BiKitzur Shulchan Aruch
Ep. 949a. Term "Bracha That Might Not Be Needed"
Term "Bracha That Might Not Be Needed"
Hello again to everybody, just a quick correction or an understanding actually. We say 'Brakasha' and it's Shriha and 'Brakasha' it's Shriha. So, 'Brakasha' and it's Shriha is in Halacha when you can do it, whatever we've been talking about. But when we say 'Brakasha' it's Shriha, a 'Brakasha' that's needed. It's not really a 'Halaurek' needed. In other words, when we say the 'Brakasha' it's Shriha, it's not that situation must be done all the time. It's just, if you did it in such a way, the 'Brakha' would not be a 'Brakasha' it's Shriha. In other words, when we're saying 'Brakasha' it's Shriha, 'Brakasha' that's needed. It's not a 'Halaurek' term, but it's just saying that the 'Brakha' is not a 'Brakasha' in its Shriha, which is a 'Halaurek' term. In other words, it's a 'Brakha' you're allowed to do it in such a way. But it's not like, in other words, in a case, for example, with the fruits, to eat fruits before and have a mind of fruits or to eat cake before the meal and have a time of mind of fruit, the cake during the meal, whatever the case is, it's a good thing to do. But it's not something that you must do out here, 'Halaurek.' I just want to make it clear everybody should have that understanding, which is saying it as a term as 'Brakasha' Shriha, that it's not a 'Brakha' that's made in vain because there is a reason for making that 'Brakha' and that is because you want to cover the cake during the meal, or you want to cover the fruit during the meal in conjunction with the 'Halaurek' as we have been talking about. I just wanted to straighten that out, thank you for listening us, 'Halaurek' and 'Brakha'