UK Column Radio

UK Column News Podcast 6th November 2024

Mike Robinson, Vanessa Beeley and Charles Malet with today's UK Column News. If you would like to support our independent journalism, please join the community: https://community.ukcolumn.org/ Sources: www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-6th-november-2024

Duration:: 1h 2m
Broadcast on:: 06 Nov 2024
Audio Format:: other

At Sprouts Farmers Market, we're all about fresh, healthy, and delicious. That's why you'll find the season's best local and organic produce, hand-picked, and waiting for you in the center of our store. Visit your neighborhood Sprouts Farmers Market today, where fresh produce is always in season. Good afternoon. It's Wednesday, the 6th of November, 2024. Just after one o'clock, welcome to UK column news. I'm your host Mike Robinson. Joining me today, we have Vanessa Bealy and Charles Mallet. Welcome to the program both. We are going to get straight on, of course, with the United States election. So let's have a look and see. This is the result just before we came on air. 279 Electoral College votes to Donald Trump. 223 Kamala Harris. Everybody will know by now that Trump is going to be the next president, unless they assassinated him before the inauguration. But the question is, will it make any difference? And the answer to that is probably not. Well, in some respects, perhaps, but only in the matter by way of nuance. So Trump gave his victory speech. He said, "This is the greatest political movement of all time. No ego in that at all. This is, of course, talking about his Nuremberg rally, and it really was coming across us as exactly that type of thing." A couple of days ago, Nigel Farage, we should say, of course, is over there because he enjoys Trump's company and being an MP. That's the best place to serve his constituents. But he was speaking to Tucker Carson a couple of days ago. Let's have a quick listen to this. Tell us, I mean, is it an overstatement to say that the rest of the world is watching this really, really carefully? Oh, you bet your life. I mean, this is big. You think it's just about America? No, it's much bigger than that. It's about leadership of the Western world. It's about what signal gets sent to dictators all over the world who are launching wars, causing problems, whether we talk Middle East, whether we talk Ukraine, whether we talk potentially what might happen with China, Taiwan, et cetera. This is, I tell you something, this is a very, very important moment. I mean, just think in the last four years, what has happened around the world? Well, this is a very important moment. But what we get there is a hint about foreign policy because, of course, for us, and Trump have discussed this. I just want to show you again a bit of video that we showed you in June, I think it was, with JD Vance talking about foreign policy. You may say, well, okay, he was on the vice presidential candidate at the time, and he's now going to be vice president. But what does he know? Well, in fact, of course, he's just reiterating policy that the Trump had expressed while he was in those previous presidency. So let's just have a listen to this. We are subsidizing the Europeans to do nothing. The Europeans are not carrying their fair share of the burden, especially when it comes in provision of weapons and their own and their deindustrializing their own country at the same time that they say that Putin must be defeated at all costs. But I actually think that Washington, at least current Washington leadership, really likes the fact that the Europeans are completely dependent on us. That's not an alliance. These people aren't increasingly allies. They are client states of the United States of America who do whatever we want them to do. Well, I think we have a real opportunity to ensure that Israel is an ally in the true sense that it's going to pursue their interests. And sometimes those interests won't totally overlap with the United States. And that's totally reasonable, but they are fundamentally self-sufficient. And I think the way that we get there in Israel is actually by combining the Abraham Accord's approach with the defeat of Hamas that gets us to a place where Israel and the Sunni nations can play a regional counterweight to Iran. Again, we don't want a broader regional war. We don't want to get involved in a broader regional war. The best way to do that is to ensure that Israel with the Sunni nations can actually police their own region of the world. And that allows us to spend less time and less resources on the Middle East and focus more on East Asia. In the same way that we want our own allies to do the job in Europe so that we can focus on East Asia, I think that the same is true of the Sunni nations in Israel and the Middle East. We want to focus more on East Asia. So you'll notice that we qualified we don't want a broader regional war in the Middle East. No, we qualified that by then saying we don't want to get involved in a broader regional war in the Middle East. Absolutely want a broader regional war in the Middle East. So so let's just consider Trump's foreign policy and what we're likely to see here. The first question is, this has been a bit of a talking point. Is the US going to leave NATO? Now, of course, if we go back to 2018, Trump was busy telling the Europeans that they weren't stumping up enough cash at that time, that NATO wasn't fit for purpose and so on. And this threat is there in order to drive the sort of drive the Europeans over the sort of hump for European defense union. This has been something that he's been working towards since he became the president in his first term. So the threat of the US leaving NATO or NATO breaking up is definitely going to be used with to force the Europeans to spend more on defense. Is he going to end war in Ukraine? Of course, he said he is. But no, in fact, as we've just heard from Vance, what he actually wants is for the Europeans to take over that conflict and make sure that they keep supporting Zelensky and Ukraine there. Is he going to end the war in the Middle East? No, because if you listen carefully to what he says, in fact, he says, we want to see the war ended in the Middle East as soon as possible. In other words, Netanyahu get on with it. And then we see that Netanyahu and Israel will be the counter to Iran in the Middle East and the US not having to get directly involved in that. That's what their foreign policy seems to be. And then the question is, will they be starting a war with China? And I think the answer to that is yes. And that has been their plan for quite a long time. Charles, let me welcome you to the program. Any brief thoughts on that? And where do you see this issue with China going? Thanks, Mike. Good afternoon. Good afternoon, Vanessa. Good afternoon at all. Yes. I think this is exactly where I'm sort of going with this segment and indeed the better, especially following the recent bricks meeting that there is inevitably a focus on what the relationship between the United States and China is going to be and indeed what governs that and how we should be thinking about it. And of course, referring to your points of, you know, really, will there be any difference with a Trump, as opposed to a Harris presidency, there are a number of things to consider. But something I picked up from search on a morning post yesterday is an article about Kurt Tong, who served as the US Consul General to Hong Kong 2016 to 2019, quoted here as describing either Harris or Trump as being like poison for Beijing. Speaking of an event organized by the American Chamber of Commerce, he said in answer to the question, which candidate would Beijing prefer to win? He said, which poison does Beijing prefer? They would want George Bush to win the election, right? Oh, and he's not running. So it's really on the one hand, on the other hand, type of thing. Now, he goes on to talk about the trade tariffs and how there might be differences between the Trump and Harris line on trade, but probably not so much with Taiwan. But going back to what you've just been talking about, Mike, I think something that we shouldn't underestimate, and especially given the role of J.D. Vance in all this is the trade relationship with China and Israel. And we see here that China exports over $14 billion worth of goods to Israel every year, putting them 42nd out of the 211 countries that they export to. And very significantly, Israel exports $5.53 billion worth of goods back to China, which ranks them as second in their trading partners, $1.95 billion in relation to integrated circuits. So it seems very hard to see how actually the United States be taking the lead on the relationship between them and China, specifically with regard to this decree that they ought to become a proper ally. So it looks like Israel really will be deciding or at least calling the shots in that relationship. And then another thing I think that concerns very much, China, but also many other parts of the world, is the National Endowment for Democracy started in 1983 by Ronald Reagan. And I thought it'd be worth going back to 83 to listen to what Reagan said specifically about the establishment of this organization. National Endowment for Democracy, a private nonprofit corporation funded by the Congress, will be the centerpiece of this effort. All Americans can be proud of this initiative and the congressional action which made it possible by engaging the energies of our major political parties, of labor, business, and other groups, such as the academic community, the forces of democracy will be strengthened wherever they may be. They'll have a caring group of Americans to go to, to get assistance from, advice, and cooperation. This program will not be hidden in shadows. It'll stand proudly in the spotlight and that's where it belongs. We can and should be proud of our message of democracy. Democracy is respect individual liberties and human rights. They respect freedom of expression, political participation, and peaceful cooperation. Governments would serve their citizens in courage, spiritual and economic vitality, and we will not be shy in offering this message of hope. Through the National Endowment, the private sector will promote exchanges between the American people and democratic groups abroad. It'll stimulate participation in democratic training programs and institution building overseas. The endowment will work closely with those abroad who seek to chart a democratic course. And all this work will be sensitive to the needs of individual groups and institutions. And of course, it will be consistent with our own national interests. We could probably spend an entire news program picking apart what Reagan said that, but I think the point, one of the significant points to draw out is of course, focus on the private side of it, the private enterprise, despite the fact that state funded, it is in fact a private body making these decisions, these overtures. And of course, the other interesting or important point is to consider what China thinks of all this. And we look at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and they say what is it and what it does, and they do not mince their words. The National Endowment for Democracy acts as the US government's white gloves. It is long engaged in subverting state power in other countries, meddling in other countries, internal affairs, inciting division and confrontation, misleading public opinion, and conducting ideological infiltration, all under the pretext of promoting democracy. It's innumerable evil deeds, of course, grave harm and drawn strong condemnation from the international community. So it's quite clear what China think about that. The question is, how much control will Trump have over this organization? And indeed, specifically with regard to Hong Kong, of course, another significant trading partner of Israel, they say that they've long been colluding with those who attempt to destabilize Hong Kong by providing funds and public support. And it goes on to talk about 310,000 US dollars provided to deal with such projects in the year 2020. Now, of course, the NED is not merely concerned with China and or Hong Kong, but also of in recent years has interests in the United Kingdom as described here by declassified UK, who wrote back in 2022 about money that's gone to what they describe as investigative groups, such as Bellingcat, finance uncovered, an open democracy, as well as media freedom and training organizations, index on censorship, article 19, the legal, sorry, the media legal defense initiative and the Thompson Reuters foundation. So I've highlighted media freedom and training organizations, because of course, those of you listening to UK column regularly, that will ring a bell in relation to the BBC media action. But I think the point really here is that there is certainly the opportunity for Trump to provide a lot of rhetoric about the relationship with China. But the question is how much of a grip will he really have on determining what the future relationships in the United States and China is going to be? None at all. In my opinion, and really, at the end of the day, the policy will be just pretty much the same as we would have had under Harris. But anyway, let's welcome Vanessa, the program. Vanessa, welcome and bring us up to date on what's been going on in Lebanon. Yeah, we'll cover some of the more pertinent news items we can discuss further in extra. But this, first of all, is in the Financial Times, or the Israeli demolitions clearing Israel's first belt, as they call it in Lebanon. So let's have a look at what that means. This was the map produced by FTE showing the villages within a three kilometer kind of buffer zone that Israel is claiming it's trying to create. This could well be a sort of a safe, face-saving exercise as they've failed entirely to actually invade very far into this area at all, despite throwing thousands of troops at it and facing, on average, 7 to 8 Hezbollah fighters within each village. However, what they have been doing is basically demolishing vast areas of the villages along this belt. And the next sort of infrograph shows that one of the worst hits is a village called Mahabib, which is on a hilltop, a historic village. And we actually have a video of the detonation of, what is it, 69% of this whole village. And in this way, basically, Israel has destroyed vast swathes of habitation and farmland in this particular three kilometer belt, but also deeper into Lebanon, as we'll talk about. This also from the FTE, while Israeli officials repeat that their war is with Hezbollah and not with the Lebanese people, experts question Israel's systematic attempt to clear the area. Alonzo Geremendi Dunkelberg, an expert on international law at the London School of Economics, disputed Israel's notion that these villages are valid military targets, saying that the existence of Hezbollah infrastructure in a civilian area is not enough to justify its controlled demolition, even if the assets could be used against Israel in the future. And again, I have to remind everybody that the military installations in the center of Tel Aviv, which of course is a bustling residential city, that is never called out in any media reports. This was back in October 2022, domicide must be recognized as an international crime, because it is the destruction, not only of people's homes, but their entire sustenance, their entire way of life. And then in addition to this, this was Afshan Ratanzi on X, Israel is threatening to bomb Baalbek in Lebanon and has ordered the evacuation of the entire historic city. I can't remember the population, but it's thousands, which has a history of at least 11,000 years. The city has been declared a UNESCO World Heritage Site. It's famous temple of Jupiter and temple of Bacchus, now faced destruction by Israel with US, UK, EU weaponry. Israel's action Mira Isis, of course, which destroyed the ancient city of Palmyra in Syria, Isis, of course, sponsored by Israel to carry out regime change in Syria. This cultural genocide and attack on history brought to you by the same nations that claim they are civilized, very good point from Afshan. And then let's have a look at Al Akbar, English, Lebanese media on Telegram, barbarians in Palestine and Lebanon, Israel as an enemy of civilization. Remember Netanyahu was constantly claiming they are fighting the war against the barbarians. On the eve of the 2006 warfare was performed on Baalbek's Roman steps for the Baalbek International Festivals Golden Jubilee. Just a day later, war broke out and Baalbek's centuries old site fell silent. 18 years later, Israel once again targets the ancient symbols of heritage with bombs striking as close as 500 meters from the temple of Jupiter. The city of Baalbek, a UNESCO World Heritage Site, represents 9,000 years of human history. It's grand structures reflecting the legacy of Phoenician and Roman cultures. And we have to remember this is the eradication of a heritage, of a culture, of a history, just as the US did, of course, to the indigenous peoples in America. And as was done to the indigenous peoples in Australia, etc. This is what the civilized countries do to the so-called uncivilized countries. Now let's have a look at the justification for this. So of course, this was back in March 2024 on the right, the times of Israel, Lebanese media reports. Israeli strikes in Baalbek hours after Hezbollah drone attack. And it goes on to say, this is a Hezbollah stronghold. And then today, or in the last few days, this was CBC, Israeli strikes threatened a Hezbollah stronghold. And secondary, it's nearly 3,000 year old Roman ruins, of course, much older than that. But if we look at the Hague Convention, of course, on cultural heritage and armed conflicts, any damage to cultural property, irrespective of the people it belongs to, is a damage to the cultural heritage of humanity, because every people constitutes the world's culture. That's the Hague Convention. So again, another convention that Israel is basically violating. And then in the same area, the Lebanese health ministry announced that Timnean governmental hospital sustained severe damage from Israeli airstrikes in its vicinity, prompting an ongoing assessment of the hospital's condition to determine whether it can remain open with the safety of its staff as the top priority. Additionally, Baalbek governmental hospital, which is overcrowded with patients and the injured, also suffered material damage from nearby strikes. Furthermore, Israeli forces targeted the Islamic health authority, the civil defence in Basurier, south Lebanon, resulting in the martyrdom of two paramedics. The ministry held Israel fully responsible for these breaches of international and humanitarian laws, and expressed astonishment at the international community's silence towards such a humanitarian violation, which makes essential medical care a dangerous task. So there's now, I think, eight hospitals in southern Lebanon and across Lebanon that are basically non-operational. The Baalbek hospital is still operating despite having been given orders to evacuate by Israel. This was a series of tweets put out by Halajaba, who was a former Sunday Times correspondent, very an expert, really, on the Middle East, has written books about Iraq and Hezbollah. So people will remember that we talked about the US embassy in Lebanon, which is effectively when you look at the photo and military base. There has always been questions and raised brows as to why Washington needs to build a mammoth embassy, sprawling over a 43 acre site at an estimated cost of 1 billion US dollars in this tiny country of only 10,452 square kilometers in size. The complex located in the suburbs of Ocoa is about 13 kilometers, eight miles from the centre of Beirut. It's almost two and a half times the size of the land of the White House, the land the White House sits on, and more than 21 soccer fields. It is the second largest embassy in the world after at Iraq. And then let's see what the US has been up to. So bear in mind, Israel is destroying hospitals in Lebanon, just as it did in Gaza previously. In Baalbek itself, in one day, more than 100 civilians were killed. But this is what the US embassy is doing to help the situation. They have turned into Lebanon's dictator and is now imposing restrictions on certain flights bringing humanitarian aid to the country, forcing them to first land in Jordan for inspection, which means of course by Israel. The embassy in Ocoa has also threatened Lebanon's national carrier MEA Middle East Airlines with sanctions. Should it transport injured people for treatment abroad? So not only are hospitals being bombed and civilians being targeted, but now they are being prevented medical evacuation. Sorry, can I just go back for one second, Mike? The embassy is also receiving a daily manifesto from IATA of the names of all passengers travelling to and from Lebanon's airport as part of its blatant intrusion in the country's internal affairs and free movement. And then lastly, she says, "Washington virus embassy in Lebanon on behalf of Israel has already blocked Iraqi airlines from landing in Beirut's international airport to deliver much-needed assistance for the hundreds of thousands of displaced people without first stopping and Jordan for inspection." Ocoa also forced Middle East Airlines to comply with its borders, not to transport injured people from Lebanon on its flights for treatment abroad, especially those injured in the pager until the communications bombings on the 16th and 17th of September by threatening to impose sanctions. Should it disobey? So extraordinary interference in Lebanon's affairs by the US again on behalf of Israel, utterly criminal. Thank you, Vanessa. Undoubtedly, we'll talk more about this in extra. Now, if you like what the UK column does, we do need your support. Please head to support.ukcolumn.org. There's a page there that shows the options. You could make a financial donation. You could join as a member and there are various membership options there. You could pick something up at the UK column shop. And if you buy something from Clive2Carlo.com, we do get a small commission for each referral that we send on. These all help us to keep going, and we do want to keep going, so please support us if you can. But of course, if you can't support us financially or even if you can, share material as widely as you possibly can, because we need your help to overcome the censorship regime. The share links are on the various videos and articles we have. You can also click on the link for comments, if you wish. Now, tomorrow at 1 p.m., we are putting out a brief discussion that I had with Jose Vega, and then showing a presentation given by Dr. Mark Palmetto, sorry, Palmetto at over the weekend in New York. Now, he has been working in Gaza for a number of weeks and was giving a presentation, or he was going to give a presentation about his experience there, about the types of injuries that he was saying, about the types of people that were being injured, and the types of conditions that he's having to operate under, was having to operate under. Now, that was to take place in the, sorry, I've lost it, yeah, sorry, the Ican school of medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, and it was immediately canceled following pressure from the Israeli lobby that claimed anti-Semitism and so on. So Jose Vega arranged another venue for this event, and it took place. We're going to show this tomorrow, and this, we're showing it, especially for all the people who criticize our position on Gaza and criticize us for taking an anti-Israel point of view. I'm going to warn everybody now that Palmetto does not attempt to hide the reality of what he's had to deal with on the ground in Gaza, and the imagery that he shows as part of this presentation is hard to view, but I absolutely encourage everybody to stick with it and watch this to the end, because we do not get any kind of real indication about what's going on there from the mainstream press, and unless you're particularly interested to go and look at some of the images that appear on social media, you don't really understand what is going on. So the images that he shows are perhaps could be described as being challenging at the very least. I'm therefore going to challenge everyone to watch this in full. As I say, you're not going to see that on the mainstream media, and it is going to be a hard watch, but please do watch it and encourage everybody else to watch it if they can. Quick reminder that the interview that Brian did with Rachel speaking from New Zealand about what she experienced during COVID is on the UK called a website now, if you didn't see it yesterday, go and have a look. I'd like to mention this petition entitled "ensure diagnosis and treatment for people suffering from adverse COVID-19 vaccine side effects." This is on the Welsh government petition website. This is a lady called Alison from Carephilly who has had a diagnosis of COVID vaccine injuries. She needs help obtaining signatures. Please do share this and sign it yourself if you possibly can. Also want to mention Alexander Bittner. This is a serving German military sergeant, I believe, who has just been put in prison for six months for refusing to serve on the basis that he would not take a COVID-19 vaccine. The details will be in the show notes if you want to go and sign the open letter, which is demanding his release. This is very briefly, if you're in any way interested in the US election, Doc Malick is holding a special podcast tonight. Get along to that if you would like to have a look at it. Okay, now let's move on to climate change and, of course, the events that we saw recently in Valencia have been blamed on climate change, the pretty horrific video footage that we've seen supposedly 217 dead so far. I've seen some very disparate estimates about people that are missing and I think this is because the mainstream media seems to be splitting up the coverage now to make it sort of regional. So I've seen numbers, anything from 89 people missing to around 2000 people still missing on this. I don't know what the truth of that is, but nonetheless, people still missing. Now, we should actually recognize that if we look at what has been going on in Valencia over the years, there have been major floods there for hundreds of years and certainly since the city was founded. So if we do a quick translation on this, the first great flood in the history of Valencia was in 1517. It knocked down three bridges out of five and there were hundreds of dead. So this isn't something that has just suddenly started happening. This is something that's been going on for centuries and the question is whether this has got anything to do with the climate change narrative. And of course, I would argue that it hasn't. The last major flood was in 1957 and well, that also carried or caused significant numbers of deaths. But the point here is that in the most in the recent years, the flood defenses have been systematically removed in many cases in this area. So why has that happened because of the EU Water Framework Directive? So if we have a look at this article here from the headline Successes of EU Water Framework Directive Implementation, this is in fact talking about they were focusing on a whole bunch of different countries, Spain, France, Belgium, the United Kingdom. But in this case, they were talking about the diversion of the main river there in order to save the wildlife. And in fact, if we should put this in the context of this article from El Español as well, which is saying that the Roman dam that prevented the floods from destroying everything 2000 years later, it's still working. So the point here is that actually, what seems to have happened is that the modern flood defenses have not coped with this latest flood that the 2000 year old dam built by the Romans did cope with the recent flood and certainly helped in the area that it is in. But these people died mainly as a result, not of climate change, because as we say, these things have been going on for many, many centuries. But as a result of policy and the decision by governments to remove flood mitigation and to in fact make the river more suitable for a return to the wildlife that they perceive to be necessary under their climate change narrative. But don't worry, if this is causing you mental anguish and mental health problems, the government is coming to the rescue in the UK here and the UK health security agency has decided to launch a call for evidence on mental health and climate change in the UK. And well, they're saying that they're going to investigate the pathways between climate change and mental health impacts in relation to the UK. We're going to identify populations most at risk from the mental health impacts of climate change. And they're going to investigate the evidence for mental health interventions and adaptations in relation to climate change, both within the UK and applicable for the UK. So that's very good, isn't it? But the question is, what are they actually doing here? And I would suggest that perhaps what they're doing is looking to see what kind of effect climate change narratives that are being pushed out by mainstream press and also by the government and so on. What effects are these having on populations? Because if we remember back to COVID-19 and despite the subgroup of SAGE, they were looking at options for increasing adherence to social distancing measures. This is from the 22nd of March 2020. These are the minutes of the meeting. And they were talking about at that time, if you remember, the use of the media to increase the sense of personal threat. And if you look under the heading effectiveness there, it says it's high if accompanied by other options. But when we look at what they say is spillover effects, we might call them side effects, those could be negative. So what is actually going on here? Well, I suspect what is happening is that the UK HSA is in fact looking to see if they're heading the spot with the climate change narrative or whether they're going a bit too far and pushing people over the edge. How many people are they pushing over the edge as a result of it? And this is really about measuring how successful their applied psychology is in this area just as they were doing with COVID-19. We can talk a bit more about that in extra as well. But let's come back to you then, Vanessa. And well, is Israel having it all their own way? Not really, no. I mean, what I am saying is an absolute increase in the censorship of people that are legitimately speaking out against genocide. And of course, we've been talking about that with the anti-terrorist law in the UK and how it's effectively being abused to punish, collectively punish people who are protesting genocide. But now you have Francesca Albanese who wanted to go to Canada and to meet politicians. And the Israel lobby, this is from the blog of Dmitri Laskaris, a lawyer and journalist. And let's see what she's saying that is upsetting them so much. Basically, the center for Israel and Jewish affairs are demanding that she's banned from the country and stripped of her diplomatic immunity. Of course, she's the special rapporteur for the situation of human rights in Palestinian territories. So she provides more documentation in her most recent report to the UN to support the claim, the accusation of genocide in Gaza is not just plausible, but all too real and part of a long term Israeli plan to displace the Palestinians. She also warns that Israeli actions now extend beyond Gaza. And there is a risk of the genocide extending in the West Bank and Jerusalem. And of course, we're seeing in Lebanon also. And she says the violence that Israel has unleashed against the Palestinians is part of a long term intentional, systematic, state-organized, false displacement and replacement of the Palestinians. This trajectory risks causing irreparable prejudice to the very existence of the Palestinian people in Palestine. And this she said on the 1st of October 2024. And of course, she's calling for sanctions on Israel. She's calling for all sorts of solutions. I do recommend people actually watch her press conference, which she handled masterfully. But it's not only Francesca Albanese, following as a Belgian workies, workers parties, sorry, MP Nabil Mokili, speaking to the Israeli ambassador, Edet Rosenvike at the Belgian parliament in the last few days. [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH] [SPEAKING SPANISH]