FM Talk 1065 Podcasts
Jeff Poor Show - Tuesday 9-17-24
[MUSIC PLAYING] From Bucks Pocket to the shores of Orange Beach, at all points in between, an insider's perspective on Alabama politics. It's the Jeff Porsche show. I don't think I ain't done it this way. [MUSIC PLAYING] Good morning. Welcome to the Jeff Porsche Show. If I'm talking 106.5. In studio today, so things will probably be a lot easier actually to tell you truth. But I'm glad to be here. Good Tuesday morning to you. Coming up on the program today, Baron Coleman, former radio host of Montgomery. The reason he and I saw up in text messages was about two, three years ago, he said, look. Donald Trump may be the most popular Republican, but they will not let him be president. He may win a nomination. They will shoot at him. They will try to assassinate him. And sure enough, come July, somebody did try to assassinate Donald Trump. And then he says, we had him on right after that. And at the time, he said, well, they're going to try again. So I'm kind of curious to see it. They're going to try a third time, according to Baron. But I'm talking to Baron about that, what do you think? He's always kind of dabbled in that lane there. And I was like, well, what? You get pretty bold predictions like that all right a couple of times. So then we will entertain what you get to say. Let's see, what else-- yeah, we have Angela Fermot, a former DHS employee or agent, I should say. It kind of knows how the bureaucracy works there, especially the organ of the department that oversees the secret service. What went wrong this time? What's going to happen? We're going to talk about that with Angela Fermot. Now, you may remember him, he ran for the State House in 2022. Came very, very close. But was defeated in real good primary by Donna Givens, who's now a lawmaker. But we'll talk to Angela in that 10 o'clock hour. Then finally, it is Tuesday, so Tuesday's with other Republican party chairman, John Wall. He'll be with us here in the 11 o'clock hour. So make sure that you stay tuned for that. I will kick it off here. I mean, the biggest story is still assassination, mania. Guys, it is remarkable just how different the tone is this time from our friends in the mainstream media and Democrats. You know, the obligatory, we could demo on political violence. There's still a few Democrats out there. But last night, the tone sort of got very dark, if you ask me, to where it's like, hey, if Donald Trump is going to be shot at, he needs to change his demeanor. He needs to change his rhetoric. Well, you have Hillary Clinton on a book tour. Who was asking for that? Well, does the world need another Hillary Clinton book? She's always talking about it last night. She's saying all kinds of crazy things. These people, well, first off, who in their right mind said, hey, it's the midst of a presidential election. What do we put Hillary Clinton out in public? Who thought that was a good idea? I'll wait your response. 2513430106. But you look around the media, Dana Bash is mad. She's out for blood. She didn't like the way JD Vance treated her in the ensuing media reaction when you toss the softballs and give multiple choice questions to the Democrat nominee for Vice President. But when the Republican comes in, you want to have a debate. And then she got-- it was a bad look for her. So she's been kind of out there, too. I guess it's this. It was kind of a wake-up call when Donald Trump was shot at back in July. But the Democrats saw what happened in the polls. They're not going to let that happen again. There's going to be no-- it is pretty remarkable. But I mean, this is what you need to know. This is emblematic of the whole idea of the left. I mean, they are driven by power. This is the world we live in, ladies and gentlemen. So the ins justify the means. We've always kind of known that in the back of our heads. And I deeply, deeply disappointing. So we could get into that. I mean, I don't know anything new. I think it's really like really standing out to me. It's the sort of demeanor in the town of the media this time. They are at least breaking into the news. Yesterday, it didn't look like they wanted to move on and talk about how the Haitian refugees weren't really eating dogs and cats in Springfield, Ohio. But at least now, they're trying to-- it's like a rationalization thing where, OK, this bad, bad thing happened, but it's a victim shaming or whatever you want to call it. 2, 5, 1, 3, 4, 3, 0, 1, 0, 6. I want to get to a story that the Atrepid Erika Thomas at 1819 news stumbled upon. So it's kind of caused a big stir. I mean, I'm not surprised. There was this group called, welcoming refugees. And I mean, I guess it's sort of a pretty simple thing here that we need policies to make it more welcoming for refugees and asking for federal money. And they said, well, you know, and in addition to this, we have signatories from all 50 states. And whenever you see something like that, you're like, oh, I wonder who signed on to this from Alabama. And you expect-- I don't know, like, a 1-0 event or somebody, right? Who would sign on to something like this, especially with the kind of hysteria going on in Sillicauga, Albert And to our surprise, not too well-makers, Travis Hendricks from Fairfield. He's sitting the old Fred Plump seat. Fred Plump got convicted on a federal bribery thing or misuse of federal funds. Thomas Action Jackson, a Democrat from Thomasville, he was the other state lawmaker, but a Fair Hope City Councilman, Corey Martin. So we see a Fair Hope City Councilman sign on to a letter that says, we need to be more welcoming of refugees and refugee resettlement in our communities. You get a, you know, sort of red flags go up. A little pushback here was this. Well, no, no, no. They don't really necessarily want refugees in their communities. It's just a general policy statement. Yeah, check out the store at 1819 News. Fair Hope City Councilman 2 state reps committed to refugee resettlement in their communities across the funds from the Biden administration at 1819news.com. It's our top training story right now. And it was just a general policy statement. Nothing to see here. Let's move along. But let me take a closer look of this letter. And it's sent, and it's addressed to President Joe Biden. And it goes on to the virtues of bringing refugees into your communities and how they can help with labor shortages and the workforce. You know, then it's like another one of these, like diversity is our strength kind of things. Not everybody really sees it that way. Believe it or not. I know that's a shock. We would bring in, you know, Afghans or Ukrainians is what this letter says. But right now it's Haitians, Venezuelans, Cubans, and Hondurans are the CHNV refugees under this parole program that they're trying to move them around and beat that January 20 deadline. So that's underway. And it's things like this are obviously going to draw eyeballs. So maybe it's just an ill timed thing. I think it was sent to us, a tip to us. But maybe a little clarity would be useful here. But that's up on our website. Also, 18-19 news story, and this one was kind of floating around some right-of-center blogs on Sunday afternoon. A UAB grant, and I actually had mentioned this yesterday, but it slipped in my mind. UAB got a $150,000 federal grant to study vaginal health for transgender men. So I don't really want to know the biology that's going on here. But I do want you to know that there is-- there are research for whatever reason in this area that is going on here in Alabama. I mean, we may be figuring out how to build rockets up in Huntsville and, you know, tending to farms at Auburn and whatever they do in Tuscaloosa, figure out how to build football dynasties. And then at UAB, luckily, they are studying vaginal health for transgender men. 251-343-01-06 would be a touch with the program. Keep the text coming. But we also kind of watching what impact this whole assassination situation will have on the election. Where is it moving people? Because initially, you could feel it the first time around in July. Like, here it is. Donald Trump stands up and does something really incredibly cool. It says fight, and there's an American flag in the backdrop, and he's got the secret service, trying to keep him down, you know. And then you felt the energy. You knew that was going to be a big deal. It's not clear where this is headed this time. I would assume-- and it is very, very untoward to talk about, hey, somebody tried to kill the former president of the United States. I wonder how it's going to help his poll numbers. But it's a reality, and have we seen Kamala Harris in the last two days? We did see the crazy vice presidential candidate's wife like talking to her supporters like they were toddlers yesterday. Turned a page on what the hell that was. But I mean, it just seems like everything, all the discussion, all the energy is on the Republican side, and it's a real head scratch. Like, there just doesn't seem to be a lot of activity, a lot of things going on on the Democrat side, a sort of very odd, strange media interview with the Philadelphia TV that aired last Friday night, and weird rallies. This is the problem, and I'll say this one more time. You could tell when a presidential-- any campaign, presidential Senate, House, local, whatever, isn't really gelled. You could tell that they don't have a determined course charted. It is making up as you go along. And here it is, as simple as this. When you run for president, you run like today after the midterms, you get your exploratory committee together, you start calling donors, you start setting it up, you figure out who's going to be your campaign manager, you do a lot of things to start putting these pieces in place. That over time, you go a whole year before the primary season, and you're working things out, you're spending all that time in Iowa and New Hampshire, and you're figuring out what works with your staff, with your marketing, your advertising, you're warning everything, and then maybe the staffer goes here or goes there, and then finally, when you get to January of the presidential election year, you got your team, and the team is like gear built for longevity. Everybody kind of knows everybody's mannerisms, and you're jailing, and you went to nomination, and you headed to November, and then you're like built. Like you got the experience, you got the chemistry. This Democrat campaign has not really gelled. You could just tell, the messaging is all off. The places they are going to do interviews don't really make sense. You know, there's no real strokes of genius here. Now, before we go here, the one thing Democrats do have, and it may bell them out in the end, is a strong ground game, but the top of the ticket right now, I think is just kind of flailing out there, and if you're a Kamala Harris supporter, you need to be concerned, but right when you talk show hocus sky, we'll do skittles today, and we'll be right back. This is FM Talk 10065. Now claim to new, the Silas country. The news, weather, and traffic, you need, you need. The talk you want, you want. And the sports you love, you love. This is FM Talk, FM Talk 10065. It's where I drank my first beer. It's where I found Jesus. Where I ripped my first car, I tore it all to pieces. Welcome back to the Jet Force show, FM Talk 10065. Thank you for listening on this Tuesday morning. 2513430106. That's the text line. We're all through some of these texts real quick while we have an opportunity. I need a text for Jeff. I'm sorry to repeat myself, but the DIMPs have already got the votes. Extra 15 million to use anywhere they need. The real voters won't matter. It's a dot deal. I'm sorry. I'm not happy about it. I believe my expectations are correctly said. You still believe the system is not corrupted. You can have a corrupted system and still win an election. I don't think they're going to get 15 million votes. Do you realize how many 15 million is a name texture? Can you comprehend that? Think about 15 million dollar bills stacked up in your basement somewhere. I mean, like, were they machine filled? 15 million. It is hard to like just have 15 million things just show up anywhere. Even slips a paper. You got, I mean, they can move maybe 10,000, not 15 million. I guess eating cat and dogs and ducks is gelling from an unnamed texture. Let's see here another unnamed texture. Okay, let me hit dashboard. It's still late. That's not me. Let's see. Pat, what do you mean? What went wrong? They did their job as they were supposed to. And then Terry, well, that's not for me. Anyway, two, five, one, three, four, three, zero, one, zero, six. Let's tighten it up on the text line there. I still think 15 million votes is, I mean, let's not be fatalist here. I'm not going to be as mean as Dale Jackson who essentially said, if he believed that it's a waste of time to have this election because it's already fixed, you're a moron. But I will be a little more gentle about that and say, look, it's harder to swing an election than you think. If it's close enough, yes, and it was close enough in 2020. It won't be close enough. I mean, you have to look at Joe Biden in that 2020 election and everything that had to go for him to win. You had a global pandemic we hadn't seen in a hundred years. They changed the voting laws in some states, just totally rearranged them. And you have, you had the usual like Trump derangement syndrome going on within our elite institutions. And despite all of that, Joe Biden just barely wins. I mean, they had that they had to essentially call it, wait to call it a race like for five or six days after the election. I mean, the election was on Tuesday and they didn't call it till Saturday. That's what happened guys. And you're going to tell me they could do that again. Like, like you think that that's, that's just going to be normal standard procedure now because here's what happened while you, while you are sleeping, they, these legislators all around the country tighten up their voting systems. They tightened up their voting laws. They said, we're not going to do these, uh, we're not going to do just these random drop boxes or whatever. I think George is out of reach now for Democrats. You've got to look at where they have to cheat and how they have to do it to pull off the inside straight and get the votes, the electoral college they need to be to, to win this whole thing. It's just the system is has flaws. There's no question of vulnerabilities, but you've got to have faith in the system. I mean, what's the point then? I mean, if you really believe it's all the fixes in and 15 million votes are just going to show up out of thin air, which I just don't believe you could conceive what 15 million is. It slips a paper. Don't, why are you listening to this show? Why do you care about current affairs? If everything is predetermined, why why bother? Why don't you check out it living in Australia or something or go buy a rock in the middle of like Arizona and live on it in the middle of nowhere? I mean, I just, I don't believe that is a real thing. It may just be maybe you're just predisposed to complaining a lot. I don't know. Doesn't matter. Bear comic code up here shortly. This is the Jeff Pore show. What if I'm talking one of six five step up in my themselves and they're slow food and green. Countable wants to. I give you my heart and I try to make you happy. You gave me nothing in return. You know, it ain't so hard to say. Would you please just go away? Look back to the Jeff Pore show it. If I talk one oh six five two five one three four three zero one zero six. That's a tech slide need to be a touch of your hopes. Yours truly probably best to use the text line. So to come on a program in about an hour from now. He's a former DSA at DHS age at age of a firm. We'll talk about what we're wrong or what he perceives the problems with the secret service are. We'll talk about security that in the 10 o'clock hour then in the 11 o'clock hour, Tuesday regular album, a Republican party chairman and John Wall. So stick around for them. Joining us now, a guy I mean, I kind of learned a little bit about the trade from him. Used to be on daily and Montgomery for years do's and views, but now joins us. Baron Coleman on the line. Baron, good morning. How are you? Good morning, Jeff. How are you? It's been a while. How you been, man? I've been well. I've been well just working. You know, got out of the radio trade, obviously, but still have opinions. So yeah, I see them on social media from time to time. Well, you know why we got you on? I mean, we had you on right after the first assassination attempt. And here we are sitting here today. And we, you know, lo and behold, they went for it again. Tell me, Baron, you said that they would try again. Well, what do you make of what happened and where does this all end? Yeah, I think putting it in a little greater context. You had me on about a year ago. And I predicted there was a 0% chance Donald Trump would ever be president again. And it's not that I don't want him to have Ashley would prefer he be president. But I do not believe there's a situation where call him whoever you want the powers to be will allow him to be sworn in as, as I guess now the 47th presidential administration. And I predicted if they couldn't defeat him at the ballot box, if they couldn't put him in prison, that they might try to make sure he had a premature death. And, you know, several listeners thought I was crazy and conspiracy theorist. And then sure enough, there was the assassination set that actually made contact with his head. That was, you could say a monumental failure or a design from the inside, one or the other. And then I came on after that a few weeks ago, a couple months ago and said, they didn't do it, but they'll finish the job. They will try again. And that's what happened over the weekend. There was a second attempt on, on his life. And I will be here now predicting yet again, they didn't complete the job this time. They will complete the job. If it does not look like they can beat him or put him in prison. So, I mean, the way I think did you, did you think that the former president would make it this far in the process? Here it is, September 17th, November 5th, the general election. Did you think that we'd be sitting here today? And he would, I think, be at least a mile front runner in his batch up against Kamala Harris. Did you think we would be where we were? No, no, I didn't. A year ago, when I, when I made that prediction, I thought they would be able to imprison him by now through the legal process, through law fair. They obviously run successful with that. I wondered whether he could survive the primary process, whether people, even in the Republican party, had a little Trump fatigue and were ready to move on. Obviously, they weren't. He, he basically went unchallenged. And then I thought, well, they'll beat him down so badly in the media. And he is, you know, not the greatest at controlling his, his delivery, his message. And he might blow up and, and, you know, they blow up in the sense that he wouldn't do well. And that he would be, you know, 10, 12, 15 points behind at this point. I think if the election was today, he wins. And, and that is why you're seeing multiple attempts on his life. So what do you do if you're him? I mean, if you're a marked man and I mean, he still seems to be kind of going about business. At least as far as we could tell now, this one not so much, but business as usual. Well, he certainly would. I mean, he believes he has, whether it's a divine calling or a unique ability to, to do good for the country, he wouldn't be the first person to put his life on the line for the United States of America. It's been happening for 250 years. Great Patriots, you know, litter, litter our history books that died in the service of his country. And I think he believes in his mission. And if it takes, if it, if it's a high risk of death, it's, it's, it's akin to a guy on the battlefield, you know, running into enemy fire to save, to save his buddies. And I think that's the way he views his mission right now. So I think he continues on full steam ahead, obviously try to beef up security around you as much as possible. But I think what this second attempt shows, this attempt from Sunday, two days ago, is that they're in all likelihood is an inside job from within his inner team contributing to the assassination attempts on him. And they need to get that fixed immediately. So we'll, we'll say they do let's hypothetical here that they get their guy. It's over. What, what, what, what happens after that? What happens if they take him out? Yes. I don't think much. Unfortunately, I think business pretty much goes on as usual. There'll be some weeping and gnashing of teeth. There'll be some frustration, but unlike the left, the right tends to exercise a great deal, more restraint when, when the going gets tough. You know, a lot of us have spouses, children, jobs, and we live a pretty good life and not many are willing to, to throw that all away to, you know, go out and protest violent. Well, I mean, I guess I ask you like this, Donald Trump's eliminated. Somebody's going to be the Republican nominee, right? So are they, I don't know that that question's been answered, Jeff. Is it? I don't know that the Constitution answers that question. I don't think there's a federal statute that answers that question. The states control the election. I think most of them, their laws probably provide for Trump to stay on the ballot. Trump wouldn't be the, he'd be the first presidential candidate to ever pass away after being nominated and after the ballots are printed. But he certainly wouldn't be the first local candidate. And from my experience, I've worked on campaigns where this has happened. Somebody dies while they're running for office. Their name stays on the ballot. And if they win, then they hold a special election. She, well, I mean, there's no statute for that. I mean, well, what happened? You can't swear in a dead guy. Well, and that's the question because if you can't swear in the dead guy, you swear in JD Vance is the vice president and he immediately becomes president because- There's a president in the right. Yeah, I don't know the answer that. And I don't believe, and I've looked for the answer because I've asked myself the same question you just asked. What happens if he passes away before January 20th or before the election? And I guess, as I'm sitting here right now, and I'm a lawyer, so it's not a completely uneducated guess, my guess is he stays on the ballot. People vote for an empty presidency, which would be akin to electing JD Vance. And then you would invoke the constitutional process to get a vice president nominated by the house. Do you think, well, I mean, if this happens, do you think Trump wins still? Yeah, yeah, I do. I don't envision a scenario. I see I operate from a little conspiratorial mindset with respect to the camel Harris presidency. I think the left is okay with a Donald Trump presidency. The establishment left, not the not the purple-haired freaks at Starbucks, but the establishment left the Chuck Schumer's and the Nancy Pelosi's. I think they're okay with a Donald Trump presidency to get rid of Kamala Harris once and for all. They don't want a president Harris. I mean, they're smarter than that. And so, but the problem is he's the vice president and the de facto leader of the Democratic Party wants Joe Biden, you know, finally goes to the nursing home. And so you have to get rid of her somehow. The only way to do that is to elect her as the president, in which case, you can't run your preferred candidates for eight years. So it's now 2032 before you can run Gavin Newsom or run, you know, Michelle Obama, whoever it is you want to run in the next election. You're eight years down the road and they're eight years older and, you know, you've lost eight years of time or you have Kamala Harris lose. You tie Trump up with law fair and investigations and impeachments like you did last time. He was 80% ineffective last time. He got a few things accomplished, but most of the stuff he said he wanted to accomplish, he wasn't able to do because the Democrats kept him hamstrung and the establishment Republicans kept him hamstrung the entire four years. And I think that's, that's their calculus here. So I can't imagine a scenario where they don't thank Kamala Harris going into the election. Are you surprised how bad she is? That's what strikes me is like she's supposed to be the, I don't know, we were we were told she was a lot of things, but I it's not so much. I don't know what her skill set is. She may be very competent or whatever, but you get the sense that she doesn't really want to be in this role right now. I like she doesn't do interviews. She is seems like she's kind of out of it. That Philadelphia interview was just bizarre on Friday night and like you contrast her somebody like a Hillary Clinton or even Joe Biden who like really wanted to be president. You can just, it just popped off your television screen. I don't get that vibe from her. I think that's like the big problem that Democrats have right now. So I get the opposite. I get the impression she very badly wants to be president, but she is intellectually honest enough to recognize she is her own worst enemy. And so her best path to the presidency is staying out of the limelight, answering as few questions as possible. A single debate was ideal for her, especially if she had questions in advance. I don't know whether that's true, but you can kind of guess what they're going to ask you. They shouldn't answer the questions anyway. So it didn't matter what questions they asked. She was going to give her pre-prepared speeches. They weren't going to challenge her. They weren't going to ask her for follow-up. She knew that. And so she played it perfectly. Go in, memorize, you know, an hour and a half's worth of talking points. Go out and deliver them and then disappear. And that's her best chance of winning. I get the feeling she very, very badly wants to be president, but she recognizes the reality that she is not competent enough to withstand, you know, face-to-face interviews. She couldn't do this interview with you right now. She couldn't do what I'm doing. She couldn't do what 90% of your guests do, which is listen to the question, remember the question, answer the question, and maybe get a few talking points in that she wants to get in along the way, but by and large, give and take with the interviewer. She's not capable of that. And she recognizes that. I genuinely believe that. I have a little troll going on on Facebook where I act like I don't know who I'm voting for, because I'm trying to cue Kamala Harris people to come out and say, you should vote for Kamala Harris. And they have. And my follow-up is always great. Convince me. Give me her top three accomplishments. What are they? They aren't. She has no accomplishments in her entire career. The best thing you can say she did was, you know, put violent criminals away in San Francisco. Though that hurts her base, because they're largely black. And she put them away for long periods of time, and she kept people on death row, even when she knew there was a sculptory evidence that could exonerate them. And she would help that from the course. I mean, her history, her career, her accomplishments are opposite of what she needs to get elected as a Democrat. So she hides those. And since leaving being a prosecutor, she's really done nothing. She did nothing as a senator. She did nothing as a vice president. So why are we voting for her? Because she's a woman? I mean, now we know what a woman is, and now we're going to vote for somebody simply on the basis that she's got the right equipment between her legs. I think that's, I think that's Amazon. Well, the struggle I have with all this, Baron, and this is like the setting in me about, you know, that it's all fixed and it's all, you know, predetermined. But like, the powers it be really didn't want Trump. I mean, why would they put somebody up like Kamala Harris with all her flaws? Why wouldn't they have figured something else out? Like, like she is just remarkably bad at this. And just she's worse than Hillary Clinton. I think, so I don't, I mean, I just, I don't get the sense she really even wants to be here. Sometimes she does what she has to do or whatever. But, you know, because this is a repeat, I think, of her 2020 presidential run. She got the big boost in that debate. She's up there. She does nothing with it. She doesn't build upon it. And it feels the same this time around. And you could go back and look at a lot of that's on her. I just, they had a track record here. The powers it be couldn't have found a better candidate to be the Democrat standard bearer. No, they couldn't. And for multiple reasons. But for one reason, Joe Biden popped off at the mouth trying to curry favor during the primaries with black voters, because he knew he was in trouble with them. And he said, I'm going to vote a black woman in. I'm going to make a black woman by vice president. Well, then he had to go out and find one. And it's, you know, admittedly a thin bench. It's a, it's a group that's not particularly dominant in politics. Black Democrat women. They're very few of them. And so you've got like maybe three to choose from. He picked one for whatever reason he picked her. But, but now she is, you know, the vice president is always kind of considered next in line. Dan Quayle was considered next in line. George W. Bush, I mean, George H.W. Bush was considered next. The vice president, Al Gore, the vice president always sort of gets the deference. You know, it didn't work out for Joe, Joe Biden in 2016, because they convinced him not to run. Had he run, he probably would have been the nominee in 2016. Even over Hillary Clinton. I mean, and people say, oh, you couldn't beat Hillary Clinton. Obama did. Obama beat her. I mean, she beatable Trump beat her. She's absolutely beatable. He probably would have. So, so there's this, there's this just political reality that they were stuck with her. And, you know, the only way to get rid of her is to put her on the ballot and beat her. Well, last, they don't want her. Well, last question. I mean, as bad as Biden is, and he's clearly not running the show now. Why didn't they just stick with him? I mean, do you, do you think that they had that June debate to get him off the ticket? And girls, they knew what they knew. Or do you think, I mean, if he's still sitting on the ballot today, he's in the eyes of a lot of people, would he have been better than Kamala Harris? Yes. Yeah, he would have been. And he probably would be in a slight lead ahead of Trump. And here's why they did this. It goes back to who do they want to run in four years? Do they want to run Kamala Harrison four years? Because that would have been the option. That's who would have been the nominee in 2032. Now, if you're a Gavin supporter. Now, if you're a Michelle Obama supporter. Now, if you're another Democrat supporter, you run the risk of her winning in 2032. And you don't get to run your guy until 2040. By doing this, they upped the waiting period eight years. They cut eight years off the waiting period to get their guy in office, to get their person in office guy or gal. This honestly was the only way to get rid of her as soon as possible. Have tell Joe to step aside, throw him out there. Don't boost him up with all the amphetamines. Let him look like a tired old dying corpse. People would be outraged. The media would turn against him. They would force him to step aside, put Kamala on the ballot, have her lose. And then in 2032, now they get to, I mean, 2028 letter. Now they get to run their person. Now they get to run their person. Because otherwise, she's the nominee in 2028. She might accidentally win. She might accidentally win in 2028. And now you've got a real problem on your hands. Because now in 2036, you can't run your person either. Because she's running as an incumbent. So it's 2040 before you get to run your person. Now they can run them in 2028. Baron got to leave it. We got to leave it there. We're about 12 years off though. It cut eight to 12 years off the waiting period. That's why this is happening. But that's why she's not going to win. Trump's going to win. We're up against the break here. But hey, thanks for hopping on. And we'll be a touch again, I'm sure. Yeah. I'll be around. Thanks, Joe. All right. Baron Coleman there. We'll be right back. This is the Jeff Port Show. That's a talk. One oh six five. Can't walk off. Stayed up late again watching TV with my best friend. Laughing at the late night show. I don't know what's wrong with me. Because I know I need my wrist. But if I don't stay about now, I'd sleep on day. I ain't in my best. Hey, yes. Look back to the Jeff Port Show. It up and talk. One oh six five. Thanks for sticking around on this Tuesday morning. Two five one three four three zero one zero six. That's the text line. You need to be in touch with the program. Hit us up there. Still to come Angela Fermot in Baltimore County. A businessman there. Please coffee shop. And a cool little bar there in Daphne. This we're checking out. Also in part in today, Alabama Republican Party Chairman John Wall. So let's see what we got here. Hey, Jeff. It's Jeff from Indiana. Hey, Jeff from Indiana. John, you terribly underestimate how far these Democrats will go to retain power. Oh, I'm not surprised you here. There are some Republicans that are pretty damn cutthroat out there. I mean, the swamp is it is a whether the still the close-ends moniker. It's a den of vipers. Now, the Republicans are getting beat typically by Democrats. But don't underestimate. Republicans and their quest for power. We just assume that they are feckless and out to lunch. But like you think about this, there certainly is a deep state operating in our federal government. An administrative state is probably more appropriate. The bureaucracies, the little fiefdoms, and the power that they have, that they have acquired, not through the election process, but just by being a part of the executive branch. And there's winners and losers in every election. And what you got to think about, guys, there are some people out there that probably will gain pretty mightily if a Donald Trump is elected president. So like, yes, it can be frustrating. You think the world is against you, but that's not the reality, because there's a whole entire world out there working on behalf of Republicans to get them elected too. They can cheat just like Democrats, one would think, right? Still underestimate that stuff. We'll be right back. This is the Jeff Porte Show at FM Talk, 106.5. From Bucks Pocket to the shores of Orange Beach, at all points in between, an insider's perspective on Alabama politics. It's the Jeff Porte Show. I don't think Hank done it this way. Welcome back to the Jeff Porte Show at FM Talk, 106.5. Thank you very much for listening on this Tuesday morning. 2513430106 rare appearance in the FM Talk 106.5 studio. So if it's a little different, maybe that's why. But I'm glad to be here, and I'm glad you're out there listening. Angel Fermot, former State House candidate, former DHS employee now, a successful business owner there in Daphty. We'll talk to him about some of the, his perception of the inner workings right now, at DHS and Secret Service, and what went wrong there. I mean, 12 hours. The guy's just hanging out there at the Trump Ralph course, for 12 hours, and no one notices. I mean, a little shocking that the area wasn't sweeped a little bit better for a presidential candidate. I mean, like I said, I've dealt with these, these, uh, presidential candidates before covering these races. They, especially with Donald Trump, was a candidate in 16 in particular. Now, his president, yes, it was much more difficult. Things changed, but it was still very difficult before he was president. You had to get there so many hours before an event. And if you're like a TV crew, you had to get at the venue, set up your equipment, and then you had to leave, and then they brought in the bomb sniffing dogs, and, you know, all the, they do a sweep. And then you're allowed to come back in, and for three hours, you have to be locked down in the venue. No one coming and going before they let you, and then then then the candidate, or the president, or whatever comes out and does their thing. It was always annoying. She had like a seven o'clock Donald Trump rally and having to be there at 40 afternoon. It was always a struggle, because that, I mean, it carved out a big part of your day. And so like in 2016, driving around state of Florida, trying and trying to race his presidential plane, and trying to make it from event to event, it was always kind of challenging. But that's how it was supposed to work. So, so when you hear these stories, particularly the Butler story, but even when he's out there playing golf, like that should have been locked down at least for three hours before he played, and then they should have brought the dogs or whatever around. But it seems like there's a lot of corners being cut here. Yeah, I'm not quite in conspiracy land yet. I don't think this is like, okay, let's lay down our guard a little bit. Maybe somebody will blow his head off. I just think it's more of this. It's just a disrespect for the man. It is, you know, especially at the, at the very, very top of the management level, it is as such, it's like, we're not going to do him any favors. F that guy, he can, you know, he was, we don't like him. And that's what leads to these lapses. But it's also my understanding too, that there are threats at all these presidential candidates, aimed at them. And we don't hear about some of them. They're not as public. What they don't want are copycats. They don't want copycats. They want, so they downplay these incidents. Two, five, one, three, four, three, zero, one, zero, six, let's get through some of these texts. Good morning, Jeff. Don't forget the 2016 Democratic primary, Bernie and socialist should have won, but black men were under polling, like the 2016 polls. There is hope. On the texture, I agree with your current guess, referring to Baron Coleman. Chris, hi, Jeff. I've seen on Twitter where both assassins who tried to kill Trump were shown, and apparently extras in black rock commercials, what do you make of that? All I can make of it right now is just a very, very bizarre coincidence feeling. All right. Like Chris, and then I'm not attacking you, so don't take this wrong. But like, think about it. Like, okay, we have these extras. We've been using our commercials. Let's coach them up to be assassins. Let's make sure they're documented on our very, um, shadowy, big, high finance entity here. It is a bizarre occurrence. Mike, that's why she says she is now black, referring to Kamala Kamala. Gene, here we go. You wanted to debate. She KO'd him now. Now he won't debate anymore. Listen to Trump. He knows she ahead. Otherwise would be playing off instead of rallying. Well, Gene, here's the problem. Donald Trump has been in two presidential debates. You okay? That's only been a one. She didn't knock him out. Why is he, why is he up in some of these battleground states? When do we go from calling them swing states to battleground states? Does anybody else notice that? I mean, are you, are you noticing that? But why, why is your candidate down? Is she so good? Why is she up like 50 points? What do you think it is, Gene? Oh, you know what? She's a bad candidate. That's what your problem is. She didn't KO him. All you got to do in a presidential debate, Gene, is not fall flat on your face. Unfortunately for Joe Biden, he fell flat on his face. But whatever, whatever happens in these debates, people are going to have their own, it's not going to move the needle. People are going to have their own takeaways. And they're going to have their own opinions, and then they're going to move along. And the debate, I don't think mattered. It may have frustrated some Republicans of anything, but it didn't say, oh, wow, Donald Trump is talking about his, I don't know, his rallies, his crowd sizes or something. I'm not voting for him, no one cares about that. Gene, have you ever been swayed by a debate? Have you ever been swayed by anything? Just like wake up and like, I'm liberal. And I'm going to go hate, listen to talk radio. 2, 5, 1, 3, 4, 3, 0, 1, 0, 6, that's the number. Hit us up there if you so choose. Also, I didn't mention this earlier, I should have mentioned it. President Trump might attend that Alabama Georgia game here in a couple of weeks. That day is also Auburn, Oklahoma. I guess you'll know where I will be. I feel sorry for your Alabama fans going to Bryant Denny. It Donald Trump does go to that game. But also seeing on Yellow Hammer news, let's see here. They're talking about, there's also some fundraisers lined up for some other down ballot candidates. So, keep an eye out for that Trump in Tuscaloosa during the midst of a presidential cycle. Let's see what else we got here. Well, this is really just sort of the media reaction. I want to hit on this and the media reaction to Trump is very interesting. The talking points were sent out, but it boils down to this victim shaming. And I guess it's like this. We saw what happened the first time around and how the polls kind of went in one direction. And so immediately on Sunday, after we got shots fired or whatever, the immediate reaction was, "Well, no, that's the right in the middle of West Palm Beach." And it was two people shooting at each other unaffiliated with anything, nothing to see here. And then they finally actually, it was a guy who has a very, very outspoken political opinions about Ukraine or whatever the hell his motivations were. Yeah, it was motivated by politics and animosity for the former president of the United States. So, it was indeed an assassination attempt. Okay, Monday rolls around. The Democrats sort of get their act together. You tune in to Morning Joe, and here's what you get. Donald Trump doesn't want to be shot at, he needs to change his rhetoric. Does that really work? Who out there is like, she shouldn't have wore that short skirt. She didn't want to have that situation happen to her. Do you guys, doesn't this seem a little, little kooky? Do they think that's going to work or is it just like, okay, if we could say this, we're not going to pull Joe and Mika off the air this morning. We're not going to act. We're going to have Nicole Wallace come on and say, hey, we need to tone down the rhetoric, especially Trump. It's just a threat to democracy. Democracy. What bothers me about this is that the dumb people who believe it, that Donald Trump is a threat to democracy, that stew over it, that would do something about it. It's Sunday morning shows. I'm wrapping up a weekend with fellow radio hosts, Del Jackson and I, and Sunday morning, and part of my duty is to monitor what goes on, on meet the press, ABCs this week, face today, should Fox News Sunday, CNN, state of the union, and the other down dial shows, the Sunday show with Jonathan Capehart, or whatever else they put on the B-listers, and at least, okay, there was at least one commentator who compared Trump to Hitler, don't ever use Hitler to make your talking point, by the way. There was a data bash who was like, just out for JD Vance, and she's not a smart person. She's trying to match with him. She does the usual routine of like, you know, Donald, if you say that Haitian immigrants are going to eat cats, or Haitian migrants, or whatever they are, asylum seekers, refugees, are going to eat cats, then you, sir, are part of the problem. You are inciting violence, and he said, well, this is what's going on. Well, we called the city manager, and the governor, and the mayor, and they say, no, absolutely not. Well, they explain all these police reports claiming as much. That doesn't matter. You be quiet, you simpleton. Anyway, so the Proud Boys, and the KKK, and the whatever, the John Richards, they're all on their way up to Springfield, Ohio, and it's all your fault. And they like, create this false sense, like, okay, these guys are saying a really dangerous thing, just getting people's emotions up. And there's no introspection there, when something actually does happen, because they're the ones that need to tone down the rhetoric. But I've always thought that was kind of a phony baloney argument anyway. Like, we have a First Amendment, and people make decisions, you know, blaming somebody else, unless that person's saying, hey, go out, take up arms, try to kill the president of the United States, which is not what's happening, then you can't really say it's some kind of rhetorical or response to some kind of rhetoric or whatever. It is bad behavior, but in this case, this is a game we're going to play, then this is what's going on. Well, right back, this is the Jeff Moore show, an FM talk, 106 five. I hear you singing in the wire. I can hear you singing in the wire. Welcome back to the Jeff Moore show and the talk 106 five. Thank you for staying with us on this Tuesday morning. We appreciate it. So to come, Angelo Fermot in the next segment in the Alabama Republican Party Chairman, John O'Wall. Jeff, have you ever wondered where this guy that tried to assassinate Trump gets his money? He is a roofer, lives in Hawaii, which is very expensive. And he could try to Florida, he goes back and forth to Ukraine, might sound suspicious to me. But I bet this guy is kind of a survivalist type, but when he was building survival shelters, I bet he can live off of bugs. He looks malnourished. I mean, there's something clearly wrong there, right? There's an iron deficiency or something. No, Tim, I it's it's not that hard to buy a plane ticket from Hawaii to Florida. It's also not that hard to get a plane ticket to Ukraine. And it's not like he probably packs a big suitcase. You know what I mean? I mean, I mean, like just crazy people, when they're especially at their motivated people, they can make do. So I mean, it's not like he flew first class, I would think heck, he might have just picked up beer cans on the side of the road and bought a Greyhound bus ticket for all we know once he got to the mainland. I think texture to skirt analogy was brilliant. But that's what's going on here. It's just victim shaming. Like, well, you didn't want that, that unfortunate thing to happen to you. You shouldn't have wore that that short skirt at the bar last night, sugar. That would sound like, you don't want to get shot at by a crazy man. You shouldn't be crazy. Like, well, I just would think that if I'm going to be a leader to a free world and knowing that crazy people would do something crazy, that maybe you could kind of do your statutory obligation and keep me from getting shot at. My name, texture, Jeff with two amateur assassins, you know, as close they did to Trump, what would it look like if professional assassins say KGB or Iranian or Chinese tried to get closer to take a shot to take you out. I think it would be a completely different scenario because of the lack of security. I'm sitting a white perimeter. Yeah, I mean, like, even if you're like the, like a Guatemalan secret agent or something, you know, just just, you know, you had to go to a world superpower. Like, who's an adversary in the United States? But maybe not a global superpower. You got to be looking at it and thinking, okay, this is how you do it. It's just not, it is, it is not good for the stability of this country. Look, Donald Trump gets shot. What does that look like? Now, our friend, Baron, calling things work. The world just goes on as usual and everybody's just kind of kind of like rock and roll and go back to work the next day. Maybe that's partially true. But you look around the general landscape, you look around the globe and people look at the United States, and I say this all the time, that sort of is speaking of stability. They, they, that, you know, you want to invest at Wall Street. You want to, you know, maybe vacation, you know, you want to put money in Hollywood for movies. I mean, the United States creates all these awesome things and it's because we have infrastructure in place. We don't have like contaminated water and we don't have, you know, like a tribal governance or whatever. It's very secure. It's a place where people want to come. They feel safe here. They feel safe enough to build like the Mercedes plants in vans or whatever, you know, Austin shipping in mobile. They're not building Austin shipping in, in Peru, are they? They're putting it in the United States of America. The Australians are, right? Because we have security and we know that you're not going to, our governments are going to come along and confiscate your property like they do in some countries, even Mexico. So what happens if your, your, your, your currency is devaluing, spiraling out of control. You have like this third world approach to prosecuting your political leaders. On top of that, they're getting shot at. That's why this is so important. Do you like, do you like your quality of life in America? Well, you've got to have stability at the very, very top of the upper echelons. We'll be right back. This is FM talk one of six, five. Welcome back to the Jeff or show. And if it talk one oh six, five, thanks for sticking around on this Tuesday morning, two, five, one, three, four, three, zero, one, zero, six, you want to be in touch with me, your show host, your best opportunity is to catch me up with me on the text line. So come on the program in about an hour from now. I'll met Republican party chairman and John Wall will be with us. So please make sure you stay tuned for that. But joining us now, it's been a little bit, I guess the last time, unfortunately, was a similar circumstance. Angelo Fermo, former DSHS agent, joined us on the line. Angelo, good morning. How are you? Hey, good morning, Jeff. Thanks for having me on. Thanks for making time for us. So, I mean, we talked about this last time. It's kind of stunning. The second time it's happened. An attempt on the former president's life, his secret service detail, clearly lacking here. What do you think? I mean, have they not learned their lesson? And do you foresee this being a problem all the way to November? You know, I think it's going to be a problem all the way to November and then beyond. I mean, it's a scary situation that we're now in because, you know, like you said, they should have learned the first time. He should have had a abundant rough protection already in there. You know, they talk about the first ring of protection and then they move into the second level. And it's just, I mean, it's mind-blowing that we're having this discussion on your show again with a less than 60 days, you know, from the first attempt. It's, I mean, it's out of control. I don't know what they're going to do to fix it or correct it, but I saw one politician on TV yesterday that gave a very valid point. He's like, hey, at this point, Trump should go out and hire his own special detail of security teams, you know, get some former, you know, special operators that work for the military that, you know, are out of service now and back in service to guard those second layers because the secret service apparently isn't doing it, even though they're claiming a victory lap right now for yesterday. I mean, the other day, you know, it is, you're right. It's just so peculiar and I maybe technically it was a success, but what we know, Angelo, that, that, you know, the guy is up to the like a three stand or something for 12 hours. I mean, and here's, and here's the thing. I mean, what's the odds? I mean, you know, the first first assassination attempt with the young gentleman a few months ago, you know, you're like, okay, how did he get on the roof? And how did he get past all these security details? How was he flying a drone a couple hours before the event? And no one saw anything. And now you move into this event where it's like, well, what is the odds statistically for that person to be on that golf course at that exact time? I mean, he could, on that specific day, I mean, there was no, you know, there was no event that was being published. There's no, how did he know to be it? I mean, if he wanted to sit there for 24 hours, I mean, he was in a good position at a good exact time. So it does raise questions. I mean, that's not published information online that the president's playing golf that specific day. So it's, it's, it does start to raise some concerns. I'm actually glad that Desanis is doing their own independent investigation, because I don't think we're going to ever get any information from the Department of Justice and the FBI on it. No, and they slow walk everything, the accountability mechanisms of Congress with oversight or being slow walked. I don't know. Do you think it's got to this point? And then I think about this, I mean, like we've, we deified government so much. And then, you know, just the general apathy within the bureaucracy, I had to watch the DC for a long time. And I kind of know, like the mentality of civil servants, to some degree, that, you know, it's just like, we just, we just got to do what we got to do or whatever, and the Secret Service, albeit not necessarily of that culture, seems to be kind of sliding in that direction, though. Well, they are because, like they're now wanting, I was talking to a gentleman the other day that was exactly in the process, that he had, he was with Secret Service. He was about to sign on. He was a local police officer here in the area. And he had heard a rumor floating around that they're trying to sign him to like a two-year contract that you can't leave the agency because Secret Service in the past for a majority of all the agents, that's not a long-term career, because it takes such a toll on your family for, you know, all the travel and being away from home. So usually most of the people that start out in Secret Service, they don't end up staying there. They bounce to other agencies like mine with Homeland Security and after, you know, so many years. And well, now there, nobody wants to sign up because they're being overworked, you know, they're just being, you know, the DEI stuff coming into play. The politics are now starting to creep into the agency itself. And the officer I talked to the other day said that he called him out when they called and offered him the job. And he said, "Hey, I heard there's a contract that I have to sign." And he said, "First, they tried to glaze over it. Oh, it'll be okay. You know, don't worry about that contract." He's like, "No, no, no, I am worried about this contract. Am I going to have to stay on for so many years?" And they're like, "Well, yeah, kind of." And he's like, "Well, then you can just rescind my application." So now you're starting to lose good recruits that would hold to the secret service. And what are they going to do? They're going to replace them with these DEI hires, not, you know, not the quality top-notch educated experience operators that would go into secret service. And I think you're going to see a problem of it only getting worse. Like you said, you lived in DC, you saw the politics. It just, they're just going through the motions of the day. And that's, that it's a scary, it's a scary thing. And I kind of, you know, I was thinking yesterday that if you looked our neighbor to the south, even though Mexico is the narco state, I mean, look at how many assassination attempts occur on not just their top, you know, leaders within the government, but across the board as politicians as a whole. I mean, if you had two people that weren't even experienced, imagine an experienced sniper unit, someone that could have got into that position with a gilly suit, with a sniper rifle. The secret service may not ever even seen them. And to me, it just puts it out on, on, you know, right out in front to all these other countries and all these entities that may have special operators. Hey, if these two clowns can get to the president of the United States, anybody can, you know, experience the assassination group. Someone that's actually skilled and trained could target not just the president, but any politician. So, you know, that is something that I hope we don't start as a country to start to edge towards a fascination attempt on our politicians from local levels all the way through the federal government, because it'll be a scary, scary time in our history. Angel, knowing that we kind of want you to know, though, like, how really close was this individual there in West Palm Beach? Like, like, how feasible would it have been for him to actually have been successful, you think? Well, you know, they said the president was on hold five coming up to six, and he was in that one area that they've already flagged, which is kind of weird to me, that they already flag hole six as a vulnerability in the area of the way the golf course runs anyway. If he had an SKS rifle, I mean, he could have easily fire, I mean, in a high capacity round rifle, I mean, he could have fired multiple rounds towards the president. I mean, and it's been a high probability that he could have hit him, you know, I mean, you see it all the time, some of these guys just get lucky with their shots, you know, it is scary that that occurred. And like you said, there's FBI is going to slow roll it. We're not going to hear much information out of them. So, hopefully, DeSantis, this team that is doing a parallel investigation will keep us more updated than our own, you know, own federal partners. What do you think that looks like? So, you know, the state of Florida, then you have the feds, I mean, I can't imagine that being a really friendly turf war, but I mean, you know, what, what, what, what might they be able to find that, I mean, without, without, you know, the feds just shutting it down or whatever. Well, you know, the feds are going to try to say that the, the, the states and fees on their investigation. And I hope, I would imagine and just knowing DeSantis himself that he'll push forward with it, they're going to conduct their own interviews. They're going to probably, you know, go outside of Florida and do their own interviews, you know, where this guy lives. I mean, because we've already seen that he pretty much, you know, just traveled all over the globe, Hawaii, Ukraine, back and forth. I think you're going to see a lot of interviews on that point. And you'll probably, I mean, they won't be able to get down into his cell phone information or his computer stuff because FBI is not going to share that with them. But at least maybe they'll, they'll be able to build a pattern of his profile, you know, who he hung out with, you know, where was he getting his funding to travel all over the globe? So you'll be able to get some of that information and hopefully that will trickle back out to the public so we can have transparency on it. I'm joined by Angela Fermot here on the program. And, you know, just knowing what you know. I mean, do you think it's this that it's an incompetency? Or is it entirely possible that someone on the inside is kind of, I don't know if they're like saying, hey, Sydney assassin over here, but maybe it's more like, Hey, you know, if we don't, we don't cross RTS and dot RIs and something were to happen, and that wouldn't be the worst thing in the world now, would it? I mean, do you think that there's any, any kind of nefarious activity like that going on with this and within the agency? You know, it will, we would only know if they'll get into the computer information and the cell phone data that they have, who they're talking to, because, I mean, I hate to be one of those people that sound, you know, conspiracy theorist on this front, but I mean, we're to two assassination attempts within, and it's a total failure and collapse within the security protection. So it does raise, and again, these people weren't, you know, highly educated. They're, you know, they're loners type situation. You know, they're kind of out there landish with their, you know, some of their crazy ideas. So it wouldn't be hard to cultivate, direct them and point them in the right direction, especially with all the rhetoric coming out of the Democratic Party that Trump's a threat to the democracy. You had Hillary Clinton just say two days ago, he's a threat to the entire world. You know, so they haven't even, even after this, the second attempt, they're just doubling down on the fact that he's this threat. And it's scary. But again, I mean, it does raise the question, how are we having this talk, you know, a few months later after the first debacle? Well, tell me this, you know, how much of that is a factor. I think there's just crazy people everywhere. And so Democrats do this when there's a school shoot. Well, any kind of act of say, political extremism or violence, I mean, they predicate the whole like January 6th incident on like some very, I think, innocuous comments from Donald Trump at the rally earlier in that day. How much of it is like really, he's a threat to democracy. He's, he's Hitler. I mean, is that, do you, do you think that kind of thing really has an impact on the safety of the former president? Oh, 100%. It does. I mean, when, when you have these people out there that are mentally unstable or want to make a name for themselves, and they're putting them out there constantly that, you know, hey, you can, you know, they're putting it out there constantly that, hey, we need your help. You know, if we need to stop him at all calls, he can't take over. He's Hitler. It's going to, the world's coming in as soon as he takes over. And you get some of these people that are a little unstable. They start believing in the fact and they think, Oh, if I do this, I'm going to be a hero. I'm going to be a hero to the world and to the United States and, and they start believing in the lies. And even after the first incident, you know, Biden comes out and Harris comes out and talking about we're going to tone this rhetoric down. We're not going to talk about it. You know, the threat to democracy anymore. I think that lasted all of about a week. And then they were right back to it. And I don't think we're going to ever reverse course and go back to where we came from, where they're not talking about this. They're just going to get it to the point to where you wait till something happens on the Democratic side. And then that's when you'll see an uproar and a rise and they'll be blaming the GOP and all the Republicans for this and that we support guns and that it's, it's us, us, when reality it's them that is, or, you know, it's them that are pushing that again. I mean, it's kind of remarkable to watch. I mean, early you heard the gun argument and the argument against the second amendment. Well, tough. I mean, we have a second amendment. Don't like it. Try to repeal it. But as soon as the left kind of got its talking points together, it became honestly a victim shaming thing like, well, yes, we need to lower the temperature in the room, but it's got to start with the president, which is a kind of remarkable thing to say. And if you're like, really, if you're doing a deep down honest assessment and you're telling, you know, we're talking about security and we're talking about, hey, you might want to think about this, you know, for your own safety. Well, what do you tell Donald Trump that he needs to do? I don't know. I mean, do you do you really believe that, I mean, in any way that the president's rhetoric had led to this incident on Sunday? No, none of his rhetoric is the rhetoric from the other side. You know, I mean, he's always been who he is. But what changed from the first time he ran and was appointed is to now the rhetoric is he has to be stopped at all costs. That's, you didn't really quite, you might have heard that a little bit in the first go around, but not to the point that every news outlet that that, you know, Bolton paid for by the Democrats are spewing that propaganda. Even after this attempt, they've already switched the gears to Donald Trump's fault. It's, you know, it's not our fault. It's his fault. If I'm Donald Trump, after this incident, I am going outside of Secret Service and I am hiring my own security detail. Now, I don't need them in that first bubble that Secret Service is guaranteed to protect me at, but I will, I would definitely have, you know, some special operators outside of that, that area going forward in any detail for the rest of my life at this point. But again, you know, we already know that the Iranians had put a hit out already. So if they're seeing this and they're sitting back going, hey, two nut jobs, we're able to get to them, we can easily get a, a rating and revolutionary guard tag team in place to, to assassinate. Well, and what, let's, let's talk about that. And before we let you go here, I mean, what is it just a matter of putting more bodies, more boots on the ground? Are, are there, are there some real tactical things here that are going wrong that they're just not doing for whatever reason? You know, in my, in my opinion, it's on two fronts. One, it's following the intel information. Cause that, look, so when I work in DC, we worked at an intel center and that intel center, you had everything available at your fingertips. Nothing occurred. And don't let them say that it's not occurring that they're not aware of. No one travels in and out of the United States that the United States government is not aware of. No one's traveling to hostile, hot locations like Ukraine and the United States government is not aware of like this gentleman the other day. They know when he's coming in and out of the United States, what airplane he's, they even know exactly what credit card and how he was paid to come in and out of the United States. So that is, they already had pre-information that he was in chat rooms and groups and stuff like that. So you have your intel side of that information that should be being shared consistently with Trump's Secret Service teams about possible threats. You know, I don't know what changed in Secret Service, but years ago, the model was any threat to any president you were locked into a system. And then when, when the president came to that area, they vetted all those targets and look for those targets within that area up to 30 days out before the president and his Secret Service team arrived in that area. I don't know, because I'm not in the know anymore outside of that. So I don't know what their protocols and policies are now, but it should still be that concept using the intel information compared with this team to kind of solidify it. And I think as far as manpower, absolutely. If you've got a first level layer and you're moving into that second level where obviously there's failures at both points at the Pennsylvania rally and now in Florida. Again, if I'm Trump, I'm not putting my face in Secret Service anymore. I'm going to put my face in my own team to protect me and the life of my family. Angela, we're going to leave it there. We're out of time, but thanks for hopping on this morning. Let's talk again soon. No, Jeff. Thank you for having me. Have a good day. And any time I'll be available for you. Thanks, brother. Thank you. Angela Fermoli is general. We'll be right back. This is FM Talk 10065. Look back to Jeff Porsche on FM Talk 10065. They just stick it around on this Tuesday morning 251343 0106. So let's see here. Community don't want to be rights, the cognitive dissonance. It's strong that the rhetoric is responsible, but not Trump's rhetoric. Well, I mean, and give you this one to be explained to me because I'm not a smart person. How Trump be it over the top, whatever he is saying about whatever is going on in the world would make somebody want to kill him. Wouldn't the violence be going in the other direction on the other side if Trump's rhetoric was over the top? Or is it just what he says is a triggering mechanism in itself for your ilk that it makes people want to do things like kill him? That doesn't sound very rational or sane. Like the political violence right now, guys, it's all on your side. Community don't want to be. We can tally up the score here and you can shout January 6, all you want. But I mean, let's go back to the summer of love of 2020. And all like historically, like even like left or center movements tend to be the more violent, the right of center movements still have violence. But it's a much so the one you always compare is the French Revolution to the American Revolution. But that's just that is the brand there. That is the trigger. I mean, it's it's the value of life. It's a different set of value system. It's very me, me, me. Well, in the left, it's very us. But whatever you want to make it that two, five, one, three, four, three, zero, one, zero, six, we can elaborate more, but I'm up against the break. This is the Jeff Porter show on F them talk, one, oh, six, five from Bucks Pocket to the shores of Orange Beach at all points in between an insider's perspective on Alabama politics. It's the Jeff Porter show. Welcome back to the Jeff Porter show at the talk. 106 five. Thank you for staying with us on this Tuesday morning. Text on two, five, one, three, four, three, zero, one, zero, six, you want to be in touch with the program. You hit me up on that text line and I'll do my best to respond to whatever it is that is on your mind. John Wall, the Alabama Republican Party chairman coming up here in about 30 minutes or so. So stay right where you are. We'll do a little quick reset about going on here. Just sort of the, the, the bizarre sort of spin in the media reacting to the second assassination attempt on Sunday. I mean, we're getting desensitized. This is what bothers me the most that we're just acting like, well, you know, it's just the way the world is now. And I said this before we had, uh, Angela Furmore on like, you know, the one thing about the United States was that he said this too, talking about Mexico and it being a narco state, but did they have these, these assassinations all the time? We don't want to get to that point. We'll just ban goods. Well, that's not going to work. Repeal the second amendment if you really think that's the answer. But the reason supported for our public officials to have security and them to execute because they're clearly failing at their job. I mean, yes, it's about the safety of these figures, these politicians, but there is a trickle down effect and there is, there are repercussions when something happens and the markets, human behavior gets a little skittish. Maybe you make a flight from whatever you're investing in. Maybe it's finance. Maybe it's pharmaceuticals. Maybe, you know, what, what do you, you go investing gold where it just sort of sits and it doesn't really contribute to the economy, but it's a safe store of value. You want, you want this economic activity operating on this assumption that it is in a stable environment that it doesn't, you don't have to be looking over your shoulder for chaos or whatever it may be. And that's why what the secret service does is so, so important. It's not just, oh, well, Donald Trump gets killed and the life goes on. I mean, it probably does for the most part, but that's why we put such a high degree of high amount of resources into security apparatus like that. But the media reaction is, like I said, well, he shouldn't award that short skirt, or I guess she, Donald Trump wearing a skirt. I don't need that to get started. Anyway, two, five, one, three, four, three, zero, one, zero, six. Also, I haven't gotten much feedback on this, but the two lawmakers, Thomas Action Jackson of Thomas Will, and that's it. That's what he puts on the ballot, not me. Travis Hendricks of Fairfield, and Pharaoh City Council, and Corey Martin kind of saying, we need to like lower our guard. We need to welcome refugees into our communities. And the federal government needs to step in and offer more resources. And you know, all the three of them signed a letter and talked about the virtues of refugee resettlement in your community. And the pushback was a little bit as such. Well, Councilman Martin, you know, he was just a general policy gesture. But when I can't get passes, no, he would talk about his community. I mean, he's speaking as a civic leader at Fairhope, where I'm from, or where I live. I'm not from there. He's speaking on behalf of his city, I think, in an official capacity when he signs a letter like that, addressed to Joe Biden. I mean, he's not speaking on behalf of Spanish forward or citronel, one way not to assume the city of Fairhope. And how do people think about that? Well, you know, it's not speaking on behalf of Pace, Florida. He's speaking on behalf of Fairhope. And maybe it's a religious, uh, I know he's a pastor and he has some convictions about that. But it's still something that probably warrants a little bit of discussion, right? Uh, Thomasville, I, you know, I can't imagine the mayor up there, Sheldon Day. I wonder what he would think of that refugee resettlement in Clark County. Travis Hendricks, Fairfield, where I'll set a Birmingham when the folks in Fairfield, midfield, Pleasant Grove, that neck of the woods. Think of this. Inslee. Do they add the resources? And so, you know, it's, it's, this was a, I think a bigger deal, uh, to me at least sort of the attitude, which, which I'm not saying is nefarious or ill-attentioned, but, uh, we'll talk about refugee resettlement in Alabama, two, five, one, three, four, three, zero, one, zero, six, uh, toothless Bamber, iron deficiency. He looks like he has rickets or scurvy. So some kind of deficiency vitamin C. I don't know. Uh, Babylon B is running out of stories. You can't make up the last assassination attempt. Money. The guy is probably a money. By the way, I read these things on the fly. They don't get a, uh, uh, first glance. Uh, and a texture. Hey, Jeff, the last time Trump was in BD to a fumbled, uh, Brian Denny, to a fumbled on the LSU six yard line LSU doesn't win the nanny 2020, 1990, if not for Trump. Tim, one of the odds this guy is going to get Jeffrey Epstein. Unnamed texture. This is a very long text. I'll do my best here, uh, to get bored. I think it makes things issue that people need to concentrate is on the perimeter. They didn't, they didn't protect the perimeter in Pennsylvania, which allowed that guy that close enough to shoot it. He killed people and to kill people. He did kill somebody and just a month later, what happened at Florida didn't protect the perimeter when the president was on those holes adjacent to the street. They should have closed the street and they should have had armed agents on the sidelines to make sure they want to approach the fence line. I can't believe that's just stupidity after the first attempt would have woke up and protected the perimeter. And then we wouldn't have had this issue twice in a row. How can that be an accident a month apart? I really like to show Jeff. Well, thank you. Dirk digger. I know how to protect Trump. He could say he's transgender. Now Donna Trump, the hard left will protect her. Ricky, that's always a Ricky. Our government is controlled by the Zionist Freemasons and the 1% and they own Jeff Poole and all the media. Jeff, you you're oil. You are a shield for Satan Catholicism, Zionist, you use synagogue, a state regime, but your day is coming when the Lord Jesus birds all it is coming. Ricky off his meds. It's kind of funny. It's cabal here of Catholics and Jews and Satan can't forget Satan. Ricky, I don't think that's a Freemasons, by the way. So the Freemasons, the Jews, the Zionist Jews, I should say, and Catholics along with Satan are running the US government. I'm gonna let you in a little secret here, Ricky. The people in the government, you know what their God is? It's either government or themselves. They don't believe in any of that stuff. On a text or another perspective is he could have been a diversion. He was acting very full of himself to nonchalant like his mission is over and he accomplished his mission. It reminds me of a scene from cut my cousin, Vinny, where Vinny was asking what type color pants he should wear. I would never choose a pink shirt to go hide out in the bushes waiting for one person. That may or may not be anywhere in the country from Randy. I don't well, we don't know that he was wearing that shirt when he did what he did. So yeah, I named texture or Randy, I should say, he did exhibit some bizarre behavior, but I kind of chalked that up to a crazy mill. How insane you have to be to try to commit this kind of assassination. There's some real problems there, obviously. So to say, you know, that it's that something else, I would be, I'd be very, very hesitant. I just, I'm not saying that he's a crazy person. He was apparently had enough wherewithal to understand some of the basic tenets of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Enough wherewithal to get from point A to point B as we have seen all over the globe. But when you have a crazy person and they're a motivated, crazy person, I mean, they're able to, it's just a matter of like ability and, you know, the commitment to a cause and sometimes, to be committed to a cause, you have to have a degree of insanity. Not everybody, but if you're insane enough to believe in something and you have a religious like fervor for this belief, then you would be, I mean, people are capable of a lot of things. When I was talking about him building survival shelters, it sounds like he's very intimately familiar with what it would take to survive if he had to. I mean, like, you know, people can be obsessed with something and know everything about it. The human brain, be it crazy, doesn't mean it's stupid. Daniel disagrees. Ricky is stupid. Well, Ricky, fired off. Ricky needs his own show Saturday at 3 a.m. All right, guys, all we can really do is pray for Ricky. I'm still not convinced that Ricky is not just an act. I mean, people here who have encountered Ricky tell me, no, he's really liked that. But sometimes I see it and I'm, you know, like you're getting your name mentioned on the radio and people are laughing at you. And then maybe it maybe that's how you find value in your existence on this planet. I don't know. So taking Ricky too seriously, assuming that Ricky is, like I said, authentic in his beliefs. I am, I am skeptical from time to time of that. Two, five, one, three, four, three, zero, one, zero, zero, see, I'm sorry. I'm just, I, you know, psycho analysis of Ricky, we could just go in circles. So I get points during the history of this program, we have tuned Ricky out completely. But at this moment in time, I suppose we can, uh, we can speculate on that. Anyway, so keep the text kind of and appreciate the feedback. Uh, what else we got going on? We got refugees, we had to trumpet Brian Denny stadium as the text line had mentioned earlier. And I, I, I, you already hear this. Well, the baby's not asleep state. Why is he here? Well, cause this is, um, especially if he's the Alabama Georgia game. What do you think most people in Georgia, especially Republican voters are going to be watching on a Saturday at two 30 are, you know, what do you think a lot of TVs in the state of Georgia are going to be tuned in probably on the Alabama Georgia game at Brian Denny stadium that no, they're, they're going to be watching home and garden television. I mean, so think about it. The exposure he'll get from being in Alabama during probably the biggest televised events as the Braves World Series. It's, it's a no brainer. He'll get some exposure from the network covering the game, which I said will be ABC. We'll be right back. This is F. M. Talk. 106 five. ♪ Oh, I don't even know ♪ ♪ And dog's coming over the phone ♪ ♪ Whoa, wrote the line ♪ ♪ Well, he never got a kiss ♪ ♪ Oh, wrote the line ♪ ♪ He don't know what he missed ♪ ♪ Is it anyone there ♪ ♪ That he's facing the red ♪ ♪ Girl, I drew that portal ♪ ♪ Look at me ♪ - Look at that, Jeff Moore showed up. Dog, what oh, six, five, 24 minutes after the hour. Thank you for listening. We get to hear more of your text here in just a moment. Real quick programming note, tomorrow on the show, Joey Clark from Onus and Youza Montgomery, the successor of Byron Coleman on that. Well, no, it went, it went barren in April rain now, Joey. But we'll talk to Joey tomorrow. And also, US Senator Tommy Tuberville, or as I like to call him coach, will be on the program, so please tune in. For that, Josh writes this, Ricky should add the Legion of Doom to that group as well. Maybe the Legion of Doom is as such. It's the Zionist over here, and then over here are the Catholics, and then back here, you got Satan himself, just kind of pushing buttons. Then what was it? Well, he said, we said the Zionists. Oh, the Catholics and the Freemasons, the Freemasons. Yeah, that's it. I'll see, Glenn, how do you find value as a fan of Auburn football? What does that even mean? I mean, Auburn's been around for like 150 years, Glenn. Glenn, maybe clean the wax out of your ears, and we'll talk, I'll make this understandable and simple terms of where the value is for Donald Trump to show up at the Alabama Georgia game. So nothing to do with the game, Glenn. Well, it has a little bit to do with the game because these are two high ranked teams and they're gonna get rocket size, incredibly high ratings, and well, it may feel like you are making a fun point about Auburn football. The point is, who's watching that? It is the people in the state of Georgia in the TV markets there, which is what Savannah Valdosta, Valdosta shares a little Italian. I see Columbus, Macon, Savannah said Augusta, Atlanta and probably Chattanooga. Maybe a little bit, you get a little bit of Greenville Asheville at the very north, but they're all gonna be watching the Georgia game, the Alabama Georgia game, because they're all Georgia fans, or maybe they hate Georgia, they're Georgia tech fans, but they're all gonna be tuned in and they're gonna be sitting there and Donald Trump's gonna be there and an exposure for the former president. That's why he goes to the game in Tuscaloosa and kind of sitting here and I guess it's like, "Well, we could make a joke about Auburn, boo, hoo, hoo, hoo." I just said, "Well, why would you do that?" Michael, "Far out sounds like the proper place "for Haitian migrants, "seems the communist family community is perfect "for refugees." I was expecting like a cat joke or something. This is what my buddy Ben, talking about the cat problem with Haitian migrants. And then Ricky sends me a screenshot of something here. Two, five, one, three, four, three, zero, one, zero, six. No context, Ricky, sending me like pictures of like very badly manufactured memes. Sorry, I'm stunned that somebody would try to pass this off to as where he gets his newsroom. But maybe, maybe I'm not surprised, but I just, I'm stunned every time he sends me something. And I should not take the time, valuable air time to look at it, but I can't help but look at like just how ghetto, how like amateur hour, the stuff he sends that drives his conspiracy-filled brain. It doesn't look legitimate, does it, Ricky? Well, it looks more legitimate than ABC News or whatever. I mean, you know, if it looks like it's something that was made with clip art, Ricky, are like a website called memegenerator.com. I mean, is that the best place to get informed? Seriously, guys, we make fun of Ricky, but what drives him, he wants to share with me has a influential member of the media, apparently part Zionist, part Catholic, part Freemason, part Satan. And when I see it, I'm thinking like, can't you find something a little higher quality than this? We could waste so much radio time and kill so much time talking about Ricky, but we will proceed. This is a Jet Force show on FM Talk, 106.5. (upbeat music) (upbeat music) ♪ But they like that you in Jackson ♪ ♪ And I'll be dancing all upon a king ♪ ♪ Let me drown town like a scalded ♪ ♪ Hound with your tail that's between your religion ♪ ♪ Oh, to Jackson ♪ ♪ You big talkin' man ♪ ♪ And I'll be waiting man ♪ - Look at my to the Jet Force show on FM Talk, 106.5. They should stay with us on this Tuesday morning. 2513430106, time permitting. We will respond to any text messages. You may send this away. Joining us now, it is Tuesday. We do this every Tuesday at 11.30, typically, sometimes we move the time around, but this is when we get to talk to the Republican Party Chairman here in Alabama, Chairman John Wall. - Chairman, good morning, how are you? Chairman, good morning, how are you? - I'm doing well, it's good to get on the show. - Hey, thanks for making time for us. I always appreciate it. Let's kick it off here. Tell me the, well, I guess we need to get to the news of the day first, you know, Saturday night or Friday night, we, you have your big event, Laura, Trump is there. Things seem to be going in a generally good direction nationally, Saturday, you have your meeting, but on Sunday, we got bad news. I mean, somebody else took a shot at the former president of the United States, Republican nominee, what was your reaction? - Well, I mean, at first, obviously, I think we were all shocked today, right? Hey, hey, for me, it's just heartbreaking that 81, they're thinking that the first flight helped her politically have a high life problem with kind of a very good today, especially our viral feeders suppressed. - This, this, look, the demonization of algebra, the constant open hatred of him and his policies and supporters, they've been telling people that he's forced into vicious world leaders throughout history. He's another Adolf Hitler, he's horrible. He must be stopped. He's the enemy of democracy, all these things. And then we're surprised when the American public and, you know, especially people who, you know, may have some mental illness, take that and run with it. And I think the answer here is, we have to hold those accountable for accountable, but it's not just the individuals who are doing this, it's the rhetoric coming from the Democrat party, coming from their talking and their lackeys within the mainstream media who are actually the ones who are pushing this agenda of violence and divisiveness within the American people and really pushing the best you can think. - Well, Chairman, tell me this. - I mean, I guess I shouldn't be stunned, but I am. Once you see it, you're like, wow, did they really do this? Blaming the, blaming Trump, blaming kids, his own words, his, his, over the top rhetoric, whatever it may be, that they're blaming Trump for his, the attempt on his own life. And they're not subtle about it at all. It's just, you know, Don Lemon, Trump doesn't want to be assault after as a threat to democracy, we'll stop being a threat to democracy. I don't know that this carries much weight among the American public, but I'm really kind of shocked about that reaction. - Oh, absolutely. Look, we are dealing with some of the most corrupt and some of the most evil people in the entire world. They would stop at nothing to keep Donald Trump out of the White House. They genuinely believe in their rhetoric and their message of socialism. And they think that the edge justify the means. And I think this is a problem. They take a very clear issue, it's very obvious that there is a law cited, a law cited this within the press today. Look at the debate, look at the moderators in the debate how they were clearly biased towards Kamala Harris and clearly were negative towards Donald Trump. It doesn't take a genius to know there is a double standard. There is unfairness within our press today. And when you take that into consideration, then yes, and their immediate reaction, instead of remorse, instead of sorrow, instead of, oh my goodness, you know, this is a dark day in America, it's blamed Donald Trump. And I wanna just ask, you know, everyone out there, your listeners, you, but the American public, how do we think the press would react if someone attempted, if they were publicly attempted to take Kamala Harris this way? - I mean, even when they, even when they get in that, like realm, like, you know, it was funny, Chairman, Sunday morning shows, you had one guest on MSNBC, like outright compared Trump to Hill, or just, I'm just gonna say it, you know, whatever. Yeah, Data Bash was sitting there with JD Vance and saying that by saying that these Haitian migrants are eating people's pets, that that was inciting the Proud Boys, I was inciting the KKK, and they're gonna show up in Springfield, Ohio, it calls all kinds of mayhem. And which these are all hypothetical, or all like, you know, this is all possible because of you. And then it's sort of just like this benign opposite reaction to when the former president of the United States actually gets shot at. - Right, it doubles standard and in the look, it's also a lack of accountability and a lack of personal responsibility. The threats somehow don't believe they need to take responsibility for anything. But I'm gonna submit you, this is not the first time we've seen something in this magnitude that the press is responsible for it. So think back to January 6th. You know, this is, that's their golden issue, right? Republicans, Trump supporters went against democracy on January 6th. But when I'm asked the question, what was that root cause? What really, you know, what made the people do what they did on January 6th? My answer is very clear, I think it was the press. So for 18 months before that, the press had been telling people it was okay to riot, burn buildings down, take over full city blocks. They're heroes, it was okay to do that for a just cause. And then they were surprised when the other side of the aisle, you know, they've been praising Democrats for doing this. And then when Republicans did something similar, all of a sudden it's, oh, it's horrible, they're being destructive, it's a dark. You know, I'm not necessarily defending what some of the people did on January 6th. But the double standard of how the press treated it and reported on it, goes just how out of touch they are with their power and what it can do. And I think this is the problem. They are the ones who incite things. They are the ones who propagate violence, propagate anger and hatred. Look, it's like you said, if you have a reporter on here saying, I'm just gonna say it, Donald Trump is bad as Adolf Hitler. Well, then is it not the duty of that? If that statement is true and if that true, then would it not be the duty of people to try to kill Donald Trump? And I think that's where we're at, the press have reached such a frenzy in their hatred and such a frenzy in their demonization that it is literally inciting people to attempt to kill a leader and to dominate the dominant need of their public party and a former leader of the free world. And I think this is an incredibly scary kind and incredibly serious issue. And it's something where we need to hold the press accountable. They are partially responsible. This is the second time. They did not curb their rhetoric after the first one. And I think they need to be held accountable, not governmentally, but by the American people for their action. - We're joined by our member Republican party, Chairman John Wall here on the program. Moving on here, and then I think it's important to talk about, you had your big event over the weekend. Let's start out with the dinner. You raised a lot of money for President Trump and other Republican causes. But I mean, very, very, probably surprisingly, for me at least, a successful dinner. - No, it was incredibly successful. And I love it because, you know, we do very well here in LA on the political, you know, on the conservative side. We're winning a lot of races. And I felt it was very important. It was a little bit different model that the party would normally do. You know, if President Trump raised actually having a fundraiser and helping raise money for a nominee. But I felt like it was incredibly important because what we did to do if we went, if we went in Alabama, but we lose the country. And I was very proud of the fact that we, you know, obviously go where Trump was our speaker. She did a tremendous job. And we were able to work together with several partners that raised over a million dollars for Donald Trump campaign. That's a very good night. It's actually double what the Trump team were hoping to raise here. And I was glad to see Alabama deliver. And once again, raise our profile and make sure we're a part of the national conversation fight for the speaker of the century. - Yeah, and then, yeah, I mean, Bill, talk about that in a relationship. The state party has with the Tennessee junior senator, Bill Haggerty. He has been out and about throughout the state of Alabama over the last six months or so, though, but kind of fight in a good fight. - Yeah, absolutely. And you know what I like about Senator Haggerty is, he comes from a background in finance and serves as Trump's ambassador to Japan. And he really does have a hard to make a difference in, you know, across the entire country. And he's been coming to Alabama quite a bit, just helping with things. And I think he has a bright teacher, you know, would not be at all be surprised to see him serving in Trump's cabinet. Either as, you know, potentially Secretary of the Treasury or even Secretary of State. So I think he, you know, obviously, he's ambitious. He's trying to help cause the conservative cause. He's trying to help Donald Trump. And I was glad he was able to fake it to this event. And even more, he introduced to the state of Alabama and also introduced Alabama a little bit to him. I think he's got a bright teacher. And I hope one day we see him in an actual finish. - And then on Saturday morning, always an important part of your, you know, your twice a year gathering, you had your, you had your business meeting. Talk a little bit about that. You know, the mentality I was there, it seemed to be, it seemed to be very, I'd say optimistic where things were headed. You didn't have one kind of mildly controversial resolution, but everything else seemed to kind of go along and get along. - No, I look, the Alabama Republican Party is very united. You know, we're not having issues that some parties are across the country where they, there's division between, you know, where the grassroots doesn't feel like they're listening to. That's not the case here. The Alabama Republican Party is a grassroots organization. I make grassroots chairments. We believe in fighting for our rights and freedoms and defending the principles that the party stands for, helping our candidates win, and building the bridges, the relationships with, the across the board. And I think that's what you saw Saturday morning. You saw a party that was very united. We know what our goals are, our goals are to help Donald Trump win, win at CD2, and then in districts across the state, as well as standing for good policy and making sure that our platform is strong and if we're standing for the issues that Republicans will be there. And I love some of the resolutions we passed. You know, we passed a resolution supporting women's, you know, women's rights and women's privacy. Past resolutions, we talked about socialism, how that's not good for the people of our country. We passed a resolution opposing decreased casinos across the state and then, you know, asking for the state to crack down on the illegal gameplay that we have that's, you know, destroying local communities. So I think overall it was incredibly good meeting, very strong. We passed a lot of good conservative values that we're going to fight for and then also got organized to make a difference on the elected front. - Now, what do you say to this? And then this happens from time to time. And every time the party passes a resolution on a particular issue, in Saturday, it was sort of the Jennifer Lovern position, the wife of Joe Lovern, but that you're by the party taking a stance on an issue and it was the gas tax at one time. I remember gambling this time. There's probably been some other things along the way that the party taking a stance sort of undermines those who are elected to make these decisions. I mean, you know, what's your opinion on that just as a general principle that I think the party does play a role in policy, but there's something to think you need to leave that up to the elected lawmakers, your Republican lawmakers, the officials to kind of determine. - Well, I would answer that with two things. The first being, you don't hear that about any other group. You never hear about the states, you know, elected officials saying, oh, we don't want to hear from the business association or we don't want to hear from the real letters association or the trucker's association or whoever it might be. Why wouldn't they want to hear from the party? Every other group and organization out there elects their opinion, they don't. Why would we silence the Republican party, the most powerful political organization in the state of Alabama? Of course, we should just be able to fear our voice and have it respected. But the second part of that is good. The party itself in our opinion has no weight and should have no bearing on an elected official. Unless that elected official runs as a Republican. And if they choose to run as a Republican and use our brand that the party owns, then they do have a duty to listen to the party and to follow our platform. They can run as independent if they want. They can run as a Democrat. But if they choose to run as a Republican that there is absolutely a duty and a need to be respectful of the party and the value to represent, because it is the party brand and it is the values that the party stands for that have saved our organization so successful. It's because we fight for people's rights and freedom to defend their values. - I mean, in the role of the party, I think in the eyes, a lot of elected Republicans is as such. Like your job is to win elections and you're a political apparatus. When you start getting into policy, that becomes problematic. Where are the policymakers? Where are the ones who kind of set that course? Does the, should the, how invested in policy and thinking about positions on these things should party members be? - Yeah, okay, so, so I think there's a very different view traditionally and historically that's actually the opposite. It's always been the party that has set the platform, both at the federal level and the state level, that the party absolutely has the role in policy. Otherwise, there would not be a platform. People recognize the values that the Republican party represents when they're going to the ballot box. They're voting for candidates who are Republicans because they feel what Republicans stand for. And so, the party has always had a role in policy and it always has to in order to be effective. - Chairman, we gotta leave it there for, let you go. Folks wanna find out more about the Alabama Republican party. How can they do so? - Well, we always love to interact with folks. We're on all the major social media at Alabama Republican party. And then, of course, our website is A-L-D-O-P.org, where they can sign up for updates, or to help volunteer as we might take back this topic. - Chairman, we'll do it again next week. Thank you, always, for your time. - How good to be on the show. - Chairman, I'm at the Republican party, Chairman John Wall. We'll be right back. This is FM Talk, 106.5. ♪ Yeah, it's small and small ♪ ♪ And therefore, my defense is ♪ ♪ Just to leave it up to you ♪ ♪ And get a taste ♪ ♪ Well, it pains the bills we've made ♪ ♪ For life it takes him down to the ground ♪ ♪ When he tried to get up ♪ ♪ Life would kick him back down one day ♪ ♪ Pop him coming to his diamond ♪ ♪ Pull his hands on my shoulders ♪ ♪ And his tears, he said, he said patches ♪ ♪ I'm the band ♪ - Welcome back to the Jeff Pore Show. What FM Talk, 106.5. Thanks for hanging out with us. Oh, what's the left of this Tuesday morning? Once again, coming up on tomorrow's program, Joey Clark from News and New Zealand News Talk, 93.1 in Montgomery, Alabama. And our senior United States Senator, Tommy Tuberville, we'll have him on. Tuberville, up on cuddler last night on a Fox business, saying he fully anticipates even more, even more attempts on Donald Trump's wellbeing. So we'll see. Firedog, I get that satanic vibe from the Jeff Pore Show. Why do you think I listen since I'm Catholic? I get the need to buy farmland and a Kubota tractor from Sean. So that's why I listen to "12 to 2" every day. Well, coming up here shortly, you better gas it up, Bob, because you have midday mobile. What you got for today, Sean? - That's true. Probably more messages about attractors and farmland and all those kinds of things mixed in. By the way, too, I noticed this with Rick, and I'm working on the development deal right now with Ricky to get this show launched and so working on that. But I think, I don't even have the text in front of me, but I was listening to it. So I think this hits a lot. Catholics, ding, okay, my world. Jews that have Jews in my extended family, ding, Freemasons, ding, what else do they have in there? - Satan. - I don't know, I mean, there may be some people, you know, that I don't know them for a fact to be Satan, or Satanist. - I don't know. I don't know. - He's a rookie though. - He's gone through some stuff here in the last two years. I could probably, you know, give you some people. But I just, I think maybe that was, I mean, I dinged on all those things. - What bothers me about Ricky is what he says in screenshots, I'm sure you've seen him. - Of once or twice. - They are ghetto, is all ghetto. - Yeah. - They're some eye space. - Yeah. - I mean, yeah, it looks like 1995 technology, Ricky. Like, give it the times, bro. It won't be to take you seriously. - They're spending their time finding the truth. Not getting them looking good, man. - MS Paint. I mean, just stop, okay? Use something besides Microsoft Word, or Word Perfect to get your message across. - Listen, now, paint is pretty good. I like that program. By the way, can you hang out a second? - Sure, I'll, oh. - Okay, 'cause I got it. - Glad to. - 'Cause I can find out if Baron Coleman gave you any stock picks. (laughing) - All right, I gotta get out of here. It's been a pleasure. I will try to do better tomorrow. Sorry, Phyllis, I forgot to say goodbye. Stay tuned. This has been the Jet Porze Show. And if I'm talking about 065. (dramatic music) (upbeat music)