Zichru4Life
Bava Basra Daf 94
[SPEAKING PORTUGUESE] The first figure on the daft, the amount of kidneys are offered that one accepts when he buys grain. The mission on the previous daft says that a person that buys grain is uncabble on himself a quarter of a calve of impurities per saw purchased. If Catina brought a price that the mission was referring to a rueva of kidneys, he might ask that a person also accepts if there's dirt in the purchase grain. Because Rob has said that if a person removes a pebble from his friend's garyon, he has to pay the value of we to equal to the pebble's volume. This proves that a person does accept dirt in a grain purchase. The garyon says that although one accepts a full rueva of kidneys, he accepts only less than a rueva of dirt, not a rueva. The garyon says that a buyer of adosium accepts a rueva of dirt and the garyon says that adosium contain more dirt because they are uprooted. Seconds are going to daft in Bolanafes minafescula. Vavuna says if the buyer comes to sift the purchase grain because it appears to have more than a rueva, he may sift all of it, and the seller has to compensate for all of the impurities, including the rueva. Some say this halocha is dina because a person pays for good quality grain with no impurities, and he ordinarily accepts impurities because he doesn't want to bother sifting the seller to remove only a rueva. But if there's more than a rueva of impurities, he would bother to sift it, and once he bothers to sift it, he sifts all of it. Therefore, when there's more than a rueva, the buyer doesn't accept any impurities. Some say it's a canass, although a rueva of impurities in a saw of grain is common, more than a rueva is uncommon. So we suspect that he intentionally mixed it in, and since he mixed it in, it has all gave him a canass to compensate for all the impurities. Third so you're going to death, Machleik is about penalizing in the case of Monash Lishi. The Gmaestan of Huna from Mishnah, where two people deposited money with someone, one a mona, and one two mona, and they disagree who left the two mona. Tana Kama says each one receives a mona, and the third one is yahimunachachiavelio. This proves that although one is attempting to steal the third mona, he's not penalized to lose his first mona. The Gmaestan in that case, each one definitely owns a mona, which we're not going to penalize. Whereas over here, it's possible that he mixed in all the impurities. Therefore, we give him a canass. The Mowostami, a rioter of Huna, from Yisushita in that Mishnah, who says that if each one receives a mona, then the Ramay doesn't lose. Rather, all the money is yahimunachachiavelio. This proves that we give a canass even the amount that he's entitled to. The Gmaestan says, no, over there is Vadeir Amay, so therefore we give him a canass. Over here, it's possible he didn't mix in anything, and therefore, it's possible there's no canass. (speaking in foreign language) The first so you're going to death, the amount of kidneys or dirt one accepts in a purchase of grain. Second so you're in Balanaphas, Manafas, Kula. Third so you're Makhleikus about giving a canass in the case of Monash Lishi. The Sinfabas d'Avtadi Dalit is a hunter. The hunter who had accepted a rave of kidneys, in the grain he used as bait for trapping, was sifting through the entire bag he was buying, since it appeared like it had more than a rave of impurities. When heard the shopkeeper tell two customers that he couldn't remember who gave him one mona and who gave him two. The hunter reminds of d'Avtadi Dalit, Sudd. The rave of kidneys that he accepted in his grain reminds the first so you're going to death. The amount of kidneys or dirt one accepts when he purchase his grain. He sifted through the entire bag because it appeared like it had more than a rave of. Reminds of the second so you're going to death in Balanaphas, Manafas, Kula. And the shopkeeper who told the two customers, he couldn't remember who gave him one mona and who gave him two reminds of the third so you're going to death the Makhleikus about giving a canass in a case of Monash Lishi.
94