Finshots Daily
Is the Unified Pension Scheme any better?
In today’s episode for 8th October 2024, we dive into the newly proposed Unified Pension Scheme (UPS) and the tug-of-war it's causing.
Check out our open roles at Ditto Insurance by heading over to Ditto's careers page - https://joinditto.freshteam.com/jobs
- Broadcast on:
- 08 Oct 2024
- Audio Format:
- other
Hello and welcome to Finshots Daily. In today's episode, we dive into the newly proposed unified pension scheme and the tug-of-war that is causing. Before we start today's episode, here's a quick message from one of our co-founders. Hey there, my name is Straits, one of the co-founders of Finshots and Ditto. And I've been entrusted with an important mission, that is finding talented marketers to join our growing team. If you're someone that has a knack for simplifying the complex and making it fun, we'd love to hear from you. Head over to Tito's career page to apply or share this with someone who would be a great fit. One step, grab a referral from someone on our team to give your application an extra edge. Good luck, we can't wait to hear from you. Now, on to today's episode. There are three big reasons why pensions matter to everyone in India. First, India's retiree population is growing rapidly. Life expectancy, which was just 35 years in 1950, has risen to 67 today and is expected to increase further by 2050. More retirees mean a heavier pension burden. Second, government employees are entitled to pensions and this affects you, the tax payer. Why? Because pensions are funded by the taxes that we pay. In March 2023 alone, there were 6.8 lakhs central government retirees receiving pensions, along with hundreds of thousands of other pensioners from sectors like telecom, postal services and railways. And guess where all of that money comes from? Our pockets. Now, you could argue that these pensions aren't entirely funded by taxes, since employees also contribute through salary deductions. And you're right, but you have to remember that those salaries are paid from government coffers or the money collected through taxes. So in the end, the entire pension pool is still funded by public money. Third, India spends a lot on pensions. At least 15% of both central and state expenditures go towards pensions, leaving less room for infrastructure development and social welfare. This brings us to the perennial question. How do we ensure the financial security of a growing retiree population while keeping costs low? Well, the government asked the same question and to solve this, it has experimented with various pension schemes over the years. First, came the old pension scheme on the OPS, where government employees didn't contribute a rupee to their retirement. They received up to 60% of their last drawn salary, adjusted for inflation via deorness allowance or DA. It was great for retirees, but terrible for the government's finances. In fact, an economic times analysis says that by FY22, over a quarter of state tax revenues went towards pension payments under this scheme. To fix this, the national pension scheme or the NPS was introduced in 2004. This market link plan required employees to contribute 10% of their salary, with the government matching it with 14% contribution. NPS was intended to be a more sustainable solution, but many government employees were unhappy because their pension payouts under NPS were much lower compared to OPS. Some states, like Rajasthan, even reverted to OPS due to political pressure from employee unions. That's when the government introduced the unified pension scheme or the UPS, scheduled to launch in April 2025. UPS aims to combine the best features of OPS and NPS. The government claims a solution that balances fiscal responsibility with social security. And this is crucial because around 23 lakh central government employees are said to be eligible for UPS in 2025. So here's why UPS is said to be a game-changer. The UPS aims to offer the best of both worlds. It guarantees a pension like OPS but requires employee contributions similar to NPS. Government employees contribute 10% of their basic salary, and the government adds a generous 18.5%. At retirement, employees receive 50% of their basic average salary drawn over the last 12 months before retirement. Plus, UPS offers inflation adjustments so retirees aren't left with the mercy of market fluctuations. This fixed guarantee pension is what makes UPS appealing for employees, while the contribution-based structure keeps it more sustainable for the government than OPS. But the UPS isn't without its critiques. One sticking point is its inflation indexation, which is tied to the All India Consumer Price Index for industrial workers. Simply put, this index measures the rise in the prices of goods and services to help the government determine minimum wages or make necessary pay revisions to account for inflation. But many argue that this index doesn't accurately reflect the real cost of living for retirees, especially in terms of healthcare and housing costs. A broader inflation index could better ensure that pensions keep up with actual expenses. Another issue is the conflict between the center and the states. Despite the center's push for UPS, some states are hesitant to opt for it. Why? Because the OPS, while financially unsustainable, is a political goldmine. Fixed pensions are incredibly popular among government employees, and offering them can win boats. States like Rajasthan have reverted to OPS, and for them, UPS doesn't seem as attractive. Plus, states that switch back to OPS can differ financial responsibility. It's because they don't need to set aside pension funds immediately. They can postpone these expenses till the time it actually becomes due, which makes their short-term finances look better. UPS, on the other hand, requires setting aside a guaranteed reserve fund right away, reducing the money available for other expenditures in the short-term. All this leaves us with the last bit of this puzzle. How do we solve India's pension conundrum? Well, India could take inspiration from other countries' successful pension schemes. For example, Germany and Denmark have raised the retirement age to ease the strain on their pension systems. New Zealand has a universal pension scheme that guarantees every citizen a basic income post-retirement, regardless of their employment history. Chile, meanwhile, manages pensions through private funds, giving retirees more control over their savings while reducing the government's fiscal burden. India could do some of this tweaking in the upcoming schemes, and perhaps combine public and private sector management of pension funds. And as we said before, the UPS, while an improvement over NPS, could be further enhanced by revisiting its indexation. Basing it on a more accurate consumer price index, or the income growth in society, as seen in Sweden, which ensures retirees are better protected from rising costs. But for now, UPS remains a work in progress, and India remains in a tug of war between fiscal sustainability and political populism. We'll have to wait until 2025 to see the response UPS gets, and if it truly delivers on its benefits. Thank you for listening to today's episode, and if you want to share your feedback or suggestions, do drop us an email to high@theratefinchearts.in. Until next time.