Zichru4Life
Bava Basra Daf 131
Zirk of life of us of Keflamad alaf. The first song on the daaf of Irkha Mabrika allows even a bari to redistribute his inheritance. Rava asks if Irkha Mabrika holds that a bari can redistribute his Irkha? Was his sak only regarding a Shrivmirah? Who is someone who can give you Irkha? But not a bari or even a bari? A Mashaashir means "Hiraya" from Amnusson's Kasha Terabi. You said your mission like Irkha Mabrika, because the mission that says regarding Exuba has been indifferent. The stipulation in Exuba that if the wife dies before the husband, her sons from him get Exuba, as well as properties. The husband received from her. The mission's language is Inun Yarsun Kessafk Subhasir. They will inherit the money of Irk Subha, and a change of inheritance is only possible to do that according to Bhirramaraka. Since Exuba is typically written by a healthy person, you have a bari that even a bari can redistribute his inheritance. Second song in the daafk, Subhas been indifferent and operates based on Atenai Besdan and not normal requirements. Rava responded to Abnusson's Kasha, Yasvuntran. You should read the mission that they will take, as a gift, not as Irkha. And therefore the mission could fit even according to the Rava. A papa asked Abai, "Why do I have any to say that, since the Halacha have been different and is difficult for another reason? How could a father give over his assets to future children?" Even according to a mayor that a person could be Malcolm Dvishla Abul-Ailam, that's only Lidavar, Shayashna Abul-Ailam. But everybody agrees you can't give Lidavishna Abul-Ailam. Rather we have to say that it's Atenai Besdan, and therefore it works beyond the normal restrictions. So maybe for the same reason, you could redistribute Irusho even according to the Rava. Abai said that this wouldn't answer Abnusson's Kasha, because Rava didn't have to use the word Yarsun, which means "inherent". And this indicates that he agrees Vibhir Khanumbreka. Third Seghannadath, writing away all one's possessions to his wife, is merely making her an Apotropis. Shmaul says, "Achaysef Kondhoshas of Leishtai, Leya Sa'ala Apotropa". We assume that a person is not likely to leave his children with nothing. And obviously he wants to appoint his wife as an Apotropis, so the children will respect her. Think Marr brings other cases. But now Ha'gaudel, obviously he made him not Patropis, because the brothers have already made their eyes to honor their oldest brother. Think Marr asks, "What about the youngest son?" Shmaul says it applies even to youngest son lying in a crib. In a case of an outsider, obviously it's a real gift, because he doesn't care if they honor him. The same applies to someone who wrote his estate is Arusa or Grusha. Since he has no reason to honor these women, therefore obviously he meant the Matana. Think Marr discusses other cases. This is the first time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?" The second time Marr asks, "Is there any reason for her?"
131