Zichru4Life
Bava Basra Daf 132
The first segue of the daff, one who wrote all his property to his wife, and then the husband's malve came to collect it. The brice says that if one writes all his properties to his wife, and then someone produced the shtardhav against the husband's property, Abiliazu says, she rips of the matana and she stands on the kzuba, meaning she didn't lose her shiba on the land from the kzuba, and if she could still collect it. The hums say, she rips of the kzuba and she stands on the gift, and since the death precedes the gift, she doesn't get anything. When he was sitting in the daff, someone heard his son died in the denisiam and wrote away his possessions and his son returned. If Nachim pass like the hums shtardhav above, that a woman who has given all her husbands nachassim, gives up her sclas on the kzuba. The gammar asked, does this mean that Abnachim doesn't follow undina? But a brice says that if a person's son travels to the denisiam, and his father heard that he died, and wrote all his estate to others, and then his son came back, Tanakama says the gift is good. If Shema Manasi says, it's not good, because if he would have known that his son would come back, he wouldn't have written it, and if Nachim pass like Shema Manasi, because he follows undina. The gammar asked that in the first case, the undina is different. She would rather that a girl should go out, that her husband wrote these properties to her, demonstrating that he trusts to respect her. Third Sughindadah, a wife relinquishing her husband's shibud, where the husband wrote his properties to his sons. The misha says that a person wrote his properties to his sons, and he wrote to his wife a karka kushu. She loses a kzuba shibud on the property that was given to her sons. That Miram gives Threep shut him, in what the case is. Either he was Mizaka to them through her, or he gave it to them in front of her and she wasn't Miram. Or he said, "Take this land for your kzuba," and she wasn't Miram. But all these explanations are disproven from the saver, where Abiyasi says, if she was McCabell on herself, even if he didn't actually write it, she forfeits the shibud. This proves that Tenacama requires both Siva and Kabbalah. We have Nachim pass like Abiyasi, that either is enough, because since he made her a partner amongst the sons by giving her the property, she forfeits the kzuba shibud. The first Sugya Nadaaf, one who wrote all his property to his wife, and then the husband's malva came to collect it. Second Sugya, someone who heard his son died in Medina-siam, and wrote away all his possessions, and his son returned. Third Sugya, a wife relinquishing her husband's shibud, when the husband writes his property to his sons. The simphabaslaf kzuba is a club. After the wife ripped up, her husband's gift to her, of his estate, to keep the family clubhouse from his belchive, and the husband saw that the son that he thought had died, returned alive. After he gave away his estate to others, he decided to just transfer the clubhouse to his son, since he was confident his wife would surely say it's okay. Club reminds of daf kzuba baiz. The wife ripped up her husband's gift to her, of his estate, to keep the clubhouse from the belchive. Reminds of the first Sugya Nadaaf, one who wrote all his property to his wife, and then the husband's malva came to collect it. The husband saw that his son came back alive, after he had given his estate to others. Reminds of the second Sugya Nadaaf, someone who heard his son died in Tennessee Am, and wrote away his possessions and his son came back. He decided to transfer the clubhouse to his son, because he was confident that his wife would surely say it's okay. Reminds of the third Sugya Nadaaf, a wife relinquishing her shibud, where the husband wrote his properties to his sons.
132