Zichru4Life
Bava Basra Daf 133
"There is no other way to go." First, so you can adapt one who wrote all this property to someone without specifying if it's Iruscher and Matana. If Una said if Ishmael wrote all this property to someone, but didn't specify it was given as Iruscher and Matana, we examine his relationship. If he's royal, Yarsha'i, he takes it in Meersha. If not, he takes it in Meersha, Matana. If Una holds like a bear in a braika, that a person can redistribute his inheritance, and he means to use whichever method is effective. Think of how to ask what's the difference between two options. If someone says if the first one was royal Yarsha'i, then the second one doesn't get, because since it's Iruscher, Yarsha'i and Lahefsek. The second is in the Daf, that it's improper to write away one's Iruscher, and if his sons are not Naikishura. The Mishah says that Kaysid isn't a class of Lahein, the Inyak has been of Mashas'a'as'a'al-suy, but Ayn Ruhrkhamnehremeno. Third is in the Daf, Yaisab and Yazir took away the Iruscher from Yazir, who sold a jewel he found to Hekdish for less than its value. Yaisab and Yazir who had a son who was not acting properly, was Magdish a purse of Goldinarim, so a son shouldn't be Irish. The son married the daughter of King Yane's crown maker, and when his wife had a child, he bought her a fish. He found the jewel inside, and his wife warned him not to sell to the king, because he wouldn't get a good price. Instead, he should sell to Hekdish and let them appraise it. They assessed it at 13 purses of Goldinarim, but told him the treasury only had seven. He said to give him seven, and donated the remaining value to Hekdish. They wrote, "Yaisab and Yazir Hekness, Arras, Ubinar Heknesshaish." In another Loshan, they said, "And his son took out seven." The Gomorb would arrive in the first Loshan, which praises what the son did, that obviously the father acted properly, by taking away the Iruscher, but the Gomorb says the second Loshan indicates the opposite, that the father did not act properly, and now caused the son not to act properly, and empty out the treasury of Hekdish. Zhurfalaqabaaslafqflamigimal. The first one in the Daf, one who wrote all his property to someone without specifying if it's Iruscher Matana. And soya, it's not proper to right away one's Iruscher, and if his sons are not Naikishura. Third soya, Yaisab and Yazir took away the Iruscher from his son, who sold a jewel he found to Hekdish for less than its value. The simphabaslafqflamigimal are clogs. When the Shrivmera gave away his entire estate, including his diamond-studded clogs, to a non-relative, without specifying if it was a gift to Iruscher, taking away the Iruscher from his son, who is not Naikishura, his son learned his lesson, and when he found a different peer of diamond-studded clogs inside a fish, he sold them to Hekdish at a great price. Clogs reminds them of the Shrivmera gave it away without specifying if it's a gift to Iruscher, reminds the first soya in the Daf, one who wrote all his property to someone without specifying if it's Iruscher Matana. He took away the Iruscher from his son, who is not Naikishura, reminds of the second soya in the Daf. It's improper to right away one's Iruscher, and if his sons are not Naikishura, his son sold a different peer to Hekdish at a great price, reminds of the third soya in the Daf, the Asa took away the Iruscher from his son, who sold a jewel he found to Hekdish for less than its value.
133