For the ones who get it done, the most important part is the one you need now, and the best partner is the one who can deliver. That's why millions of maintenance and repair pros trust Granger, because we have professional great supplies for every industry, even hard to find products, and we have same day pickup and next day delivery on most orders. But most importantly, we have an unwavering commitment to help keep you up and running. Call, click Granger.com, or just stop by. Granger, for the ones who get it done. The views expressed on this program by its guests do not necessarily reflect the views or beliefs of the host or video network. This program's sole intent is to help educate, foster critical debate, and help raise and discuss political and social issues, which already exist in the public domain. Thank you and enjoy the program. All right, all right. Welcome to Sunday. Wire. I am sitting in for Patrick Henningson. This is Brian Heschert-McLean with you, and I've got Adam Ruckus Clark with us as well. Adam, welcome to Sunday Wire. How you doing? Very well. Thanks for having me, Heschert. Yeah. Exciting week, to say the least. It has been a little bit of an exciting week. The infinite doom scroll has provided all kinds of gasps and horrors and WTFs that we can talk about this week. So we can review here with Heschert and Ruckus sitting in for Patrick Henningson. Big shout out to all our friends and team at 21st Century Wire.com to include you over there in the interactive chat room. That can be found on the website. It's in the lower corner there. Let's see. What else? What else? We're going old school today. We are going audio only. This is the sort of our bread and butter, what the majority of the 513 episodes of Sunday Wire are. We're looking forward to Patrick coming back and having those video feeds up for you out there on all those 21st Century Wire and Sunday Wire locations. But today, we're going audio only, Ruckus. So, yeah, that's how we're going to roll it out. And my goodness, let's, Ruckus, let me, let me start with the story about Scott Ritter, out of DD Geopolitics, who we've talked to you on this show before, on X, they're right. The FBI is conducting, well, has conducted a search at the Delmar home of Scott Ritter, the investigation details. As of Thursday, remain somewhat unclear. I believe this happened on Thursday morning. Scott's passport was, as you probably remember, recently confiscated and he was prevented from flying to Russia where he was scheduled to speak at that conference in St. Petersburg. He also met with RFK Jr. at the night before this, interestingly enough. And of course, I think most of you know who Scott Ritter is, but if you don't, he's a well-known geopolitical analyst, former United Nations weapons inspector and Marine Corps intelligence officer. He's known for serving as a UN weapons inspector in Iraq from '91 to '98, and he played a key role in monitoring and verifying the disarmament of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. But he became a prominent critic of the U.S. government's stance on Iraq, especially in the lead-up to the 2003 invasion, arguing that Iraq did not possess active WMD programs. He's of course authored several books and articles, more than several, on military and foreign policy and very critical insights into international security issues. So, Ruckus, did you see the video? They talked to Scott outside his house, he made a statement, and it looks like the feds were there confiscating all of his tech. Yeah, actually, there's a little bit more to it that has emerged since then. It was, yeah, you're quite familiar with Larry Johnson, former CIA, and he's been on a number of programs on TNT, your program with Patrick. I'm trying to remember if he's even been on Sunday wire, probably. Yeah, recently. Of course. So, anyways, he was recently on a radio show just a couple days ago speaking to, oh God, Ray McGovern, Matt Ho and Scott Ritter. Scott talked about some more of what had happened, and as Larry Johnson put it, he was shocked to discover that the FBI showed up with copies of Scott's emails and text messages. The FBI has apparently been spying on Scott for years, and I guess the domain accusation is to do with the fact that he's a foreign agent, and apparently Mr. Johnson, Larry is suggesting that he thinks it was a mistake for Scott to have even talked to the FBI, and so I want to, this just came out, so I'm going to have to check out this discussion here. But yeah, it looks like the FBI has had their eye on him for a while. They had copies of his communications. They really want this guy gone. Where were they are? I guess I'm going to have to use the proverbial air quotes inverted commas they write. I sure I mean, because you don't know who or what it is exactly that is upset with Scott Ritter. I mean, considering the things that he does, and that he says, in my imagination, if this were like a Hollywood script at the end of the labyrinth maze, and you find out who's at the top of the chain there, it's ultimately whoever represents the military industrial complex. So he's definitely been poking that hornet's nest for a while now. So I don't know. It's still a developing story. It was sad to see interesting timing, all things considered, because it's beyond the point of, are we going to be close to World War III? I think we've been seeing a lot of things that, in retrospect, will be considered the early stages of what will be probably considered World War III, unfortunately, as sure. Yeah, a lot of the bullet points, the stories, the articles, the hashtag latest things, you know, that have been flying around lately. If you just kind of take them out of their current context, you can kind of graft them in front of World War II, World War I, and see a lot of similar happenings to include shutting down independent journalists, opposition journalists. Yeah, and it's like, dude, why they have to take all his tech if they're already inside all his tech? We've got all these emails. We saw all your emails, so we've come to take your computer so we can have all your emails. Well, I see a lot of these things as sure as like a photo op, you know, this is not, it wasn't really meant to intimidate him, it's meant to intimidate everybody else. That's just the way I perceive it in your rights. Yeah, and it certainly certainly works. And again, you know, precursor, look what happened to Gonzalo, Lira, you know, he was doing similar things, but in a different location, where was he again? Oh yeah, the place where we're defending democracy, right? It's funny. How's that democracy working out for them in Ukraine? Not so well, I imagine. Of course, is that working so hard for most countries these days, unfortunately? Yeah, somehow we're protecting it everywhere by making sure that no one but progressive globalists have access to it. So good global citizens can have something that looks like maybe a shadow of democracy, but if you're a conservative or a nationalist or a common sense person that doesn't like globalism, then watch out. You could get Scott Riddard. I guess that's the message at this point. Well, yeah, I guess I would rather live in fear of that than be like most people out there who have to live in fear of ISIS when they attend a Taylor Swift concert or something. Right, yeah, I get a little dicey for the Swifties all of a sudden. Ooh, scary. So what happened there for anyone who hasn't heard there is a actual news connection between ISIS and Taylor Swift. A connection? I don't know the right way of putting it, but I think I think ISIS, there is an attempt by the deep state to resurrect the old boogeyman known as ISIS and repackage it for a new generation. And what better way to do so than to terrorize Swifties? Swifties are Taylor Swift fans for those of you who don't know. Right. Yeah, so she had a concert about to happen somewhere. Remind me where it was. This is in Austria. Three concerts that were canceled. That would ultimately affect, I think it was 65,000 actual ticket holding attendees. But I guess on top of that, there would be like another 30,000 or so hanging outside the study stadium listening and doing like a tailgate, a Taylorgate party, whatever you want to call it. This whole thing should be called Taylorgate. So, but yeah, allegedly we've got the same old story. We got a bunch of young folks that are labeled as teenagers just because their age ends with the four letters T-E-E-N. Did I do that right? Okay, yeah. So, but the main ringleader is a scant 19 years old and then we got like an 18-year-old and I think somebody less than that. There was a fourth suspect that was briefly considered, but they dismissed that who was named as being 15. But they have three people who have been arrested in connection to this. We had three concerts canceled, three suspects. There's two of threes. I wonder if there's a third, three somewhere, I'm sure. Third one is- Allegedly, the plot is because they're all radicalized online. Don't you know how sure because I went to Instagram. So, these young lads became pledged their allegiance to the leader of ISIS thanks to Instagram because that's usually how that goes from what I understand. I wouldn't know. I'm not planning on pledging allegiance to anyone other than my learning savior and I have to do that offline. So, we're good here. Are you listening, FBI? Don't Scott Ritter me. Oh, man. Yeah. So, we have Sage in the Chat says, "New and improved ISIS. ISIS for today." It's like New Coke or something, right? We reformulate it just a little bit. I don't know. Is this ISIS for the youth, for those that didn't already realize that they're like a creation of CIA and Mossad and military industrial complex, maybe perhaps? I'm really not sure. But apparently, the alleged plot was from the 19-year-old ringleader. He was going to drive his car and he was going to attempt to, I guess, attack people with knives. You can see a picture of him doing like a crossed X with his arms holding big old scary knives or whatever. If that didn't work, he was going to have explosives in his car, just ran this car into a bunch of people outside and just let the car go off. I'm like, okay. Okay. This is also a little bit disturbing because it comes on the tail of what sort of, in a way, was the spark that kicked off some of these protests. Be they organic or mostly astroturfed, still working on. But in Europe, right? After there was that young person that killed three Taylor Swift fan little girls, we can half ago or so. So, what's the deal with all the swift stuff leaking into our geopolitics, I wonder? Well, I mean, there's that long-running conspiracy theory. She's some sort of sigh up, right? But, yeah, good observation. It's like, you can hardly walk a mile down the Twitter feed or the news feeds, the news scroll before you run into Elon Musk and Taylor Swift. They're always in the news, although it's just two people who care, right? But they're always somehow associated to things. Elon Musk is definitely more hands-on. But, yeah, why does Taylor Swift get like, leads into everything? Sorry, dad used to that word there. But, yeah, she leaks through, seeps over to like every little piece of thing. I don't know why. I mean, she headlines, maybe. Maybe, you know, because if this really is all about propaganda and fear, what better way to amp up and play with that algorithm? I mean, if you're going to have a terrible tragedy happen that you're going to use to your advantage as a propagandist, isn't it better to have as many hot keywords as possible to take advantage of all those hashtags. You know, terrible Islam, ISIS, hashtag, ISIS, hashtag, Muslim attack, hashtag terror, hashtag be afraid, and hashtag Taylor Swift. Yeah, let's do that. Yeah, right, because there's so many eyeballs on her, you know, and you're right. We've seen, we've talked about it before. This, this, you know, that was the Pentagon, I believe, somewhere in the DoD, they floated around the idea of using Taylor Swift as some sort of influencer. And, you know, it certainly, it certainly does seem like something is going on in those sort of stagecraft realms, as it pertains to Taylor Swift. She made that strange comment, kind of like going up against George Soros too, which was interesting because there is a there, there's, you know, a thing with ownership of some of her songs and all that stuff. But man, she's like one of the richest stars we have, and she comes from a rich family also, billions, you know, billions in value, in brand value, if you will, name value, personal wealth. And I don't know, man, it's just like, okay, let's game this out for a second here, man. If, if you're the Pentagon or the CIA or some, you know, group out of, you know, something under the umbrella of DHS, let's say, or Pentagon. And you've got Taylor Swift as some sort of asset. And Taylor Swift herself has probably a better security team than Donald Trump, perhaps maybe. It's like, really, you have to shut down three concerts, like, you know, 90,000 people's worth of, you know, viewing over three teenagers, like all this thing over, you know, I can't help but think that all these, you know, radicalized people were seeing lately in the stories to include the Trump, the alleged Trump shooter are all like of daily shooter caliber, you know, or, or daily stabber caliber, if you're in the UK. It's just, it's really odd. And then we're, I guess we're really being pummeled with the whole resurgence of youth, the youth radicalized on the inner webs, which is laughable, elapsibly laughable. So all the, all the machinery of, you know, of Taylor Swift security combined, let's just imagine they probably are combined with, you know, US intelligence and stuff. And they can't foil a plot with, like, they have all of Scott Ritter's emails, but they don't, like, we're, we can't break into Thomas Cuck's phone. And we're concerned, we're gonna have to shut down these three concerts because we're so concerned about radicalized teenagers who've been radicalized on Instagram. It's just, it's just all so ridiculous. Also, they, they foiled the plot and they caught the ringleader and the people who were going to do it. So why did they cancel the concert? Yeah, right. That makes no sense. Yeah, exactly. And now this, this concept of this online radicalization thing is an old school thing, right, that we've been dealing with for a while. But now that's about to, to converge with two other major things. And, and I just, I think it's about to be like a giant, like three car pileup of these, these radical, radicalization ideas or whatever. But okay, so we got the online radicalization, and now we've got this attempt to shut down the internet because, like for instance, in the UK, they're trying to good chase after online thuggery or whatever they're calling it, like armchair thugs or people who are instigating by retweeting or sharing a video, right? So now, now they're afraid that's going to radicalize others to go out there and be anti immigration or be racist, right wing or whatever, right? And then on top of that, there's three. Oh, isn't what's unfolding, what Israel is doing right now in, in Gaza against the Palestinians radicalizing enough to the youth who are just witnessing it because we're also seeing the protests on the campuses, which are pretty much died down. But, but isn't that the same kind of concept right there? Like, isn't that radicalizing enough? All you have to do is just sit here and, and you're, you know, you're like this youth and you're, you're going through teen angst and you see that the West is just doing West things and we hate it, we see it, we observe it too, but we're not going to radicalize and join ISIS, but we're going to comment on it and maybe hopefully try to put our heads together and come up with a solution. But, you know, the youth, their youth, they're full of anger and they're upset. And so, you know, I just imagine that all of these major things and the idea of disinformation and misinformation, we're probably coming very close to a, they're going to shut down or control the internet a little bit more hardcore than usual scenarios, I sure. Yeah, and, and this whole idea of radicalizing people, radicalizing youth, I'm sorry, but some, some people talking about current events online are not radicalizing people, you know, you want to look at real radicalization that's happening just, you know, you don't have to go back all that far, go back to 2015 and look at the way the mass media and the, you know, power politics that, you know, mass media, the power politics, the very bankers themselves, the very, you know, corporate structures at the Fortune 500, they radicalized everybody against conservatism, against traditionalism, against family, against God, against each other. We had all that power politics radicalization that has taken place and they go as far as to higher people, higher actual radicals or people trained in rules for radicals, to astroturf a lot of this anger. And then 2020 came around and they radicalized us against unknown, unseen, invisible, unproven particles, apparently flying around between everybody, crawling out someone's nose and crawling up someone else's nose and all that. And then they radicalized everybody over the concept of jabs and shots and mRNA and all this. They radicalized everybody about hyper sexualizing children and mutilating children. That's all stuff people have been radicalized over. It's like everybody's everybody, they're trying to radicalize everybody with the main, you know, the main systems. And then in that process, while they do their little ops, right, their little patcon, their little Northwood style ops and their, their syops, then the patsies all turn into people that have been radicalized by an Instagram account or a couple Instagram accounts. It's, it's, it's, it's just, it's ridiculous. I think you're 100% right. And I believe Wikipedia would actually even agree with you. I was like, we keep using this word. And it's one of those funny words, you keep saying it over and over again. And the more you do, it's like, is this even a real word, radicalization, radicalization. I'm not feeling very rad saying it over and over again. Yeah, man, like Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, right? That's radical, man, like the 80s, 90s. Like when you'd hit the, when you'd hit the half pipe and come off the other end and stick the landing, that was radical, dude. But no, no, now we're radicalizing little, little children into, you know, teenagers into stabbing little kids online. So I wanted to look at the official definition here, according to the Ministry of Truth, Wikipedia, they say radicalization is the process by which an individual or a group comes to adopt increasingly radical views in opposition to a political, social or religious status quo. Well, I take offense and I have a great big problem with this because it's more exactly what you just described. The only reason that anything like, say, you or I might say which are traditionally traditional would be considered radical is because a proverbial day have changed the status quo on us by radicalizing the entire society. I mean, the definition of radical here says, radical politics denotes the intent to transform or replace the fundamental principles of a society or political system, often through social change, structural change, revolution or radical reform. They've done that to us through social change and through structural change. And they're accusing us of inciting revolution because we desire to go back to our traditional fundamental principles. So that's where we are, ladies and gentlemen. Yeah, the old Hegelian terminologies here. Right. And who was the, I believe we had a president, sort of a benchmark president who came in and said, flat out that he was going to fundamentally change the country. I know this one. I know this one. It was, it was, it was, it was, yeah, come on, it was Barack Obama, the rock star, we know. The Barack star, Barry, Barry Sitero, indeed. Yes. And here we are. And we look around and it sounded ridiculous at the time. And those of us that pointed that out and game theory that out and said what we thought that would mean in the long run, we're looked at as fringe. And now we look around, right? You walk into a random school board meeting pretty much in any blue city in this country and unfortunately a lot of rural areas too. And you'll find radicalized people. Geez, I just saw one on, on my doom scroll yesterday was this dude dressed up like a lady who had a lot of really creepy like sexual stuff on their social media. I think Libs of TikTok did a, just a repost of this person. I love how they just repost stuff. They don't editorialize it or anything just to let you look at it. And yeah, we've got these radicals all over the place that, you know, clearly, clearly want to see fundamental change and act as though it's, you know, I love it when they act as though they have some sort of constitutional right to undermine the traditions of the constitutional republic in which they live. Well, I mean, to be fair, they were elected, weren't they? Democracy. So you get the government you deserve perhaps? Yeah, yeah, right. Or the government that was stolen from you sometimes there, you know, there's this wacky, crazy idea hasher. Some, some people, I mean, a very small handful of folks, not many suspect that, you know, the voting process itself is a little shady and not above board in particular using these electronic voting machines. But, you know, when they see news of like the creators of these voting machines getting arrested for bribery and fraud, it probably doesn't make them feel much better about the election process. And that does it? Well, you know, if you feel that way, you've probably been radicalized. You should trust the machines that have no cyber security protocols run on them that are connected to the internet that are controlled remotely in some cases from, I don't know, it's like Slovenia, Slovakia. I'm not even, I don't even remember, you know, some George Soros Institute, BlackRock funded, you know, analyst farm in a foreign country where they don't do background checks on employees. Yeah, they've got access to the voting machines, but I'm sure that's fine. And if you think that's a problem, you might have been radicalized online. I think you maybe you meant like, because of the people who I was just making a reference to, this guy, what was his name, Roger Pinatte? Yeah, this guy, he was the co co founder and the president of Smartmatic. That's the maker of those voting machines. The very same Smartmatic, I believe, is suing Fox News. Yeah, so yeah, I guess they were taking bribes related to the 2016 Philippine elections. It was him. He's from Volkhar, Taun, Florida. There was also Jorge Miguel Vasquez. And let's see, there were a couple other people like a caught up in this. But they, you know, these are the same people that replaced Venezuela's voting systems back in 2004. So yeah, these people have been in the news all the time. But you know, don't worry, the company has come out and assured everybody that the company is not in trouble. The machines are not in trouble, and everyone can trust free and fair elections. We have no nothing to worry about, regardless of the fact that the person who makes our machines is a giant scumbag, and he just got busted. But we're okay. Everything's fine, people. Nothing to worry about here. Yeah, this is fine. I mean, it's a it's a giant multinational corporation. I'm sure you can trust them, right? I mean, why would we not? I can think of a million reasons, not to. Well, this, this lack of faith and trust that we have in the Fortune 500, and particularly with technology giants that have, you know, members, sea level members that sit on the Council of Foreign Relations, go to Bilderberg, go to Davos, all that stuff, I'm sure that's 100% fine. But you know, a lot of people don't. Anyways, I'm sure that this is probably not helping one JD Vance these days. I don't know, we'll probably hit that a little bit later in the program, but even he himself connected to, you know, that that Reed crowd, that PayPal mafia, if you will. So yeah, there's the whole tech thing is really a problem right now. But Ruckus, before we go there, before we go to American politics, what getting back to the online thuggery, do I have this correct? Was it Richie Sunak or someone in the UK threatening to arrest people in the USA? Like, like, like, if I say something online that's like, I don't know, makes me sound like, you know, I really like Tommy Robinson or something like that. Is our red coat's gonna like show up on my front door and put me in shackles and put me on a plane and take me to a London Gulag or something? I mean, what is this? Well, it's, it's not Richie Sunak, he's out. They have a new Prime Minister. It's a, it's a farmer. Right, right. But it wasn't cares that made that comment, right? It was another like parliament member or something. Uh, no, I believe it was Keir Starman. Okay. All right. Right out of the gate. He's talking about they want to, um, they're going to increase surveillance like facial recognition stuff. They're going to do, they want to move forward with digital IDs. Uh, they want to crack down on the internet. There's a big fight going on with, um, Elon Musk. Uh, and I think right now that the UK police chief has threatened Elon Musk, um, overall of this. See, they're all upset that just by sharing, um, uh, the, uh, okay, let's start. Okay. Let's start with the, the British Prime Minister guy. Okay. Keir Starmer. Okay. So since these riots, uh, Keir Starmer came out and he started going against the troublemakers is what they're being referred to, right? Or sometimes online bullies, right? Like hooligans? Yes. Are they worse than soccer hooligans? I'm just curious. They let soccer hooligans do some pretty crazy stuff over the place. We're talking about youtes. The youtes. There are violent counter protests. There are riots there are protests counter riots counter protests. It's all confusing. Um, but that's the point is because since it's confusing, it's the fault of social media and Elon Musk in particular. It's all, it's all excess fault because they were showing videos and people see the videos and they like and they retweet them. And now they're in trouble for inciting racial hatred. Interesting. Because this is following. Yeah, I'm following. I can't help it. Like just draw a quick, uh, cold sack off to the side to, to roll down for a second here. Um, didn't Elon have the same problem with Australia after people were posting the video of the, uh, uh, pro palestinian, uh, orthodox priest that was stabbed by someone who was potentially radically radicalized on the internet by, uh, prosianist posts. I mean, do I have that right? I don't think like they weren't able to really get much out of Elon for that. Correct and correct. You're absolutely right. Yeah, there was a lot of like, saber rattling and at the end of the day, nothing ultimately happened. I think it was finally dismissed. They gave up. So Musk, Musk has been on a bit of a tear. He's, of course, gotten into it recently with, um, before this, he was having it out with Maduro. Um, I think there was an unofficial, uh, discussion of some sort of fist fight going on between him and Maduro. Oh, that was funny. That's always fine because Maduro was accusing him of using his space laser weapons to spy on him and want to invade his country with rockets or something. Uh, what I'm just kidding. But yes, Maduro was quite upset with, uh, the handling of what, uh, how X was going down with allowing people to spread clearly false information about how, uh, the election in Venezuela had been stolen or posting videos from like seven years ago and saying, look, look what happened. Maduro stole the election. Uh, and X was just letting it happen. So yes, we had that and now this. So the UK is upset. But okay. Um, let me back up real quick. So there, there were a couple of people who've been arrested, uh, related to what started the, the original, uh, shenanigans was in the wake of the, the violent attack on the young ladies at the Taylor Swift themed dance class or whatever, the little girls, uh, the police, unlike the, the Taylor Swift concert where the cops and the media come out right away and say, Oh yeah, this is ISIS and we caught the guy. And here's this picture and everything. They didn't say like Jack squats about what was going on in, in the wake of the knife attack on the young ladies that they were very mum about it. The police were active funny. The media was active funny. Politicians were acting funny. And in retrospect, it would appear that what happened is that everybody was more afraid of appearing to be racist by just being out and open and honest and they caused a bit more problem than it would have been if they had been transparent about things in my personal opinion. So yes, so imagination is ran wild and the rumors went nuts and everybody next thing you know, say, Oh, this is clearly all these girls will, the, the victims of like Muslim, terrorist Islam type stuff. And ultimately it would appear that's not necessarily the case, but that's what sparked it. And, uh, I guess there was a quote unquote attack on a hotel, which happens to be housing, uh, like hundreds of asylum seekers. It's totally unrelated, but this is how it, you know, everything gets mushed together, right? And there was a violent stuff. People throw in rocks at cops and people getting into it and fires. I don't know. It doesn't take much. I guess you just accidentally knock over a trash can out there in some places in the UK and they just in spontaneously combust. It happens. So, you know, uh, we had that. And then in the wake of that, they had a, I guess they were calling them anti racist protests. So they had people who were like, Oh, we don't stand for, we can dem what took place on the hotel yada yada. So now they just recently arrested. Uh, let's see, Jordan parlor age 28, the first person to be jailed for inciting racial hatred related to the recent widespread disorder and rioting parlor is of sea craft in leads. He's been jailed for 20 months at leads crown court, uh, just on Friday parlor has admitted or had admitted to here's this crime. I hope y'all are sitting down for this parlor posted on Facebook between August 1st and August 5th messages, which allegedly urged others to attack a hotel housing more than 200 asylum seekers. So, um, doesn't necessarily say whether he was there or participated. Uh, but because he posted Facebook messages, he is now in jail for 20 months, 20 months for posting online. Wow. Um, so. And, and I'm assuming that we're not, uh, told what was posted, like, cause, you know, there's, there's a bit of a burden of proof required for that here in the United States, right? Like you, you, you, uh, well, there's supposed to be at least, um, a call for violence, you know, that, that sort of, uh, shouting fire in a movie theater or, hey, go to this, you know, this place at this time and do this. I wonder if there was anything specific like that, that they're able to lean on to get that, uh, 20 month sentence. My goodness. Yeah. Or was it just me all around? They made, they made like a bunch of arrests so far, like almost 600 related to protests and rioting following the, the stabbing attack that took place in South part, uh, Southport, excuse me. Um, and the rioting and protests and counter riots and counter protests have been going on since July 30th. So, um, it's already been almost two weeks now, almost not quite, but, um, I guess what 11 days, uh, yeah. Well, but I, but I really wish I was looking for all this news. Uh, I need somebody from the UK to fill me in about how this, this, uh, they want to cure starm or was talking about all of this, this, this really Orwellian stuff. I mean, right out of the gate talking about facial recognition that they were making this like, hey, it doesn't matter. If you show up and you were here, you were part of it. We're going to catch you. We promised we got the technology. We got the means. It was very like in your face and on the nose kind of stuff. I just can't find any of the, the, you know, the news about it. Cause it's all been washed out now. This beef with Elon Musk has taken center stage now as if Elon Musk is like responsible for any of this. What a joke. Again, you know, Taylor Swift, Elon Musk, let's put him in everything. Right. Uh, exactly. Um, two six in the, in the chat here in the discord chat says, uh, there have been about 700 arrests in the UK apparently in the last few days and about 400 charged. So that should be the headline. You know what I mean? Two six, like that should really be the headline here. It's the fact that, you know, we have one guy who's one example. Um, you know, maybe he did say something that was a call to violence. I don't know. I wouldn't know without, I don't know. Maybe if I was the FBI, I would have access to all his emails magically or something, but, uh, you know, it's like the, the real headline in the world and the free world should be that exactly the way you wrote that there have been, you know, X number of arrests will go with 700 here. If you have a reference link, do, do drop it to me. Um, but, you know, that's the headline, 700 arrests in the UK in the last few days, 400 already charged. For what? Like, can, can we, can we have some honest journalism on that? Like, are they, are they literally putting memes up? Are they memes people don't like? Are they, um, are they, uh, you know, a patriot oriented, comments, if you will, are they, you know, pro nationalist, uh, with, you know, no racial connotation, sort of, uh, charges, like what are, that's a lot of, that's a lot of arrests and a lot of charges. Um, but I mean, this, this does seem to be on par with what we're hearing. I mean, last time I heard a statistic, it was like 4,000 people in, in a year span or something like that, people being arrested in, uh, in the UK, um, for online posting. I mean, it's, uh, it's, it's like an order of magnitude by like 10, uh, more than, you know, people jailed in, in Russia, which would, you know, surprise of a lot of people, I think. Yeah, and I did find one, um, he's a former British lawmaker, uh, Tobias Elwood. You're going to love this. This guy's a British Army reservist and a senior officer in the 77th Brigade. Uh, he has voiced strong opinions on the role of social media in fueling the public disorder. Uh, he's, he's a formerly known for supporting vaccine passports. So you know where he stands there and we all know about the 77th Brigade, because they're taking on information warfare, part of the whole PsyOps thing, uh, since 2015. Uh, but yeah, he says that, um, he wants to strip an anonymity. He wants nobody to be anonymous online. Social media needs to, to remove the ability for users to be anonymous, 100% and the riots in the UK are proof of this. Uh, and then to bring this full circle to Elon Musk, it was just on Friday where the London's Metropolitan Police Commissioner, Sir Mark Rowley, uh, was speaking to Sky News. Uh, he's threatening to charge foreigners for quote unquote whipping a patriot online and he named Elon Musk, uh, as somebody who could potentially be prosecuted. He said, quote, we will throw the full force of the law people and whether you're in this country committing crimes on the streets or committing crimes from further a field online, we will come after you end quote, uh, asked whether the Metropolitan Police planned on charging people posting on social media from other countries. Rowley replied, quote, being a keyboard warrior does not make you safe from the law and quote, and he named, quote, the likes of Elon Musk and quote, as potential targets for investigation. Oh my God. That's, that's the one I was thinking about. Yep. Uh, and Photon adds, uh, he was head of all intel agencies as well before. Okay. Sweet. And we got the, uh, support article here. Thank you to six for dropping that. Who are the, this is out of BBC dot com. Who are the rioters and what jail sentences have they received? Um, and in there, it says the riots following the fatal stabbing of three young girls in Southport have been the worst unrest the UK has seen in more than a decade. The violence in towns across, uh, England and Northern Ireland has been fueled by misinformation online. The far right and anti immigration sentiment, about 600 people have been arrested and more than 150 charged over the unrest, including both anti immigrant protesters and those opposing them. Hmm. We'll have to see about that in the long run. Uh, we've been looking at some of those arrests and who they are as well as tracking the charges they face. This is interesting, Ruckus. So check this out. Um, just as a couple of examples, they've put up, uh, one, two, three, four, um, like nine people, uh, mug shots, uh, incident locations, what they're convicted of and what they've been sentenced to. So they gave us nine examples out of, uh, let's just say a hundred and fifty. We know 600 were arrested, but 150 have been charged. So let's just say out of a hundred and fifty, you've got a 29 year old male, Declan Green, uh, from Liverpool incident in Liverpool, convicted of violent disorder and setting fire to a police vehicle two years and five months. Okay. Um, that clearly is a real crime. If that's true, setting fire to a police vehicle. Although a lot of people got away with that here in the United States, uh, during the BLM and George Floyd riots, um, and a lot of the Covidians stuff too. So then we've got a 58 year old, uh, incident location, Southport, violent disorder and assaulting a police officer. Okay. Um, again, another, uh, legit crime. If everything's above board, sentenced to three years in prison, then you've got Stephen Malin, um, incident in, uh, Hart Le Poure. I don't know if I could pronounce that right. I'm sorry. Convicted of just plain old violent disorder. Okay. Two years and two months, another one, John Paul O'Malley, Southport, violent disorder, two years, eight months. What about this? There was a guy I heard. He was very scary. He's responsible for a lot of damaging things. Uh, Tyler K, do you see him on the list? Yes, I do. He is at the, the very last one on the list and oh, he did the worst. He did the war. I can't believe he did this. Insiting racial hatred online, three years and two months in prison. Damn. Yeah. Yeah. Um, you look at all the hatred that is incited on mass media cartel presentations. Again, circling back to that, uh, no problem, no problem at all. I mean, look at all the Hollywood people and CNN and MSNBC, et cetera, et cetera. People who, you know, openly called for, you know, Trump's assassination, all this stuff, uh, made videos about it and all this Madonna saying she wanted to blow up the White House. I mean, we could just, we've got years and years of examples of that. People that had, uh, massive followings, you know, massive followings. Do you think Tyler K has a bigger following than, I don't know, Madonna or Whoopi Goldberg? I'm guessing not. The part that stands out to me more than anything, believe it or not. And I wasn't expecting this is the incident location. It's like, yeah, it's like all these have places. It's like this guy, incident location, Southport, uh, Liverpool, Plymouth, uh, Hartlepool, um, um, leads. And then this guy, Tyler care, incident location online. That incident on, remember that online incident? Yeah. Well, he's not. Yeah, this is frightening. It's really, really strange. Like, and, and also, let's just let me also point out this, uh, this, uh, Declan Green, right? Okay. Convicted a violent disorder, um, and setting fire to a police vehicle. He got two years and five months. And the guy that, uh, assaulted a cop got, uh, three years even. And the guy, Tyler K, the guy that his incident was online. He didn't blow anything up. He didn't set anything on fire. He didn't assault anyone. He got three years and two months. So he got the stiffest sentence, um, of all of these people, as far as I can tell. Yeah. He has the stiffest sentence here. Um, and then there's other people that just say violent disorder. Uh, I don't know what that means. Someone would have to define, like what falls into a violent disorder. Um, curious about that. Throwing a, uh, snotty Kleenex at a police officer's shoe. Yeah. I mean, it could be. It absolutely could be. It could be, you know, somebody smacked them with a placard and they like grabbed the placard or something, you know, I mean, who knows what, what this is. It could even be words that they said with a word on it. Right. Exactly. Yeah. Yeah. The same thought is me pretty much at the same time. Like, it could be something they wear, something they say, something that's written on their placard, perhaps. Um, are these things considered violent disorder? I mean, a flag, a flag. They're weird about that. Oh, yeah. Right. Flags of certain color. Um, definitely. Yeah. It kind of reminds me of like a J six sort of thing in the sense that, you know, they, they charged like thousands of people with, um, interrupting a government. I forget the exact term of it, but it's like interrupting a government procedure or something like that. You know, people that were didn't weren't even there again, you know, like, uh, Enrique Tario. Um, but you know, then you also look at all the astroturfing man that's going on. All the like, people that are there in non grassroots, organized situations like we've been seeing here in the United States for a long time. Also, you got to wonder about that too. Uh, a lot of times the, the people they'll arrest and then show you the faces of, I'm not saying this is the case with all these, but we've certainly seen this where, um, people that are, that make this the news, if you will, um, with some of these arrests inside of protests, are people that have strange histories. They have been, you know, potentially leveraged, uh, used as confidential informants or agitators or stuff like that. A lot of times you see names like this and arrests like this. And then they're the ones that, you know, get out within six months to a year. Well, you know, the other people that, you know, let's not forget, there's 600, you know, 500 and, uh, some odd other people who've been arrested that they're not showing us, you know, so it's like, it really makes one wonder in situations like this, especially when the cops are standing back doing nothing and the cops are like cordoning off, you know, different areas for these things to happen and then standing back and, and watching it while people film it, you know, um, if we really have these wonderful police forces, like, why not stop these things, uh, before they happen, if they're completely organic, you know, uh, no, uh, the tactic is to put in confidential informants, agitators, uh, people that have multiple uniforms they can put on. We've seen people, uh, show up in the BLM click and then show up in the Trump click, you know, at a couple of events later, even some of the most famous ones like the, uh, Buffalo horn guy, the MAGA shaman dude, uh, you know, and Tario himself, Tario, uh, a known, uh, FBI informant or fed informant of some sort. So yeah, do I think Tario's going to stay in jail as long as, you know, I don't know, say the grandma that came from across the country? Yeah, I don't think so. I don't think so. Um, so it's a mess, dude. This is a total mess, you know, um, and when we talk to some of our friends in the UK and in other places, they're saying it's not like this everywhere, you know, this, it's like these things pop up. They happen. There's a whole bunch of, you know, nasty comments and, um, you know, things caught on video, uh, but then you go to other parts of the city, other parts of, you know, the UK and everything is normal, much like it was here in the US and the Floydian era. Yeah, and looking at this little breakdown of the, um, the offenses that people were charged relating to 159 individuals, there were a total of 10 online offenses. That's, that's freaking crazy. Yeah. What the hell is going on here? I don't, I don't know. Uh, let's see here. Yeah. Also, uh, I've heard this, uh, photon just dropped, uh, a sub stack radical article here. They made that said that within it says they're making people stay at home again. Like there's like, you know, lockdown style sort of things going on in here. And also, like you were saying, Ruckus, you know, uh, this, this pushes towards facial recognition, which, you know, obviously is going to dovetail with digital ID at some point, which is one of, you know, the ultimate goals, uh, for the future dystopia they're trying to build for us. So, I don't know, man. I have to, we have to ask, uh, who dropped that photon? How many masks do you have to wear when you go outside to keep yourself safe from a violent, uh, right-wing protests? Far right extremists, at least six masks I would wager. Yeah. And the thing is, you know, the thing that bugs me about this, and it's just like almost everything else that people protest over, uh, to include Israel's genocide in Gaza. It's like, there's, there's literally zero reportage interviewing of anyone, any protester or any citizen or, you know, butcher, baker, candlestickmaker, anyone, uh, in the vicinity who might have a nuanced perspective or good questions to ask. No, it's none of that. It's, it's the cops are there. Crap is on fire. Uh, people are fighting and it's, um, anti-racist and far right extremists. Like, there's, there's nothing in between. There's nothing about like, hey, uh, you know, my, my, my kid was, um, you know, they lost their school, you know, their schools turned into something completely different because of the demographic changes here. And you know what I mean? There's not, there's nothing like that. There's nothing. It's just, especially if you're in another country. So, and I'm sure that, you know, um, our friends in, in the EU and, you know, other countries, when, when they're trying to look at news here in America, if they're just looking at, you know, the mass media stuff, it's the same thing. It's like you've got anti-fascist and then you've got far right extremists. It's like, this is the, the dialectic that they want to, the narrative, the dialectically driven narrative that they're giving to the rest of the world. And you know, the message is really clear. Uh, if you, if you know what you're looking at, you know, if you know you're being dragged by the nose into a dialectic, the message is, hey, we're gonna, we're, we're gonna have a race war, guys. We're gonna have a civil war. Uh, there's nothing in the middle. All you have are extremists, right? And you've got the bad extremists and then the people that are against the bad extremists and who are the bad extremists? Well, it's patriots, it's conservatives, it's traditionalists. It's, it's anything that doesn't suck up to this dialectical narrative that they're giving us. And I know that that is not the case. Like, I can see it. I can see it just watching the videos. I see the same thing playing out over and over again. Uh, yeah, I mean, if, if it ain't broke, why I fix it, I mean, it works over and over again, the same formula. It's, it's, you know, come on, man. But it's just, it's hot. It's so shocking every time it happens. Um, it says, see, you know, this seems like a natural progression. I mean, isn't it interesting that we're discussing here a population that has been unarmed, disarmed, you know, yeah. And, um, as, as, uh, as Funk pointed out in the discord chat, uh, the online safety act, you know, we've been warning about the online safety act, the disinformation, uh, board, the, the analog to this thing in Canada, the analog to this thing in, Australia, New Zealand, you know, like, this is, this is what those are for. Like, this is exactly what we've been warning against. This is exactly why freedom of speech and freedom of press is more important than it's ever been in all our lifetimes. Uh, because they can take these things, these disgusting, horrible, uh, global, globalist, odious acts, like the online safety act and, and use it to go after people who will dissent online. You know, it, it's insane, man. It's insane. And you know, people do, you know, to, to go back to radicalization. Yeah. Sometimes people do fall in, you know, organically into the inorganic radicalization because it's problem reaction solution. They see the problem. They have the reaction. And unfortunately, the solution is not your, your, uh, you know what I mean? If, if you're all of a sudden find yourself, uh, on one of those extremes because, you know, it, it speaks to you and your worldview at this point in your life, if you get a little older, it won't, uh, hopefully, um, you know, it's easy to fall into that. But this is exactly why they set these up because they know that they can astroturf it enough to create the optic that things are worse than they are and, uh, have no discussion about, you know, um, policies that could alleviate some of those things or no discussion that the policies that are in place were put there purposely to cause this, to bring about this, um, you know, this false dialectic radical dialectic, you know, so yeah, it, you end up with, uh, a complete information fog, like a fog of information war where you've got, you know, some people that, um, do fall into those ideologies because they make sense to them and their worldview, but they're, you know, overshadowed by all the astroturfers and whoever, you know, the media and social media lords decide to, you know, put up on these articles. Yeah, it's interesting that they, they refuse to do it this way. I mean, I guess since they understand that the, um, in general, um, the people will, will rise up against their controllers if they're aware that they're, they, they're being controlled, um, so they, they put them against each other, I suppose, um, because we have a natural desire to fight back against tyranny, it would appear, um, and they, they realize this. Very interesting what they do there. Isn't that a form of Marxism, how they do that, where they, they spare the actual criminals and they actually criminalize their, their political opponents is that exactly, like, pretty much by definition how Marxist systems work. Yeah, 100%. I mean, you can see that in effect. You've seen it in Russia before. Uh, it's insane, man. It's absolutely insane. Look at Mao, you know, look at the cultural revolution, same, same playbook, same playbook. And then it's not lost on, on the observers who are just sitting on the sidelines, but then yes, they, they try to drag us in there. There's no such thing as the, I'm just going to sit on the fence and watch this one. No. You got to pull you down on one side or the other, whether you want it or not, or at least frame it and make it look like you were on one side or the other when you're not. I mean, there's no, there's no middle ground anymore. There's no gray. It's all black or white. It's all right or left. It's all this persistent, ridiculous, fake struggle. It's, it's really getting obnoxious to be completely honest with you. Um, yeah, like we're beyond the, it's almost the point here, like the next time there's a massive, like, protest, I would suggest, hey, we all need to just go and attend because whatever charges we're going to get are probably going to be much lighter than us waiting and then tweeting about it and then five years from now going to prison for life. Yeah. Yeah. It's, it's, it's ridiculous, you know, and as a, as a global citizenry, we should be very aware that this is being done on purpose. This is, this is not, you know, there, there are organic responses to the, to the situation, but the policies that were put in place were put there intentionally to create the situation. That's, that's what the whole Hegelian thing is. So yeah, does government care about you? No, are they trying to protect you online? No, of course not. No, they're busy tearing down your traditions. They're busy turning us against each other. They're busy creating dialectics, violent, id, you know, violent identity politic and racial dialectics that do not represent the majority of people so that they can put this kind of control down. It's, it's just insane. So yeah, the UK riots and other places where riots are going on, very, very sus, respect, very sus, respect, respect. Ultimately, by the way, what this means is because of that, that threat about the, remember that threat, how the UK says, even if you're not from the country or whatever Britain says, we're going to come after you. I don't know how that's going to work. But the thing is that apparently, I don't know if it's back online, but did you see this where the police departments websites were not accepting anyone from other countries to visit it? No, I missed that. Yeah, they were blocking non-local IP addresses. That's what it was. Oh, actually, yeah, I do. I do remember seeing that this week. Yeah, that was crazy. It's like, oh, okay. So transparency just, you know, gets, it's like a faucet that can just shut it off at some point. It's like, well, yeah, we're just going to, we're just going to geo fence this, this whole topic here. So only and and in a related topic to add a cherry to all of this, another thing that has been shut off, at least for the next 10 days or so, would be this social media platform X has been completely cut off to inhabitants of Venezuela, courtesy of one Nicholas Maduro. He should be cut him off. Oh, man, this, this is all going in such a bad direction for for us internet folk. My goodness. I hate it. I really hate the direction, you know, I thought we were, you know, I thought we were into globalism, guys. Hey, globalists. I thought we thought we were globalizing. And now you're saying we're not allowed to know what's happening in the countries that our brothers and sisters reside in. Are you kidding me? Like, you can globalize our our supply chain. You can you can globalize sexual identities with the whole global homo initiative of the the UN and all you can globalize everything except our ability to enjoy the internet, to speak with each other, to to do one of the, you know, short of going to another country, I'd say, you know, being online and and having a a worldview that is, you know, people strive to base in some sort of reality and an understanding of current events, hopefully somewhat based in reality, like that that's going to be taken away. They're going to take that away. Take away our ability to actually be a, you know, a global citizenry that represents the actual zeitgeist of that global citizenry. We'll take that away. And what what's the trade in here? Well, like, what do we get? We get safety and security. We get to know that if we go to an NFL game or a Taylor Swift concert that, oh, don't worry, daddy governments here with their, their digital IDs and their facial recognition systems, and they'll certainly cancel the concert if a teenager has been radicalized on Instagram by, you know, new ISIS or something, they're definitely going to take care of us. Well, I guess not because, you know, you're going to get your Taylor Swift concert canceled, you're going to go home and you're not going to be able to look and see what's going on, you know, in Liverpool or in New Zealand or in Australia or, you know, shit. It might be good cop, bad cop again. It's not always like coercion. Sometimes it's like the promise of something nice and new and cool. Like, you know, hey, you know, we know your little has tinted about taking these unex tested mRNA altering gene jab things. But don't worry, if you do, we'll give you some free donuts. I will give you a raffle ticket for a switch stakes. You might win a new car or all that crap. What if, like, eventually, like, if, if, if, if, this threat of fear or you want safety and security, that's not good enough. What if you want access to guaranteed income or extended life technologies, things like that? What, what, what fancy new things are right around the horizon that we're not going to be privy to because we don't want to participate in the new status quo because we've been radicalized, Tessher. Yeah. Well, that whole concept is, that's a social reject thing. That's a you're not viable thing, right? And, you know, Bill Gates is over there working with the WHO right now to make sure they can certainly push that New Zealand's come out with a new legislation that is going to push that stuff. You know, that's going to get that they apply that one, that concept to us a lot with the vaccines. But you can see how this easily graphs over to online speech, free speech, sharing memes, sharing thoughts, putting your worldview out online, even if the way that you present it, some people might find offensive. And, and here we sit, Adam in America, where we literally have a founding document that says that is a right that government doesn't even have to mess with. That is in a God given an alienable right. Yet, here we are, you know, looking at the, you know, potential resurgence of the disinformation board and being harmed online, all right? Citizens being harmed online here in the United States by the algorithms and this kind of stuff. I mean, this is all, it's all going in the same direction. We could be guilty right now of committing a crime in another country and we don't belong to that country. Well, I mate, are we going to have some, is there going to be a guy in a safety yellow suit with a Billy Club show up at my door over this broadcast? I mean, we don't recommend that. We live in Texas. Yeah, I have Billy Club, man. Yeah, Billy Club guy. I don't even think you can carry a knife, right? I mean, we got six or seven of those just like strapped to our boots at all times just for, you know, opening beers and, you know, killing our medillos and gutting them on the side of the road where we eat them. I'm just joking a little bit, but not really. I mean, but that's why people look at America so much, because I'm sorry, it UK friends, but at last I heard you don't have a first amendment and it certainly looks that way. It certainly looks that way by all these arrests that we're seeing for online location harms. Yeah, it's pretty wild. I never thought I would live to see this. This is the type of stuff we joke about or, or, or predict what's going to happen. And here it is. It's literally happening. People are literally being arrested for posting on social media. I mean, wow. I mean, just wow. I don't even know what to say anymore about it. Yeah. Could you imagine like, in the lead up to World War II or something like that, if you just, I mean, they didn't have social media. So, you know, like, say you wrote something on a Post-it note. Did they have Post-it notes? Probably not. Say you wrote something on a three by five card and handed it to someone else and, you know, a cop came along and was like, "Oh, nope. You can't write that and hand that to someone." You know what I mean? Like, pass it on in the classroom or something like that. It's just not can't do that. Sorry. They didn't even technically do this. No, they didn't. We made it through the whole pandemic and medical misinformation. I mean, you could kill people with your medical misinformation words coming out of your mouth under your social media, but they didn't throw people in jail over that. You know? Yeah. This is crazy. This is really beyond the pale. No kidding, man. No kidding. Dangerous. It's a very dangerous precedent, you know, and this is one of those things, you know, that like, we've been talking about this forever. It goes way, way, way back. But I mean, we, I think, you know, occupy and the tea party in the, you know, later 2000s here in the United States is a perfect example of what we're talking about here. And I think that was sort of the last, the last gasp of the grassroots, right? Because at that point in time, this is not that long ago. This is just like a blink of an eye. It's like you had, you know, mostly, mostly Democrat people or, you know, common sense people, independent people, look like I just looked at it as a bunch of hippies at the time. But, you know, looking back on it now, I kind of look at it differently, doing occupy, right? Occupy Wall Street. And they were, you know, all upset about their, their call to arms was the 99%. You know, the 1% ruling over the 99%. And, you know, that was looking at all kinds of things, you know, politics and corporate reality and financial reality and policy and all that, you know, how it benefited basically only 1% of, you know, the elite, the 1%. And same with the tea party movement, you know, I know people that were original tea party people. And again, another grassroots thing, like, hey, you know, we see tyranny happening via political policy and agreed with some of the occupy people actually when it came to a lot of the financial policy. And then what happened? Both those movements completely infiltrated, corrupted from within early versions of influencers dropped in there using the talking points that, you know, those crowds resonate with, and then slowly migrating them out of that anti-establishment set of, you know, complaints, talking points, I don't know, policy disputes, and dragging them into what, you know, is now contemporary power politics, which is more cult of personality oriented and identity politic oriented. And, you know, it's the same thing. So, we saw that. And once they did that successfully, all of a sudden that seems to be the norm. And we've got NGOs that can deploy, you know, hundreds of people at a time, armed with, basically, the tactics, solensky tactics. And, you know, we, and then we get things like on a much grander scale, like we saw at J6, and like we're seeing right now with this anti-racist versus far right extremist quote unquote stuff. And, well, okay, so examining the playbook, what's their next move? What comes next? Well, that's the interesting thing about these times, I think, it's like, everything's out there. All the tactics are, have the appearance that they are working. And even when they don't, they just silence, you know, silence, arrest, gulag, marginalized algorithm, ghetto, anyone, you know, that's got enough eyeballs and ears on whatever they're saying. So, I mean, anything's next, I guess, anything's next. It's like, we're out of the slow boil phase. But somebody still got their hand on, you know, that's like, we used to talk about the boiling frog is a David Ike that kind of brought that imagery into the, our lexicon. And now it's like, you know, we've got an entire chef smorgasbord. We got a chef stove here with like nine, 10, two dozen pots bubbling on it right now. And, you know, a lot of fingers on every burner. So yeah, anything could be next, man. This could all get toned down and we could go into another, you know, slow roll up to 2030. And, you know, just work the work the weft plan. Or we could just straight up see, you know, World War three start or a civil war start or a manufactured terror invasion start. I mean, it's it's absolutely nothing's off the table right now. Good. Well, you know, and we've got this, we saw what's been taking place in Europe. And then now quite spectacularly, specifically in the UK with their immigration problem issue. I guess it's not a problem. Sorry. No, like full fledged just come on over everybody. It's not a problem, right? Yeah, clearly we're having problems here. Yeah, we're we're we're bracing for our own problem, just like that here in the States has your but not only that, it's it's, you know, it's election season. I mean, yeah, are we going to mean, they keep dropping these hints, they keep saying like, I mean, what's the number one talking point that you hear when they're when they're discussing who or what is crossing our border? It's military age mail as if you know, I take offense to that that talking point, by the way, because it's just brought up all the time. I'm like, I'm like, well, technically, I'm a military aged male, but I wouldn't be I wouldn't be proud of like your military was full of a bunch of old skinny ruckuses. Okay, this is just because you're of a certain age doesn't mean that you're automatically of that mindset physically or mentally. It just means that you're of a certain age, but they they use that to instill that that that narrative, right? So so it's it's it's seeding this idea that in the near future, I mean, we would believe it if they say, Oh, shit, look, there's a there's a group of 80 pair of military trained Chinese Guatemalan citizens who pledge to ISIS and they're they just took over a small town in Kansas. It could be fucking anything. Excuse my French. Uh, but did I lose you there? You're back. Yeah. Gravity had its way with my phone. It happens, but you see, they've been they've been dropping these little breadcrumbs in their little narrative. Do you think that we might see something happen here, some sort of terror event, some sort of immigration flashpoint, some sort of attack that then gets the the protest role? And I mean, it is election season. Don't they have more important things to worry about right now? Like trying to win over votes and sell folks on, uh, you know, a JD Vance VP or a Tim walls VP. Oh, anyway, that's right. But do you think we're going to see some some crazy stuff happen in here similar to the UK before the elections? It kind of depends on what the plan is for that election. If if the election is something that they can't, this is just my opinion today, it changes, but today it feels like if by some reason, uh, they can't rig the election again, as many people think it was. Oh, no, they're thought crime. Uh, you know what I mean? Like if, uh, and if, frankly, if they can't kill Donald Trump, you know, uh, he had a plane, he had an incident with his jet the other night, some people are, uh, theorizing that it may have been a sabotage and another assassination attempt. Um, is it? I don't know. Is this, is all this assassination stuff, uh, just more conspiracy candy, more, uh, methods for, from, you know, with which the, uh, again, air quotes, they can use to, um, increase the radicalization of mainstream conservatives. Uh, maybe, but maybe not. Maybe they're actually trying to liquidate this guy. But anyways, uh, if Donald Trump is not like selected and actually becomes elected, I could definitely see that happening post-haste. Um, you know, between maybe even between the election and the inauguration. So that's definitely on the table, uh, something popping off, uh, because you know, I mean, they're, they keep warning us about it. They, you know what I mean? Like we're seeing, uh, warnings all over the place. You can go to the DHS website and it'll, you know, tell you, hey, you should have a bug out bag. You should have this. You should have that. You should have water. Uh, you know, you should be prepared for anything because the power could go out. We could have a cyber attack. We could have a terror attack. Who knows? So, you know, and I saw reports this week also about, um, infrastructure, a lot of talk about the infrastructure and how, you know, multiple nations have, uh, access to, you know, all these different infrastructure, uh, critical infrastructure systems, if you will, water management, et cetera, power. So yeah, that could definitely happen. Um, what else would be on the table? Uh, bird flu, I suppose. I mean, that one seems a little rough to try to roll out, uh, for the election, but they're already doing it and they changed the, uh, the Democratic National Convention to virtual, I think. So that kind of smacks of the whole basement run that we saw from Biden. So yeah, this, this, there's definitely a lot of things that, uh, could and may happen. I don't expect we're just like looking at a potential October surprise at this point. It's just like we're surprised every day and, and now, you know, we've got international activities going on too. They're, they're, you know, there's this, uh, intelligence, 17 intelligence agency, probably, uh, stuff going around about how, um, Iran has an interest in seeing Donald Trump assassinated. So, you know, and we've got Iran saying, uh, that they're going to retaliate against Israel, but they're waiting until, you know, ceasefire talks have, uh, completed or, you know, whatever that's going to look like. I don't have a whole lot of faith in that, but yeah, we could see something happen more, um, globally, geopolitically, uh, we could see something happen right here at home. And then there's all this cyber stuff going on. We had, uh, you know, that whole clown strike, crowd strike. I mean, thing happened. Hey, did you say clown strike? Somebody made a parody website called clown strike and they're, they're using crowd strikes logo. So crowd strike tried to, uh, do a cease and desist through, um, through, uh, the web services that was hosting the website and they, they don't have a case. So clown strike is get, gets to stay up there, and they get to keep using the crowd strike logo and all these different parody things. It's very interesting, funny stuff. But let's, let's talk about that. I mean, you make a good point. I mean, that would probably be a big one. I know that there are actual contingencies put in place in our government here, uh, where we would suspend the elections in the case of, say, a war time thing, which is kind of similar to, you know, how democracy's working for Ukraine because, you know, Zelensky, no, no election going on out there. Uh, he gets to stay in power indefinitely. Yeah, no mandate. I mean, he's not president anymore. He's a dictator. I don't know. I guess he's just acting. Well, I was always been acting. It's funny. I've seen how he acts. It's, uh, it's offensive. But there's, there's quite a, you know, a number disturbing developments happening in the, uh, the Gaza region. Um, since the killing of the, the, the high level Hamas guy, they have a new leader. I don't have his name in front of me. Um, so, um, I would normally rely on somebody like Patrick and Basil to fill us in with his back story. So I'm going to skip over that. However, I did want to discuss. There's a couple of big things that have been happening. Um, by now, I'm sure everybody's familiar with the, the drama unfolding over the, uh, we want to defend the right to torture, uh, through a terrible ways. Uh, I'm not going to discuss too much into you understand what I'm talking about with the Palestinian prisoner, um, the involving a broomstick and all that fun stuff. But now there's a guy who's actually involved in that has been going around making the rounds on like podcasts and on video. Um, so you'll find, um, videos of that out there if you so desire, but it is. Didn't he? Was he wearing like a ball of clava or something in the interviews? He's hiding his identity. Yeah, you know the one. Lovely. Um, if we were doing video, I would suggest that we would play that clip, but it wouldn't make sense because he's not speaking English. So we'll just skip that. Uh, but there, there's been an, an, another development that's similar. Now we have, uh, some sort of, uh, prime, uh, I mean, in Israeli ministry, some sort of some politician, uh, top aid coming out, trying to justify starving dozens to death. I saw that. Yeah, it's an Israeli minister. I'll have his name in two seconds. Here it is. Uh, Smotrich. That's the one. Uh, so it's Israel's finance minister, uh, Bez, Bezalil Smotrich. Uh, he says that allowing Gaza's entire population to go hungry would be morally justified as a means of fighting Hamas. So yeah, that's quite disgusting. Um, so we have that going on, uh, which is probably, you know, one of the many, many reasons that we, we were seeing, you know, Hezbollah, uh, responding. We're, we're seeing threats from Iran, of course, especially after the attack on the former Hamas leader, uh, on their soil. Turkey has been, um, ramping up their rhetoric as well, uh, suggesting that they are imminently prepared to take the fight to Israel and get involved. Um, and in the midst of all of that Israel went ahead and said, you know, we're just going to go ahead and attack a school. Um, and, but it's okay because Hamas was operating there, but yeah, we got like 90 to 100 civilians dead not that long ago. Um, so yeah, all of this happening at once. So it certainly, certainly could see a World War three type flashpoint happening there. Yeah. Um, if, if I were this, whatever this power structure is that is, um, working to maintain its control in the United States, I think at this point, I would just, uh, you know, if I was Dr. Evil or whoever, whomever, Star Chamber, uh, decision maker, I think I would just not have an election. Why even bother with one? Um, you could just do what the kind of democracy that we're seeing in, in Ukraine, right? You just don't have the election because something happened in the Middle East or in Europe or in Taiwan or all three or here in the United States as well. You know what I mean? It wouldn't be that difficult to nudge everybody into another Floyd incident, you know, like similar to what we're seeing in the UK right now, you know, have those things popping off locally and have the, you know, that be the complete distraction, uh, you know, causing chaos of, of mind and in the streets. And then it could be a torrent of things or any one thing, you know, Donald Trump's plane falls out of the sky. Joe Biden heals over. There's a lot of talks still going around this week about Joe Biden not being alive or Joe Biden being in hospice. There's a lot of that flying around right now. Uh, if that all were to come to fruition in the next four months, Kamala Harris would be de facto president because Joe Biden would be off the chessboard. Maybe Donald Trump would be off the chessboard. I mean, heck, I wouldn't be surprised if they took Kamala Harris, uh, and walls off the check board, uh, chessboard too. You know, they could just start taking big names off the chessboard, having little, little racial conflicts, little helter scalters popping up in westernized countries, have a disease, whatever, uh, something pops off somewhere else. And we're suspending the election, you know, we're in a war stance. Uh, we're going to suspend election. Kamala Harris is now the figurehead and, uh, we're off to the party. Uh, that's a party. I don't want to attend, RSVP, Negatory. Uh, please, uh, sorry, I lost my invite in the mail. There you go. Yeah. Uh, I was not, I did not retweet that invite, uh, or that meme. Dangerous, dangerous. And to be clear for anyone who's listening who wants to convict me of a future crime or convict me in the future of my past crime, which is presently taking place, um, clearly where we, nobody here has sure. I think you agree with me as saying that allowing two million men, women and children to starve to death is anything but an act of self defense. And it's clearly not genocide. Right. And, you know, bombing all the hospitals, turning off the water, turning off the food. Uh, yeah, that's, that's all fine. That's all, uh, Israel defending itself. Right. You know, I've, I brought this up on boiler room on Thursday, but I think it bears repeating. When I look at that rhetoric, it's like, oh my gosh, let me see some of this conflict. You know, oh my gosh, right? Like you're willing to bomb a school. You're willing to bomb all the hospitals. You're willing to, to stand by. Well, thousands, literally thousands of children and women are being turned into amputees right now with no anesthesia. Holy crap. These, these chemos guys must be insane fighters, right? Like, I'm, I'm, there must be so much access to video of this war that I can see. Well, I go look at, you know, my various accounts where I can see stuff like that. You certainly won't see it in the mass media cartel, but you know, you get on telegram, whatever you know, for example, you can follow like, uh, you know, Vanessa Bealy or some of the guests that we've had here on this show, Eva Bartlett, you know, a whole bunch of people, right? Don't, you don't have to just trust one person or anything, but there's a lot of places you can go on telegram and other places on, in the apps and on the web, uh, where you can see the war in Ukraine. You can see trench warfare. You can see, I mean, it's, it's clearly not going well for the Ukrainian soldiers. It's sad to say, but in some cases, sad to say, but you know, you look at the mass number of lives lost and it's like, holy crap, it's approaching like, like half a million Ukrainians. By the way, that fighting age male talking point, that really doesn't mean anything because you look over there, it's like, uh, they dropped that down to teenagers and raised it all the way up to retirees. So, you know, who's, who's to define what a fighting age male is in this new undemocracy. But anyways, you, you, you look at, you know, you can see drone video, you can see, rifle mounted GoPros, you see like, you know, uh, kit mounted GoPros, you see UAV footage, you know, I can see people stabbing each other in, in trenches, I see people shooting at each other, I see drone warfare, I see all this stuff, right? I see piles of dead people in mass graves. It's horrible. This is all horrible. I don't suggest you go see it unless you got an iron stomach, but you know, I see all that in Ukraine. It's like, yeah, there's, there's some crazy conflict going on there. There's some, some battle happening. And look at this, the similar channels out of Gaza. And it's like, I see IDF snipers, like shooting teenagers and shooting journalists. Uh, I see, you know, Jay dams falling, you know, 500 pound bombs and 2000 pound bombs falling on neighborhoods, decimating them, completely destroying them. I see dead kids, dead kids after dead kids, after dead kids, mutilated kids, crying mothers. Uh, you know what I mean? I'm just not seeing that fierce, uh, warfare that I'm seeing in Ukraine. And even in, in Ukraine, I don't see anyone saying, oh, we should definitely like, starve out all the Russians, or I don't see Russians saying we should starve out all the you. You know what I mean? It's just none of this. Like, uh, we're going to bomb all the hospitals. We're going to, you know, just decimate this society. You know, we're going to, we're willing to kill two million people. Like, I just, you know what I mean? How do we, how do we square that circle? It doesn't make sense that it's like, they're invisible. Right. Exactly food poisoning. It's like Hamas is almost invisible. To be fair, I have seen some, uh, Hamas, uh, snipers, you know, um, doing things. But when I see, when I see that, I see them targeting officers in the IDF. You know what I mean? Combatants. And I don't see them doing all this terrible stuff that we hear that they're doing day to day. So I don't know, maybe, maybe I'm just dumb, Ruckus. Maybe I just don't get it. Well, you're, you're lacking the, the comprehension about the moral, uh, thing. See, Israel has the, the moral high ground here. So they're allowed to do whatever they want. I'm being incredibly sarcastic. Yeah. It's so honest face obvious. This is why anyone with a heart, mind and soul who's not completely been brainwashed to become like a giant Zionist worshiper or some sort, um, can, can quickly become radicalized against the status quo by saying, Hey, wait a second. I don't think that that's right. And you shouldn't do that. How dare you say that we don't have the right to defend ourselves. That's not what I'm saying. You go to jail. Wait a minute. What did I shut up you before you get the broomstick? That's where we are. Right. And it's like, what the hell is going on in these administrative detention centers? Um, did, did they clone Jeffrey Dahmer like enough times to, to have him, you know, copies of him running around, uh, as, as prison guards and, um, interrogators in these detention centers. I mean, dude, that I don't even, I hate this story. I absolutely hate what's going on. It's terrible. I can't believe, you know, here we are. It's 2024. We live in a, you know, post World War two world, a post Vietnam world, all the stuff behind us, all these atrocities behind us. And we're, we're sitting here looking at current events and talking about people administratively detained by an occupying force getting tortured in administrative detention centers with broomsticks. They're going to, I think Jamie Handshaw said it best. They're going to do bad things to your butthole. All right. Um, that's where we're at destroying hospitals and schools, leveling a piece of land that has over 2 million people on it. And it's for the moral high ground. Who's, who's moral high ground? Not mine. No, not mine either. Um, but we get to, we get to pay for it too, ultimately. I mean, like, uh, this most recent attack that happened, I have that we're, it took place at the Al Tabin School in Northern Gaza just yesterday. More than 100 civilians did. It was reportedly three 2000 pound bombs dropped on them as they were worshiping, uh, having a, a, a fadger prayer at dawn. Uh, those bonds were supplied by the United States of America, allegedly. Yeah. Yeah. Your tax dollars at work for a set of morals that may or may not fit with your own, uh, absolutely insane. And we've got drowned. Let's put Donald, let's spotlight on Donald Trump for a second here. I'm going to play this clip, Ruckus. You're not going to be able to hear it, but I'll, I'll tell you what you missed. Everyone else will be able to hear it. Here we go. It's about 40 seconds. Stand by. It helps if you unmute the clip before you play it. Here we go. That Kamala is in favor of not giving Israel weapons. Yeah. That's what I hear. Look, uh, she's been very, very bad to Israel and she's been very bad to Jewish people. And I say it, if anybody I know is Jewish and they would vote for Kamala over me, they should have their head examined. If you think about it, I gave them Golan Heights. I gave them the capital of Israel, Jerusalem. I built the, I even built the embassy. I gave them no arandial. The problem is they didn't do anything with it, but we would have gotten along with Iran. I was looking forward to it. I, I was fine with Iran. You know, we hit them a couple of times pretty hard, but we would have been fine with Iran, but I got them. I terminated that deal. Okay. So Ruckus, what we just heard right there was Donald Trump talking about how Kamala hasn't done anything for Israel. And she talks about not wanting to arm Israel. And then he goes on to say he gave Israel the Golan Heights. He gave Israel Jerusalem. He stopped the Iran deal, you know, me, me, me, me, me. And I find this to be right there on par with his lack of cogency on the Vax topic. And he's even doubled down on that a little bit this week and kind of go at pretending like feigning like he's going to go after big pharma. Not about MRNA though, but about the rise in child autism. You know, he's gonna, he's way behind the curve here. And I think it's a joke. I've got a, a matching clip somewhere. I'm not gonna play it. I don't have it to hand. I've got a matching clip of Kamala speaking at an APAC meeting, not just but a couple of months ago, at most, where she flat out said, we're gonna give Israel everything they need. We're gonna continue to support them. Blah, blah, blah. I mean, it's, it's a joke. It's an absolute joke right now speaking of dialectics and, and bull crap that the mass media is putting out. It's a joke that the Biden administration or the Democrat party as a whole is anti-Semitic or that they're not going to support Israel. But that seems to be the talking point on all of the mainstream conservative and even here within Trump's own campaign platform. Yeah, I did hear the audio just fine. Oh, good. Good. Yeah. So thank you for not playing the Kamala once since they can hear the audio just fine. Yeah, she would just start cackling in the middle of it. If you actually talk or was it just? Oh, yeah, a little bit of both. We're gonna, we're gonna continue to support Israel. Cackling, Kamala. Oh my goodness, courageous. Yeah. I don't know, man. It seems like no matter how you slice it. Yeah, it's, it's not just the left or the right, but it's also the middle. There is a mysterious third candidate out there fighting, vying for president. But regardless of which three of these people win, Israel wins. Yeah, period. Yeah. 100%. Yeah, Kamala Harris, right. 26 again in the chat says, right? That's a good one. 26 also said, I saw that cleanup crews scraped up the remains of people killed in that recent bombing of the refugee area in the church and they couldn't identify the bodies. It was all just burned meat. So they gave the relatives the weight of their deceased in a plastic bag filled with body parts. Unfortunately, I've seen the images and you're absolutely correct. It's very sickening. I mean, is that not ritual murder, ritual humiliation, war crime? I mean, whose idea was this, who approved this? Why is that something that happens on the quote unquote moral high ground? Can can someone please explain this to us? Ruckus and I would love to know how that applies to the moral high ground, you know, that that sounds, that sounds like just about the worst war atrocity one could, you know, it's among the worst ones that we have record of or could possibly dream up to be happening right now. Well, wait, there's always tomorrow. Oh, but wait, there's more. Yeah, right. Exactly. They seem to keep one upping themselves, in my opinion. So I really don't know how much further this is going to go on. I mean, I don't imagine it's going to go for much longer before I ran, really, just says, you know what, we're done with this little proxy thing and helping it. We're just taking it straight to you. It's all like Donkey Kong. Yeah. And Lindsey Graham is going to get so happy. Yep. It says a lot also. I just want to brief side note. You mentioned Turkey earlier. Turkey is an ally nation of the United States. I mean, if you go to... They're a NATO member. Yeah, they're a NATO member. If you go to like, you know, any of our military post graduate schools, you'll find Turkish officers there. There'll be a, you know, a couple dozen at least in just about every graduating class of Turkish military officers. So how does that work out? What's that all about? Like, are they going to leave NATO? Are they going to take all that advanced weaponry and training that the United States has been giving them for decades now and just see that turn against our greatest ally in the Middle East? I mean, quote unquote, that whole thing is just like, there's, I see no discussion about that. No one wants to touch that whole topic of Turkey and what that actually means. Well, you know, maybe this Thanksgiving will be talking about a different kind of Turkey. Yeah, really. No kidding. Talk about an inconvenient factor here that you don't see them trying to explain this to people in America in mass media because they can't. All right. Well, let's get out of the Middle East. That's all we can tell you on that one right now. Let's go to Ukraine, though, for a second here, Ruckus. I heard the F-16s have finally arrived, and that's definitely going to work out better than the Abrams and German Cheetah tanks, right? Yeah, sure. Yeah, they're filming Top Gun 3, I think right now, as we speak out there. All right. Is George Clooney out there with Tommy Cruz? They replace the lyrics. It's not highway to the danger zone. It's highway to the democracy zone. Yeah, heading into overdrive. That's right. Yeah, so are they nerfed F-16s? That's my first question. How nerfed are the F-16s? Because we sent over nerfed M1 Abrams tanks, right? They didn't have the same active protection stuff on them. They didn't have the same communications gear, all that stuff. However, many tanks they sent over between us and Germany multiply that by the number of crew members. Those variables will give you, do a little algebra there. Those variables will give you the amount of Ukrainian men and boys that died in a flaming metallic hulk. All I know heather is that those bad boys are made right here in the USA, and I'm so proud of that. USA, USA, send our F-16s. Yeah, save, save democracy in Ukraine, where they detained, tortured, and killed an American journalist. Let's do that. Let's send some tanks over there. Let's heck tell you what, let's send some of our tier one operators over there. Sure, they'll send some of the best of our best over there. Let's do that. Absolutely insane. And then also, so yeah, I don't know what's going to happen with the F-16s, who's training them. I mean, at this point, like, you know, does this mean no fly zones are being set up? Because if a no fly zone is set up, then this is a big escalation. I guess that's my maybe more important question than are the F-16s nerfed. It doesn't matter if they're nerfed, because even if they're not, they're going to fall out of the sky when they meet their first SU-35. Those Sukhois are way outclassing our old ass F-16s. I noticed they didn't send any F-35s over there. So yeah, but does that equal a no fly zone? Because once a no fly zone is established, it's a whole lot different than a ground skirmish. Yep, not sure about any of that, but the training was all done way ahead of time. That's why part of the delay here, because these are promised over a year ago. So they've been spending this entire time training the pilots. And the pilots are allegedly the Ukrainian pilots. They're flying them right now. They're up there and the sky is doing whatever. Showing off to people, I guess. They got shiny new little Nazi Trident logo things on them. They're cool. Great. Just great. And we're also seeing Ukrainian military incursion into Russia, right? We're seeing-- Oh yeah, this is interesting. That's pretty interesting. I don't know what to think about this. I don't know. We're probably on the four or five days. I was trying to check. I think it's still going on. This is into Kursk, the Kursk region. K-U-R-S-K. My Russian is rusty, but I think it's Kursk, something like that. But yeah, apparently, at random, they just, I don't know, sent in at least the 1,000 troops Ukraine did into this region. We're talking like six miles or more into Russia's territory. And there were these wild videos, Hesh, I don't know if you saw them, but it looked like there were actual attacks on civilians driving around. People driving their cars inside towns, inside of the city, trying to avoid anti-tank mines and stuff, being shot at, wild stuff. I don't know what's going on. And then I heard reports that they're actually-- they're speaking English. You see these videos? Like these supposedly Ukrainian soldiers inside Russia, and they're all speaking English to each other? I don't know what's going on, man. It's very confusing to me. Yeah. Yeah. And I mean, if these reports are that, if these are attacks on civilians, again, would we be surprised after the way Kiev treated the Donetsk and Lugansk, you know, all these areas that, you know, they've been bombing, killed over, you know, like 1,400 civilians in a span of a few years. So yeah, that's terror, right? I mean, I'm not classifying it that. I just look at the definition of terrorism, and I think it fits that definition. I don't know. Maybe someone should check that definition online and change it so that I don't have to think this. Maybe you can make this be about defending democracy if you, you know, change Wikipedia and the dictionary sites like you did for mRNA. But it sounds like terror to me attacks on civilians like that. American contractors too. Like, that's a little disturbing. If there are American contractors there involved in this incursion, what does that say? I mean, it'd be one thing if they were going after, you know, Russian military bases, and maybe they are. Maybe they are. Maybe that's part of it. And I also wonder how many of these 1,000 Ukrainian soldiers made it back over the line? Did any of them, you know what I mean? Like, we've heard a lot of reports about how they're not allowed to turn around ever, you know? Well, I hope they sent in more than just 1,000 because the latest numbers are that up to 945 soldiers as well as 102 armored vehicles will not be returning. Yeah. And if you were to try to return, yeah, back to the front soldier, back to the front. Anybody know what Metallica song I'm referencing? Back to the front because they will kill you. They will kill you. If there's no retreat, there's no surrender. And I'm guessing they walked into a situation that many of them didn't come out of. Maybe the American contractors get to turn around. I don't know. Askin for a friend. Yeah, I have a report here from RT where at the end it mentions the Putin described this attack as a quote-unquote large-scale provocation. Putin has accused "keyve" of conducting quote indiscriminate strikes and quote on civilians, residential buildings, ambulances. As I indicated here, multiple videos are circulating online in the past few days that appear to show Ukrainian troops firing on civilian vehicles. The Russian defense ministry has estimated that "keyve's" assault was carried out by forces numbering up to 1,000. So it looks like they've already wiped them all out, which is supported by tanks in artillery. The chief of the Russian General Staff Valerie Gerazimov reported on Wednesday that "key's" incursion had been halted by the military and that Ukraine had suffered heavy losses. So there's really not much new reports coming out of here, but I don't know. It looks like there was a lot riding on this. This was a big deal. It was the largest assault on Russian territory since this whole thing started, but it looks like it's a spectacular failure. It seems like a lot of military strategists are looking at this and saying, "We don't understand what you're doing. This was like a suicide mission." So I was curious if maybe somebody went off the rails here or went rogue. I don't know why they did this, what their ultimate intention was. But yeah, and I shudder to think that there are Americans involved in these heavy casualties that were taken on the Ukrainian side. Yeah, absolutely. Some great guesses going around in the chat there, but we got to hand it to food poisoning who guessed disposable heroes. That's right. That would be one of the lyrics in disposable heroes. Yeah, man, this is insane. This is absolute madness. So there we go. Your F-16s America, your F-16s have arrived. Let's guess we'll have to wait and see what they do with them. Other than photo ops, creative accidents dropped us a photo of Zelensky looking concerned. He's actually wearing black today, not all of drab, but in front of one of those F-16s. So I'm very proud of his new acquisition there and probably looking forward to sending someone to crash and burn in it or be exploded midair in it. I wonder if the ejection seats work, Ruckus? Yeah, and there may be some reports coming out in the next few days. I'm guessing, because I've started to leak out about, I guess there was another drone attack on a US airbase, this one in Syria, according to Reuters, which would make it the second one of its type in the past week. And I shared a video with you, Hesher and everybody in our private group here from the boiler room, Colonel Douglas McGregor, talking about something recently and I don't know where that was. I think that was in Yemen. There was an ambush that took place in a number of American mercenaries, allegedly, along with 10s, like 70 something special forces from Israel may have been ambushed and killed. We might see some reports of some American casualties coming out of this region, I'm guessing, in the next week or so. And I don't know if that's going to lead up to anything, because we're really playing with fire now when we're talking about Americans being killed. Yeah, and I'm guessing that since it's largely contractors, I'm guessing within their contracts with Raytheon or whoever their contract agency is, there's probably stipulations in there that they don't have to tell us, they don't have to tell the public and their families won't be allowed to speak about their demise is potentially. And yeah, that was Colonel Douglas McGregor, speaking with Judge Knapp. Let's play the clip, actually. It's a couple of minutes, but we'll take a breather and play this clip for you. Seeing anything classified, but I am reliably told that roughly 70 Israeli so-called commandos or special forces, special operations, force types, along with some number of Americans, the total number was 70. How many were Israeli and how many were American mercenaries that were joined in this operation? I don't know what the exact breakdown was, but it was obviously mostly Israeli, and they infiltrated successfully in the Yemen, but they were tracked from the moment they infiltrated by overhead satellites, presumably Russian. And the Russians provided this information to the Iranians who immediately telegraphed it to the Houthis. And whatever you say about the Houthis is that they're tough umbrays on the battlefield. They set up an ambush and they killed all of them, and there is footage of the dead. And I haven't had a chance to examine it carefully, but clearly most of it's Israeli, but there are some indisputably some American mercenaries there, maybe some Brits mixed into it who are also employees of the same contract firm. Now, this is something very important for everybody listening to understand. Persistent surveillance today changes everything in warfare. It not only enables precision strike on a scale that has never been the case in the past, it makes it impossible for forces to infiltrate into regions without being discovered. It makes so-called surprise attacks on the scale of Pearl Harbor and impossibility. We don't really want to come to terms with that in the United States. We continue to look at forces from the vantage point of the Second World War and the distant past. Those days are over. You can't cross the Atlantic with impunity. You can't do very much of anything without being detected. So the point is that this this is a wake-up call and not just for the Israelis or the contractors who are part of this, but this should be a wake-up call for all of us. And we need to take it very, very seriously, because the only way to wage war in this setting is to disrupt the space-based reconnaissance, intelligence, and surveillance. We do that. The game changes and you're really going through. All right. So there you have it. Colonel Douglas McGregor talking to Judge Knapp there. And he brings up a good point, man. And I think this is one of the reasons why the information warfare, the cyber warfare, the propaganda, seem to be front and center. Like seem to be the pointiest, bleediest edge of the spear when it comes to NATO and the Five Eyes. It's like if they didn't know yet, they know now they can't even land themselves in Yemen. That says a lot. And you know whose fault it is. I can't believe we're doing it too. It just goes back to it's Elon Musk. Right. So I think Colonel Douglas McGregor just threatened Elon Musk. Oh, how dare you? That's my bread and butter, man. That's my that's my bag, baby. And it's really interesting because we were finishing up the boiler room this week with a discussion about like space based laser, like satellites fighting with each other and stuff like that. And that's kind of what he was alluding to at the end there. I mean, if it wasn't for this advancement of this this second skin layer of all these satellite tech, you know, spy satellites courtesy of the likes of Elon Musk and his buddies. Yeah, I mean, but the other thing that sticks in my mind about this hessers, what he said, it's like it makes it impossible for surprise attacks to take place. So can someone explain to me exactly how to talk to a first seventh happen again? Wasn't that a bit of a surprise? Caught everybody off guard didn't see that coming. Yeah, right. It's kind of like when they say, oh, we can't get into it. We've got Thomas Cuck's phone down there and, you know, go down there at the FBI, of course, we can't get into it guys. We just can't, we're working on it. You know, these iPhones are hard to break into. Give us a wicker to that pipe bomb. Yeah, right. Yeah. Wait, why'd the camera turn off when that happened? You know what I mean? Yet at the same time, it's like, oh, Scott Ritter, we read all your emails already. You didn't even show up and grab his iPhone yet. Like, okay. So when it's convenient that they can't figure something out and they can't figure cyber warfare out, just can't do it, can't do it. But then, when it really comes down to it, it's like, yeah, pretty much any modern, modernized nation has satellites and, you know, very advanced ISR intelligence surveillance reconnaissance capabilities, cyber capabilities. Absolutely. Yeah, that article that I think it was burning beer dropped it to us during boiler room on Thursday. It's out of wired. It's from last year, February of last year, enter the hunter satellites preparing for space war. There's a company called True Anomaly. It's a startup backed by then US Senator, now potential vice president JD Vance is one of his venture capital firms. And their whole thing is launching pursuit satellites on SpaceX, which they did last year from this company. So, you know, they've got these basically Star Wars things going on and JD Vance is, you know, his venture capital firm involved with it. And the whole thing here, they're talking about these pursuit satellites, basically, they call them jackals. Good name. It says the jackals will not house guns, warheads, or laser blasters. But I bet they could if they wanted to. But they will be capable of rendezvous proximity operations, RPOs. What does that mean? That means the ability to maneuver close to other satellites and train a battery of sensors upon them, which could reveal their rival surveillance and weapons systems or help intercept communications. Well, well, well, you got to wonder what Russia's capability is, you know, in that similar realm of tech, low Earth orbit, defensive ISR slash potentially offensive tech. Whenever you see those, what we think are, you know, SpaceX products going up to, you know, improve our communications, improve space exploration, get us to Mars, whatever you may think they're doing up there. These things are being launched also. So, you know, you see those 20 lights in the sky going up there, getting in place. You got to wonder, is it all for us? Is this is this all cool tech to make our cell phones go faster or what else is going on when you've got this kind of, you know, this goes to back to dangerous space junk and space tugs and all kind of stuff that Ruckus has talked about on the daily Ruckus and in his reports at today's news talk. So, yeah, Ruckus, that whole thing, it's like, oh, okay, then, wow, how about that? There's JD Vance, right at the pointy edge of the space spear. And there has been this incredible battle to dominate space. And as I had reported on the daily Ruckus, thanks for bringing that up. There's a reason for it. And it's kind of what Colonel Douglas McGregor was referencing there. It's the, how is it referred to? It's the ultimate high point, right? You want that like, when we're analyzing the attempted assassination on Trump, everyone keeps looking at that water tower. They're like, how come nobody was up on that water tower? Because in that scenario, that was the ultimate high point. That was the ultimate high ground. That's what it is, the high ground. So militarily speaking, they consider space the ultimate high ground. So this all makes perfect sense to me. It's just the part that's strange to me is this getting up close. What was the initials for that again? Let's see. For which one? Oh, I had an ISR, like intelligence surveillance reconnaissance. Something, yeah, but how did they get very close proximity? Oh, low earth orbit. No, no, no, no. The satellite's going to skirt right up next to the next, the other one, oh, okay. Yeah, that that was our PO rendezvous proximity operations. Yeah, that's what it is, right? They're just going to get close enough to like you use like a little zapper scanner to try to steal their data. To me, it seems like they're going to get close enough to touch it, right? Couldn't they just kind of like, just give it a little nudge and knock it out of orbit or something? Yeah, or hack it in a way that they can take control of it. I mean, what are the actual capabilities here? They really don't tell us. They're going to give it a virus. There you go. Don't get closer than six feet. I hope you're wearing a mask. Just kidding. You mean like bird flu or like clown strike? We got all kind of viruses floating around. Yeah, I mean, like a computer virus. They could do that, right? Yes. I mean, maybe sneak up behind it and insert like a little USB stick. Excuse me. I don't know you like that. All right. I mean, maybe, yeah, conceptually, but can they really do that? Or like, if they were able to do that, then why the giant failure in Yemen? Why not use that stuff? And where are these assets with the Trump shooting, by the way? Oh, yeah, we don't really want to solve that one. So of course, we're not going to see any of that footage. Yeah, yeah, of course, you know, when you realize the technology that they had with the existing satellites from just 20 years ago, where you could like read the fine print on the back of the dime laying on the ground. Where's all that technology? What happened to that? Right. Right. You know, and getting back, you know, it's a satellite view here. You know, this thing we're talking about right here, sort of maybe the bigger story here, the biggest part of this story is that it's quite obvious now that Russia is backing Iran big time that just sent over there. They are constantly that, you know, it's my understanding that right now they're sending over large batches of S 400. Is it 404,000? I can't remember, but it's this they're hot. They're top end missile defense systems, anti air systems, also being told that hypersonic missiles are being sent there over to Iran, which of course, you know, we'll we'll filter into Yemen. Wouldn't it be ironic if that ended up filtering into Turkey as well? To come full circle there. Imagine that. And China too, China, China, and Russia, and Iran right now that like the whole bricks thing is looking a little bit more than just a financial front this week. It's almost starting to play out like some sort of world war scenario, isn't it right? I mean, don't be silly, Ruckus. We're not going to have one. This is 2024, my friend. I mean, we've evolved past world wars, haven't we? I mean, we've got we've got AI and we've got VR and, you know, all this cool stuff, man. We don't, you know, we're worried about marginalized people. We can't have a world war. That's that's ludicrous. It is kind of weird though. So if Russia is supporting Iran and then, you know, Russia obviously wants Trump to get reelected. That's why they meddle in the elections. But at the same time, Iran is meddling in the elections to make sure Trump is not elected and they're trying to get him killed by assassinating him. I'm so confused. I've completely lost the plot. Oh, no, I haven't. They have. Right. Right. Wow. Let's see here. Bear just dropped into the Sunday wire live chat on the discord and said, looks like this is reposted from Doug Douglas McGregor. Three minutes ago, breaking Iran attack expected on Israel at any moment says Fox News. So yeah, I mean, who knows, man? Like, remember, we took a break last weekend. The weekend before, we were literally closing out Sunday wire. Maybe it was two episodes. I think it might have been actually episode five, 11. But as we were closing out Sunday wire, Biden dropped out of the race. I mean, we could literally have this. I mean, if that if if Douglas is correct, it could be the same sort of thing. We could be winding down and then get breaking news that I think this is a clear sign that Sunday wire needs to start two to three hours later than normal. Hey, that would interfere with our range time. We got guns to shoot today later. But yeah, thanks, Bear. And yeah, I wish I could say I was surprised to see that. And then and and just like last time, if it's in squarely with our analysis of like, hey, here's where this is heading. And bam, there's there's the proof in the pudding. Yeah, baby. None of us are excited or happy about this. Because I guess that means guess what we're going to be talking about next week, everybody. We're all for three. Yeah, right. Yeah. So all right. Well, there we have it. I mean, geez, that's, you know, first amendment being shut down with Scott Ritter, or at least intimidation factors and chilling effects updates from Gaza updates from Ukraine updates on UK riots. Quickly, Ruckus just switching gears here, former YouTube CEO Suzanne Wojikiki died somewhat suddenly, I don't know, maybe in a battle with cancer or some kind of turbo cancer, some people might be aggravated brain cancer that just popped up out of nowhere. And her 50 has changed absolutely nothing in her life. And she was very adamant about getting all the shots and the boosters. She was very healthy. I can't even imagine what have caused this. And it's a terrible tragedy said to hear it. Yeah, yeah, yeah. And her accomplishments are noteworthy. She was, you know, obviously involved with high ups at Google, former wife of one of the Google have CEO C E C level people, if you forget the guy's name. Also, of course, was in charge of YouTube when ad pocalypse happened. And when the first round of wrong thing, fan of free speech. Huge fan of free sense, or anybody. Yeah, so then she was a lovely person. Yeah, right there at the head of that sucker, when policy changes were made that affected a lot of us personally, and a lot of our colleagues personally, took many of our ability, you know, abilities to monetize any of our work away from us and kicked people off the platform sort of, you know, in that like 2016 and 17 era brought in the first wave of massive internet censorship. So, oh, and also, also, she was involved with the, the big data database collection, the human genome project coming through. What was it? 23 and me, I think got countless millions, probably of people to send in their DNA to the giant database, which was just recently sold, if I recall, to another large conglomerate, wonder what they'll do with it. I'm sure they just want to tell you what percentage of Neanderthal you are, and, you know, what percentage African American you are, and give you a cool story about some of your alleged ancestors. Why are you being racist on yourself? Why are you being racist on yourself? I'm a, I'm a Neanderthalist. So, yeah, Susan Wojikikiki, rest in peace, I guess. Sorry to hear that. And then we got, let's round out with some US politics in Olympics here. The Olympics are going to close soon. The gender confusion controversy is still raging because of the misleading words by the media and the Olympics themselves. But I think we saw two dudes fighting each other for the women's boxing championship, Olympic championship. Do I have that right? They're women, apparently. Women with X, Y, Curlism. But they just happened to have the genetic markers of males. Oh, yeah. That doesn't mean anything. I'm sure it's a natural occurrence. We have finally got some clarification. Thanks to this debacle. Thank you in advance here to the International Olympic Committee, the IOC. Their president has finally figured it all out for us, Hesher. We finally have some clarity with this whole thing. Oh, crap. I might be wrong here. It would appear, he said, on Friday, he is not aware of a quote, unquote, scientifically solid way of distinguishing a man from a woman. Oh, darn it. We were so close. Whatever happened to drop your pants? Oh, I guess that would be a microagression or a macroagression. Yeah. Yeah, those pesky, those pesky chromosomal tests, we can't trust those. We can't trust our eyes. That's for sure. Because it sure looked like two dudes punching each other to me. It's clearly I'm not a biologist. I can't trust my eyes on that. I guess I'll have to trust Variety magazine and all the sports blogs and Reuters and just use fun terms like intersex and high testosterone and XY chromosome positive. Those are things we can say, I suppose. Yes, the Algerian one, Iman Khalif, labeled her, I guess, critics, enemies of success after she won, out her country's first ever Olympic gold medal in women's boxing. Congratulations to them. We've also got the second one, which would be Chinese, Taipei's, the new team. They took Olympic gold and featherweight boxing on Saturday, defeating Poland's Julia Cezmarotti. They both, both these people insist they are women and they are upset about everybody making a big deal about this. So see, that's the strange thing to me too. I mean, because normally it's like I am a male and I identify as a female. So again, as far as these people are concerned, they were born and raised as women. So the way they're treating it is a little bit differently. It's the controversy that's very fascinating. I mean, again, this stupid argument, we still can't tell the difference between a man and a woman. Even these people who are just like, hey, listen, you know, we can tell, they can tell between man and a woman, which is very strange. So I don't know. But there was this other thing I just saw in my last hit, but allegedly just a quick headline level here, apparently doctors out in the UK. So this is a different problem here. But now we've got UK doctors who have been ordered by the NHS and new guidance to ask men if they're pregnant. So that's where this type of thing leads, right? Anyways, I'm happy to see that no actual females without the X, Y chromosomes were not, glad they were not seriously hurt. Well, fighting these two boxers and yeah. And don't bully them. Don't bully them online. You could end up in jail. So trade, trade those memes, print them out, hand them to your friend behind a dumpster or something like that, like you're selling a bag of weed. Because apparently that's actually, you don't know how to do that in the most states here. But anyway, like the old days, selling a bag of weed or something like that, you have to print your memes out. They are now, you know, they're now contraband. Your meme collection is contraband, and you're going to have to print them out and hand them off, you know, in dark alleys. Yeah. And ultimately at no point to, I mean, because since the argument is about male versus female, we forget that, okay, there's a reason why we separate the two because the male team seems to have a, some sort of an advantage physically, right? Well, can't you physically have an advantage over somebody else when you're like doping and using steroids, right? Isn't that also not allowed? Yeah. Why, why, why should this even be allowed? It doesn't even matter the reason, the, whatever the causes, they were shot down from the sky, they got hit by like gamma rays and they turned into the Hulk. Would we allow the Hulk to fight a normal human being? No, because they have some sort of physical advantage. It doesn't matter about the gender argument here. The fact is that these two boxers had a physical advantage over the other women, and they should not have been allowed to participate in this event. Look at that stunning brave woman, the photograph there that creative accident just dropped in the discord. I mean, that is a stunning brave woman with a head that matches the shoulders in a perfectly symmetrical womanly way and an enormous bicep, lats and traps. I mean, you know, that's a stunning brave woman right there. And, and Ruckus, again, we're a biologist. We can't say these things. Look, even a Supreme Court justice would not be able to rule on what is going on here. Can you provide a definition for the word woman? Can I provide a definition? Yeah, I can't. Not in this context. I'm not a biologist. Okay, she's not a biologist. That's, you know, that's sorry. That's a Judge Katanji Brown Jackson right there being questioned by Senator Marcia Blackburn a couple years back, if we all recall. So, Ruckus, we have to understand that even a Supreme Court justice is not able to tell us what a woman is. So, for lowly plebs like us to try to figure it out is, is just offensive. Well, it has gotten worse because at that point, not that long ago, how many years ago was that now? We could at least rely on the opinion of a biologist, but now even biologists are not allowed to say what a woman is. Of course not. They don't know crap because they're not. Oh, wait. Well, yeah, we totally lost the plot again here. That's a window gone. Yeah, yeah, we are floating now. Changing definitions are so fun. Yeah. Okay, one more Olympics thing I wanted to throw out there. Ruckus, did you happen to catch the breakdance competition? I missed it, but I was catching news reports about it. I was reading, it's getting panned. People called it really cringey, cringeworthy. I think Snoop Dogg was somehow involved with introducing it or something. So, I'm gonna have to watch the videos of it because I don't, and I was a big fan of the breakdancing that we were talking about this, you, me, and the lovely Spore were hanging out at a fine local establishment, I believe, and Spore said she was interested in learning breakdancing. Oh, yeah, she already can. She's, I mean, she's got it. She's got it. I'm watching this 36-year-old breakdancer named Ray Gunn. That's a capital R and capital G, all, you know, six letters jammed together, Ray Gunn. Okay, 36-year-old breakdancer Ray Gunn competing at the Olympics, according to KFC Barstool, the most unintentionally funny thing you may ever witness. She went zero and three and scored zero points. And this 36-year-old woman, can I assume she's a woman? I don't know, I'll try. Has a PhD in breakdancing. She was there representing Australia and is like literally flopping around on the floor like a dead fish. Like, you know, people saw it and they thought this was, you know, like a joke, like, oh, this is someone who's just clowning and they're gonna come out and they're gonna introduce the actual, like, breakdancers next. And it's really weird because you watch the event and there's some, like, legit breakers there. You know what I mean? A freaking electric boogaloo in all over the place, like Olympic-level boogaloo. Wait, I have to say electric boogaloo or it means something else. Olympic-level electric boogaloo. And then you see Ray Gunn come out there and it's like, this must be a joke. But no, this person is like, you know, wrote her dissertation on breakdancing. And she is a doctor in breakdancing. That's correct, my friend. I have wasted my life. Yeah. If I had known this was a career path, I would have, dude, I feel treated, man. I feel like, man, I'm sad to hear this. If I had known, man, this sucks. I wanted to do that so bad. That's all I ever wanted to do. When I grow up, I want to be a doctor of breakdancing. My dreams have been crushed. I want Snoop Dogg to introduce me at the Olympics while I do the dead fish. I mean, dude, there's a meme in the gif in the discord right now of what it looked like. I mean, that given it's only a couple seconds, but that's pretty much the highlight right there. Dude, I can do the dead fish so much better than that. Right? And you don't even have a PhD in breaking an electric boogaloo. No, but I've seen those movies like 100 million times. I should get an honorary degree. Yeah. I think between the amount of times that you and I have seen electric boogaloo break in, break into electric boogaloo, search for animal chin and gleaming the cube. We should be professional skaters and PhDs in breakdancing at this point. Right. And then just imagine how many local community centers we could save. Oh, yeah. I mean, Snoop Dogg would definitely invite us over to hang out. There's there's no doubt about it. Hopefully he's listening. Snoop Dogg, if you want to regain some cred after introducing that horror show and calling it breakdancing. I mean, is that not is this not some kind of blasphemy to to real break in and, you know, the real hood? It just kind of feels like it's some rich white girl. I think she's a white girl from Australia. Mocking breakdancing while she has a PhD in it. I mean, come on. Maybe she's not mocking it. I'll have to, I'll have to watch all of this video and I'll be the judge of it. They also did a, they had skateboarding and I find that interesting. So I want to watch some highlights of that. Yeah. Yeah. I do too. I saw a little bit of that surfing. I was also interested in the precision shooting sports. Always interested in those. But yeah, it's weird, man. You tune into something like breakdancing. You're like, okay, this is pretty modern, new, hip, kind of cool. You know, there's definitely a lot of talent involved in it. Let's get it in the Olympics. And there was there was also a sewage survival swimming. Oh, yeah. Right. I mean, that's like hunger game stuff, which fits in perfectly with the opening ceremony. That whole like swimming in the sewage, you know, it's like a, like a worse than a scene out of catty shack where, you know, a baby Ruth ended up in the pool. It was a bit of a prophetic metaphor, ultimately. Yeah. Truly, truly. All right. Let's, let's round out. Let's go back to the UK here. So Olympics are just about over. I'm glad. The UK. I mean, the US. Yeah, US. Sorry. Let's go back to the US. We don't know where we live. Yeah, wherever. I mean, we all live in the dystopia at this point. We are a globalized nation of serfs, digital serfs, clearly trading memes in the dark, the dark alley by the dumpster. So that we're in presidential candidates. Yes. So we don't end up in Gulag or having our cell phones taken away. Yeah. If you're just joining us, you're listening to the Sunday wire. You got Hesher and Ruckus sitting in for Patrick Henningson. The video is off today. We're going old school. We're audio only. I saw someone just ask about that. So yeah, we're, we're on the audio stream today and the podcast version. If you missed any of the beginning of the show, we'll be up shortly after the program here at 21st century wire.com. Embedded embedded in the show post over there. So we appreciate it. If you get out there and share that around, maybe next week, we'll flip the video back on. If Ruckus and I are sitting in, again, we'll come up with a way to do that. It was just, we had to go old school today and I'm happy to be here with all of you old school on the alternate current radio live stream. And I guess I'll take this opportunity to shout out 21st century wire. Again, if you want to support 21st century wire.com, you can go to the support link up there at the website, 21st century wire.com. There's a support us here link there. You can become a member. You can pick up some product from Clive to Carl. There's a number of ways you can support us over here. And we really appreciate that same with alternate current radio. We've got a link to our support over there. A couple of you have dropped in there and supported us recently. We really appreciate that on both platforms. So yeah, thanks to everybody that is helping us keep come back because clearly those that run the contemporary narratives don't like it when we show up and do these broadcasts. Let's see here. Yeah, so it will be a spreaker recording and it will be on that 21st century wire.com show post for Sunday wire episode 113 a week in review. I can't believe how many things we've had to cover ruckus just to do a weekend review here. I mean, this is, we haven't even gotten to the US power politics yet. Let's close out with that. And by the way, it's been two weeks since a live Sunday wire. So can you imagine if we tried to do a two weeks in review? Forget it. Yeah, really, no kidding. Yeah, that's why it's also good for you to follow all of us over at today's news talk T and T dot news. You'll find me on state of the nation Monday through Friday with Timothy Shea. And you'll find ruckus on a number of shows over there to include Johnny Bedmore, Jason Burmas, and a number of our Australian broadcast friends as well. T and T dot news is where you find us over there for that full on day to day stuff. And of course, our friend Basil Valentine, our colleague here at the Sunday wire has been sitting in for Patrick, well, Patrick's out doing international man of mystery things. So shout out to Basil. Maybe he'll join us next week here at Sunday wire. And if we can, we'll get that video feed up for you. It's, yeah, we'll see if we can do that next week. But this week, we had to strip it down, go back to basics. And because this a lot, it's a lot to cover for this week. I want to start with this one. Adam Trump, quote, I heal fast, end quote, his ear looks pretty good, dude. It really looks pretty good. Well, from what I can tell, I mean, there's not a whole lot of good pictures of it. But from what I can see, I know a lot of people that would love for me to just jump down. I'm not trying to say anything. I'm just saying, I saw that that video was here. I mean, he does heal fast. Well, okay, listen, here's the thing. Okay, I remember when my sister would get her ears pierced or whatever when I was a kid, right? Right? There was a time where she had it pierced, and then it closed up right away. The ears do heal very quickly, apparently, scientifically speaking. True. I don't know. Maybe the guy was shot in the ear and he healed fast. I don't know, but it's certainly not doing anything to calm down the conspiracy theories that he faked the whole thing. Yeah. Yeah, so that just is what it is. Like, if I was his PR guy, I'd be like, hey, look, man, I know you heal fast, but could you just not this time? Yeah, could we like, after the fact, take a whole punch and just kind of take a little, you know, just a little nug out of that, that lovely, great, wonderful ear of yours. That's a good point. If I was dropped, I would have requested like a gnarly scar or something. Yeah, right? Like, when you go to the, when you go to the plastic surgeon right after that, it's like, could you leave that big chunk out? You know, that looks pretty badass. I mean, why not? That's putting that on. That's my campaign slogan. I sacrificed my ear for America. Make ears heal fast again. Okay. So that's, that's a thing. We kind of covered the JD Vance being cozy with the PayPal mafia there with the, the satellite company that makes the jackals, but a lot of people are uncomfortable with this, this cozy relationship between JD Vance and big tech luminaries associated with PayPal. Hey, hey, hey, it's 2024. What these people want to do in the privacy of their own bedrooms is between them, has you? Right. We don't want to engage in any conspiracy theories. I'm sure everything's above board. No problem there. Yeah, I don't know. I, I got to personally take a deep dive on, on him and his background and his relation to, to Elon and everybody, Dorsey. That's Peter Thiel. There you go. That's, that's the big one. I guess that's, that's, I already know. I don't like that guy. I think the carp as well, um, all of them, like, yeah, the PayPal mafia guys. So yeah, I don't know what that ultimately means, but isn't it interesting, isn't it interesting, Hesher, that who, who, who was like heavily handed involved outside the media, the mainstream media with like running off story, pandemic and the last time an election was allegedly stolen from Trump and he's going to be friends with all these same people. It makes no sense. Yeah. Yeah, it really doesn't. Um, he's also, is this like, keep your friends close and your enemies closer kind of a thing? Right. And we're talking about, you know, modern ISR, right? Like intelligence surveillance reconnaissance. I got news for you and I guess Scott Ritter has news for us on that too. That's not just used for, you know, dropping mercenaries into Yemen. Um, that's used right here on every single one of us in this country and one of the long polls in that tent that holds that what many would call unconstitutional surveillance, a violation of their fourth amendment is a technology called Palantir. And they specialize in software platforms for big data analytics. Sounds benign, right? No, look it up. Do some reading on it. Palantir technologies is that lens through which they look at people like Scott Ritter's emails. Many people would say, it's a key piece of technology inside DHS, NSA, CIA, FBI, et cetera, et cetera. So he's a co-founder of not only PayPal, but Palantir also and the founders fund, which is another venture capital firm that was formed in 2005 and has roughly $12 billion in total assets. And it was the first institutional investor in wait for it. SpaceX and Palantir. So, and he is Peter Thiel himself has a net worth just personally, not as business as a personal net worth of $11.2 billion. So, you know, and that only puts him at 212th on the billionaires index. So, you know, I was going to say that's all. Yeah. Yeah. Well, there's 211 people with more billions than him. But then who's the small fish under the small fish? Well, JD Vance right there. And attach both of them attached to SpaceX, right? Both of them attached to Elon in a way. Very, very interesting. So, is Peter Thiel and anyone in his orbit going to do anything that would hurt their bottom line in the name of helping the plebs or changing the political landscape? You really got to ask yourself. Well, I mean, that depends. Has he been radicalized? I'm guessing everyone on the Bloomberg billionaires index is in one way or another. Radical. Rad. Super rad. Here's a question, Asher. Which one is the more contentious VP pick? JD Vance or Tim Walls? Balls to the wall. Balls to the walls. I don't know. Yeah. Yeah. You just made me think of the band except they had that great song balls to the wall, man. Yeah. What's with this guy? They've had to roll back his military history. He's been what appears to be maybe rightly. No, Asher. He's handled firearms in a wartime setting. Oh, no. They had to delete that. Oh, crap. Yeah. He said it. But we had to delete that from the records. And there's a lot of- Which is exactly how anyone who's ever fought in combat describes it. I've handled weapons in wartime settings. I know. What? What? Yeah. Okay. Were you cleaning someone else's rifle out there in Italy? Well, other people were fighting in Afghanistan? Maybe? Maybe we're training or something from what I hear, but we don't know. It's been deleted. Yeah, deleted now. A lot of deleting of stuff, and that's going across the board. So if you haven't heard yet what we're referring to- Smaller's entire history. Yeah. Right. But what we're referring to with regards to her VP pick is that he's been accused of what is called stolen valor here. And that's not just a colloquial term. That is an actual federal offense to make claims about your military combat history if they are incorrect. And our veterans in this country are very keen to keep an eye on people doing that. That's highly, highly inappropriate and illegal. That was brought to walls' office in 2009. All right. A couple of veterans went into an office, spoke with a staffer of his and showed them proof of potential stolen valor and asked them why he's saying certain things in public, like the comment that Ruck is just paraphrased, as well as things on his bio, talking about how he's a combat veteran mentioning enduring freedom, I think, in particular where he was not deployed for combat. And then using these potential stolen valor sort of talk or a platform, if you will, to push for gun control, to push for disarming Americans and making the most common and standard semi-automatic rifles in America illegal somehow in violation of the Second Amendment. Well, my favorite part is the mainstream media reported about five, almost a week ago now, after she had picked him as her VP choice. The reason was that she was opting for a vice presidential running mate with executive experience, military experience, and a track record of winning over the rural white voters who have gravitated to Trump. Yeah, I'm sure he's a much better pick for that. If those were your qualifications, he fits it way better than Tulsi Gabbard. Oh, wait, she's not in the party anymore. Never mind. I also heard I was looking for a source on this, but I had heard it from one of the mainstream media outlets in one of their just like daily headline level reporting about something that it said that her reason for picking this guy, what she had never, she had never heard of him. So the admission was she had never even heard of this guy, and she had never talked to him. But after talking to him for like 20 minutes, we totally hit it off. And I just knew he was the perfect, like, that's how quick, like, I'm like, what the, like, that's your, yeah, okay, very well thought out decision, met the guy 20 minutes, we hit it off. Clearly, this is the person that we're going to run the country with. What, tell us you don't take us seriously as voters without telling us you don't take us seriously as voters, etc. Yeah, particularly Democrat voters. I mean, this is amazing that people are like, yeah, I'm down with this. Like, we've got Democrats out there, progressives, liberals, Democrats, who are calling for the electoral college to be abolished or changed. I guess because they want better representation, but, you know, set that aside. They're completely fine with the DNC, just, you know, potentially, you know, stealing the last election. Okay, they're not going to, those voters are not going to buy that. We'll set that aside. They're okay with everything that's been going on. They're, they're, they're okay with not having a primary where they don't even get the opportunity to have that, you know, they're giant rainbow tent with, you know, 15, 20 people in there and watch them all talk to each other, you know, they're little six minute talking points and stuff that they don't, they didn't even give you that. They didn't even give you that that nothing. It's like, oh, actually, you know, we're going to, we're going to bump this. We're going to bump Biden out. We're going to, you know, commit a soft coup here of some sort, make you wonder if he's even alive. And if that's a dude in a rubber mask, like scoot, like an episode of bad episode of Scooby-Doo or if it's, you know, six foot four, Jim Carrey pretending to be Joe Biden or something like that, or maybe he's just dead or maybe he's in hospice care right now. And we're just going to, you know, give you this person. And guess what? Well, she got $81 million, almost overnight. Wow. Nido. And then like you were about to say, Ruckus, they start scrubbing her record from the internet. Isn't that interesting? But not surprising now, is it? Because her record's abysmal. Aren't we told all the time, like, hey, you know, it's online. It doesn't go away. It's there forever. Well, yeah. Well, it's not exactly true. Depends who you are. Oh, man. Yeah, ridiculous. So if you're not familiar with that one, they've scrubbed all kinds of articles from mainstream media. So mainstream media is literally willing to take their own work, their own hard work and throw it in the garbage, right? Delete the post that talk about her history, her heritage, her track record as DA in California, her track record as a senator. It's really, really amazing to see the scrubbing of the internet. That's one thing, but the astroturfing of it is another. Are you seeing some of these AI generated photos of her crowds at some of these rallies? No, I've seen people making fun of it or responding to it by making fake AI pictures of Trump like black people at a barbecue in the middle of the street in New York or something like that. Or Trump hanging out with Kamala. I've seen an AI of that too. But you know, even that one, like, if you see the picture of Trump and Kamala sitting together, it's amazing to watch the meme or turn into, you know, AI generated images. If you look closely at it, it's still the generator still can't do fingers and toes and certain other things. So you can see that Kamala has like an extra finger in there, like the hallmarks are right there for you. And then there's... I've been thinking about that, by the way. I think that that's fake. I think they're doing that on purpose. Yeah, I think that's intentional too. Because I think that there's a proverbial hidden group that have access to much better AI and they want us to think that that's, you know, unless they got like six fingers, it's, you know, it's real, you know. Right. You've got you've got pleb AI generators. And then you've got, you know, the actual, you know, military grade stuff. And that's indistinguishable from reality, most likely. So yeah, there's pictures of similar pictures of some of her rallies where it's like, you'll see people's heads stuck together or like, you know, a hand blending into a leg or, you know, just these weird amorphous, like, if you zoom in, it's like, what is this? Is this conspiracy candy? Like, what's the source on, you know what I mean? It's just we're flooded with this stuff. What they do during the pandemic where they just have like cardboard cutouts sitting inside the audience. Yeah, apparently with the rise of AI and it being given to all this, you know, pirates on the internet, like, we're just in that realm now where we're saving trees, everybody. Yeah, but we have to question every little thing that we see online. Absolutely amazing. So yeah, I also saw Kamala using the same speech verbatim in Michigan and Wisconsin. That was interesting. And then she also plagiarized some of Trump's talking points talking about how she was going to, she was, because I think, I don't have the quote in front of me, but I think it was to do with taxes and taxing tips. Like, I think the DNC realized that, you know, Trump's idea for removing tax on food industry workers' tips and other tips is a winning talking point. So she basically stole that one. And she stole a couple other planks too, because she doesn't have her own platform yet. You know, at least know not that I've seen. The truth comes out and we figured out the true conspiracy, we know who really runs the world. It's waitresses. Yeah, right. No matter who wins this election, waitresses win. Yep, your, your waiter and waitress, that's going to sway the election this time around, apparently. Yeah, so let's see here. What else? What else? I think that's it. That's all I have. Oh, wait, no, no, there is one other, Ruckus. We need to talk. I mean, unless I've missed something on this, back me up if I have. But before we close out, we need to talk about RFK Junior and the bear cub. Stupid bear cubs. Well, where did this, this was, this came out of nowhere, like, I just had a left feel like what? Yeah. So in case you missed it some 10 years ago or so, there was a bit of a tragedy that happened. It would appear that a poor bear cub had been struck by a bicyclist in Central Park in New York. What, why do we think it was struck by a bicyclist? Well, you know, there was a bicycle laying on top of the poor dead bear cub. And everyone was trying their darndest to figure out what was going on here. Well, the culprit has come forward 10 years later. It was none other than Robert F Kennedy Junior, apparently, who placed the dead bear cub there and laid the bicycle on top to stage it and make it look like it was an accident. Apparently, he had been traveling with a friend as part of a falconry retreat or something. And his friend, a female of some sort, I assume, at least that's what it was reported, struck the bear with her vehicle. And RFK Junior Bobby said, hey, you can eat that. He wanted to save the bear and skin it and eat it, take it home. And well, it just didn't work out for him. And he couldn't leave this rotting bear in his car. He had a hop on a plane, so he was like, what am I going to do with it? And then his friends were drinking at the bar and they said, Hey, I know, why don't we go take it and drop it off in Central Park and make it look like somebody hit it with a bike? Yeah, that's a good idea. And apparently somebody found out and they were going to write a scathing article about it in variety magazine. And RFK Junior decided to get out ahead of it and did a visit for a podcast with Roseanne Barr, where he told the story of how he staged the dead bear cub in Central Park 10 years ago. I mean, you got to love it. It's pretty brilliant. Actually, this is some some great political maneuvering right here. I'm going to actually play the clip because I think people just may not believe this unless they hear it. Take a listen van in front of me hit a bear and killed it a young bear. So I pulled over and I picked up the bear and put him in the back of my van because I was going to skin the bear. And it was very good condition. And I was just going to put the meat in my refrigerator and you can do that in the yard safe. You can get a bear tag for a real kill bear. And so then we went talking and I had the bear in my car. And then we had a really good day and we went late. We were catching a lot of came and the people really loved it. So we stayed late and instead of going back to my home in Westchester, I'd go right to the city because there was a dinner at Peter Luger's steakhouse. And at the end of the dinner, it went late. And I realized I couldn't go home. I had to go to the airport. And the bear was in my car and I didn't want to leave the bear in the car because that would have been bad. So then I thought, you know, at that time, this was the little bit of the red neck. And they've been a series of bicycle accidents in New York. They had just put in the bike lanes and a couple of people that got killed and it was every day and people had been badly injured. Every day it was in the press. And so I thought, I wasn't drinking, of course, but people were drinking with me who thought this was a good idea. And I said, I had an old bike in my car that somebody asked me to get rid of it. I said, let's go put the bear in Central Park and we'll make it look like he had a bike. Funny for people. There you go. Cruises, stranger than fiction. It really is. There was a weird, I'm sure this is just a coincidence. And I mean that I'm not being facetious, but it was weird that he brought up the red neck factor that that almost plays into that's almost a slick little NLP into Trump advanced this campaign. I would have avoided that term, sir. Yeah, maybe just a bad choice of words, maybe just honesty, but kind of makes you think about that hillbilly eulogy. All right, you're hungry for bear, doesn't it? Yeah, man, I could use a bear burger. All right, man, let's see here. Let's get out of here, man. It's been great having you today. It's been great having all of you with us over there listening at 21st century wire.com spreaker.com, alternatecurrentradio.com and on all the subsequent podcast downloads. Thanks for hanging with us. And on behalf of Patrick Henningson and our team at 21st century wire, we really appreciate you sharing the show around and hopping on over 21st century wire.com and alternatecurrentradio.com to support us. We definitely need your help to keep doing what we're doing over here. Ruckus, over to you, man. Anything we forgot or final thoughts? Oh, no, I think we covered it quite well, my friend. So until the next time, I do so much appreciate you inviting me to help you carry the torch in Patrick's absence. So much love to Patrick and everybody. Shout out to the listeners, the chatters. And yeah, please make sure you're checking me out over on today's news talk, tnt.news. I do produce news segments for the Johnny Vadmore show, the Jason Burmett show, the Melinda Richards show and the Dean Mackin show. But I'm only on those two latter shows, which are Australian shows Monday through Thursday, US time, because that is their Tuesday through Friday. So basically on Friday here in the US and the UK, you'll only find me on Johnny Vadmore and Jason Burmett. And of course, I do produce for the Jason Burmett show. So, you know, forgive me if I say, I think it's one of the finest programs out there. If you're missing it, please make sure you're tuning in. That one is Monday through Friday on today's news talk, tnt.news, at 3 p.m. Eastern. Okay. Thanks for having me again, Hesher. May God bless each and every one of you. May God save this republic. Ruckus out. All right. Thanks, Ruckus. Thanks for joining me today and helping navigate the omnibus that is the Sunday wire here at alternate current radio in 21st century wire. Yeah, get on over there. Check out the Patrick Henningson show and then stay to the nation and then Jason Burmett and all the other great shows. But those three shows are back to back to back. And then the Mike Ryan show also after Jason Burmett. So back to back to back to back great shows over there into the night into the morning into the afternoon and evening tnt.news is live. We are around the world. I'll underscore what Ruckus said and thank you once again for joining us for this live broadcast. We will look forward to speaking with you again next week. And that's it. We're out of here. Have a great rest of the weekend and a wonderful week. Don't let all this dark news get you down. But don't let it make you tune out either because we got a pretty crazy season headed our way here. I'm sure we'll see you again for another Sunday wire real soon. Hesher and Ruckus out. Good news, boppers. The big alert has been called off. It turns out that the early reports were wrong. All wrong. Now for that group out there that had such a hard time getting home. Sorry about that. I guess the only thing we can do is play you a song. [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music] [Music]
