. Maybe a swing state governor can help her win one of those swing states. There's also the vibe. She has to be able to trust that person and feel they can be her partner in all this, and could one day, possibly, as the lion's accession is there, could serve as president. And, of course, the full and first rule of picking a vice presidential nominee, do no harm. J.D. Vance. Now, the buzz around Josh Shapiro, it's unavoidable. And it's why the press today was really trying to get anything out of him. I mean, anything out of him. Do you expect Kamala Harris to ask you to run the hero, considering all your success here? I think that's a question for the vice president. Governor Shapiro, are you planning on meeting with Vice President Harris this weekend? I think any process questions like that should go directly to the Harris campaign. I'm going to say the last time you spoke to Vice President Harris this last Sunday. Yes, it is. If you're not going to the Hamptons this weekend, what are you doing instead? [LAUGHTER] You all think I'm gonna tell you what I'm doing? And you go see Deadpool, obviously, everyone else goes see Deadpool of the weekend. I'm just saying, right? I want to bring a national politics reporter for Axio Sofia Kai, Democrat strategist Jonathan Cott, and Republican strategist John Ferri. I'm glad that everyone is here with me right now. It is kind of a speed dating political weekend of all weekends. Tell me, I mean, you've got names like Senator Kelly. You've got Governor Waltz, you've got Governor Shapiro. Who do you think Republicans are going to fear the most about a potential running mate for Harris? Well, probably your Xbox, Joe Manchinum would be the one I fear the most. Does he be great? Wait, is he on the list at all? He's not, no. Oh, okay, I'm gonna say breaking news, people. Okay, wow, go ahead. I mean, I do think that Josh Shapiro is interesting because he's from the swing state and he's a very effective governor and he's got pretty high popularity ratings there. And I think he's pretty good on his feet. The problem for the Harris campaign is all of these selections are pretty untested on the national stage. So I really couldn't tell you which one's the best or which one's the worst. And we're going to find out because we found a JD Vance. All these people have to go through the ringer and none of them had the chance to go with the ringer. And this is pretty quick, compact timeline. And we didn't even know Kamala Harris was going to be the presidential candidate until a couple weeks ago. So this is, as you said at the beginning, all very fast, all very hard to figure out. And so I don't love to give advice to Democrats, but I do think that Josh Shapiro, because he represents Pennsylvania as a swing state, would be probably the one we would fear the most out of this group. So when you look at it and thinking about, I mean, that phrase, rising star can be a really great thing for somebody trying to enter the political stage. But then you know that some people really enjoy a falling star as much as they do a rising one. And the small window to vet to figure out how they could be an asset is going to be a problem in this instance in some respects. What do you see as the most additive partner for Harris? I think the three, I would think, at the most value to our Governor Bashir, Governor Shapiro, and Governor Walsh. I hear a theme. Governors. Because what you have is three moderate governors who have managed to get things done in a bipartisan way, have talked to Republicans, have won over independents. That's what they're going to help her with. So I think it's definitely going to be one of those three. And I think what you're going to see is a quick rollout. You're going to get a bump from it because they're going to be very popular. All three of them have been sort of out there, you know, auditioning for it and all doing very well. I think Governor Walsh has come out of nowhere because he's so well in articulating the Democratic message in a way that everybody can respond to. People in northern Minnesota who are pretty conservative are responding just as well as the people in Minneapolis who are pretty liberal. So I think he's coming out of nowhere to sort of be maybe the front of the pack, but she's going to get the bump from that. She's going to get a bump from the convention and then you're going to go into Labor Day and it's going to be a tough race, but I expect it to be pretty even. I think the one thing we'll know is there is no chance it's going to be as bad of a rollout as JD Vance. So we're one up there. Oh, man. Everyone is now every person in the campaign is crossing their fingers and their toes at that very statement as we speak. Sophia, you know, we've seen and heard a lot more from Vice President Kamala Harris in recent weeks and we really have over the course of administration, but she's not getting interviews per se. What do you make of that decision and does she need to incorporate that into her campaigning at this point? I think absolutely. I mean, the reason is like they've taken this sort of thing out of the box and they don't want to break it. They, you know, they've done it quite well for two weeks and a part of that is preserving the risk factor and minimizing that. When you put her in front of, you know, an entire gaggle of reporters, that in some ways can be more of a risk than they want. You know, another test for her is if she goes on foreign trips, you know, we know previously that there have been moments where, you know, she made a mistake and they're trying to minimize that. And I think she's done quite well. Her campaign has told me that her speech in Georgia on Tuesday was one of the best speeches she's given that they've seen in her political career. And that's the type of momentum that they want to keep next week, the week after that, the Democratic Convention. You know, and soon after that will be the first mail-in ballots will be mailed out to voters. So, you know, there's really no time to waste and they most certainly can't, you know, to John's point afford a bad VP rollout. And yet, who's going to be that person who's going to be with her on Tuesday, who'll be on that official ticket and what will it mean? I mean, Sam Vibe, because someone joining me right now knows at least one of the governors very well. Governor Shapiro, I'm talking about the former Philadelphia mayor, Michael Nutter, mayor, thank you for joining me tonight. I'm sure you can imagine everyone is talking about this shortlist, this beep stake, they were trying to get any information out of the governor or Shapiro if they could. Unsuccessfully, you think that Shapiro would be the best running mate choice for Harris? Why? Well, first and foremost, this is clearly Vice President Harris's decision. I tend not to give elected officials advice on public TV, but certainly- How about cable TV? How about that one? Give it on cable TV, mayor, because that's where it really hits home. Governor Shapiro would be an excellent choice. Vice President Harris will figure this out. It's a bit of a political marriage, if you will, when you have a presidential candidate, a vice presidential candidate, the chemistry, the symmetry, how they work together, how they get along. But certainly, Governor Shapiro has been on our scene for a good while, a state representative, the county commissioner chair, Attorney General, and now governor. And so, he's an executive, he is experienced. They seem, every time I've seen them together, they actually seem to like each other, they enjoy each other's company, but he's a serious guy, and he will do the job, he would serve well. And as some of your guests have mentioned, certainly the opportunity, the ability to be not only well-liked and respected in Pennsylvania, a critical state of the many battleground states, I'm sure is a serious consideration in addition to doing the job. Remember, President Biden picked Pamela Harris to be his vice president, because if you need somebody to do the job, you have to be prepared for that. That's a very responsible thing to do as president. And so, Vice President Harris now has to make that same critical decision in terms of someone who's a runny mate, not just a win-in-election, but to govern the United States of America and take us forward. And, of course, to be one's partner while governing decisions are made, I mean, we infamously heard from the former Vice President Biden about wanting to be the last person in the room when critical decisions had to be made. I described the popularity perhaps in Pennsylvania, but there are progressives, there are pro-Palestinian groups who are sounding the alarm on Shapiro's stance on the Israel Hamas war. But his take isn't really qualitatively all that different from other possible VP contenders. Why do you think he in particular is being singled out? At least from what I've read, unfortunately, there appears to be some focus on his faith. And I thought in the '60s with President John Kennedy, we have gotten a little past the religion test to be in elected office, whether local, state, and certainly federal. Let's stay focused on the job. I don't think anyone's been more outspoken in opposition to the activities of the government of Israel as it relates to the war in Israel and Gaza. I don't know all the details of why people are opposed. I've been in office for a while. None of us are going to get 100%. But there are many, many things going on in this country and in this world. And the beauty of America, of course, is that people can express themselves. But I think when you look at the totality of the job, the ability to get things done, to be a partner with Vice President Harris. Certainly, Governor Josh Shapiro has to be right at the top of that list. She will make that decision. That is her right and responsibility. We need to stay focused as Democrats, moderate liberal Republicans and independents. We need to stay focused on the one thing that will bring all of us together, which is keeping Donald Trump out of the White House and nowhere near 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Well, we'll see if that is a shared opinion among the electorate in the states that will ultimately decide it. But, you know, I have to ask you, the announcement is coming on Tuesday and it's going to happen in Philadelphia now. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania Governor, does this mean Shapiro? I mean, I can't imagine having the grace if you're the governor of Pennsylvania and somebody else comes to your major city and it's not you next to him. What do you think? Well, first and foremost, no matter what Vice President Harris decides, I know Josh Shapiro well enough to know he is a good, strong, loyal Democrat. He wants to win for this country, first and foremost. Should he be the person selected? I'm sure he'll be thrilled out of his mind about that. But, you know, when you start lining up the logistics here, an announcement on Tuesday, it's in Philly, Pennsylvania, critical state, and then on to a number of other locales. You know, a lot of us have our fingers crossed and, you know, we're hopeful. Well, we will see what Elton Lee prevails. We've seen a lot of the Olympics. A lot of people lower podiums who are smiling in spite of it all. Michael Nutter, thank you so much, Mayor. Back with the panel now at this point in time. I do wonder about this. This truncated schedule, the fact that normally people are leaning in all the more by Labor Day, but they already have the ticket already set. You've got a Trump Vance ticket that is trying to figure out how to pivot towards this new top of ticket. When you're looking at this, how much is the Trump campaign you think going to be focused and strategizing according to the VP pick as opposed to the top of ticket? Almost none. I mean, I think that if it is Shapiro, he's good on a couple of issues that Republicans like. He's good on education with the school choice. Republicans love that. He's been good on Israel. Republicans love that. So they're not going to focus on him. They're going to focus on the top of the ticket. And I think Trump said last week and he's actually right. In most presidential elections, I think almost all of them, the voters vote on the who's at the top of the ticket, not who's the vice president and vice presidential. I remember when Dan Quayle was the choice and everyone thought what an idiot he is, and it made no difference. He still won H.W. Bush won in 1998, this is a long time ago. So I'm not sure if they're going to stand. I also don't think almost inevitably who they pick is going to be more moderate than Harris. And so they're going to focus on Harris because that's what they want to do. And of course, I know there's been some focus on Vance, but if the Democrats want to be successful, they're going to get their just focus completely on Trump. But at that point speaks to the idea that it could be a balancing and it could actually, if there is common ground that Republicans could see, would say her second hit, her second in command, that could actually nurture the benefit of the Harris ticket. Yeah, the ticket is going to be balanced and centrist in the middle because that's where you win national elections. You're already seeing her changing her positions on a few things, on a few issues that she had in the 2020 primary. She knows that her base is actually the 50% in the middle of the country that's got Joe Biden to win the primary and win the election. So that's why I do think you're going to have a centrist candidate and that will help balance her out. And it will also make it harder for the Republicans to attack her as a San Francisco liberal because if you are standing next to Andy Bashir with a gun and a diet Mountain Dew in his hand, it's hard to paint him as some like radical liberal who is out of touch with America. It's a hell of a visual just now. You're hearing the same things with your liquid? Yeah, but I think that's also why I think this VP decision is so key for her because I think there's added pressures on her because of who she is. And I think for the same reason, day one after Biden announced he was not going to run again. I heard from Republicans including Trump Republicans that they were concerned about Shapiro because the Republican running in the Senate in that state was very much putting him together with Shapiro. I mean, that tells you everything you need to know. Well, we have a couple days of the decision will be made. We'll see what happens. Thank you all. Ahead, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin now revoking a plea deal with the alleged mastermind of 9/11. Why he made that sending reversal and what happens next in just a moment. They say opposites attract. That's why the sleep number smart bed is the best bed for couples. You can each choose what's right for you whenever you like. You like a bed that feels firm, but they want soft. Sleep number does that. You want to sleep cooler while they like to feel warm. Sleep number does that too. You have to feel it to believe it. Find the bed that's for both of you only at a sleep number store. Nine out of ten couples say that they sleep better on a sleep number smart bed. Only sleep number smart bed lets you choose your ideal comfort and support your sleep number setting. Sleep number smart beds automatically respond and adjust to your movements so that you sleep comfortably all night long. Beat the summer heat. Temperature balancing bedding, like true temp bedding, is designed to move heat and humidity away. So you sleep just right. Can't agree on temperature? The sleep number climate 360 smart bed lets you adjust up to 30 degrees cooler or warmer on either side. So you can be polar opposites in the same bed. Sleep better together. J.D. Power ranks sleep number number one in customer satisfaction with mattresses purchased in store. And now sleep number smart bed starting at $999. Prices higher in Alaska and Hawaii. For J.D. Power 2023 award information, visit jdpower.com/awards only at a sleep number store or sleepnumber.com. I'm Dr. Sanjay Gupta, host of the Chasing Life Podcast. What does it really take to be the best? What does it mean to score a perfect 10? Especially when the world is watching in your country's pride is on the line. Cognitive scientist and the current president of Dartmouth College, Seon Bylock, breaks down what it takes for anyone to perform under pressure. Listen to Chasing Life. Streaming now, wherever you get your podcasts. Breaking tonight, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin has revoked a plea deal made with the alleged 9/11 mastermind Khaleid Sheikh Mohammed, commonly known as KSM and two other co-conspirators. That agreement would have taken the death penalty off the table for KSM as an attempt to prison and change for pleading guilty to all charges against him. But in a quiet Friday night release, Secretary Austin declaring this in a memo directly to the senior defense official in charge of that agreement. Quote, responsibility for such a decision should rest with me. Joining me now, former associate counsel to President George W. Bush on national security, Jamil Jaffert. First of all, why was this plea deal made in the first instance? This is all pre-trial. There has been no trial. The death penalty off the table. What would have gone into making that decision in the first instance? Well, you know, this conversation about whether you might do a plea deal with the 9/11 defendants has been going on for a while. For a number of years, a number of the prosecutors involved in the case have said it's going to be hard to get the death penalty. It's going to be hard to convict them at all. We've been tied up in pre-trial hearings for years, months and months and months. And there's this issue of evidence coming in, right? We know that enhanced interrogation techniques were used with some of the detainees, including KSM, who was subject to the water board. There's a question about how much that evidence can come in at trial given the military commission procedures and rules. Because of its coercion would be thought of, obviously. That's the theory. Yeah, exactly. Well, the idea that there would be a plea deal offered secured and then Austin would be able to revoke it. Why would he have the authority, unlike a judge, a prosecutor in the normal course of business? Well, these are military commissions. And so under the military commissions act, the person who convenes the commissions is the Secretary of Defense. Now, he typically deliates that authority to, in this case, a one-star Brigadier General retired Susan Eschlear, right? She had the authority to bring the charges, convene the commissions, and make plea agreements. She made a plea agreement two days ago. Second defense part announced it. And then two days later, Secretary of Defense says, "I'm taking away your authority to make plea agreements, and I'm withdrawing from these three deals." How is it possible that he would have two days afterwards revoked it as opposed to beforehand said no? That is, I think, the million-dollar question. Did he not know that this was going on? I mean, they put out a press release, right? He's the Secretary of Defense. Did they find out about it after the fact? It's not clear. It appears, you know, that these, that the prosecutors were telling the judge in the military commissions, "Hey, we're looking to make a deal. This is going on." This conversation has been happening for a while back in 2022. There was a potential deal on the table. The decision was made not to do that, right? So it's really unclear why this is happening now. In a normal prosecution, you would have to alert the victims or the family of the victims about a plea deal you're making. I wouldn't say change the course of that plea, but at least inform them, and they definitely have opinions on this. We were saying that the families, in some respects, and survivors as well, and families of those who were killed in those attacks, some called it a gut punch of sorts. Could that contribute to the pressure to not have this plea deal on the table? Well, certainly there's been a lot of pressure to force these guys to go to trial, allow all the testimony to come out of trial, allow the witnesses to speak at trial. Now, this plea deal, the theory was that there will be a long sentencing hearing where there will be victim statements. They'd have to sort of hear all the victims testify. That being said, there are those victims and families who say we want a trial. We want the death penalty on the table. There are other victims' families to be fair that have said we want this thing over, we want it done with, we want whatever the deal is. Let's get it done and let's just move on with our life. Being able to say what we want to say about our family members. It's been 23 years. Why hasn't there been a trial to this point? Well, you know, we've had a number of cases go all the way up to the Supreme Court. Supreme Court's forced Congress to go back and redo the military commissions legislation a couple of times. And then ultimately, there's been these issues in these pretrial hearings. We've had prosecutors leave, we've had, we're on multiple convening authorities leave. So there's been a lot of turnover, a lot of back and forth. And at the end of the day, when these charges were finally brought, we're just tied up in pretrial proceedings. Can you bring in this testimony, right? Can we listen when the lawyers are talking to the defendants, right? Because of course, you don't want these defendants getting information out of Gitmo, right? At the same time, do they have a right to talk to their lawyers in private? So all these issues, every single issue that can be litigated is being litigated and so it's slowing everything down to a crawl. Prosecutors saying, let's get a deal, let's get it off table. Some 9/11 families, a lot of elected officials are saying we want to see a trial. Well, with us and does not want this plea, and that's where it stands today, how much it will set back the proceedings, we'll have to wait and see. Jamil Jaffra, thank you so much. Thanks, Laura. Well, not everything is coming up roses for Vice President Kamala Harris. We'll tell you about the one bump in the road appearing today for her, next. While the Harris campaign's momentum has been nothing short of meteoric, she's raking in the money and the polls while they're trending in her favor. But today something happened that could provide some unsteady grounds in the months to come. After weeks of hearing the Biden administration speak about the strength of the economy, a crack emerged in the form of the July Jobs Report. The unemployment rate ticked up to 4.3%. My panel is back with me now on this point. First of all, Jamil, you look at this, I mean, there is this wave of excitement, the common momentum people are calling it. You've got 300 plus million dollars that's been fundraised. But the Bidenomics issue has not gone away and voters having a disconnect between how he wants them to feel and how they do feel about it. What is the Harris campaign for you to read to course correct that? So I think she has to run on the record because she was part of it. But let's also point out prices are coming down, wages are going up. This was one bad month in a series of like 11 great months that shocked even most economists. So she has to run on that, but she has to give a vision for what the next four years of her administration will look like. And you're seeing it. Look, she's the first candidate who's talked about like rent prices, something that affects millions of people around the country. And she's talking about how she's actually going to lower prices for everyday Americans, what she's going to do on prescription drugs, stuff like that. And you'll contrast that with Donald Trump's policies, which seem to be just another round of massive tax cuts for very rich people that does little to help anybody else on top of the massive tax cuts that he passed in 2017 that only ballooned the deficit. So I think she's going to have to lay out her vision and separate a little bit from Joe Biden, but it'll be a contrast of what the Trump years versus what the Biden Harris years looked like. And I think Trump, excuse me, but how does Trump sees on that moment? Well, he talks about how good his economy was and how bad the Biden economy is. And I think that the fact is that economists might say this is all great, but the American people haven't felt that. They felt a crunch. They felt the inflation. They felt the interest rates going up. They can't buy houses. They can't buy food. They're struggling. And they've been struggling for quite a while. And when the president, the current president wants to talk about Bidenomics, she has to make a choice. Does she run on Bidenomics? As you point out, or does she come up with something new? It's so hard because she hasn't run a real campaign, any campaign. So she's got to define that campaign right now. And Trump has to say is, hey, I got my record. People still feel nostalgia for the Trump years. The Trump economy has a very positive impact. People have a positive view of the Trump economy, and they don't have a positive view of the Biden economy. And that's going to hurt Kamala Harris. Well, this most recent campaign she's developing, obviously, has been like what a little less than two weeks now that she's even been named at presumptive nominee at this point in time. But speaking of Donald Trump, at the NABJ, in a moment that was overshadowed, I think, a lot by all the things that took place during that long interview session, he talked about the economy, the grocery bag economics, talking about bacon and the price of ham sandwiches and gas prices and beyond. You had some reporting, though, about what took place before he actually got on stage. What happened? So Trump on stage mentioned the audio issues. And we had asked you, spoke to the NABJ president, and he told us that, yes, there were some audio issues. Those were resolved, but in fact, the issue that prevented Trump from going on stage on time was, in fact, the fact-checking issue. And we were told that this issue was so prolonged that the NABJ president was in the process of drafting a statement to tell the 2,000 people who had assembled to listen to Trump speak why Trump could not go on stage. And in that moment, 75 minutes after when he was supposed to go on stage, Trump just walked on. What was the fact-checking issue you're referencing? You know, so Trump did not want to be fact-checked live. And essentially, his aides told the NABJ president that, oh, no, we don't want this fact-checking situation and, you know, otherwise he's not going to go on stage. And so that is the reality of what happened backstage. And I think it shows us just how tricky it may be for Trump to sort of engage with black journalists and also potentially with the larger black community and black voters. Very fascinating to think about how that was described versus what the behind-the-scenes may have brought as well. Thank you all so much. Glad you were here with me. Next, an Olympic boxing match that lasted just 46 seconds and fueled the culture war over gender and women's sports. Not to mention online abuse against the winner, but it's not what her detractors are making it seem to be at all. We'll explain what's going on next. From politics to pop culture and everything in between, CNN's Five Things brings you the five essential stories to get you up to speed and on with your day five times a day. Hello from CNN. I'm Jo Beck. With the Five Things You Need to Know for Tuesday. CNN Five Things. Listen now. Add free with Amazon Music. A controversy over gender and women's sports is now unfolding in the Olympic spotlight. It was sparked by this moment. In just 46 seconds, Algerian women's boxer, Iman Khalif beat her Italian opponent Angela Karini in an Olympic boxing match. Now Karini says she stopped because of the intense pain in her nose after the opening punches. She burst into tears after the fight and did not shake Khalif's hand. That led to a flood of online abuse against Khalif, including from Elon Musk, JK Rowling, Jake Paul, and former President Trump who posted this to Truth Social, quote, "I will keep men out of women's sports." But as it turns out, the reality is more complicated. The International Olympic Committee says Khalif was born female, has lived her entire life as a female box, as a female and has a female passport. In Algeria, being gay or transgender is illegal. So what's going on? Many of the detractors are pointing to a 2023 decision to disqualify her from the boxing world championship. Now the host, the International Boxing Association, IBA, said both Khalif and boxer at Lean You Ting, who represents Taiwan, failed to meet the criteria to participate in the women's competition. The IBA cited undisclosed tests that said the two women had competitive advantages over the other female competitors. Now that organization that said that has since been suspended and discredited by the IOC for corruption and financial-related issues. The IOC spokesperson says Lean and Khalif's participation is, quote, "not a transgender issue." And the Italian boxer, Angela Karini, she has since apologized for her treatment of Khalif after their match. I want to bring in Jamel Hill. She's a contributing writer for The Atlantic, and the host of Jamel Hill is Unbothered Podcast. Jamel, so good to see you. I have been seeing this headline and following it for days now, thinking about all that's been taking place and all the speculation. People jumped the gun on this before knowing the full story. Why were they so quick to come out against her? It's really simple. The reality is that people in this country, certain people, certain groups of people, the conservative right being at the top of the list, are weaponizing trans women in the trans community, and using that as part of their ongoing culture wars. And this young lady, unfortunately, was the victim of what is a gross American mentality. It's not adopted by all mentality, but we're talking about that there is certainly a huge issue with transphobia in our country. And if people understood for two minutes what the dynamics of this was, it never should have got out of hand in this regard. And I feel so sorry for this young woman who has been subjected to these attacks. When all it boiled down to was that the woman that she competed again realized after getting hit, she couldn't compete. And rather than accept that gracefully as a competitor, she chose to weaponize this further by crying and by saying it was unjust. There was nothing unjust about it. I mean, to be frank, you just got your butt beat and that's the end of what happened. And seeing how all this ugliness and hatred and bigotry ballooned as a result, I think there's a lot of people that really need to take a hard look at themselves about what is it that would drive so many people to denigrate and try to destroy this woman. I mean, you mentioned the layers to this and I'm glad you laid this out for the people that are watching the other part of this too. This same young lady competed in the 2020 Olympics in Tokyo. And she was not a gold medalist. And if you look at her record, she has been beaten by other women before. In fact, I think it's something like only 10% of the fights that she's fallen in have actually -- she's actually knocked someone out. So if she had this competitive advantage that people initially claimed, she'd be a lot more successful and she wouldn't get beat at the rate that she did. And so it just -- I felt really awful for members of the trans community who are watching this unfold, who know that there are so many people out there who are willing to just use their worst possible instincts and worst possible degradation against that community. It's shown a light on something that is just a huge problem in our society. And to be clear, this is not a transgender woman. This is a woman who is not used as a poster child to try to convey some other culture war and the fact that she is being used in that way is something that is just so unbelievable to so many people. And you know what? We've been here before in a way. I mean, when I heard about this, it brought to mind the South African runner, Castro Simena. And obviously these are distinct scenarios. But the idea of competitive advantage, if you've just read her guest essay of the New York Times from last year, it is unbelievably compelling. And it's reunited a lot of debate about fairness and women's sports. And you have to wonder why is it such a polarizing issue? Why is it so hard to believe that someone could be an exceptional athlete and a woman? Well, we have to appeal back some layers. Let's peel them all back. Because there are some commonalities here. And it's the commonalities that women of color face who are athletes. Always constantly having their physique, their appearance compared to men. We saw this with Serena Williams throughout her career because she's strong. She's powerful, unlike other tennis players that she played against or were part of her era. She had one of the most powerful serves, if not the most, that you had seen in tennis. And constantly she had to face caricatures and stereotypes that she was a man. So these are very specific attacks that are often directed at women of color, especially black women. And then beyond all that, I heard a whole lot of people who were ready to be loud and wrong about this chime in using women against other women's head. We need to protect our daughters. We need to protect women's sports. Meanwhile, the Dutch, they have a volleyball player who was a convicted rapist, convicted of raping a 12-year-old who was playing at the Olympics. I didn't see any of those same people with those protect our daughters, protect women and girls in sports. And often when it comes to issues of equity, when we're talking about financial investment, when we're talking about given female athletes and women's sports, appropriate media coverage, where does that protect women's sports crowd then? Where's Donald Trump's tweets about protecting women and protecting women's sports, when we're talking about how women are under-invested in when it comes to sports? The things that are damaging women's sports and are damaging participation, are lack of investment, lack of resources and lack of media coverage. Those are the things that hurt women's sports. It is not the presence of trans women. And using trans women as a weapon in what is a broader issue about women's sports is frankly disgusting. And of course, using her as a boogeyman to convey all of those things, and you know, when you said what you said, if you want to protect women and daughters, she is a woman. She is somebody's daughter and she's a woman in sports. It's because of that old statement. Ain't I a woman? Jamelle Hill, thank you so much. Thank you. Well, look, you have heard the pundits talk all week about Trump, Harris and J.D. Vance. But what do the voters actually think? You know what I'm going to check back in with some folks from my Michigan focus group next. But first, this week CNN Hero has lived a nightmare that is familiar to many Americans. Her daughter died from a fentanyl overdose at 26. And now she is turning that pain into healing for women who are struggling with addiction in her own hometown of Johnson, Vermont. Our Johnson always had a lot of life in community. And I was seeing that just go away. This whole street was one of the hardest hit places for gangs moving in and drug dealing. I don't think a lot of people realize it's here. It's embedded in your community. But with Jenna being so involved in it, I really learned so much about the places. We did everything that we were supposed to do as a family, but it doesn't matter who you are because that drug basically owns you. So many of the struggles that Jenna went through, I realized there were gaps. So we started building Jenna's promise, helping women that are struggling with addiction. All eyes on who Harris will pick for her VP with those interviews happening this weekend. But eyes can't be torn from the VP Donald Trump already picked with Senator J.D. Vance, making PR mess after PR mess for Trump. He took out the portion proportion of Americans who are reviewing him unfavorably now since the end of the RNC. And eight point job. This is unfavorability. That's what the polls say. But what do Trump supporters think about all of this? Well, here's what some told CNN. He could be a little hardcore with some of his policy. He's got the fire that Trump has. Maybe two business men in the White House would be a good pick. I think he's a hot ass. I'm a military guy. He's another man that's going to have to prove himself. He's nice and young, so we'll have him for a long time. I want to hear some more about this. Let's bring in some voters from the battleground state of Michigan, who I spoke with in the immediate aftermath of the defining debate between Biden and Trump. A lot has happened since. Joining me now, Janine Martinez, she says she plans to vote for Trump. Felicia Johnson, who plans to vote for Harris. In the past, she says she hasn't voted for Harris. Thank you for joining. Let me begin with you, Janine. What do you make of Senator JD Vance's comments about people without children? Well, I believe we've sometimes, we all take stuff out of context. I'd like to hear the whole story, not just bits and pieces of it. And I would say we all have, sometimes we say stuff in the past. We might regret. And we've all changed and learned from it. So I have a feeling he might have said some stuff out of context, but I'm feeling he's learned from it. And it's 2024. And I think he's ready to do the job and support Trump. Jenna, let me bring you into this conversation as well. Do you agree with Janine or do you see things differently? I see things very differently. When you have somebody who's a leader, I agree with Janine's sentiment that people should have the right to express their opinions. However, my disagreements lies in the fact that when you are leading a country, there are implications to what you say. So when you make statements that essentially put these labels on to people who choose not to have a family might be targeting people who have a chosen family regardless of the situation. It's pushing people into a further divide. And for most parts, you don't want a president who's going to further divide us. You want somebody who's going to unify us. So when you have somebody who seems like he doesn't really respect a majority of women unless they have kids, it's really hard to stand behind that and hear somebody make women only out to be mothers. Felicia, I want to hear from you on this. I wonder what this all tells you about the Trump Vance ticket given these statements that have been made. We're going back to 1950 with the Beaver Cleary against ideology. They want to go back where women aren't an MRS degree to have to get married, stay at home, have babies, and that's it. So we are the category that we're not human beings that could take for ourselves. And that's disastrous because David Vance is an attorney. He's a Congress person. He's political. So he knew what he was saying when he said it. So I'm not giving him a free pass on anything. Janine, let me bring you back into this point. You know, Democrats, they are preparing obviously to nominate a new candidate. Kamala Harris, last time we spoke, she was not on the top of the ticket. Now she is that presumptive nominee. You plan to vote for Trump, you say. Do you think that Harris poses a bigger challenge to Donald Trump than President Biden? I would say yes. In what way? I would say I was concerned with Biden's age and being coherent and able to lead this country. So I believe with now Harris in that, I believe she's more coherent. But what concerns me is I don't think she's ready for the job yet. We need this is one of the most important jobs in this country is to lead us. So I need somebody who's got a backbone ability to stand up against other world leaders. And I think Trump has more of that experience than she does. I'm curious as to what do you think you would need to hear from her to solidify that opinion or change your mind? I would say just a time and experience. I haven't really seen much in the last four years from her or been more of the on the coke skins of Biden. So I haven't seen her come to be more of a leadership role. And I'm not really interested in a Trump and the president that's more interested in joining TikTok and being hip hop. That's not something I need as my presidential leader. That should be the number one priority. I need you to lead the country and be able to talk to other political leaders when it comes to real debate and concerning issues that are revolving around the United States. We bring you in this Felicia as several and many candidates, of course, are on social media or using it as a vehicle to get out to the people they're trying to reach to Janine's earlier point. But you plan to vote for Harris, you say, and Democrats seem very energized. Did it concern you in any way either the way in which she has embraced either social media or conversations about developing voters who are looking to that source? Or the way that Democrats have really, they have coalesced around her without having her name on the top of a ticket at the primaries. What do you say to all that? So, to my point of view, you have to meet people where they are. The Gen Z's, that's where they are. The millennials, that's where they are. So I'm a baby boomer. We were a paper, so you have to meet people where they are. So I have no problem issue with it, and the main thing is to give people to vote. That's the issue. I have to pose in November. Really quick, I wanted to show each of you, because last time we were all together, I asked you all to raise your hands about who you would intend to vote for. But now I want to ask you to raise your hands if you are looking forward to a debate between Harris and Trump. Absolutely. I see shadows. I think everyone's hands went up right there. And I got to tell you, last time the hands were a little bit slower when I asked you. So there must be some new energy in all of this. Thank you all, Janine, Felicia, Jenna. Great to see you all and meet you each where you are. Thank you so much. Thank you for watching Anderson Cooper 360 is next. We have so much technology. We have the ability to control so much in our lives. You still can't control Mother Nature. It really is a terrifying experience. Violent Earth with Leop Shriver now streaming on Max. (explosion)
