UK Column Radio

UK Column News Podcast 11th November 2024

Brian Gerrish, Ben Rubin, and Prof. Diane Rasmussen McAdie with today's UK Column News. If you would like to support our independent journalism, please join the community: https://community.ukcolumn.org/ Sources: www.ukcolumn.org/video/uk-column-news-11th-november-2024

Duration:: 1h 3m
Broadcast on:: 11 Nov 2024
Audio Format:: other

At Sprouts Farmers Market, we're all about fresh, healthy, and delicious. That's why you'll find the season's best organic produce hand-picked and waiting for you in the center of our store. We bring in local farm-fresh fruits and veggies bursting with flavor. Come on in to discover everyday favorites like juicy berries and crisp greens, but also unique peak season varieties like moon drop or cotton candy grapes. Visit your neighborhood Sprouts Farmers Market today where fresh produce is always in season. Good afternoon. Today's Monday, the 11th of November, 2024, just after 1 o'clock. Welcome to UK Column News. I'm your host Brian Girish, delighted to have with me today. Diane Rasmussen-McCaddy will be speaking from Scotland. And Ben Rubin, who will be with us from London. Well, if you can see the backdrop, certainly over Plymouth Sound, it looks as though the storm clouds are gathering. And I think that's not a bad theme for today's news, but let's start off with Remembrance Sunday. And I just wanted to reflect on the fact that, of course, across the country and many very small villages, people were paying their respects to Britain's war debt. Let's just have a look at this image. Well, we've got road clothes, surprisingly, in order to allow a little remembrance ceremony to take place. But essentially, what was happening were people were paying their respects at the war memorial. This is in a relatively small little village. And let's just have a look at a very short video clip to see how that was going. [MUSIC] So there we are, very poignant, but I think it reflects a great deal of the nation still in UK in 2024. Those people coming out to pay their respects. But I'm going to suggest to our audience today that behind the scenes they and we are being utterly betrayed. And we're digging deeper, and the best place to go to get an impression of this is to have a look at what was happening with the main service in London. Let's look at this film clip. [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] So there we are, an excerpt of course from what actually took place. But are we to trust the people who were present? Well, let's focus in on a little bit of that video clip, because in one shot, there were some really key people. And let's just have a look at these people and see what they've really been doing for the country. So Kia Starm here, of course, has said he places Davos above Westminster. He's putting Zionist Israel above the UK. And of course, he's desperate, desperate to keep the war going in Ukraine. So Shia hypocrisy to be there at this remembrance of the dead. Let's bring in another one. Well, we've got David Cameron, certainly placing Zionist Israel above his own nation of the UK. And we've got Gordon Brown here, of course, placed the EU above the UK and then sold off the nation's gold for pennies. We've got Tony Blair, who, above all, prosecuted a war on the live weapons and mass destruction. And he's continuing to ferment war with his attitude on Ukraine, not one, of course, the Middle East. On his left here, I think we've got John Major, who certainly placed the EU above the UK, but also supported the war in the Gulf. And then, of course, we've got King Charles, who simply believes that the policies of the global elite via the World Economic Forum and the sustainable development goals hold priority over anything he's doing for the nation. And, of course, he is another one, absolutely on board for war and more war in Ukraine. And if you think I've missed him, I haven't, because top left, we've got Boris Johnson, political activist, as he was, nobody knows what exactly his official position was, as he fermented the war in Ukraine, and has consistently worked to continue that violence going. So I'm going to say, as those people in the local villages paid their respects, what was really happening at a national level was sheer hypocrisy by a globalist elite who simply don't care about the dead and violent speed in Ukraine, or the Middle East, or elsewhere. Hypocrisy is the word for me, and I'm very happy to say it to our audience today. I'll just say that if you'd like to understand more about your king, King Charles, the green king, and what he's really up to, have a look at no smoke without fire, the green king on the UK column website. And I'm sure many of you will learn a great deal about what this man is really trying to do, and it's certainly very clear that he's not trying to help people in his country of the United Kingdom. So can we trust the BBC? Well, of course, this is where it takes a very dark turn. This is just a selection of the BBC's headlines, but this is one of their, what I would regard as a gross image, because what are we looking at? Well, let's bring the headline up in a bit more detail, because apparently this is a festival of remembrance. Remember what this is about, remembering people who've been killed or mutilated in wars across the world, but apparently this is a festival. This is something to be enjoyed by the country, according to the BBC. And if we want to force that idea home, here is another one of their images, which is the glorious dead dead. So presumably, we are celebrating, we're making merry for those glorious dead. And of course, we can have a look at the text in the article that I've gone on screen at the moment, to see that it says that as the petals fall in the Royal Albert Hall, the festival will pay tribute to all victims of war. And remember those who made the ultimate sacrifice, and those who continue to risk their lives today. And I'll add in wars that these men and women are creating with the help of organisations such as the BBC. Well, here's a headline that really starts to ram this hope, this idea of perpetual war home, because the headline is that Starmer is joining Macron for Armistice Day events in Paris. But we've only got to look at the daily telegraph, and we've got a headline of Starmer plots to thwart Trump on Ukraine. But the secondary headline, the small one, is PM and EU leaders to hold talks on boosting weaponry ahead of a new administration. So the agenda is very much to keep the war going at all costs, and certainly not to allow Trump to be successful in calling for peace. This image shows the BBC sort of reframing tactics on the public, because we've got a demand for more defence spending in UK, we've got Europe's leaders featuring Zelensky himself apparently, and then we've got the festival for the dead at the bottom. I'll just end this segment by saying that if people are still unsure as to what the global agenda is followed by our King and Western leaders, then we've talked about these many times in the past, their climate, to give the fear and enable control of the nation's big farmer, fear and control of our bodies, money supply, which is total control of each and every individual, constitutional issues and justice, the nation and its institutions are to be destroyed. And of course, behavioral change is the key one controlling our minds, and especially the minds of our children. Well, if that's the backdrop to war, of course, we've got unrest and trouble brewing on the streets of UK and Europe, and let's focus in on what happened in the last few days in Amsterdam. It's a little video clip narrated by Dutch men themselves. Let's hear what they had to say. Where we've reconstructed how the visit of Maccabi-Hulgens plunged the city into chaos. The incident in Amsterdam fighting between Israeli football fans and Palestine Solidarity demonstrators. The city of Amsterdam was a very important part of the city's history, and the city of Amsterdam was a very important part of the city's history. The city of Amsterdam was a very important part of the city's history, and the city of Amsterdam was a very important part of the city. The city of Amsterdam was a very important part of the city's history. If you ask me, you could have seen this coming. Looking at the history of Maccabi Tel Aviv, you know that these supporters, these hulgens, that they are violent, Zionist, they attack leftists in Israel. So for the audience listening in, if you could understand the little bit of Dutch there, what he was essentially saying was that people were attacked, taxi drivers were attacked, their cars were damaged, and then he's talking about the Israeli fans starting to attack property, ripping down flags, and then attacking people on the street. He said it was okay, while they were simply chanting, but when they started to do this, we, as the Dutch residents of Amsterdam, had to take action. Ben, let's bring you in, because you've also been following this story, and you've got some report here from the Dutch police. Hello, yes, and I have been following it very, very closely, because this pops up over the weekend as people won't have failed to notice, and it's the latest example, and probably the most emphatic example that we've seen recently, where what's being reported to us in the media has been completely detached from the reality of events as reported on the ground. Now, we've just heard from some citizen reporters in that report that Brian just shared, but we've also got this little segment coming up now from the Amsterdam police. With a match, a large group of Maccabi fans gathered in Dam Square in central Amsterdam. Some arrests were made after trouble between the Israeli club's fans and pro-Palestine protesters, police said. Then, on their way to the match, some Maccabi fans were filmed singing racist and anti-Arab songs. They were also glorifying the death of children in Gaza, as I understand it, and to see this kind of behavior playing out, and then for the reaction against it to be presented as inappropriate, I think, is quite remarkable, actually. We've got another report here coming up from another citizen journalist who was actually on the streets of Amsterdam over the weekend. Maccabi hooligans were walking around in our city. They were armed, and they were attacking people from Amsterdam, mostly people that looked like Arabs or Muslims, or people that were wearing Palestinian symbols. And they were tearing down flags from Palestinian flags from houses. They were chanting, "Let the IDF win to the Arabs." And this is actually part of a longer chant. It also includes, there are no schools in Gaza because there are no children left. And these people, they brought banners with them. They brought stickers with them. One of the stickers I saw myself said, "We make war for fun, or we have war for fun." They were glorifying genocide. So, of course, people from Amsterdam, they got really angry. And actually, one of them ended up in the canal that was a counter attack, you could say. And there was actually a lot of police response, but it was mostly directed at the pro-Palestinian protesters. The media coverage of the Netherlands, it was, as far as I've seen, very one sided. Titles like a pogrom happening in Amsterdam, like people that were too hunting. So, yeah, this has been positioned as a pogrom. And actually, that was the word that really jumped out on me over the weekend. So, this is racialized violence. A pogrom is racialized violence. And the reason that this resonates so strongly with me in particular is because my ancestors came, some of my ancestors, I call to Jewish. They came to this country to the UK in the late 1800s after a pogrom. So, I'm obviously interested in what's happening here. And what we're being told about this just doesn't seem to stack up. And there's been quite a bit of commentary on it. Brian, I think you've got a video from UK journalist as well that we're going to take a look at. Yes, we have. And I think this is very significant because Owen Jones is not somebody that the UK column would normally align with on various subjects. But in this case, he did a really excellent piece of camera. This is only an excerpt. But what he's talking about is the behavior of the mainstream media in order to rewrite history of what took place on the streets. Let's have a look at this clip. Sky News, having been pushing comparisons with Kristallnacht on air, they actually did their job. They posted a video which accurately gave context. And do you know what they then did? They deleted it. Let's explore this further. But first, let me show you their original clip. Violence in Amsterdam left at least five people injured and dozens have been arrested. But what happened? Supporters of Israeli football club Machibee Tel Aviv arrived in Amsterdam ahead of their UEFA Europa League match against Amsterdam club Ajax. On Wednesday, social media videos verified by Sky News show Machibee Tel Aviv fans tearing down Palestinian flags from outside of homes. Other social media videos appeared to show residents chasing Machibee Tel Aviv fans. On Thursday, just before the game, crowds of Machibee fans were filmed singing racist and anti-Arab songs. While a pro-Palestinian demonstration had been banned by the mayor over fears there would be clashes. Later that evening during the match, Israeli supporters appeared to disrupt the minute silence for Valencia flood victims with chance, whistles and fireworks. Machibee fans were seen attacking locals as a police car can be seen driving by. People with Palestinian flags were seen marching on the streets. Machibee supporters say they were beaten and attacked on the streets of the Dutch capital, with videos showing some of the violence. Safely Palestinian we go. Good. Sky News could not independently verify all of the footage shown. Police arrested 62 people. Five were taken to hospital but have since been discharged. Israeli far-right ultras are notorious for their racism and physical violence. Dutch Israeli and British leaders denounced the attacks as anti-Semitic and even referred to it as a pogrom. But their statements failed to mention the assault by the Israeli hooligans against Dutch citizens. As they say, they then deleted this. Originally offering no explanation whatsoever, they then posted another video they called a re-edit, which wasn't a re-edit at all. Come on to that. Accompanied with a tweet reading, editors know this is a re-edit of a previous video which didn't meet Sky News standards for balancing impartiality. Aside from manipulation of the news, my key point here is what we are starting to see is people from all backgrounds, all agendas. Some we agree with and some we don't, seeing through the manipulation of the media in order to promote a common line over what the situation is in Israel or what it is in Ukraine. In this case, focusing on trouble with Israel and the Middle East. But he's spot on because basically the news was manipulated to give a formal agenda. It was nothing to do with the truth. And what's worse is that the mayor of Amsterdam then banned demonstrations. There was another demonstration forced in which people were really upset about what you've just seen on your screens. Look at how the Dutch police treated them. [MUSIC] [BLANK_AUDIO] [CROSSTALK] [CROSSTALK] [BLANK_AUDIO] So there we are horrific, but then you've got some more comments that were being made in the background which also show the sheer hypocrisy of the Western governments and political elite on this particular incident. This was what really caught my attention to be honest with you because I could see the videos coming out that we've just seen. So there's very clearly a lot of provocation going on, quite frankly, physical provocation, a lot of chanting, a lot of racist language. Apparently during the football match, there was a minute silence to pay respect for the people who lost their lives in the flooding in Valencia earlier on this month. And the Tel Aviv fans were singing through it. I mean, it's just blatantly disrespectful and ultimately going to ladder up into something like it did, right? It's almost like it was designed to set off a conflagration on the streets of Amsterdam. And something that jumped out of me was the fact that a couple of days before this, it was reported by the Jerusalem Post that just in case Mossad agents will be joining. That could be Tel Aviv FC trip to Amsterdam and Mossad's motto was, until very recently, by way of deception, they'll shall do war. So it does really make you wonder whether this is deliberate and if they're trying to destabilize Western Europe, right? Because that's certainly what's happening on the back of this. And also to draw attention away from what's going on in Israel and in the countries around Israel that it's currently in conflict with. Let's just have a little look at some of the coverage from the establishment, right? Because this is really what caught my attention. You've got get Wilders here who is the Dutch leader talking about epogram in the streets of Amsterdam. That is absolutely emphatic, right? We've become the guards of Europe, Muslims with Palestinian flags hunting down Jews, right? Look at the language here, it's incredibly emotive, right? I will not accept that. Never. Never again. He carried on. In fact, this was the same day he was having a face-to-face meeting with his dear friend, the speaker of the Knesset, Emma Al-Hanna in Amsterdam, right? So this is within 24 hours, he's having a sit-down meeting with one of the top political figures in the Israeli parliament. No more anti-Semitism and Jew hate is enough. Absolutely no context here, right? So we're not talking about the fans, we're just saying, no, this is a pogram, this is Jew hate, and even the king of the Netherlands was getting in on it. He's saying, we failed the Jews in World War II. Again, think about what we talked about earlier. We've just had Armistice Day yesterday. In fact, today, it's the 11th of the day. Apparently we failed the Jews in World War II. Last night we failed them again with the reaction that we saw. David Lamme, obviously getting into the mix. He's horrified by last night's anti-Semitic attacks on Israeli citizens in Amsterdam. My thoughts are with those injured, their families and everyone affected. I utterly condemn these abhorrent acts of violence and stand with the Israeli and Jewish people across the world. Again, no context, no accountability. Absolutely none of the information about what had actually happened. We've got the chief rabbis, Sir Ephraim Mervis getting in the act as well, making a statement. I won't read through all of these. Sarah Sackman, Casey, who is the solicitor general. She's one of the top lawyers in the country and an MP for Golders Green and a Labour politician talking about again the anti-Semitic attacks in Amsterdam, how appalling they were. Referencing this organization, CST, which is kind of like a parallel police type organization that's popped up in the UK, focused on hunting down examples of anti-Semitism. They're closely monitoring the situation. They're in contact with police. Then we've seen just never ending stream of Israeli and Jewish commentators on Twitter. I was basically talking about this in a completely one-sided way. I'm basically saying that Jewish people have civilised, other people are not civilised. There's been a suggestion that this is going to happen in London or Bradford or Leeds here from Dr. Philip Kisley. Maybe it's laddering up to something like that. I don't know. Actually, one of the things I'm really noticing is that this is being used to terrorise British Jews as much as anything else. There are people that are actually quite concerned about this, who have got nothing to do with what's going on on the ground. They aren't linked into Mossad or anything like that. They're just worried about seeing these things coming up and Jews being at the centre of this again. Obviously, all of this is an enormous distraction away from the ongoing violence in the Middle East. Actually, as that event was taking place, a bomb was dropped on Tyre in South Lebanon, killing civilians in their homes. Countless are still buried under the rubble. The Chief Rabbi David Lammy, Get Builders, and other people on Twitter are interested in talking about that. Thank you very much. We will be talking more about this in UK column Extra after the news. First of all, I'm welcome to the news today. If we're losing the truth, we're in a post-truth era. A library is going to be the good places to go to. Hello, Brian, and hello, Ben. Unfortunately, not. It looks like libraries are one of the most captured organizations in the West. I'm going to go into a story that I've been working on for the last couple of weeks. Starting with a book review that I did on a new book that's been published and endorsed by Oprah, and other major authors in the States. The book is called That Librarian, the fight against book banning in America by a librarian called Amanda Jones. The full review is available in the Scottish Union for Education sub-stack from last week if you'd like to read the full thing that will be in the show notes. Amanda Jones is a school librarian in small town Louisiana in the United States, and she provides library services for students from age approximately to 11 to 14, and she was previously an English teacher. What happened to Amanda was she basically raised a defamation lawsuit against some people who she said were accusing her of doing things like hate speech and so on, and all these things. There's a lot of back and forth around who said what, and who did what, look into that in a little bit of detail, but her haters apparently were the ones that she was trying to soothe. The case has been released by the judges four times denied saying that she had no defamation going on. We'll get into that a bit more as well. And essentially her book is just a large rant around how awful it was, how awful it is to be canceled and boy, I certainly know about that myself as a canceled librarian and academic. But of course, if you're not on the side of the organizations, then it really doesn't matter how you feel about your cancellation because nobody really cares to support you. But it seems apparently that hypocrisy is the theme of the day in today's news, Brian, or one of our themes because she talks a lot about inclusion and libraries and inclusion of all kinds of materials for children. But when it comes to the people who are on the side of her so-called haters, here's some quotes from her book, she said, quote, nobody was asking to interview them, except wackadoo outright bloggers. And did you know that you can send anonymous poop grams to people you don't like? I'm not saying I've ever done that, but I'm not not saying it either. So we'll see some examples of some screenshots that she includes in the book where she says, oh, I absolutely do not put sexual content in front of children at all. And these are from, for example, from the Citizens for New Louisiana who will hear from Warren just a minute. And all they're saying is simple posts like kids shouldn't be exposed to pornography, people who say otherwise shouldn't be allowed in your kids, I think that's a reasonable statement. But we also see examples from the books that she actually put into her book, giving instructions to teenage boys about what to do with female body parts to get them excited. I won't go any further into detail because I don't think it's appropriate. We also see as well. Here's some more examples of what citizens for New Louisiana and other groups in Louisiana were trying to do to alert the public to what's going on, including a photo of her giving a speech to her parish library in July of 2022, which is kind of when this all started for her citizens for New Louisiana has a lot of content on its website, a recent article, as we can see the next slide is some examples of what they're calling vulgar kids books. So you can read that in the show notes, and Michael Lumsford wrote that article. I was able to get in touch with Michael Lumsford last week. Again, he's one of the men who's been targeted by Amanda Jones through this defamation lawsuit. And I recorded an interview with him that was about an hour on Friday. I just have a short clip here and maybe in the future we'll put the entire video on somewhere on the UK column website, but here's just a short clip from what Michael had to say about his side of the lawsuit. If you want to just first, I guess go ahead, just state your name and your role. Yeah, so Michael Lumsford citizens for a New Louisiana. I'm the executive director and a bunch of other, you know, it's a small nonprofit. So I'm the president and, you know, all of that stuff too. So that's just, um, that's me. We do government transparency work. The core principle here is if you really knew what your government was doing, your government would probably stop doing it. And that's what got us into this Amanda Jones thing because she is a government bureaucrat. And she has been advocating for leaving some pretty crazy stuff in the children's section of our local public library. So I brought that to the public's attention. And she sued me for defamation. And by the way, the judge said, that's not what that word means. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. That was really surprising to read the whole book. I mean, being over here. Bless you, by the way. Bless you for reading that book. I haven't, you know, I wouldn't do that. No, well, I, I sent you the book review. If you, I read the review. I'm not going to read the book though. That's, no, no, no, you don't need to, you don't trust me. You don't need to. And I did it just so that nobody else had to. It was a painful experience. My husband was listening to me complain about it. Yeah. The folks that, the folks that actually have read the book, the reviews I've seen of the actual style and whatever, if you can call it that have all come back with the same basic synopsis is it's just a woman scorned. So, yeah. So as we, we have a full hour of him talking work about what we can do to kind of work against the putting these books in libraries and fighting what's happening and fighting the librarians and basically he says to do it one book at a time and one library at a time. So I think he's got some really practical assistance to help people at Kimberly Isherwood and so on. And those of us around the UK who have the same agenda and the same books going into our schools and our libraries around the country. There is another useful website that he told me about called book looks. You can find out what kind of content is in a book and basically what it should be rated for and if it's appropriate for children of certain ages, which I think is really important because if we think about things like films and video games, we do have, we do get those kinds of ratings, but for some reason librarians don't want to put those out in front of books. Some other coverage that has been going on that around Twitter here's something from Walter Hudson, who is a legislator in America and basically saying there are no banned books, because when something is banned you can't possess it you can't produce it you can't buy it or sell it. All they're trying to do is make sure that content is appropriate for curriculums and to put into libraries and making sure that children don't get exposed to things like what is on the other side of the slide, which luckily have black dots over the areas that need to be exposed but in the children's versions, those parts are entirely exposed to them. So we have also another video that I would like to show from the education meeting from Louisiana from Senator Heather Cloud and just to expose how bad some of this content is when she tried to get it put in front of everyone, what happened, let's hear what she had to say in the meeting. >> Can I say one thing Mr. Chair? >> Yes ma'am. >> Earlier today I had the books from the Protect Innocence printed in color and handed to each one of the members so that they could actually see the content that is in the books in the libraries. And Don Watson who works for the Senate staff, she did the printing for me and she was very hesitant to hand those over to me and she wanted to do it the right way. I simply just wanted them to print the books, staple them together and hand them to me and because of the content is so graphic, they had to make sure they had a cover on the front of the books, a cover on the back, they binded it. She put the material in a folder, sealed it and I wanted my legislative assistant who is probably 20 years old. She is an LSU law student to go to Don Watson, pick it up and bring it to me on the chamber floor. And Don Watson came to the chamber and she asked me if I would give my permission for my assistant to carry that material because if she would open it and read it, that would be potential for a sexual harassment lawsuit against me or the Senate staff because the material was so graphic. And that brought so much weight and gravity. I shared that with a couple of you to imagine that our legal staff in the Senate had to be so careful in handling this material because of its graphic content and afraid of sexual harassment charges against us for this content that is readily available for our children in our public library systems. If that does not bring gravity to the situation, then I don't know what else could. Thank you, Mr. Chair. So thanks to Michael Umsford for referring me to that clip and Brian, I don't know what you have to say about this, but I think if we can't put in front of state legislatures, legislators, we shouldn't be putting in front of our children either. Absolutely not. But of course, people have got to focus in on the individuals in government and the civil service, the agencies, the charities and the other bodies that are promoting this stuff, which is designed to destroy the minds of our children. It's very clear. Well, if people like what UK column is doing, please support us. And if you go to the website, you can find our support independent journalism page and you can make a donation, of course, which is very helpful, but you can also take out a monthly subscription, an annual membership at £50 a year, or a lifetime membership, which many people have done. Alternatively, well, in addition, you can make a purchase from the shop, and we're always highlighting that we're covering healthcare products from Clive decal, and we get a small percentage of purchases you make for those products. And the other thing to say is that, of course, whatever we do is there to be shared with hopefully some recognition. But if you have a look at the video interviews, for example, and you're a member of UK column, you can not only be sharing but commenting on those productions. And tomorrow, sorry, 11 comments on that one. Right, tomorrow, at one o'clock I've got an interview with Justin Walker, Walker going out. That's the Treasury letter. And this is the response, the despicable response to a letter that Justin sent via his MP, Tim Farron, to the Chancellor initially, asking about the monetary system, how money was produced, how the government controls it. And the response that Tim Farron received was so unbelievably dismissive and rude that it surprised him as an MP. So we discussed the letter and why the Treasury doesn't want to talk about the issuance and control of money via the international banking cabal. So look out for that one. Now, something which a lot of our viewers have been very emotional about is the fact that we have this key report on Richard D Hall here from the BBC Arena Attack Conspiracy Conspiracist ordered to pay £45,000. Well, that was only part of it because from Richard's website, he's faced with the £45,000 in damages, £22,500 to each litigant, plus a whopping £234,000 in claimants costs. Now, I'm just going to say that when I look to the journalists that produce this article, while one has got some standing, we have one lady, Gemma Sherlock, very excited here she's becoming a journalist. But she's also very excited that we've got pot stars type Taylor Swift who may be coming into action, or we've got witches marrying themselves or we've got sex toys. So the BBC really doesn't regard anything to do with citizens investigating and challenging what the government is telling them. And clearly they were prepared to put what I consider to be some low grade journalists on the case. But I'd like to say to our audience that originally UK column, absolutely reported from the moment that Marianna Spring did her surprise investigation of Richard D Hall. This is our report from the 31st of October 2022. And here's Marianna herself. This is some of the comments she made at the time for five months she's been looking into conspiracy theories who target UK terrorist survivors. My investigations and new research research, along with the testimony of those effective show that conspiracy theories and tactics like those deployed by Mr Hall are emblematic of a wider phenomena. The survivors and breed families are experiencing. And then she went on to talk about Alex Jones being fined a huge amount of money. And I'd say she didn't do any investigation into any of the research that people were doing into what the UK government and authorities were saying about the various attacks. But we wanted to highlight this to the audience, which is, of course, the BBC monitoring at the time was also saying that it was tracking people's social media accounts and managed to get about 300,000 views that were still on YouTube. Five years after the incident she managed to get those YouTube clips taken down. So this is the BBC spying on you if you dare challenge what the government is telling you about major events. And I think this is very, very significant and people need to understand how dangerous the media environment is and of course Richard D Hall has been caught by that dangerous environment. So if you want to help him if you go to his website's got the address here, rich planet.net/donatelegal.php. He tells you how he can, how much money he needs now, and he shows you ways that you can help him if you would like to do that. I can say to our audience, this is very, very serious stuff, because effectively information that Richard D Hall wanted to bring into his court case was not permitted. I understand by the judge. What are we dealing with here, are we dealing with genuine trials, or are we now dealing with political trials in UK, helped and aided and abetted by the BBC, a lot of questions to answer. We'll talk a bit more in extra time. Sorry, let's bring you back on. And you're looking at project 2025. Yeah, Brian, thanks. As an introduction to this segment, let's look at all of the wonderful joy that the left in America was experiencing after the election last week. I don't see a lot of joy going on there, unfortunately. So one of the things that's been happening as part of the fallout is this is all related to part of what is project 2025 and we'll get into that, but something that has been happening with leftist women in the United States has been what's called the four B movement, which we will see originally came from South Korea, shorthand for Korean words that start with the letters BI, which means no in Korean. And these four statements are the refusal of heterosexual marriage, the refusal of childbirth, abstaining from dating men, and the rejection of heterosexual relationships as a whole. So we have to wonder here, what is actually going on, they were so against abortion, but if they're not going to be having sex with men anymore, then maybe it doesn't matter if abortion is legal or not, because it won't be happening, at least for liberal women, right. And so, you know, what is the larger identity going on here and what is happening to our people that are having such a horrible response to the election results. We've seen in top universities in the United States, the past few days, the coddling of university students who are meant to be adults over 18, they've been offered prions, legos, cookies with milk, coloring books, therapy sessions, therapy dogs, all kinds of things to help them postpone the exams, canceling classes, all kinds of things to help to help these students deal with the loss of Kamala Harris and the election last week. And what's at the center of all of this, or at least part of it is what has been called project, what is called Project 2025. But what I want to look at is some of the slants that have been taken and the different sources and the media and the politicians about what this actually is. So first let's see what Kamala Harris said about Project 2025 during the campaign. The project 2025 is a plan to return America to a dark past. Donald Trump and his extreme allies want to take our nation back to failed trickle down economic policies. Back to union busting. Back to tax breaks for billionaires. Donald Trump and his allies want to cut Medicare and Social Security to stop student loan forgiveness for teachers and other public servants. And I say to AFT they even want to eliminate the Department of Education. And while you teach students about our nation's past, these extremists attack the freedom to learn and acknowledge our nation's true and full history. Including book bands. Book bands in this year of our Lord 2024, just think about it. So we want to ban assault weapons and they want to ban books. The good news is that there are no book bands going on as I've just said, what did Trump say or what did he know about Project 25 during campaign. Let's see what he said. For the former president, he's now distancing himself from the controversial Project 2025. That's a massive proposed overhaul of the federal government, which includes firing tens of thousands of government workers and replacing them with Trump loyalists. It also calls for cutting Social Security benefits. It was drafted by longtime allies and former officials in Trump's administration. Trump posted on his social media website that he knows nothing about it and has no idea who's behind it. This comes days after the head of the think tank responsible for the program, suggesting there would be a second American Revolution. So, Trump was actually not part at all of creating the Project 2025 documents, the United for Leadership, which the Heritage Foundation, I think Jane has been creating for several years now, has was one who put it out and they said it's not that in the 1980 and 2023, the game has changed. The long march of cultural Marxism through our institutions has come to pass. The federal government is a bare mouth weaponized against American citizens and conservative values with freedom and liberty ever as it never before. And they have four promises that are basically breaking down the 900 page, 1000 page documents. There's a free PDF that you can look at online. But what they say is that ultimately the left does not believe that all men are created equal, they think they are special. So let's get into the heritage foundation a little bit who actually did write this particular document. Their mission is basically to be a conservative think tank. They've been around since 1973. They were particularly influential under the Reagan administration, which adopted several of its policy recommendations. And they also contributed documentation that overturned Roe versus Wade. The associate director of this presidential transition project said that it's time to lead the groundwork for a White House that is more friendly to the right. And that is what they were trying to do. So who are some of these people and what is going on with some of these organizations? Well, in this particular situation, we've got Chuck Schumer from the left of the United States holding the document trying to expose things. So the Heritage Foundation here was trying to say, well, the left is providing propaganda, but potentially I think that both sides are providing propaganda about what they're doing and what they're actually hiding behind. So who is behind this heritage foundation? The chairman is Barb Ben Andel Gabby. She is also on the board of directors of Altacor, which is the parent company of Anway. And what is Altacor? It's a privately owned corporation run by the Davos and the Ben Andel families and these are billionaire families. And here if you look at part of the Anway website, which I guess is under Altacor, they have an EDI policy. So are they really promoting these conservative values that they are writing about in the 1000 page document or not, if their company, if their chairman is providing EDI policies? The vice chairman is Michael Gleba. He leads the Sarah Skai Foundation. I hope I'm saying her name correctly. According to the 22 annual report, the foundation had a market value of almost $850 million and he is the chairman and the treasurer of this foundation. The Sarah Skai Foundation, according to Influence Watch, was created by the niece of Andrew Mellon, who was, of course, a philanthropist, banker, politician, highly successful financially was a politician in the past. It was the US Secretary of the Treasury, as well as interestingly, at one point, the ambassador from the United States to the UK. So we have a lot of trolling going on as well from the conservative side. Here's Matt Wallis from the Daily Wire, and he tweeted something after the election result had millions of views on Twitter and elsewhere, where all he said was, now that the election is over, I think we can finally say that, yeah, actually, Project 2025 is the agenda, LOL. So we had meltdowns all over from the liberal media and from liberals posting online about what happened in his website, Project 2025.com is intentionally trolling website. And if you go to it's actually a very badly designed website, it looks like it's from about 1998, which is actually an advert for his new film, Am I Racist. So going back to libraries again, so timeless altogether, and as an example of how leftist organizations are putting this into perspective for people, what does it actually say? So I just did a search through this thousand page document, just a control F search for what does it say about libraries and librarians, specifically, and these are direct quotes. Children suffer the toxic normalization of transgenderism with drag queens and pornography, invading their school libraries. Cultural institutions like public libraries and public health agencies are only as independent from public accountability as elected officials and voters permit. And two more points. On the next slide, please, the Universal Service Fund subsidizes rural broadband networks, a low income programs, as well as connections for schools, libraries, and rural health facilities. And finally, educators and public librarians who prefer pornography should be classed as registered sex offenders, which is probably the most controversial of those statements. And that's what the libraries have been running with in library related organizations. So here's an organization, it's an advocacy group for libraries called Every Library, and they've been putting out a whole lot of propaganda twisting around words around Project 2025 and libraries, which I've been following closely. Same with the rhetoric is very troubling, saying that the librarians are going to be permanently charged and incarcerated because of how divisive Project 2025 is, and it's against the First Amendment on the freedom to read, apparently. So we see on both sides a lot of manipulation, and when you need to actually look into the policies to see what it's going to do, and there's no guarantee at all that Trump administration will put into place anything from the Heritage Foundation, because these are just suggestions that they hope that the president will take on. One last point that I would like to make that we need to look for potentially is something called the America First Policy Institute, which is actually chaired by the man who was an official member of Trump's transition team, and it was founded by former Trump admin officials in 2021. Some, the independent is calling it an extremist platform, including requiring ultrasounds for people, they don't say women, but people requiring abortions, reversing gun control laws and has 10 pillars which sounds somewhat similar to what is in the Project 2025 document. But I just want to say finally though, that having these messaging coming from different groups is really increasing the division in the United States. We saw the protests of the election results from the left, and we've also seen now that we've got Trump and then Biden Trump again, showing the division increasing the problems of what's going on with the two sides just getting further and further apart and potentially more violent crime. Diane, thank you for that. I'll just say to our audience, our news of necessity is becoming ever more complex as these increasingly complex policies come forward. This is the deception by the so-called global elite, as they bring policies forward, we are not supposed to understand what's happening. So they are complex and difficult to unravel. The U.K. column is doing a good job being able to take these policies apart show that show the audience where they're coming from and who the key people are behind them. Ben, let's bring you in because if we've got trouble with education and libraries, we're back on that subject to climate, the ultimate fear and control weapon. It's the ultimate control and fear weapon. That's a very good way of describing it, Brian, and there is a global criminal network, ultimately extorting nations and citizens out of trillions of dollars a year under the pretext of a completely manufactured crisis. I'm going to call them the climate cabal and it's very closely linked in to the UN and I'm going to be talking about them over the next three weeks and beyond as well, but particularly the next three weeks because today marks the beginning of COP, which stands for Conference of Parties, which is a series of formal meetings where governments assess global efforts to advance the Paris Agreement, Paris Climate Change Agreement. There are 198 parties to this, 197 countries plus the European Union. The meeting starts today in Baku in Azerbaijan, and they are meeting in solidarity for a green world, which is a lovely bit of Soviet Communist type language. Now, they built a huge temporary structure to house the event. They're flying in hundreds of thousands of delegates from all around the world. It's going to run for 11 days of meetings, seminars, debates, deal cutting, tax raising. They're looking for a trillion dollars a year to finance their great, just global transition and apparently no one sees the irony of flying these people all around the world in order to combat climate change. So they're producing a lot of pollution, they're producing a lot of hot air, not least. This gentleman, Simon Steele, the Executive Secretary of UN Climate Change, taking to LinkedIn yesterday to say tomorrow is the opening day of the COP 29 UN Climate Conference in Baku, Azerbaijan. As I said to my team today, old climate actions from all governments have never been more crucial, because the climate crisis is already hammering every nation, hitting national and household budgets harder every year. You can say that again. And vicious outcomes remain vital. Climate finance is the great enabler, right? This is all about money. And to give you a sense of the tone of how he's going to be asking for that money, this statement came out last month. And he says here, COP 29 must be a stand and deliver moment for the world. And stand and deliver is what high women used to say to stage coaches when they were robbing them at gunpoint. And that is very much how this feels. We're being shaken down. It's a scam. They want us to pay them trillions of dollars, destroy our economies, ultimately to fix the weather. I think that's what they're promising to do. As I said, we're going to talk about this a lot over the next couple of weeks, because the event kicked off today, it's going to be running for the next 11 days. One thing to note that's really important, I think, is that Azerbaijan is effectively a dictatorship, so steel in his ilk will be very comfortable there. Just a few statistics. Its freedom score is seven out of 100. It ranks 145th out of 180 countries in 2024 for freedom, according to the Freedom House. They rank 167th out of 180 countries on the press freedom index. It's run by an elite family who've been in power for over 20 years. Quite remarkable that they've chosen to go there to be honest with you. Speaking of repressive regimes, this obviously extends to the UK. Steel was recently in Liverpool, which is an accelerator city for climate action, apparently. You can see the regions and the mayors, this whole evolution process leading the charge for the transformation of the global system. Actually, Liverpool has been at the center of a lot of this stuff. In the COVID era, it was a test case for reopening live events where you had to turn up and show a negative COVID test. That was the first place they did in Liverpool. Also, they ran some of the first mass testing programs in Liverpool as well. This is obviously something going on in the city. Probably need to take a closer look at that. Of course, this is all linked into the British establishment as well. What else is happening in the UK? In '21, we launched all the establishment, the Royal Family, Prince William in particular, launched the Earth Shop Prize. You can see here, this was the launch here. You can see William Kate stood out in front of the pavilion there. The Earth Shop Prize is the most prestigious global environmental prize there's ever been, according to Prince William, who is the founder and the president. It's got quite a bunch of grandies on the board. You can see Christiana Figueres, who is the former executive secretary of UN climate change. She had Simon Steele's job before he had it. You've got top UN people in here with Prince William. You've got David Fine, who's the general council of Standard Chartered, the big investment bank. You've got Jacinda Ardern in there. You see these top-level globalists all backed by lots of rich families and corporations. As per usual Bloomberg Bezos, you've got Paul Allen from Microsoft, who's with the co-founder alongside Bill Gates. You've got the Mastercard Foundation, you've got Uber, so all of the usual suspects. We're very excited about this because they've just announced the winner of the 2024 Earth Shop Prize. This happened last week, so William was down in South Africa, slapping a lot of backs, taking a lot of selfies with young people. How jolly, isn't it fantastic? He is a real person. Oh, look, what's this? He's sitting down in front of a sign that's got a common purpose logo on it. Isn't that amazing? Actually, those images came from common purpose. We could tend to have a lot of time left, but I wonder, Brian, if you had something to say about that, I think this might be the first time we've seen a royal at a formal common purpose event. Well, I'll say, yes, common purpose, still, it's all tricks, but it's very much on a global scale now, but let's talk about this in more detail in UK column extra after the news. Brian was right, everyone. That's what he neglected to say there, but I'll say it for him. What else have we got? We're going to continue it. This is the Brits are running this, right? So, I'm talking about Clonic about the UN, talk about the royal family. We talked about Prince William, but it's also his father, still very much in the mix, not to be outdone, Windsor Senior, this here from the Sustainable Markets Initiative last week. And we can see that the Chief Executive of the Sustainable Markets Initiative, Jennifer Jordan Saifie, talking about this wonderful event being held at Buckingham Palace. You can see their Lammy, Ed Miliband, all of the politicians, and this kind of circus that's growing up around this. I guess this is the court, ultimately, what we're looking at here. We've got a lot of lackeys, we've got a lot of obsequiousness, we've got a lot of celebrities in the mix as well. He's now Rogers from Sheik, helping to usher this whole thing along, ultimately. They've done a fantastic job of building a political and economic and cultural plague around them in order to help sell and promote this message to the people. And of course, the rules are all doing this for the common good, right? Well, actually, it turns out they're probably not. They're probably doing it with their own benefit. And actually, there's been some great reporting, including from the Guardian. I'll give them their due about the rules over the past few weeks. And the fact that actually, they really are just parasites, making millions from charities and public services and pulling, I think, £50 million. From leasing land to services such as the NHS and schools, according to some investigation that's been done. And the climate cabal and this whole agenda is ultimately how they're going to be rolling out this kind of behaviour to the rest of the world. Ben, thank you very much for that. Excellent analysis. And, well, we've ended on the Green King, which is why, when you saw him standing, or kneeling, putting his wreath down in great respect to the nation and the dead, the people who've died trying to protect this nation and its supposed freedoms. Really, this is nonsense because in the background, he's working to a completely different agenda, which is designed to bring in a global government system where these people will hold power. To deal with this, we've got to understand how it works, how the system works and the individuals driving it. And I very much hope that UK column will be doing a good job in lifting the stones to show this horror. But if you wonder why the road's got potholes in it, the schools don't work, the hospitals don't work, the military doesn't work here in UK. It's because all of their political effort is going into this globalist agenda. It's not going into making your day-to-day life better. That's the hard truth of the matter, and we'll leave it there for today's news. So a big thank you to everybody watching, listening, wherever you are around the world. Thank you for your support. A huge thank you to people who are donating to the UK column, signed up as members because it's your financial contributions that allow us to do what we do. So thank you very much indeed. We'll be back in a few minutes before our members with UK column extra. Otherwise, UK column news will be back at one o'clock on Wednesday. See you then. Bye-bye. [MUSIC] At Sprouts Farmers Market, we're all about fresh, healthy, and delicious. That's why you'll find the season's best organic produce handpicked and waiting for you in the center of our store. We bring in local farm fresh fruits and veggies bursting with flavor. Come on in to discover everyday favorites like juicy berries and crisp greens, but also unique peak season varieties like moon drop or cotton candy grapes. Visit your neighborhood Sprouts Farmers Market today where fresh produce is always in season. (beep)