FM Talk 1065 Podcasts
Jeff Poor Show - Tuesday 9-03-24
[MUSIC PLAYING] From Bucks Pocket to the shores of Orange Beach, at all points in between, an insider's perspective on Alabama politics. It's the Jeff Porsche show. I don't think Hank done it this way. [MUSIC PLAYING] Good morning. Welcome to the Jeff Porsche show. And if I'm talking 106.5, happy Tuesday morning to you. And I hit start on the week. I hope everyone had a good Labor Day weekend. Texts like, you need to be in touch with me, your host. 2, 5, 1, 3, 4, 3, 0, 1, 0, 6. Coming up in about a half-hour Paul DeMarco. One of our show regulars will be with us right to call him by a few places. I know of the trustful Tribune, but in a few other places as well. Some presidential politics, really. And then just-- we'll get into it in a moment here. But our cadre of AL.com columnist, acting up again, making some really dumb assumptions about Alabama. Also in a program, Dale Jackson, since we did have a show yesterday, we just bumped him up a day. And I know you're all thrilled about that. And then finally, John Wall, our Tuesday regular, the Chairman of the Alabama Republican Party, will be with us. Once again, text slide, 2, 5, 1, 3, 4, 3, 0, 1, 0, 6. Please tell me what's on your mind. Obviously, we're still in the throes of a presidential election, 63 days, until this is two more months. They say everything that happens after Labor Day is what matters. Else after Labor Day, are you feeling it? People pay an attention more. And we're going to be rocking, rolling, jamming along here. Hopefully. So we'll see how that recedes. But I don't know. There's still hard to really find a direction of the Harris-Walls effort. And I said this last week, the poll was trending. The polling was trending against them, finally. But not in a significant way. It's not salvageable for either side, frankly. The important, I think, I guess, is the sugar hives worn off. That enthusiasm that was generated from Biden stepping aside is kind of wearing a little off now, and we'll see where that goes. The ebbs and flow of the race. I know it's an eternity until Election Day. But some Mikey's pointing to saying, you know, it's Carl Rove on Fox News talking about this. And it's hard to operate on this assumption that the polls are going to get it wrong, that the polls are off by a factor of 10 points or something. But if you look at where Hillary Clinton was, look at where Joe Biden was at this point in their election bids. And Hillary barely losing Biden, barely winning. Harris is way, way down. It showed, like, 10-point lead for the Democrat. And this is neck and neck. It's like a two-point difference. So I don't know if the polling is correct. Does some self-correcting or what? But the one you want to watch, I guess, some of the betting odds, you want to watch Nate Silver's site. I'm not really a big buyer of Larry Sabino. I think he leans a little left. That's a center for responsive politics on TV all the time. But those are the key indicators. The real clear politics average is-- while it seems very simple and it kind of puts everything in a snapshot, it's not reliable because you take a bunch of polls who use different methodologies. And I don't think that works. What's a likely voter? It's like these Fox News polls, guys. And Fox News is just using what their models are just using registered voters in their response and their survey. And it's not all those registered voters are going to show up at the polls. You see the likely voter, which doesn't always get it right. The science is kind of off there. But Fox anticipating every registered voter is going to show up to vote. I don't think so. This isn't one of those elections where people are really excited, excited, like in Obama or even a Reagan Clinton to some degree. It feels-- because our politics is so right now for both. It did a lot of people just kind of walked away from it. So that's a quick take on that. Let's see here. Let's start out with this. The Sheriff Birch here in every month here on NASA's Sheriff from Shawn's program. Coming out of the AL.com story yesterday, wanting to kind of change the constitutional carry. And they won't call it that, because that's an activist label there. But what's the change? The age required people under 21 to have a permit. So this is a little tone deaf. I get it. You think it's got a curb crime? Number one, I don't think that's true. Maybe, maybe marginally. But do you believe in a second amendment or not? You believe in the second amendment? Didn't-- why does it apply at only 21? What-- do you not have constitutional rights between the ages of 18 and 21? If you believe the second amendment applies to 21 and up, the way we interpreted in Alabama, why does it magically kick in at 21? Now, you could disagree with the whole premise of the permitless carry. And you know, that's fine. But it doesn't-- you know, the whole idea isn't that we're just going to let your constitutional rights kick in at a certain age. Maybe go die for your country in 18. You can vote in 18. You don't want to think 18. You either want to do one of two things. Sheriff, you either want to change the Constitution to say that the second amendment-- maybe gun ownership ought to be a privilege, not a right. And I'm not sure that's where you come from. Are you think that adulthood should be get at age 21? So I don't think this is reading the room real well. This is not really where-- this is-- we're going to go nowhere in the Alabama legislature. Do you want to solve crime? Well, I've got more criminals. I mean, that's all I can tell you. And I understand law enforcement and in your harm's way, the people that are a little of the immature side with a gun. But look, we have a second amendment in this country. We have chosen to interpret it a certain way in Alabama based on the actions of the Alabama legislature. And there's no gray area here. It's pretty clear. So like I said, you're either-- you want to change the second amendment to have some caveats and not call a gun ownership a right, or B. You just want to-- you think that adulthood ought to be get at age 21. We can't be-- or we shouldn't be, although we are, but we can't be selective with rights. Now, you know, some things are privileges like, you know, you don't get a drink and smoke cigarettes to your 21, but those aren't rights. So those aren't guaranteed by our founding document, OK? The basis of our American government. And so the second amendment, you know, can be interpreted in a bunch of different ways. But we have chosen, in Alabama, as one of the 50 states to interpret it in a particular way. So you want to change it. I just don't think that's going to sell. Also, so if you've been keeping up with this, we talked about it a little bit. I've been Albertville, Alabama. Pilgrim's Pride, a chicken processing-- well, Pilgrim's Pride is a company, but they have a chicken processing facility near Albertville. Poultry, you know, we know about the poultry farming and the poultry sector of agriculture at Alabama. It's been going on for years. And they've been having a hard time, allegedly, getting workers at this Pilgrim's Pride processing plant. So they've been busing in Haitians. And people at Alabama were like, hey, why are these bus full of Haitians coming to our community? And I mean, there's been a lot of unfortunate things set online. And I would say even in these public forums, sitting town halls are doing up in Marshall County. But the deed of the cadre of columnist at AL.com, who's been mailing it in lately, 500, 500 words. And he has this column out. It's kind of a smear on Albertville, Alabama. Albertville, Alabama, which has really seen its demographics change over the last 20 years, a place where immigrants have gone to live in Alabama. And you look it up and you can see this shift in the Russellville and Franklin County and Albertville and Marshall County. But anyway, so people are objecting to these Haitians being brought in. And Archbald goes and he finds like four Facebook comments. I think one comment in the town hall. And then he looks at these other poverty law centers, like Hape app or whatever, to see that the Marshall County courthouse in Albertville, a bleeder stitch too, just wanted to go to one in Albertville. The one in Albertville has, you wait for it, it has a Confederate flag monument set in Alfred. Apparently this, I don't know why, but it was put there in 1996. You can count on the late side for the sons of the Confederacy, or daughters of the Confederacy movement. But he somehow ties that that monument is there, erected in the courthouse law, on the courthouse law, and to this, the objection by the people there, not what these Haitians bust in. Now, here's what's important, guys. It is not so much that the Haitians are being bust in. It is that they are being bust in to be cheap labor for this, this, this low red chicken processing facility that obviously is going, is it paying a high enough wage to get people who live there to go and work there? So they're bringing in their labor, which is just, here's the irony. And when Archibald brings up the Confederate flag, and I stole this, by the way, I didn't come up with this, that the Civil War, what did about eradicate, I mean at least the left and others will tell you, Civil War is about eradicating slavery. OK, well, it's upper and lower suction. Slavery, a low wage, cheap labor, pulley, clearly. You know, it's free labor, as far as some are concerned. However, the Archibald taken on this is, well, we want to enable this Pilgrim's Pride facility to bust in migrants in the name of cheap labor. And that's what's going on here. Is that like, if you're a asylum seeker and you seek your refuge from the ongoing turmoil and Haiti that's been going on for like 100 years or whatever, then perhaps you would go some other place besides Albert Bill, Alabama, I don't know. Anyway, we got to get a break in here. 251-343-0106. This is the Jeff Porchow, an FM talk, 106-5. You got to know when the hold up, know when the hold up, know when the walk away, know when the run, you never count your money. When you're sitting at the table, there'll be time and love to count when the dealings done. If you're looking back to the Jeff Porchow, if I'm talking 106-5-2513 or 301-06. Let's get through some text here. Martin Hiller was really bad about changing her dialect to an area. Also, her Walsh referred to as tampon Tim lately. Hilarious. Yeah, I know it's been going around for a while about Walt's. The Hillary did it a couple of times, but Kamala Harris says it everywhere. Makeup it what you will. I don't know what to make of the dialect change. And at some point, none of this is catching up with her. No one seems, at least in the media, seem to be bothered by any of this. But I don't know what to say here. How much does the mainstream media matter in our presidential elections? And at what point does it become an excuse for not getting results? Jerry, the sheriff is a little too chubby with the old.com. He is a little bit better than his predecessor, but he's still not falling to Constitution. Ah, I don't think they'll see dirt digger. Democrats say they are for union workers. Then why did they pass that to let all those illegals in the country go to work for less pay? Look at the hotel workers striking. So the illegals will take the union worker jobs. And it's an interesting point about NAFTA and how it kind of hollowed out what little manufacturing was left. Look, we have a global economy and all of these jobs. I mean, it's just now that you can import and export so easily. The goods can move around the world, even services. I mean, you can do. I mean, apparently they were testing out like McDonald's drive-through speakers and the person taking their order was like at a call center in India or something. But anyway, the point being is like, we didn't need the federal government to come in and pave the road, pave the way for the exporting of our jobs. That was always the knock on NAFTA. And NAFTA was kind of like-- always talking about Maroville and Vanity Fair there. And it had about 100 year run, say, probably 70, 80 years. But it was downsizing little by little by little by little. And when NAFTA came, it was just that was the death knell. So the point being is this, guys, when we talk about what's going on, what NAFTA in the '90s, I mean, that was like, oh, well, let us expedite the process of moving these jobs from the US down to Latin America. And it ultimately to China, then finally right now, they seem to be in Southeast Asia. Mr. Platt, if you're under 21, you need a permit. OK, it's still not about the money, though, right? If it's not about the money, it really is a heartfelt effort to curb crime or curb gun crime. That's one thing. But I just don't think that's where the state believes your gun ownership on a reside. And if you commit, where is this proposal? Why can't we say, hey, if you commit a gun crime, the penalty is way, way up here now. Like, there's a lot of structural problems in Alabama's criminal justice system, a lot of them. And we don't have places to put people, but we keep raising the penalty for these crimes. And then you get to the sentencing phase and the judge. There's like 700 years at them. And then they're out in five because of the way our system is right now. It's midnight. So we've got to figure this out. It's all a disarray. And it doesn't seem to be a lot of momentum, but that's where it ought to be. Put more criminals in jail. Less gun crime. Well, bearing back, this is the Jet Force Show at FM Talk, 106.5. Feel that long sum, too. Just win the-- [MUSIC PLAYING] Welcome back to the Jet Force Show at FM Talk, 106.5. Thanks for hanging out with us on this Tuesday morning, Tuesday after Labor Day. Text slide 25134301, 006. That's how you get in touch with the program. So please make sure you utilize the text line. Still to come. Still to come on the program here. We'll hear from ear and about an hour. Dale Jackson, WVNN, Ann Yell-Ammer News. And Alabama Republican Party Chairman John Wall. So please make sure that you stay tuned for that. Joining us now on the line is our good friend Paul DeMarco. Paul, good morning. How are you? Good morning, Jeff. Hope you and your listeners had a nice weekend. I did, I guess, given the football circumstances, but not exactly a powerhouse there. Unless you were an LSU fan, like my wife. So otherwise, good weekend football. Well, I guess it could have been worse. Hey, you could be like a Florida fan or something right now. Hey, I want to kick it off here, Paul. So the sheriff down here, Mobile County, wants to up this. Well, you know, we got permanent, let's carry in Alabama. He wants to up to age 21. He says that this could like maybe solve some of the problems, some of the gun violence. I just find that to be tone deaf. Maybe it would work, but I don't think it's going to go anywhere in the legislature. But wouldn't it be smarter? Maybe we lock up more criminals or how about this? Raise the penalty for gun crime. I don't know, but this seems like an ill, just not a very, not the best approach forward. But it's really not complicated. And the Alabama legislature could solve this next session. You can start having truth and sentencing, but you also could do what police chiefs and police departments are doing up here in Jefferson County. When they have gun crimes, they're not going to the Jefferson County District Attorney's Office. They're going to the US Attorney's Office because they're getting stiffer penalties. And the bad guys are spending more time behind bars. So that's what's going on up here. And I anticipate you'll see more of that in Mobile County. But that's how you solve it. You look at the federal system, where there's more day-to-day time served as opposed to the same system. You don't have to look far and wide to find solutions to start trying to resolve some of these problems with repeat offenders on the streets using guns to commit crimes. Look at what's the federal system. That's why folks do that up here. Let's talk about truth and sentencing, though. I alluded to it in the last segment, like the judge will throw out a big, big sentence, and then there's so many carve outs and ways to get out of prison, and he don't really serve that. But getting to a truth and sentencing model, the big structural problem here is there's nowhere to put a lot of these criminals. And we can raise penalties all day, but if we don't have prisons, then what do we do with them? Well, no question about that. And while we're watching these two prisons go up, and candidly, we need to add more room at these prisons. We don't need to close-- we don't need to build new prisons and to close the existing ones. We've got to figure out how to get the cost and control. And I saw that Senator Elliott was saying, let's look at the bid process and how we're doing these. But we don't need to be closing prisons just because we built new ones if we need that space. Because obviously, the crime the past three years since 2020 has continued to spike, particularly violent crime. Well, you know, and there's no real discussion about this. It's like, OK, we need prisons because they're part of our criminal justice system, and we want to deter crime, lower crime, et cetera. But I feel like the state we were like dragged kicking and screaming to this point, your violation, the amendment. But I think you see a real tangible problem out on the streets with crime, because we just have a criminal justice system that's a disarray. Let's look at Bessemer this past weekend, Jeff. And I don't know how much you kept up with this. We had three individuals that were shot and killed, I believe, Friday night, and Bessemer. Then you had three more that were shot over the weekend, three different individuals. And then there was a vigil service for the three that were killed, and three were shot there. So in the course of like three days, you had nine people shot, three killed, six wounded. Don't pull them with our criminal justice system, and Bessemer, and you got to say, OK, well, what's the problem? Is it policing? Is it prosecuting? Is it the sentences? There needs to be a real look at the folks that committed these crimes, and they've already caught one of them. Well, let's look at his history. Is this one of the guys that are revolving door in and out of the criminal system? And that's what we need to be looking at. I don't think we look at enough of that. The folks that are being arrested, what is their criminal history, and are some of these, some of the same folks that are just going in and out of the courthouse, because they're either not being prosecuted, or they're getting weak sentences, and getting right back out on the street. But the move here, and I don't like this at all, especially from Republicans, to go after making about gun ownership, making about the second amendment. Like, look, the Alabama legislature, you could disagree with them, but in the end, they decided they would interpret the second amendment of the Constitution a certain way. And that's the ground rules. And there's no in between here, right? Like, you don't, there's two things at play here, and going out to the way the sheriff down here wants to go about it. Like, you either believe the second amendment ought to be repealed in gun ownership, ought to be some kind of a privilege and not a right, which I don't know why people may agree with that. But are you want to say that adulthood really begins at age 21, not at 18? So like, you can't, you can't do it this way, I don't think. Well, it isn't a fair comparison to say, OK, let's look at those cities like Chicago and Washington D.C. that have some pretty strong gun control laws. And is it working there? No, clearly not. So, but also, not only is it not working there, they also have terrible criminal justice systems, because they're not arresting anybody, and they're not putting anybody in jail. Oh, Paul, so that I got to think this too. Like, I don't think changing the permit requirements is really going to like really make people change, or it's going to make criminal behavior change. I find that to be, it's almost a cop out. And I'm not saying that things aren't hard on law enforcement right now, but I just, this is so misguided, and in a way, it works against trying to solve these problems with a gun violence in the state, or any kind of violence, or any kind of crime in the state, by making it about this. You put your energy towards something else, because I don't think this is it. Well, that's why you see, again, law enforcement up, in North Alabama, at least in Jefferson County, they've told me we're going straight to the U.S. Attorney's Office, because we can get different grounds as opposed to going to state court. And so, you could probably have that same conversation in the Gulf Coast, you're probably going to get the same answer. You think so, because, I mean, just the U.S. Attorneys, I mean, I know they're all kind of under the Biden administration, but are, do we have any reason to believe that they are, I mean, that this is, Birmingham's not just unique in this regard. - Well, look, you probably have prosecutors and judges that are willing to lock people up, and that's part of the problem up here, is we've got some judges who are not doing that, and that is a problem. So, you may get the stiffer penalties, and so, that's the question is, why do you have to go to the permit route? If you've got prosecutors willing to, prosecutors and bald and noble who are willing to put the bad guys, and you've got judges who are willing to sentence them, so you're right. Maybe you don't have that problem. We do have that problem here, because we've got judges up here, and you can look at case after case, you can read about it, where somebody was convicted of murder, and they're not getting the sentence they deserve, and that's why, or they committed a violent crime with a gun, and they're not getting the sentence they deserve, and that's why law enforcement say, well, the only way to get them off the street is a federal prosecution, with a federal judge sentencing them. - I'm joined by Paul DeMarco here on the program. Paul, let's move on. It's obviously presidential election cycle, and this race goes back and forth, back and forth. I think the Sugar Highs warned all for the Harris and the Democrats for now, but I mean it, she's still got, I mean it still could go either way. The problem is here that, I don't know, I look at this and take Trump out of it, and Trump's gonna do what Trump's gonna do, but if you're a Democrat and you're watching this, I mean, what makes you think that she's capable of winning this election? I mean, I think they got, I still think the Democrats got a lot of problems here, and the media are kind of painting a rosy scenario for them, but the reality is, it's not quite as rosy as maybe the perception is. - I still think it goes back to some folks, they just don't like Donald Trump, that they don't care how unqualified she is. They don't care, but it looks like some of the independence are like, look at the economy, look at the wars around the country, national security, look at homeland security, and they're like, well, well, even if they don't like Trump, they're willing to vote for him because they don't have any confidence in a cross, who the competitor is. And that's what was really interesting that, again, you look at the polls, I mean, I'm personally watching Pennsylvania, that to me is the bellwether about who's gonna win this election or not. And if you believe the polling, Donald Trump, even after they switched from Biden to Kamala Harris still has a lead in Pennsylvania and considering how much of it is still in Philadelphia, that really says something about the direction of this election of potential victory by Donald Trump based on Pennsylvania. - Well, what I find to be Harris's problem is it just, it doesn't seem like there's a lot of enthusiasm. I'm not saying that people are gonna go out that we're gonna vote for Biden or Harris or whatever now we're gonna vote for Trump, but I think they got a problem where a lot of people are just gonna stay home and not play the cycle. She just doesn't generate. I mean, I think the media are trying to portray her as Obama 2.0 and she's really just kind of Biden 2.0 or I don't know what a good moniker is, but it's not gonna generate any case. It's not really generating any enthusiasm necessary. - Well, Jeff, let me add this to the equation. I mean, if I can, the election Jimmy Carter versus Ronald Reagan. I mean, obviously the Iran hostage situation was an issue in that election and the economy, just how bad things were. And if you look at, we're back to all the pro-Hamas protesters in New York City, the horrible murder of those six hostages in Israel. What's going on around the world? The grocery prices are still at what, 20% or so. I think all that plays a role, just a bigger, larger role than just the personalities as well, where folks will say things aren't good right now when it comes to the economy and national security and homeless. So I do think those will play an outsized role in addition to the personalities, whether you think she's confident or whether you just don't like some of these people don't like Donald Trump's personality. - Well, and you look at the methodology and these surveys. I mean, I think these pollsters really do try their best to get an accurate, give an accurate depiction of what's going on out there. But like their own biases get in the way and they're modeling and they think that Harris is gonna draw a turnout like you would see for an Obama or what not. And I just don't think, I think that's a false assumption. And this is where Democrats maybe are a little high on their own supply right now. - And I still believe, and this was true in 2016 and I don't know what percentage of the voters, if it's, I do believe there's a percentage of voters who are Donald Trump who are never gonna answer a poll and are not gonna say, yeah, I'm gonna vote for Donald Trump. I do believe there's some folks that just aren't gonna do that. I don't know if that's a half a percent or what, but I do believe Donald Trump's still under polls in eight years from when he was first elected in 2016. - Well, just in general, like right of center candidates under poll, right? Look at Barry Moore in AL1 and how everyone assumed that was going for Jerry Carl, but the polling was off. But it's true and the problem, I don't really know, are pollsters compensating for this or not? They see, they will compensate, it's kinda like radio ratings and when they get a response, a book back, an African American response gets more weight than in their conclusion than a white American or another ethnicity. And there's some of that going on and the polling, I'm afraid, but it distorts the numbers and it doesn't give a real reliable sort of view of what's going on politically. - Well, and then the other that's just not making the headlines, this huge fight going on in the States about the Cornel West and RFK being on the ballot or not, I saw Georgia, I think said that some of those could be on the ballot. I mean, again, we don't know what is that a percentage point difference, whether some of these third party candidates on there, 'cause when you saw how close the race was in Georgia, this could end up making a difference. I mean, this is not Ross Perot and Bill Clinton Bush, but I mean, we do have to believe that there's so much money being spent in the fight over these third party candidates that there must be some internal polling in both Kamala Harris and Donald Trump that they're worried about it. - Yeah, 'cause this will make a difference. - There's just people out there who will not vote for either one of these two candidates or either two party, they're just, they're so fed up with the system, they're gonna go cast their vote for the third party. And like, you know, we see didn't pass a rough nader, Jill Stein, I mean, that swung the election or the Republican. - Yeah, and so it's much effort and time and you see what's going on in Michigan and Wisconsin and Georgia, these, I guess, seven or so states or border states, so much fight over that. You feel that must be making a difference. So you've got to watch that as well as we get closer to November the fifth. - Paul, we got to leave it there a little long, but thanks for making time for us. - Hope you and your listeners have a great week. I'll check 'em out on Twitter @Paul_TheMarco. We'll be right back. This is the Jeff Porte Show on FM Talk, 1006.5. ♪ Milk to spoons again ♪ ♪ Moana tried to tell me ♪ ♪ To stay away from the train line ♪ ♪ She said that all the railroad men ♪ ♪ Just drink up your blood like wine ♪ ♪ Hey, I was country, country ♪ ♪ Wasn't too ♪ ♪ Yeah, I was country ♪ ♪ From my and down to all my poo ♪ ♪ I still am ♪ ♪ And look the same ♪ - Welcome back to the Jeff Porte Show on FM Talk, 1006. Bye, thanks for sticking around on. On this Tuesday morning, 25134431, 01660 be with us. I'll see, oh my God, Chris, let's see. Anderson are the Haitian people here legally. I mean, I assume because they are asylum seekers that they have some kind of legal status. But it's really kind of this idea that you have this business and they're bringing people, you know, the tax they put on the local infrastructure and I mean, Anderson the local healthcare, education system, the policing, go down the line, education, et cetera. And, okay, what are we gonna do about that? How can this community absorb this culture that I mean, it's very different from Marshall County, Alabama. And it's being done by this chicken processing facility where these Haitians are coming because they are bringing them there and the chicken plant doesn't care. I mean, it's like, okay, well, we got our labor and it's also like, you know, the zoning regulations and there's no housing there for these people and they're abusing that as well. There's all these problems that the community is upset about and it should be upset about, but you can't say anything or you're a racist. Tim, Jeff, what are your thoughts or come all wanting you to pay a 25% tax on unrealized capital gains? It's just a talking point. It's not serious policy. I wouldn't take it. I mean, who is going to spearhead that? I named Techster, Chuck said a Fox News interview that he had the right to interfere with the 2020 election while. He may not have had the right, but he does have certain authorities and they can be abused. I don't know. I do think the Democrats aren't doing the same. I did too wrong to make a right, but just point it out. We'll be right back. Since the Jeff Porchoe, what if we talk about 065? ♪ The happiness on earth ♪ ♪ Ain't just for high achievers ♪ ♪ I come to know ♪ From Bucks Pocket to the shores of Orange Beach at all points in between, an insider's perspective on Alabama politics. It's the Jeff Porchoe. ♪ I don't think I've done it this way ♪ ♪ I don't think I've done it ♪ Welcome back to the Jeff Porchoe, the fifth talk, point of 065. Thank you for sticking around on this Tuesday morning. 2-5-1-3-4-3-0-1-0-6. That's how you get in touch with me. Your show host, if you want to participate and interact with the program, still to come in about 30 minutes from now. Dale Jackson, WVNN, and Yellow Hammer News. He'll be with us, so please stick around for that. And then finally, we're wrapping up in the 11 o'clock hour, John Wall, the Alabama Republican Party. Last week, they announced their big summer dinner coming a little late this year, but closer to election time, I suppose. Laura Trump, gonna headline that. We'll talk about that and I want to expect that's here shortly. Let's get through some text here, and put these off here. I know I'm, well, I got a few. I'll see if you've got five, six, I'll see here. Josh, which president gets damped on them for creating and implementing it, Bush or Clinton? I think Clinton. It was a little late for Bush. Now, I'd say that Bush wouldn't have supported it, but it is from that era. We could have stopped it. Mys, this is a Democrat platform so far. Kill every unborn child, and the baby is more whenever you think you need until you die. Is the abortion working like it should? There's this expectation. That abortion that the abortion issue will play as big of a role as it did in 2022. I mean, here's the deal with 22. The Dopp's decision was very fresh. People are very emotional about it, very upset about it, and they opened up their checkbooks. And Planned Parenthood was able to weaponize it. I mean, you know, that's how they did, that's how you win elections. A lot of these midterm elections have very low turnout. They just don't have the oath of a presidential election. It's a different, you motivated a vote but I would argue to you that same, those are your typical general election voters built into that number. I'm not saying this isn't a winning issue for Democrats. It may very well be a winning issue, but that's not important to me philosophically. If we lose every election because we still do that, we still do that, and we still do that. I mean, we still do that. But if we lose every election because we still don't pro life as Republicans and fine, we got to do what we got to do. But I sure would like it if Republicans articulated their position a lot better than they are right now. Um, but, but you're right, but they're trying to run on this. And as a strategy, I don't think they're going to get the same results. That it was a blimp in the radar because Democrats have always run on pro choice, Republicans have always run on pro life. And it's a little peculiar. What's going on with Trump and his back and forth on this? I am not particularly thrilled with this aspect of Trump is them. Say he's pro life, but then support support choice measures. Not helpful. Uh, Sheriff Bert, apparently they keep up with the federal court cases, which are holding eight restrictions for people 18 to 21 to business firearms is unconstitutional. No, it's not a, it's not a question of possession. It's a question of, uh, of a license. Do we require a license? And licensing is constitutional, but Alabama, we chose it to interpret the second amendment differently, Terry. Um, angry patriot. I'd like to share personally, uh, the sheriff is looking out for more ways to have promo calls through the rest criminals. The usage of gun is supposed to be taught by parents, but he's been more time praising the people who use guns and properly give, uh, the most severe penalties for those who commit the violence. Guns need to be a big part of society. Not a big problem. Well, it's, I mean, and there's no government solution for these cultural problems, I think these cultural shortcomings, which is parenting in general. I mean, we can go down the line down the list of things that bad parents are probably responsible for on the woes of society. We can start with crime, but you can go through the education system. You can go through hunger. You can go through a lot of problems, diabetes and whatever health. Unfortunately, maybe fortunately, I don't know, but there's no law that says it's illegal to be a bad parent. In fact, the one time in our society, we used to shun the bad parents. The parents who just did not raise their kids did not treat them properly. We used to shun them. Now we're told that, well, that's insensitive. That's more harmful than good. I mean, it used to be having an out of wedlock child used to be some kind of like scandal. Now it's like, it's a badge of honor if you're raised by a single parent. And that's, that's not where society should take us. But back to sheriff, I mean, okay, he's looking for a problem. We'll cause the rest criminals, but this is how you, I mean, I'm sorry. This probably isn't a good way to do it. It's just the gun lobby in America, the NRA, whatever you want to call it, is way too strong and you can villainize it. You can, you can attack the NRA. And this is what they did during the constitutional carry debate. It was all anti NRA, but like how the membership of the NRA. I suspect even in Alabama is pretty high. Like this is like, it's, it's tone death. Uh, let's see. I named textor. Did they think they're committing gun violence? Are there all of a sudden get a buy by the law and wait until they're old enough to get a gun? This all, this only penalizes the law by the citizens. You're taking young people's right to defend themselves away. If they do this, then they need to raise the military age. Okay. But, but they're not. On a textor, the rosy perception is the only way they shove a rigged election down our throats again. If we had the real poll numbers, they would not be able to fake the ballots, but they keep getting it wrong on names. Actually, they keep getting it bad wrong. Like, okay, one bad election. So let's go. I would state, let's go to, I mean, Bush and 04. I mean, they were, they were counting the, it was, it was going to be carry, carry, carry, but Bush Gore, it was going to be Gore, see Obama McCain. We kind of thought it was going to go Obama. Same with the Yes Romney. Trump Hillary, it was going to be Hillary with Biden and Trump. I mean, it was going to be Biden and all these were close, close elections. I, I just think they're still compensating for the Obama years. Jerry, the state of Alabama probably used taxpayer dollars to fund a chicken farm when it was built. We have tried to track that down, Jerry. Now, Pilgrim's Pride has received economic incentives in the past from the state, but it's not clear if they were for this particular facility. Martin, a lot of people nowadays say racist, but should be saying realist. Mr. Plot. Perot was right after all we did hear a giant sucking sound. Leo, good morning, Jeff. Culturally misguided, a youth could be solved with orphanages of slashing welfare to biological mother, but we won't do that. We've tried that in the past where they tried to cut back on some of these, these benefits. It's never worked. For some reason, it's a lot worse. It continues to deteriorate the situation. The Jason Willock, now these aren't my words. He's a used to be a sports columnist. Now he's kind of gone right of center. He calls it the baby mama culture. And the baby mama, these are major American cities where you have African American women rise to levels of prominence. And a lot of times they're single mothers. And he says, well, what's going on? Cities are a reflection of their parenting. I don't know that I'm quite out there with him on that, but there's something that's really, really, there's not a value put on life in some of these circumstances. It is like go around just shooting people or firing your gun in the air, not realizing what a serious deadly weapon that is and it's so nonchalant. It's and everything is so instinct or gut reaction. And, you know, we used to could deter some of this with our criminal justice system and penalties. But that's not really having the impact that it once had. So what do you do? Well, I can tell you one thing requiring, uh, having a gun permit requirement, I don't think it was going to get us there. Tim, Jeff, I definitely think you have the right to discuss the pros and cons of pistol permits and right to carry it. And it works pretty good if you are ill all by the citizen with guns. But if you keep logging out the sheriff, you better not get pulled over for any traffic violations. You're probably going to be put jail just saying. I do stay on the side of the bay a lot more these days. Well, I really don't get out the sheriff here. I, I just, I don't think this is going to work. I can't. I think it's a distraction. But quite honestly, like I will acknowledge there's a criminal problem. There is a gun violence problem. We agree on that. What to do about it. And this like push for more onerous regulations or firearms, maybe that would work. But under our system, under the state's interpretation, the current interpretation of the second amendment in the stated reasons why they changed the gun permit requirement. Because you have this sort of broad view of the second amendment. You know, your, your gun ownership shall not be infringed upon by any form of government. Well, it didn't, all of a sudden you're going to carve out any, but we're going to make an exception here. I mean, philosophically, it's contradictory. And so, Tim, that's, that would be the, the problem with this whole proposal. That, yeah, well, it's just common sense, Jeff, but it's not. It's got a lot of problems. Because you're never going to get the Alabama legislature to go along with it. So why you, why put yourself out there and do this like that? When there's like a hundred other possible remedies, short term, long term, whatever, the pursuit. We'll be right back. This is F.M. Talk with us. Six. Five. Count the one. Just. I give you my heart and I try to make it happen. And you gave me nothing in return. You know, it ain't too hard to say. Welcome back to the jump port showed up and talk one of six, five. Interesting to get around. Dale Jackson up in the next segment. Let's get through these text here. And Jeff, Alabama should change the law of juvenile crime, which is sealed. And should the youth get convicted as an adult? It is said it should be enhanced. Michael, why doesn't the sheriff just go out to the group and the general public who's causing the vast majority of violent crimes? It does take a rocket surgeon. What's a rocket surgeon to figure out the profile of the types of people, young people doing most of the crime. Jerry, poor old Danny B. came after your first guest pretty hard this morning. But I like his thoughts on letting the feds prosecute the criminals instead of the state. That's a good start. If they go to federal prison, the state doesn't have to pay the incarceration. Danny B. came after my guest pretty hard this morning. We'll see. Monty, I would suggest if you are a parent and a recipient of a government welfare or assistance, you will lose all of that. If your child is out of 10 school and has been arrested and convicted of criminal acts, we have to hold these not present parents accountable. And finally, bones on. Jeff, a government started out to give you everything you want and the power to take it away, everything you need. They took away my seagulls watch desk because she was behind on her mortgage payments. But it's very difficult to keep your job at Popeyes when you don't have a thumb. Thank you for that bone saw. Really appreciate the input. Why doesn't the sheriff just go out? It's not that easy. I mean, you do have to ask them. There was an issue run up earlier about probable cause. And not having department gives the probable cause. It gives a little more weight. So I just I guess I don't think this is going to work for a bunch of reasons, but primarily the legislature is just going to say no to this. That's number one. But number two, when you push something out like this, well, then all the other remedies that you couldn't propose are not going to get any. I mean, like, why not have something that is likely if you're going to push it in a Republican led legislature? You're not, you're not Stephen Reed, Sheriff. You're not a Randall Woodford who may, you know, need these Democrat mayors that have been complaining about the constitutional carry law. I mean, but they're just a philosophical problem with that. As long as the state is read and I see it being read from the foreseeable future, you're not going to have them change or weaken the second amendment in Alabama. There's going to be a lot of pushback. It's just that John Sharp drops that story on the Monday on Labor Day. And I'm telling you, there's there's going to be some wall makers who push back against this. And it becomes a non starter. It would have become a non starter. Well, why did you put yourself out there? And this, I mean, maybe we should have to share fun to talk about it. But just my, my sort of Cracker Jack analysis here is that. Like, I hear something like that. I see it and I am not offended by it or anything. It's just not realistic. And you need to be keeping it safe. Your primary, your primary responsibility is public safety. Then this isn't just maddling in the levels of state government. It isn't a good idea. But there's a lot of cuts on other problems, just to tell deafness and what you only come to expect from it. I mean, it's always a hot button issue. And what, you know, do you believe the second amendment or not? Well, then why if you do, then what's your interpretation of it, I guess? Like making case in that regard that this isn't meant to be a slide on the second, I guess, but I still don't think it's going to sell. You'll you get the sheriff's losses, right? The powerful sheriff's association and Alabama, a very powerful lobby, lost this fight. Now they're trying to roll it back. And I don't see it, not for the foreseeable future. Maybe after the next election at best. We'll be right back. This is FM Talk 1065. When you don't believe a word, I- We're having an all-night revival. Some call women and someone steals the bible. For the same mind survival. Welcome back to the chuff 4 showed at the talk 1065. Did you stay with us on this Tuesday morning? Text line 251-343-0106. Amanda needs no introduction, but I'm going to do it anyway. From Yellow Hammer News and Hotsoils, W-V-N-N. Dale Jackson joins us. Dale, good morning. How are you? I'm doing pretty good. Doing pretty good. Gators got stopped this weekend. My son almost beat me at NCA 25 on our web stream. But you can go watch @thedalejaxon on Facebook. And I'm looking forward to a great week. I'm going to the USF Alabama game. Taking grant to his first football game. So it should be a lot of fun this week. Did you, you went to Alabama game this week, didn't you? I was there, yep. I was there. Had a good time. Any impressions? Yeah, they're good. They're still good. I mean, not that their competition was really anything. But always a good time. Always enjoyable there in Tuscaloosa. Everyone has a lot of fun when Alabama's winning. And this was a good time. Well, it's good to hear. So we'll get to national politics in a second. You're pretty familiar with Albertville, Alabama. Your wife's from there. It's kind of your-- Half Albertville, half Asian, yes. That's my wife. It's kind of in your listening area sort of. John Archbald, who has these casted aspersions on the good people of Albertville, who take issue with these Haitian migrants. They're being busty and to work at the chicken plant there. I really take exception to this. Now, whatever about these Confederate monuments of these courthouses, but they're all over the state of Alabama, this one happened to come along in 1996, which is kind of late for that. But let's put that aside. I mean, I don't think it has anything to do with what's going on now. Well, let's just say that the individuals who are there, they don't seem to be too worried about it, do they? You can see the people who are coming. They don't seem to be too worried about you. No, it's not scaring them off, isn't it? Right, right. So anyway, well, he-- By the way, John Archbald filed that dispatch from Birmingham, where his paw was a preacher, or did he file it from Yale? Harvard, or wherever he's at? Yeah, someone in New England, I think, I believe that's the case. Okay, just check it. Just check it. I'm sure they loved him there when he-- where the email went around with that link to the story in it. But I don't think many people were in Albertville were impressed, and I don't think I'm very impressed with him either, so. That's sort of how he rolls. I mean, he found this-- I guess he went to the SPLC, like a Confederate landmark tracker. Do you have that? Yes, that is a real thing. And then he went on Facebook and found four comments that, you know, how Facebook-- obviously, Facebook comment-- I mean, I know Facebook commenters are the pulse of the community. So anyway, we put those two together to declare Albertville sort of this racist hellscape. Now, in Archbald's defense, and I'm going to offer this up very lightly here, in his defense, there was also the person at the Town Hall, who was immediately rebuked by pretty much everyone, who said those people have a certain smell to him. I've been to Haiti before, you know, that kind of stuff. And so there's that, but yeah, you know, it's not necessarily a good look, but look, Archbald is reaching. Archbald knows he's reaching, and this is not, in any way, shape or form meant to draw anything to this conversation. Other than anger people more. So that's what Archbald's about right now. That's his story. Kyle Whitmire took over as the nerdy idiot. They're at ail.com, and he's just trying to get back in the mix. Well, I just-- I don't think you, you know, all of that is no tangential, because what's going on here is Pilgrim's Pride chicken plant is chasing cheap labor. Here's the irony, Dale, that the Civil War in a confederacy was, we could say, if it was indeed about slavery, then that was cheap labor. Well, the irony here is Archbald's taking the side of the cheap labor with these Haitians that are being bust in to Marshall County. Oh, yeah, he doesn't care. Oh, look, he isn't-- look, there's a lot of union folks who are very upset about stuff like this, because it depresses wages. There's others that know that eventually these individuals will be on their side. And that's really what they're looking at here, and Archbald's taking that position. Like, look, this may be bad for these communities, but screw them. This will change those communities, and this will replace those people. They won't dare recall it the great replacement theory, but that's what it is, and that's what they're supporting. I mean, we'll change the electorate if you don't vote the way we want you to. They say it out loud, and Archbald's supporting that. They act like it's a conspiracy theory, and then they do stuff like this. Well, the problem, though, is-- and then that is part of it, but I think the biggest problem is it's not fair to the people who have to go to school there. I have to drive on the roads, get health care, like-- Law enforcement. Yeah, you have all of these things. You have a bilingual component now that you have to deal with in your community, and it's not as if they're saying, "Don't come here," but it is all being done because this low-rate chicken processing facility doesn't want to pay whatever the going rate is for-- and how high could a wage be in Marshall County, Alabama, by the way, but they don't want to pay that, so they're bringing in labor. Yeah, I mean, you're right. You're right. I mean, it's all about getting that labor in there and getting it in there for cheap and not having to increase the pay for the locals, which you would argue that Archbald would claim he's rooting for the local young-- the local man who is uneducated, who maybe could make some money that you can play, but won't work there for 15 bucks an hour. He won't-- they don't acknowledge. They don't go-- they don't go deep enough to acknowledge the problem. I mean, this was about what, the Confederate monument? Of course, they're not going deep. I mean, this is ridiculous. I mean, to suggest that those monuments have anything to do with this at all, it's so incredibly lazy that only someone phoning it in from the Ivy League to Alabama could behave this way. If I question it, John Archbald, is this? If your new editor at the Birmingham News, or "Ailed Econ" as it's called now, was in place when he applied there or his son applied there, would either of them have a job? Not based on the work that-- well, I don't know about Ramsey Archbald, but John Archbald is-- you're right, like, mailing it in is so spot-on. No, no, no, but Ramsey Archbald, I assume, is a notoriously white person as well. Oh, well, that's-- is he straight? I don't know. I can't make it assumption. I know John Archbald is a wife, and then someday I'm going to get John Merrill to come on and tell that whole story about the machine at Alabama and how those two really like embellish a lot of things. I'll tell you this. I'm not interested in that. Well, I mentioned that, but in this scenario, what we do know is the new editor of the avail.com is under a lawsuit for saying that he would not hire any more straight white males. So I really got to think that Archibald should stop doing what he's doing and write a letter of resignation in order to clear the path for somebody else. No, well, whatever six figures are paying him at avail.com, and you know, ill.com don't really have-- I mean, they're broke. He must have something on the new house family or something. Well, I know that J.D. Crowe come back to work after he disappeared for a long time, so who knows what's going on there? Well, he apparently was sick. That's why I didn't know that. Yeah, so he got to tread carefully there. Well, I'm not saying I want him to be sick. I'm just saying he was gone for a long time, but no one has any idea now. Now he's back with his clanhoods and writing those projections. Joined by Dale Jackson, WVNN, Yellow Hammer News, Dale real quick, something-- so Trump and this IVF stuff, which is fine, I guess. I mean, he really-- technically, it's brilliant. I'm not crazy about it as a real policy point, but I listened to a lot of people talk about it, and I keep getting this wrong. That court decision in Alabama, in Alabama, they banned IVF. That did not happen. There was these IVF clinics who said, "Oh, we have to approach this different because the state of Alabama, at least in civil matters, is going to view these embryos where frozen as human beings," and they had taken a step back and they suspended-- a lot of these clinics suspended the IVF services-- is not the Alabama legislature or the governor or whoever saying, "Now shall not have IVF in this state, but that's the way it's being portrayed." Yeah, out of an abundance of caution, the clinics decided that they were going to pretend that they couldn't operate. Not all of them, but a lot of them. We're going to pretend that they could not operate, and the legislature said, "Fine, whatever," and they passed the law and said, "Okay, let's go ahead and do that," and they did. So, missing from that is the super majority Republican legislature in Alabama immediately came back and fixed it. I mean, that's what happened, and that part's missing from the story. By the way, I would love, love to sit down with George Stefanopoulos, Kamala Harris, and Donald Trump, and say, "Quick, someone explained the IVF process to me. Explain how it works." One of you, the three of you, explain this to me. Now, go and see what happens. Donald Trump is like, "Oh, it's the best. It's the best people need it. We need to do it." Kamala Harris would cackle, and George Stefanopoulos would say, "Well, Bill Clinton didn't have sex with those embryos." It wasn't a criminal case, but the Supreme Court in Alabama had to do something here, right? When these embryos are destroyed, what are they? They property like your cat and your dog, or are they human beings? Am I crazy to think? Am I nuts? Is this just a made-up position on my part to say like, if they're not implanted, they're not viable? Am I stupid? But viability is the argument of the left when it comes to abortion. I understand that. Okay, maybe that's not it. Maybe if they're not implanted, they're not actually alive? I mean, what are we supposed to do with this? I mean, these are why these institutions exist. We're supposed to figure this stuff out, and they haven't done a really good job of it. I mean, I guess the hardcore right position, the Christian right position on this, is the minute that they are fertilized, then it has a soul and discarding its murder, right? Like, that's the gist, right? Yeah, I think so, yeah. Yeah, so that's the gist there. I don't know how you move anyone on that position who feels that way. I just don't know. I know people have gone through this process, and they surely do not envision it that way. They are thankful for the children they have from that process, and that's the other conversation. Well, here's one of the problem-wise that when you go through this process, they create a bunch of embryos, because it's like throwing darts to the dartboard. It's a very low percentage, but you want to throw as many darts as possible, so they create as many embryos, but then when you actually conceive and have the child and so forth, what do you do with those embryos? And they're being discarded, which is very objectionable by the Christian right. What do you just keep them forever? I don't know. Have them all. Do you force the women who come in there and say, "I need IPF?" Okay, but you're going to have to have 38 babies. But it's just a suction, too, that all of those embryos, I mean, these embryos are created naturally as well, and it's like, some just don't take. It's like a failed implementation. That's why I started there. That's how I view that. I know that sounds crazy, but that's the time I view it. I think ultimately that will be the position, like when it attaches, then is when you got to give it the protections it so deserves. Sure. And if you read the dissent, and this is kind of a crazy dissent, I mean, there were two dissenting justices, and the Alabama Supreme Court's wildly to the right. But the wheelsellers at Greg Cook were like, "When this human protection, when this wrongful death stuff was done in the 1800s, there is no way that the Alabama legislature, when they wrote this law, could have conceived of this as a possibility." So you are saying, by giving them human status, the court is thereby making law, and that's not our role. Yeah, they just made it up. I mean, I get that and I agree with that. I think that that's probably the bigger problem here. And it's unfortunate that it's kind of come to this, but there are going to be a lot of some people on the right who have a problem with this. And every time they speak up, which they absolutely should, let's make this as clear as they can speak up on anything they want, they're going to be treated as if they want to ban IVF, which has never been the case. No one's suggesting that. And they said the other day that Republicans in the Senate, I was watching, I forget what it was, I'm assuming it was CNN, let's just say that. I was watching CNN in one of the column, one of the people, like, yeah, in the Republicans, what a ban IVF, and they voted to do that. No, no, whichever, yeah, no one has ever proposed that. All they voted on were two competing pieces of legislation, one which said IVF can do anything it wants, and abortions can be done everywhere. And the other said, if you ban IVF, you'll lose your Medicaid dollars. The Republicans said you'll lose your Medicaid dollars if you ban IVF, but they didn't touch the abortion issue, and the Democrats were obsessed with that, tying abortion to a Republican, so we're not doing that. That's what actually happened. But you can't have that conversation on CNN. You just can't do it. So they tell you, oh, they tried to ban IVF. Nobody did that, not Alabama, not anywhere else. But it's such an easy talking point for them, too. Oh, no, no, it's right. And Donald Trump's whole thing with the pro-life position down in Florida, that whole situation, that has really muddied the waters on this as well. I mean, because, like I said, set them all down and make them explain it. Well, it was a tactically smart thing for him to do to say, hey, I think that IVF should be free or covered or whatever. I'm not talking about that part. But hear me out here on this. I'm sorry. And now, the response from the Democrats, he's making it up. He's lying. You can't trust Donald Trump. When he says that, he'll say anything to get elected. And they don't really have a good response for that, because it's just, well, Donald Trump's a liar. All right. And again, the reason why that's bad twofold is that was literally the criticism of Kamala Harris last week. My values haven't changed. And now they can flip it around and easily so and say, look at Donald Trump. You guys are complaining about someone not being very clear on what they stand for. I mean, he changes position two times in a week. Yes, well, I think it's in this vein that Donald Trump is just being bad orange man. And you can't trust him. So don't listen to him on that. Right. And that's sort of the benefit to Donald Trump being the candidate. I mean, it was like, OK, we do better, guys. Hey, Dale, we got to get out of here a little long, but folks want to find you online. How can they do so? Watch me beat my son online, Facebook.com/thedalejaxon, Twitter.com/thedalejaxon. If I can ever get my YouTube stuff, work at youtube.com/thedalejaxon. Dale Jackson, ladies and gentlemen, we'll be right back. This is the Jet pore show on the flip talk, 1065. Baby, don't waste your time on me. I'm so damaged beyond repair. Life has shattered my hopes and my dream. Stayed up late again watching TV with my best friend. Laughing at me late night show. I don't know what's wrong with me, because I know I need my wrist. But if I don't stay about night, sleep on day. I ain't in my best. Hey, yes. Welcome back to the Jet pore show on the flip talk, 10065. Thank you for being with us on this Tuesday morning. 2513430106, keep the text coming. We'll get to a bunch of those over the next few segments. Still come on today's program. John Wall of the Alabama Republican party will be with us. That's about 45 minutes or so in the next hour. Tim of the lengthy text here, we'll get to it before we head to the bottom of the, I mean, to the top of the hour. Jeff, I think the best way to deal with juvenile crime is to cut assistance and funding and or funding for these parents. It did cooperate with the local authorities on either capturing or stopping these juveniles from any crimes. I know sometimes they're not controllable, but if you are a parent, you turn these juveniles in, when they commit these crimes and help the authorities, you wouldn't lose your assistance. I mean, it's just as times when this is the problem with government, I mean, this is instructive in this sense. I mean, it's like a one-size-fits-all approach, right? Anyways, you got ideas, but like all these circumstances vary wildly, right? Like they're just bad kids out there who are going to do whatever the hell they want. And is it really the parents' fault? In some cases, it is. In some cases, it isn't. I like the, well, he was an adult, but how much culpability is tied to the parents? And the other problem, Tim, is this, the politics of it will never work. I mean, there are left-wingers out there who just think open the floodgates up of government assistance, like there's never enough. And you're penalizing people for the wrong reasons or whatever. That becomes, I think we're just problematic. Um, especially a lot of this assistance that the state doles out is tied. Well, there's federal dollars involved. And just like anything you do with the federal government has like certain requirements, strings attached. So something like this probably wouldn't be allowed withholding federal benefits or withholding state benefits paid for with federal dollars. Based on this kind of solution for a criminal problem, they're going to say no to it. And that's, you see how intricate of a web, this is. You just, how about slocking criminals up and have stiff penalties would solve it. That's sort of the best straight approach, I think. We'll be right back. This is a Vib talk below 65. From Bucks Pocket to the shores of Orange Beach, at all points in between, an insider's perspective on Alabama politics. It's the Jeff Poor Show. I don't think I've done it this way. Welcome back to the Jeff Poor Show. And if I'm talking about 065, thank you for staying with us on this Tuesday morning. This is a losing track of what day it is. These holidays always throw you out, don't they? Two, five, one, three, four, three, zero, one, zero, six. We need to be in touch with the program. Let us know. So to come on the program, we'll talk to Alabama Republican Party Chairman John Wall. That's in about a half hour from now. Apparently, we haven't. We'll talk about the Algarab Dinner and how it's Laura Trump is the headliner. But also added to the lineup. United States Senator Bill Hagerty, former Ambassador to Japan. Also, was a frequent guest on my show when I was on at Huntsville? We've had him on a couple of times down here in Mobile, so maybe we'll get him on again. Before the Algarab event here in a week and a half or so. Once again, two, five, one, three, four, three, zero, one, zero, six. So we got a little several text here. Martin writes this about 35 years ago. "Hations were brought to Baltimore County for fieldwork and had guards with Uzzies because you told me this already." I think, Martin. Maybe a couple of weeks ago. Jerry, how were they allowed to go on offense on the IVF issue? If you were to hospital and the hospital allowed someone to turn off your life support, the hospital would be liable, but they used it. They used the court ruling. What even the court ruling? They eventually settled the case. The case should have been settled out of court. It never should have made it to the Supreme Court. It is on the mobile infirmary. It is on an defendants for not settling this case. Because what happened essentially was, I'm going to replay it here for you. We're talking about the IVF and how Alabama got to where it was. During COVID, it's not clear to me who somebody is. I've been told it was a homeless guy, but I've heard other things. Went into where they store these frozen embryos and picked up one of the dishes with the frozen embryos at it and got freezer burn and dropped it. The dish goes on to the ground and rests in peace embryos. Why was it just locked down? This looks like negligence. We were looking into this. Now, the clinic maintains that it was under COVID. Everything was supposed to be locked down. Hospital did a bad job in security and enforcement. So that's why the hospital was a plaintiff. I mean, as I defended as well as the clinic. Okay, so if you're the parents and you lost these embryos, what are you entitled to? You just say, oops, my bad. Are your bad or whatever? And look, getting to the stage of the life cycle when you're going through IVF is not easy. They extract eggs and they inseminate them and they, you know, there's a whole process here. And you have to take all these hormones. I don't really understand it all, but there's a science here and it's very expensive. Okay. You're entitled to something to get to that point because not of your own doing, but because of a negligence, either at the clinic or the hospital level, you no longer have these embryos. They do your property. You're paying for them to store them in a safe, secure location. And somebody just comes in and we still don't really know the whole story there. So anyway, um, as it goes, uh, dropped and the embryos are now deceased. Okay. So the parents of these embryos or the couple or whatever they are, sue the clinic and it goes on and it goes to different levels of court. Well, there was a question. What are, what are you entitled to? How, how are these embryos? Are they property? Are these indeed human lives? And this is what the Supreme Court of Alabama added to the site. Is this, is this a life? Or is this like a property? Is this like you're, like I said to Dale the last hour, is this like a cat or a dog? Because of the eyes of the law, their property, they're not. So your title is some kind of compensation and they had to figure out how to fix that dollar amount to proceed with the lawsuit, proceed with the litigation. Well, the Alabama Supreme Court and the defendant should have known this and they should have just settled out of court. But the mobile and fermory, I understand, took it, wanted to take it, to take it, to take it, to take it, to take it as far as they could. Ultimately said, no, we're not going, we're not, we're not settling, we want to pursue this. And the Alabama Supreme Court said, okay, well, we think that these are classified as human beings, human life forums, and therefore they are entitled to compensation under a wrongful death claim. We're categorizing these embryos as humans. What else would they be? We don't know. I mean, they're not, uh, they're not widgets or something. There were two dissenting views. And this is a Supreme Court that's packed with the Republican. I mean, it's a right, right, right of center ideologically. Then they, they sort of took a strict originalist approach, which was, well, the wrongful death laws that were, were written in the 1800s weren't really anticipating this law being applied to something like this, because they could not have pathomed the possibility of IVF. And then here's what happened. Well, this is how the Supreme Court's going to rule, we're going to shut down our clinics and all these IVF clinics around the state. By the way, tomorrow we're going to have a couple of doctors talk about that decision. We're going to shut down our clinics and it might have been, you know, like, your malpractice insurance is like, Oh, whoa, whoa, whoa, we got a, we got a whole do. We got to figure this out. You need to hold everything now that we're, we're applying these definitions because this changes things. This changes your insurance rates. I mean, so you stop cease. Out of abundance of caution. Well, well, anyway, when that happened and you hear this and I'm, I'm, you know, watching this now that Trump is offering IVF, he wants to make it free for everybody. You're hearing, well, he's a liar, blah, blah, blah, but also you're here. Well, Alabama banned it. Well, Alabama didn't ban IVF. Even with the Alabama legislature's fix, Alabama, the state of Alabama didn't say IVF is bad. But that's the fiction that's being propagated in the media to make you not want to vote for Republicans. Cause you think that Trump and Alabama legislature and Alabama court are all the same and they're just so much a crazy right wing, rabid Christian Bible thumb and Republicans, then they're going to ban our IVF. So we better vote for a Democrat and so much more nuanced than that. If people just get it wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong every time. Like, like these parents who lost their, their, their embryos. What, what about them? Are they not entitled to something? Well, then what are we going to call these embryos? I want to hear that. I don't like me to press. Give me Amy Klobuchar who's attacking the state of Alabama for that circumstance and give me what she she would have done or whoever it may be. Oli Jong fast or, um, these, these be rated talking heads on MSNBC. Well, what's the right approach here? Should the, should the state of cindo the property and the hell with your concerns? Here's a buck 50 for your, your, your heartbreak. Greg Deljax. I think he's your best guest. But every time he's talking, I can't think of anybody, but Matt Foley living in a van down by the river with his raspy voice and how excitable he is. Pat, how about firing the parents and the children that continue to commit these crimes? That can be a legal way to slow that crap down or finding. I'm sorry. I, I, like I said, bad. I, you can't hold your parents, your parents. Yeah, they're responsible and maybe you could tie into getting the gun and not securing the gun or whatever. But the important thing is here, I mean, like, that's just not our system or criminal justice where you're responsible for your parents, acts or your children's, that's that's not American. Ricky, they're hiding it. Jeff, kids are dropping dead everywhere. Sending me screenshots of a lot of things here under at 18,000 dropped in from kill shots, yet they're hiding all the deaths. The kill shot said you're helping the devil hide his crimes. How many millions of people got the COVID vaccine? I mean, let's let's try to come up with a number here. Let's see. Uh, how many that really give you a number? But I, I got to think globally. It's, it's at least in the, in the tens of millions, if not more, probably a lot more. And I'm sure that's an easily found number, just not while I'm talking on the radio, but okay. So according to vaccine tracker, 12.7 billion shots given 613 million administered in the U.S. This is a October 20 2022. So, uh, 613 million doses administered in the U.S. 152 million in the UK. Hey, well, anyway, the point being, uh, 12.7 billion. Let's assume they're embellishing that. That's what they do. 118,000 out of, uh, potentially billions is jericky. It's a drop in the bucket. Jeff, I thought Ricky was banned when did you lift it? I did for Christmas. Uh, I was feeling charitable. Usually I just ignore Ricky, but like we got to keep this. I'm not like a vaccine super fan here either. I think if people want to have the right to take the vaccine, they ought to be able to, if they don't want to take it, then they shouldn't have to. And I think when there's a pandemic of this magnitude that we expect a response from our government, I mean, it's just out there is to it. But the government shouldn't mandate it. But every time somebody drops dead, a certain age because it's got a heart situation and they are blaming the vaccine. And maybe it's the vaccine's fault. I don't know where that is. I'm not qualified to speak on this. But what I can tell you is, give me the documented number of cases where we think that the vaccine impact of calls someone to die. And instead of like benefiting them from the standpoint of protecting them against COVID, it actually caused a something bad. And put that side by side with the number of people who have gotten this mRNA vaccine. And it's like microscopic. You don't want to take the vaccine, don't take it. But be very careful making conclude or offering conclusions to why things happen. We'll be right back. This is the Jeff Porte showed at the talk when I was six, five. Thank you for being with us on this Tuesday morning. Thanks line 2513430106. I've got a bunch of text here. I'm going to blow through these here in a minute. I cut up on tomorrow's program, a program to note here. I got two IVF doctors going to join us. And we'll talk about Donald Trump's, they're Alabama IVF docs. We're talking about Trump's proposal and we'll get into it. There still has to be a fix to Alabama's current law. And we will talk about that tomorrow's program. We'll see Joey Clark of news talk 93 one will be with us as well. So please make sure that you tune in for that. John Walker up here shortly. So stay tuned. All right. I hear we go. Let's see here. Tim, I'd like to see the contract on holding those embryos might look like it'd be like a contract you signed when you get a safe deposit box. You have no recourse or in guaranteed protection. I don't think that's true. I don't think that they ever envisioned something like this happening, to be honest. It's this on say the IVF ruling was unforeseen. This scenario was described to Terry Collins in the Florida Alabama House as she infused any amendments. This wasn't by accident. It was a kitchen and a feature of the anti-abortion constitutional amendment passed in 2017. It was passed in 2019 or no wait to constitutional amendment, not the law. I don't know about that. I agree. Patriot imagine that there are actually real life people who bragged about getting the experimental vaccine to save lives by risking their own L.O.L. Justice is why don't trust the general population. So Jeff, how am I not a band? You are a band in your own way. Fire dog, we expect a response from our government and it's always the wrong one. Yeah, but I mean, what else do we have? They always get it wrong. What else do they always? A lot of times they do get it wrong. The number of shots. Okay, well, to check it out, Jeff, please take it to account that the vaccine does not stop one from contracting or spreading COVID. Well, it's fine, but I mean, and this was like a moving target with this, the rollout of this vaccine, what it could, it couldn't do, but did it maybe mitigate some of the symptoms or whatever? You know, these two to deny that the COVID vaccine had no impact on attacking COVID. Are people willing to say that? And how many millions of people like that? We don't know any of this at best. And we have to assume that our medical professionals are telling us the truth. And I know that's a leap of faith. But the number of people who have died from some sort of a COVID vaccine related death versus how many people have taken it and how many people it may have helped. Not quite there. I'll see. Terry Jeff, I got the vaccine based on information decision and form decision based on information granted by my government. Too bad that information was incomplete at best. Um, and a texture, not how many took the vaccine, how many lost their jobs because they didn't take it. Well, let's say that wasn't what we were discussing though. And then that's a separate discussion. I mean, we shouldn't be mandated to inject something into our body. But to blame people's deaths on the vaccine as Ricky is, then like he's got a number here, but that is a such a small number compared to the number of people who got the shot. Drunk texture. Uh, did I hear right that all members play into cow bears this weekend? Like is a cow barrel. So we're up. Uh, unnamed texture. The more facts you received, the more likely you are to contract COVID. This I got the vaccine and then like it took me about a year and a half or so to actually get COVID. But I'm still here, uh, live and well. I was never a big believer in the mask. But the vaccine just seemed like the right thing to do at the time. Text line 251340106, uh, time permitting will respond to anything you send. This is the JetPort Show on FM Talk 10065. [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] [inaudible] Welcome back to the JetPort Show on FM Talk 10065. [inaudible] Thanks for sticking around on this Tuesday morning. We do appreciate it. Joining us now in the line, we do this every Tuesday. John Wall, the Alabama Republican Party chairman of the Alabama Republican Party is on with us. Chairman, good morning, are you? I'm doing good. It's good to be on the show. Hey, thanks for coming on. Let's start here. The your dinner coming up here a week from Friday. It's covered in summer dinner, large Trump, but also I understand bill Hagerty added to the list. It's an election year. Tell us a little bit about it. Well, you know, I really love the line of that coming together in the center because you got the word Trump who obviously being the daughter-in-law of Donald Trump. But also, I think one of the people who are revitalizing the RNC, you know, we see so much more energy at the national Republican Party level and a lot of that is due to Laura. She really is a strong leader. She's talking about the principles that the party needs to be focusing on, returning to our fundamental values. And I think that's an incredibly important thing for the RNC. And you can see the difference she's made. So she's a tremendous guest. I think people are really going to have fun listening to her. And then, of course, Bill Hagerty recruited into the Senate by Donald Trump himself. You know, I think it's pretty clear he's going to be in the Cabinet, whether that's Secretary of State or Secretary of the Treasury are part of some question marks, but two high-profile Trump team members coming to Alabama who are really excited about what's coming together. I got to know, sir, Hagerty, well, that election. Well, I was on at Huntsville, actually, and they expressed a lot of interest in being on. I guess to pick up those liquid county Tennessee votes, but he's been doing some things in Alabama fundraisers and whatnot. That kind of interesting that he's expanding his profile here in the Yellhammer State. No, you know, it really is. I would add into that with him in Huntsville, where he's doing a fundraiser. And he kind of said he was Alabama's third senator. And everybody kind of laughed, but at the same time, what a great thing for Alabama, because it's one of the situations with Bill Hagerty, you have two things. You have one. He is a true conservative, like a very strong conservative, stands up for the principles. The party believes in these platform issues, stood against FISA and so many of these things where we saw really government overreach. And he's been one of those small government fiscal conservatives that we need. But no, we're looking at his future in the Cabinet, potentially that Trump wins in the Cabinet. I love that he'll have a fond memories of Alabama. And it's going to be good for our state as well as a course for Tennessee. Yeah, so a big line up coming up here week from Friday, right? That's when a little late this year. That's right. No, it is a little bit late just with the convention. We delayed things because, you know, so much went on with both the Republican and Democrat conventions getting a little bit later and really focusing on the general election. And I'm going to put a plug in here, like to your listeners, if they want to do something before the election for Donald Trump, this is a Trump victory fund fundraiser. You know, if they want to help fund efforts, going to Georgia, send me volunteers to Georgia, this type of thing, but also have a really fun night. This is a great opportunity. I hope people, I hope people get, you know, are able to come because I think they'll enjoy this event. Chairman, when I saw this story, I think I may have heard you, you may have heard you laughing from afar, but I'm going to get you to react to it. The Southern poverty loss that apparently does a poll showing and this polling that they have done, I actually never heard this entity doing a poll, but they did a poll in this figure's Dobson race giving figures a 12 point lead over Carolyn Dobson. And my instinct, my initial reaction is like, did there's no way? This is, this is, what was your reaction to that poll? Well, it gave me hope because look, if the Democrats are our polling thing, and let's be honest, Southern poverty loss centers are Democrats. I know they try to, they try to act on partisan, but we all know what's going on. But now, if polling can be this disingenuous, and trust me, as a former pollster, I know it can. It also gives me hope on the national level with, you know, with some of these swing states, like, this is what pollsters are doing. This is why they can be so inaccurate and why Donald Trump has overperformed polling in years, and why I believe, Carolyn Dobson will overperform this polling. You know, I don't want to be so cocky or confident to say, oh, she's in a lead or anything, but she is not both points behind that is laughable. That's interesting, Tay, because like, why are they polling this race? Why did they fill the need to put this out there? And it was, you know, just sort of how the water carriers, the media, are treating this as a legit poll. This is an activist organization putting this out there. Well, look, one thing that I struggle with, and I have for years, is you have all these far left groups. And whether they're socialist or Democrat groups or, you know, basically, the allies, the social engineers of the Democrat party, when they speak, the press jump through their hoops, whether it's Southern Poverty Law Center, think tanks, you name it. But if you go to the opposite, you know, the conservative think tanks or club for growth or whoever, when they put something out, each doesn't get picked up on. And I think this is just one more area where you can see the bias of the media. It is pretty clear that if it's a liberal or progressive organization or think tank, the media are going to develop over, they're going to report it, they're going to look at whatever they're saying, and then conservative stuff with that. And I think it's just one more area where we have to fight this battle for information, because it allows the left to communicate the message they want to the public without even having to quote a quote "be partisan." Like if the Democrat party had run this poll, nobody would believe it. Southern Poverty Law Center has the same agenda pretty much as the Democrat party, but they believe it because it comes from quote an independent organization. Let me ask you this. And so, you know, I've talked about this a hundred times that whoever, whichever presidential candidate wins AL2, be it Trump or Harris for a while, or say Biden, that's how this congressional race is going to go. But I think this is certainly a swing district, but I don't think it's going to be a reflection necessarily of anything nationally. I mean, Alabama is still unique, and even though there's a D presence there that kind of, you know, based on past president, the D presence really overshadows the R presence there. That doesn't tell me, that doesn't tell me that that is necessarily a reflection of anything going on nationally, that it really is all politics is local, and the Trump can pull it out there, but it's not really necessarily like a Michigan or, you know, any of these Pennsylvania or wherever we're talking about being swinging. I think it's a very unique situation. No, I absolutely agree with that. And a lot of that is because, look, on the national level, you have a lot of minority influence. As you do in CD2, the difference is they're not the same group of minorities. You know, the Democrats would love to stereotype all African Americans or all Hispanics as being the same, this group mentality, group identity, and it's not true. So, you know, your New York City or your Philadelphia black population has very different values than the rural area in CD2. You know, a lot of our minorities in CD2 believe in family values. Their communities are centered around the church, and they don't like what they're seeing from the Democrat Party right now. And I believe we will one day see more and more of that community recognizing that and coming over to the Republican Party. I hope it's this cycle and helps us win this swing district. But whether it is or isn't, I think there's a very different value set between the Democrats and the minorities in CD2 and the rest of the country. So, I think you hit the nail in the head. The Democrat policies here in Alabama, even the Democrat communities are not popular. They understand we need to close the border. They understand that we need to protect our children from this transgender crash. And these are the things that are affecting their lives. They see it. They know it. And it's why we have a chance to build the ticking ground here in Alabama. Another element to this is, I think Dobson will maybe just slightly, but she will outperform Trump and CD2. Because I think they're, you know, the type of people who they are is some of these sort of urban neighborhoods, but not necessarily maybe affluent. They're not ever going to vote for Trump, but they'll vote for Dobson. They'll go along with whatever the Chamber of Commerce or business community line is. But I don't think the opposite is true. I don't think there's anybody out there who will vote for Trump and then vote down ballot and vote for Shomari figures. And I think I think the figures performs in line with Harris and that's that may be one advantage for the Dobson folks. I know you're absolutely correct. And look, and I'm going to say this, if they're sincere, you have this movement of people who are like, they want to see, you know, especially some of the simple progressive women who are like, they want to see women in office. Well, look, this is their chance. You know, if you're a suburban mom in Mobile, if you're honest about this message, if you're not voting Democrat, you're voting, you should be voting for Caroline Johnson. And so I think we will see some of that. We'll see a few percent. And if she over performs what Donald Trump does by two or three percent, though you're getting close to the realm where we're seeing that, where we're seeing that in polling and with past election results, we're that's very close to putting her into that 50% mark where it's a very competitive race nationally. The trend, I think that Harris has cooled off a bunch. To me, it's it's not real clear what the direction is other than it's not she's not full steam ahead anymore. And you got to give it to them. They really had a good, good rollout. But the problem to me is they used up all their headroom like they used up that last sprint. They peaked a little early and I and I use this the other day with a high ranking politician in the state. It's like basketball season and the team that peaks in February and fizzles out by March and doesn't play as well in the tournament. But that that's what Harris sort of feels like to me. Like she's she because you knew there was no way they could keep up that momentum all the way to November 5th. But I'm kind of wondering like like how much they got to be really those guys on the other side going to be really close to their ceiling. I know I agree. And I told that, you know, talking about this before post convention because she had two honey moons here. Don't forget that. She went straight from becoming the nominee. You know, this positive press straight into their convention. Got a goose off of that. More than likely and anything can still happen. But if you look at past presidential elections of the trend, they're at the high watermark now. And if that's the case, I think if the election will help the day Donald Trump would still win, we still get Georgia. We still get Pennsylvania closely. And then we pick up at least one in Nevada in Arizona. That's the electoral votes we need. It's not. So as long as Donald Trump can fold, we'll see that now or even gain a little ground. I think we're still in a very good position. Yeah, because I still think I think Trump has room to grow. I'm not so sure about Harris. And here's the thing. Let's crazy, crazy hypothetical here. But if Harris were the Republican and we're chair for Republicans here, I mean, let's be honest about where we are. And Harris, a situation where Republicans, I would be worried. I just, I wouldn't see a path. I would be worried. But you don't really get that sense from the other side. They, you know, the Lincoln Project and all those. They act like they've got it wrapped up. I think that's insane. Well, you have to remember. It's like we saw with the poll we were talking about. They project strength. People that public like to vote for a winner. We saw this with Hillary Clinton in 2016. We saw with Biden, you know, where they were like, oh, Donald Trump is so far behind you doesn't have a chance. Well, in 2016, that caught him out because, you know, he obviously did have a chance. And he way over performed expectations in 2020. And the argument community actually won the election without unconstitutional voting practices. But what the here, I think with the biggest mistake that the Harris campaign has made and the mainstream media has made is they have introduced her to the country, or I should say reintroduced her to the country as this swab, well spoken, you know, community. Can she actually deliver on that when she's on the debate stage or when she's off teleprompter these events for, you know, the next 70 days? And I think that's very hard for Canada to do. And I think they have set expectations too high when she does not deliver on those expectations. I think you're right. I think that's where we start to see a trend down for her. Well, I think this they're kind of treating her like a like Obama 2.0. Okay. And to think about Obama, I mean, he's a once in a lifetime politician, but I mean, anticipating the turnout that Obama's going to draw. But I think with some of this polling chairman that it's maybe waiting respondents for our early certain demographics a little heavier, because they think you're going to get African American turnout like they did for Obama. She'll probably outperform Joe Biden, you know, potentially, I don't know in the African American communities or maybe, you know, turnout will be up because of her, but I even held her Clinton. But but I don't I think it's a reach for her to assume that she's going to get Obama level numbers. You look you're 100% correct. If you watch Obama's speech to convention, you saw it. I mean, do I like his policies? No, but the man has charisma. Probably the probably the best spoken president we've had since ratings. Just incredibly smooth charisma. He knows how to talk about issues in a way that brings in independence or even Republicans. You know, he was talking about religious liberty. Thank you to very skilled politician and a very skilled orator. And Kamala Harris does not have either of those. And I think what the press has tried to do in creating that image that she is that next, you know, that Obama 2.0 is actually going to be what sinks her at the end of this thing. Yeah, have they raised a bar too high for her? I really believe that. I mean, look, if somehow she delivers, we'll be sitting here scratching her head and you know it too much for now. But I don't see how she does it. I've never seen her be able to deliver that. I think the expectations are too high. And I'll tell you right now, I do not want to be her if I'm going into a debate September 10th. And I hope that President Trump sits back, stays calmer and lets her be the focus. And talk to the American people about the values and the issues we believe and how those healthy American people and then let her just crash and burn because I think that will happen if she's if she has to actually present with how to teleprompter for 90 minutes. Chair, we got to leave it there. We're out of time. Folks want to find out more about the Alabama Republican Party. I can they do so? Yes. Well, we always love to interact with people on social media. It's at Alabama Republican Party. And then our website where they can get tickets for our upcoming summer dinner with Laura Trump is a L G O P dot org. All right, I'll check that out. Chairman, we appreciate it. Always good to be on the show. All right, we got to get a break here. We're right back. This is a flip talk. One oh, six, five. You don't have to fight to be a man. There's someone for everyone. Spent my daughter. Marking harder needs mountain moonlight. Order of time. Make a little of it. We'll go back to the jumpboard show at the talk when it was six, five. Come up on tomorrow's program. We got a couple of IVF doctors to be named later and Joey Clark of these talk of 93 one. Oh, we'll see here. Fire dog. I confirmed Jeff poor existed as of January of this year. He may be replaced by a I have been replaced by AI since however we could ask AI Sean in a few minutes. No, I can guarantee you. No artificial intelligence here. I'm not much intelligence. Apparently either drug texture says he is stone cold sober. Watch your language squirrel, the voters, Democrats, the Democrats is very driven, ignore gender mess and stuff and will still follow the Democrat dangling the carrot. John wall. This district was made to be Democrat district. Also, John wall Democrats talking about black people. CD two as a monolith. And then finally OMG you two are in a bubble. Our guy is not a skilled orator. She is nothing like Reagan and he's a bubbling idiot. The Republican party has put Harris where she is. We get stick by idiot. I don't even know where you're going with that. Settle down a name texture. Come up here shortly. Midday mobile, shots all of it. What's you got Jeff? Yeah, maybe didn't catch the whole AI conversation, but I saw a story earlier today that the kids use an AI to get like chat GPT or whatever to write papers. The software used to figure that out as well behind where the software is. So the kids are getting away with having chat GPT write their papers. I dig into this. This is my AI concern for the school year. I'll tell you what though, as an editor of a news website, I had to be on watch for that too. Yeah, well, it's yeah, maybe still a job for human beings out there. Coming up in just a few minutes of a all two candidates. Shmari figures joins me. Also, Todd Stacey coming up today. April Marie Fogle, Wayne Dean, a whole bunch of folks on this Tuesday edition. That's right. A midday mobile. All right, y'all check that out. Shmari figures ought to be good. But I got to get out of here. I'll try to do better tomorrow. Sorry, Phyllis. I forgot to say goodbye. This has been the Jeff Pore show on FM Talk 10065. [Music]