@truthhertzradio on Odysee
Napoleon the Mason
Okay, everybody, welcome to this discussion, Napoleon the Mason. Since Napoleon was clearly a Jewish tool, that's the least you can say about it. We'll have more to say on his Jewish nature in the next video, but since he was in fact one of their tools, and since the French Revolution was a Masonic plot, we shouldn't be surprised to see that Napoleon himself was in fact a Mason. It should be a given, right? When we see that the third faction, Freemasonry, established the French Revolution, they weren't going to let someone come into power shortly thereafter that wasn't in league with them now, were they? How is it that Napoleon even rose to such prominence so quickly, right? Very few have ever asked that question. He got by with little help from his friends, obviously. In a mere two years, he had risen from being an obscure artillery officer amidst the terror of 1794 to commander in chief of the army by early 1796, think about that. A week after his appointment as commander of the French army in Italy, he had married Josephine D. Buharnai, if I'm pronouncing that right, Buharnai, however, who was the widow of Viscount Alexandre D. Buharnai, a prominent Freemason and nobleman. She was the husband of a prominent Freemason, probably an Eastern star member herself. Josephine seems to have been attracted to Freemasonry very early on as it turns out. She was probably initiated again into the female arm of Freemasonry, the Eastern star, at Strasbourg. All her husband, the Viscount, was commander of the Rhine army. Later, their son Eugene D. Buharnai, or whatever you have pronounced that, Buharnai, journeyed to Egypt with Napoleon, he later became the Grand Master of the Grand Orient, D. Italia, and of the Supreme Council of the 33rd degree in Italy, which was, of course, well, 33rd degree wasn't invented yet, but he was a high-level Grand Master of the Supreme Council in Italy. Anyway, when Josephine became Empress of France in 1804, she was elected the Grand Mistress and patroness of women's Freemasonry in Paris. See how from the start, Mr. Napoleon had to be their little bitch now, didn't he? Even though he said some things against the Jews, that was herslian Jewish anti-Semitism. Many women close to her had also joined the Masonic sisterhood. Josephine's favorite niece, for example, Emil D., it was that name I can't pronounce again, too haremai, or whatever, wife of Antoine-Marie Shamans, Count of La Valette, and Director General of the Imperial Postal Office was elected as Grand Mistress of the Adoption Lodge and a Korean in Paris. Anyway, with such obvious Masonic connections, is it not obvious how Napoleon was able to attain the French throne in the mysterious fashion that he did with such speed, right? It makes no sense otherwise. Obviously, he was well-connected, you can say the same thing about Mr. Adolf, guys. It wasn't until later in the late 20s that he started making money off of mine comp to any significant degree. And yet, for years prior to that time, he was living high off the hog. He drove around in frickin' Mercedes. Where did he get the money for that? We know it wasn't from his meager income that he claimed to be getting off of, you know, some of his paintings and some of his other writings, because according to what he reported to the tax bureau, he wasn't making anywhere near enough to afford a goddamn Mercedes. How did he do it? Yeah. He got by with a little help from his friends as well. And by the way, I'm going to mention later about Mr. Napoleon making Masonic hand signs on numerous occasions, right? You know, the famous hidden hands specifically, multiple portraits of him were painted with him tucking his hand inside the flap of his jacket. Oh, yeah, that's not a Masonic hand sign, is it? But the same is true of Mr. Adolf. Hitler fans will say, "Oh, what do you mean, he threw masonry out of Germany?" Oh, yeah, he threw Jews out, too, who he was working for. And of course, he threw Masons out, who he was also working for. They were low-level Masons. The upper echelons were fully in league with this. They wanted this so that it looked like he really was opposed to Jews and Freemasonry. No, he hell was not. And again, just like with Napoleon, Mr. Hitler, you can do a Google image search. These are real pictures. They're not doctored. There are scores of them that I personally have found over the years. I'm sure there's a lot more that aren't so easily attainable, but in general circulation, there are scores of pictures of him giving Masonic handshakes, guys. In fact, you'd be hard-pressed to find a picture of him engaging in a handshake where he's not doing the Masonic classic handshake with his thumb folded up and over, curled up and around the hand of the person he's grabbing. It's not a normal, regular handshake. It is a uniquely Masonic handshake. The same one that you can see being given by other Masons all through the ages, he was a Mason, goddamn it. And he's made other hand signs, too, the diamond hand sign where you put your two hands up and you show your palms, your hands are flat out, all your fingers are together, and you have the tip of your index fingers touching and the tips of your thumbs touching. And so you get this diamond shape. That's your symbol of the compass and the square overlaid, right? In the center, you get that diamond shape. That's the shape he's making. He's a goddamn... He was a fucking Mason. There's no question about it, guys. Absolutely. Anyway, I talked about this before. I think it was called the Nazis and the occult factor and how they were all part of this secret society called the Fool Society, a spin-off of fucking Freemasonry. So all the while he claims to be against Freemasonry, cut the shit, the devils in the details, stat paying attention, and stop engaging in Christian-type apologetics, such that when you're shown all the problems, you keep writing it off, writing it off, writing it off so you can cling to your hero the same way that Jesus freaks do. It's got to stop, man. It's got to stop. If you're going to truly call yourself Jew-wise, you've got to become aware of the little games they play, the little puppets that they put out there that seem to be opposed to them and yet upon close inspection, a good early example of this was fucking Napoleon, a major Jew-ass-licker who pretended to be against them, just like, goddamn Winston Churchill, right? The statement about the conspiracy for world government that the Jews are in charge of and they're behind the Bolshevik Revolution was all true when he said, but he wasn't opposed to it. He said it so that people would think that he was opposed to it. And rally behind him, yeah. Trump doesn't have to play that game though, does he? Because he knows that people are so goddamn dumb down to the Jew problem that they not only have no qualms with him supporting Israel, his base cheers him on for it, doesn't it? Anyway, the fact that Josephine herself was so well connected with Freemasonry at very high levels. That fact alone strongly indicates that Napoleon himself was a Masonic puppet. But of course, there are many more indications, very strong ones that we can turn to. We don't have to just depend on that. That in and of itself is suspicious, right? But oh, no, no, no, no, it goes much deeper than that. First of all, there were literally dozens of Masonic lodges in France and other parts of Europe that bore Napoleon's name, such as the St. Napoleon Lodge in Paris, the Napoleon Agni Lodge in Toulouse, the Napoleon Lodge in Florence, the La Castellian Napoleon in Naples, not just in France, but in Italy, other places, but Masonic lodges across the board that bore his name, one in Madrid, the Italian Napoleon in Madrid, yeah, another Masonic lodge bearing Napoleon's name. I mean, you know, doesn't that tell you something right there? Anyway, on and on it goes, in addition to this, Napoleon's strategic entourage was overflowing with prominent Freemasons, such as Talirand, Gespard, Monge, Jean Baptiste, Cleber, André Massina, all frickin' Masons. As it turns out, most members of Napoleon's family were Freemasons. For instance, his brothers Joseph Jerome and Louis Bonaparte were all Masons. What do you think the chances are that Mr. Napoleon himself was not going to be a Freemason with his three brothers being such, Joseph specifically was named Grand Master of the Grand Orient, De France, isn't that interesting? Naturally, Napoleon's father, Charles Bonaparte, was also a Mason. Napoleon's brother-in-law, Jaquem Murat, was likewise a Freemason. Historian and Masonic author Francois Colaveri wrote with confidence that, quote, "The initiation of Napoleon is not a legend. He was initiated into Freemasonry, probably in Egypt as is expressly claimed by the Grand Orient of France," that's from Le France, McConnery de Bonaparte, French publication. There's at least one surviving portrait of Napoleon making the classic Masonic hidden hand sign where his right hand is hidden beneath his coat. Actually, there's several. I wrote these notes several years ago. I found quite a few more. There's at least three or four of them guys where he's making the hidden hand sign. What that is, it's like a tip off to other brother Masons like, "Yeah, everything's going according to plan. Our hidden hand is marching forward, our cause of world domination without the public even knowing about it." Many modern political leaders, of course, have been seen doing that same thing. Even Mr. Pat Roberts, who wrote a book supposedly against the New World Order, he too has been seen making the Masonic hand sign the hidden hand sign. Yeah, what a piece of shit, man. These leaders, guys, Tex Marz years ago did an exposé on that, wrote a whole book on it about how all the top churches are headed up by Freemasons, all of them baby, not just El Vatikana. Anyway, just as the Templar excursion to Jerusalem was the convenient result of the Crusades, so too was there a secret society agenda behind Napoleon's invasion of Egypt. The idea to do this was not Napoleon's himself, of course, but that of Charles Maurice Talierand, a secret Freemason clergyman who was a major supporter of the French Revolution and was later made foreign minister by Napoleon. He was a member of the prestigious Lodz-Lay Philadelphies in Paris and of the Lodz-Lay-Anes-Reunis. The Philadelphies Lodge had adopted the constitutions of the Egyptian Rite and were adamant about restoring Freemasonry in its Egyptian roots, really, Hixacian roots. This was ultimately what laid behind Napoleon's invasion of Egypt, inspired by Talierand in 1798. It was about recovering and confiscating paparite and other documentation/artifacts that pointed to early Judeo-Masonic roots there, again, going back to the Hixacian period. This was where Mason retraces its roots in Egypt, so they wanted to conquer Egypt so they could go in there and get their old records, just like the Crusades was a desire to gain control of Jerusalem. Ultimately, they wanted to control of it indefinitely, but they knew they probably weren't going to get control of it permanently yet because the Arab population had overawed them so much, but they got control temporarily enough for the Templars to go in and loot whatever they could find. They knew there were a bunch of treasures there, not just gold and silver, but other treasures, important documents and other articles that they wanted their hands on. For several years, they were going in there and doing just that, engaging in digs and very secretive. There's no question. I covered this before, guys, in a video quite a while ago, I don't know, a year and a half, two years ago. I talked about a document that was once on display at the Vatican. It's now been locked away, but how this document, dating back to the time of the Templars, written by one of them who participated in these excursions, describing how, yeah, they went to this underground passage beneath the Temple Mount, there were passages there. The Temple Mount was connected underground with the Temple, the underground passageways, and so it was describing in this document how they were going through this passageway. They were a bunch of booby traps that were set to prevent anybody from gaining access to this treasure and how they managed to get through them all. Anyway, when they finally got to the room, how was the treasure they were looking for, they could see gold and other precious stones set in gold, glistening in the light of their torches in this dark chamber. All of a sudden, the next two or three pages are missing from the document, the pages that we're going to describe what they actually took out of there, and then the document picks up with their journey out of there now, taking the horde that they had collected, unbelievable. Liberately tore those pages out, of course, not wanting to know what they found. Anyway, this was not the first time that Judeo Secret Society sought to gain control of France utilizing a French leader to do so at that. In 1249, King Louis IX landing at the port of Demetia, or Demieta, with a force of French knights, some of which were Templars, of course, attempted to gain control over Egypt. Did I say over France? I meant to say over Egypt. Napoleon wasn't the first time they used a French leader to gain control over Egypt. This had first begun in the first attempt at, it was 1249 under Louis IX. But he and his men were defeated by the Arabs at Mensora, a small town on the road to Cairo. So it was a completely failed attempt. They had to wait several more centuries until Napoleon came along to finally do it, and apparently they did too. We don't know what they took out of there, but they apparently knew at least the general location where tradition had told them that certain important documents and/or artifacts were hidden, and so under Napoleon, amongst other things, that's what they did. They went looking for these articles. Anyway, in 1270, this same king had launched a second attempt at a conquest of Egypt, but the desert trek was too much for him, as it turned out, for him and his men, and so the whole plan went belly up once again, with the king himself actually dying en route. So that failed. So check this out. Two major attempts on the part of Freemasonry or Templars or Rosicrusions, it's all the same yet, different names for Jewish secret societies, but several attempts were previously made over several centuries to go into Egypt by the third faction to uncover their old roots there, documents, artifacts that were secreted away. Finally though, under Napoleon, they got what they wanted, but that still wasn't the last of it. Still another attempt was made by the Duke of Khosul, Minister of Foreign Affairs under Louis XV, he tried to get the king to invade Egypt as well. The Duke of course was a Freemason. Anyway, so there were three attempts now, prior to Napoleon. Napoleon was the fourth one, and apparently a successful one. We can only guess at what they took out of there, just like we can only guess what they took out of Jerusalem after the Crusades were won, with the Templars took out of there. Anyway, when Napoleon undertook the effort to conquer Egypt, he journeyed there with 167 savants, scholars, and experts from many different disciplines. These experts were personally selected by Gespard Monge, a personal friend of Napoleon, and a high-level Freemason from the Nine Sisters Lodge in Paris. Come on, man, is this not obvious what was going on here? In fact, many of the experts on this team were also likewise Freemasons. This was a third faction enterprise, just like the Templars going into Jerusalem, right, and just like the three previous attempts to go into Egypt. They were desperate, they wanted something there really bad, right? Something of great importance. So, again, is it not obvious that this entire undertaking was, in fact, of a Freemasonic nature of which Napoleon was a very big part, of course it was. Interestingly enough, it was Napoleon who paved the way for another Frenchman, Champolian, to study and supposedly crack the code of ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs through the use of the Rosetta Stone. I would venture to say they probably knew already how to read the glyphs. This was just the cover story, you know, for how they were able to do it in modern times. So they had secreted away, scoured Egypt and made sure there were no references on any stones there or, you know, any documents that they hadn't already gotten their hands on that could have incriminated our little tribal friends for all the trouble that they caused there. They don't care about references to the Hixos because most people don't even make that connection. But you know what I'm saying? I didn't care now that the Egyptian language, I mean, you know, the hieroglyphs could be translated. Once that's probably one of the reasons they wanted to get in there, too, to make sure that there wasn't anything that could incriminate them. The same is apparently the case guys with the Mayan script, too. I think they know how to translate the entire thing. They're acting like, "Oh no, it's been a lot of tedious hard work. We've cracked the coat a little bit, but not completely. There's still a lot of loose ends, you know, some gaps that we got to fill in." But yet there was a scholar back in the '60s who said he absolutely knew how to translate the thing, you know, the Mayan glyphs, that he had figured it out and they suppressed them, they attacked them, demonized them. That sounds very interesting. And why would they not want it known how to translate the Mayan script? Because there are, in fact, a lot of references in there to the tribal bastards, as I pointed out already previously on... I think it was this channel, or else my true-thirds channel, I can't remember. I mean my, my Christian and two channel, I can't remember now. But anyways, I did cover that, talking about how they ultimately took down the Mayan empire, they had infiltrated it, they had fucked it up, you know, they... Some of the documents or the scripts that have been translated, the Mayan glyphs, describe a foreign king that was ruling the empire that was hated. He was a foreign king, and how he had screwed up the whole political system, he was hoarding wealth in his hands, creating more poverty, and, you know, all kinds of desperate circumstances were rising because of his corruption. And he was known as "curl knows" isn't that interesting. So I think that's the reason we can safely say why they've been suppressing the full translation of the Mayan script, they don't want us to know. And that's probably a reason why a lot of the documents were destroyed by the conquistadors, right? There were coduses that showed how to translate the Mayan script, and a lot of the elders, the Mayan elders who knew how to read it, were slaughtered by the Sephardic Jewish conquistadors. They had a lot to hide guys, they knew the history, you bet your ass they knew it, they didn't want anyone else to know. So they destroyed these manuscripts so that people couldn't read these texts and put the pieces together. So what little they squeak out is stuff that they don't have to worry about, right? Because they figure most people are not going to be able to fill in the blanks and figure out the foreign hook-noser involvement, how deep, how far reaching it actually went. Anyways, anyways, no question guys, that this whole Napoleon escapade into Egypt was Masonic, absolutely. And they wanted to do the air the same that they did centuries earlier in Jerusalem, find ancient hidden treasures and documents, third faction Jewish documents. Anyway, let's take a few moments to talk about, Mr. Champolian, John Francois Champolian. No surprise, was also a, can you guess, Freemason, yes indeed. There's at least one portrait of him doing the famous hidden hand sign as well, just like Napoleon himself. During the Napoleonic Wars, Champolian was made exempt from the draft because he claimed that his deciphering work of the Egyptian hieroglyphs was too important to be interrupted. Yeah, he got a little free, get out of jail free card there from his Masonic buddy. In 1815, Napoleon escaped from his exile on Elba and marched to Grenoble where he was received as a liberator. All there, he met with brother Mason Champolian and encouraged him to publish his works on the Coptic language. How much you want to bet though, guys, it probably wasn't his work at all. It was just handed to him on his lap and he became the poster child, right? Just like Zuckerberg became the poster child for Facebook and the genius who discovered interfacing technology, network interfacing technology, what a bunch of horse shit, they stole it from this private company in Ohio and gave it to him. Champolian and his brother Jacques were loyalists to Napoleon, of course, brother Mason's, and even after Napoleon was defeated, they aided the Napoleonic General, drew at the Elon who had been sentenced to death for his participation in the Battle of Waterloo. They gave him shelter and helped him to escape to Munich, you know, that figures. This sounds like the old Masonic policy of rescuing a brother in distress, right? Anyway, the Champolian brothers were subsequently condemned to internal exile in France, or well, in Fijac, and Champolian was removed from his university post in Grenoble and the faculty was later closed. Under the new Royalist regime in France, the Champolian brothers had invested much of their time and efforts in the establishment of Lancaster schools, as they were called, in an effort to provide the general population with "education." This was considered a revolutionary undertaking by the ultra loyalists who didn't believe that the education system should be made accessible to the lower classes. Thus, this effort on the part of the Champolian brothers was not commendable, but was merely a Masonic ploy to foment disdain and rebellion against the new regime. They'll always do this, guys, they'll act like they're on the side of the underdog when they could give a shit about the underdog, they're always pissing all over the underdog, but they'll act like they care when it can advance their sleazy, frickin' agenda, like they do with the black community, they'll give a shit about fuckin' blacks to the ones who orchestrated the whole goddamn slave trade, right? But then they come along later and act like they're concerned about them, so they can turn them against white people and make it out like the whites were the ones that ran the slave trade. Again, yes, they were white slave masters that were fucking raging pricks, but it wasn't a white enterprise. So I said it before, I'll say it again, I'm all for reparations for blacks for the slave trade, absolutely 100% supportive of it, and let's go to Wall Street and raid their coffers and hand it over to the black community. That would be some real restitution, wouldn't it? God, fucking damn it, man. Anyway, sure enough, guys, the Freemasons were at it again in 1821 when Chimpolian, Freemason extraordinaire, led out in an uprising in which he and a band of Grenoble citizens had stormed the citadel and hoisted the tri-color flag instead of the bourbon royalist flag. As your third faction added again, because they were concerned that all their efforts with the French Revolution and what was carried on by Napoleon were now being threatened. They didn't really care that Waterloo was lost necessarily because they already controlled the British government, but they didn't want the ideals that were established under the French Revolution and carried on by Napoleon to come to an end either. Anyway, Chimpolian was caught and charged with treason, but then went into hiding and then eventually wound up getting pardoned. Imagine that, here he was, guilty of treason, right? And yet he managed to skate, he got a fucking pardon, yeah, he got by with a little help from his friends, how do you suppose that happened, give me a break? Anyway, once again, it's not obvious that Mr. Chimpolian was supported by his brother Mason's because he had worked in, you know, helping them decipher the, well, he had worked so closely with Napoleon and those brother Mason's, not necessarily because he deciphered the documents. Like I said, they probably already knew how to reap Egyptian hieroglyphs. Or maybe there were some missing pieces and he finally filled them in, who knows? But very often guys, people they hold up in a pedestal are not the geniuses that they make them out to be, it's just because they're tribe members and all they're doing is releasing shit they already knew they were withholding from the public. Like with Einstein, right? Einstein was just plagiarizing, stealing from people that had gone on before him and they just put him up in this pedestal like he was the one that originated these ideas and it turns out the ideas weren't even right anyway, goddamn it all. Anyway, there's some more interesting background on Mr. Chimpolian. He had a close acquaintance with Angelica Pali from Livorno, Italy, who may have been a descendant of the Medici family as it turns out. Anyway, her name Pali literally meant Angel of the Temples and she was heavily involved in her medic literature as were the Medicis. Chimpolian once said of her in a letter to a friend, "I thank the great Amun Ra for meeting her. Harkening back to Masonic roots, Judeo-Masonic roots, third faction roots back in Egypt, going back to the era of the Hixas, right? Anyway, no surprise, little Miss Pali years later became an avid supporter of the Masonic anarchist Giuseppe Mosini, who was also close friends with Albert Pike. My, my, my, look at these connections. I coined a new phrase the other day talking with a friend. Instead of birds of a feather flock together, I prefer pigs of a snow together, hang out. There you go. Look at these connections, guys, son of a bitch. Anyway, moving on here in our little timeline, in July of 1830, the restored monarchy under Charles the 10th, who was a brother of Louis the 16th, was toppled. This second revolution was engineered by France's most famous Freemason at the time, the Marquis de Lafayette, who had very close ties early on with, you know, Benjamin Franklin, for example, right? Oh, they were members of the Circle Jerk Club, you know, Hellfire Club and whatnot. He met numerous times with Mr. de Lafayette. Anyway, he personally masterminded the coup d'etat that brought Louis Philippe de Orleans into power. Again, this was another third faction frickin revolution, guys. The first one had ended the monarchy, but it made a comeback, and now they orchestrated in 1830 another one to make sure there was not gonna be a lasting comeback for the crown. They wanted the royal bloodline faction completely removed from the scene altogether. This was done, again, to prevent France from returning to a monarchy, something that Masonry Judeo Masonry was adamantly opposed to the third faction, right? They wanted the church and the state brought to a final and complete end so they could rule the world through their banking enterprises and their little secret society collaborations. And so how was this particular revolution pulled off? The three days of Masonic-staged Moody Street fighting and riots in Paris riots, Lafayette had grabbed a tricolor flag of the revolution and wrapped it around Louis Philippe de Orleans proclaiming him the citizen king of France. There was nothing but sheer propaganda, but it sadly worked as it usually does, right? The masses are so easily swayed, guys, by their little bullshit schemes they pull. The mob cheered and Louis Philippe won the day. So anyway, there you have it Masonic ties extraordinaire with Mr. Napoleon. That's how he was able to climb the ladder of success, guys. And so in the next discussion, we'll be looking at Napoleon the Jew. Oh, he was absolutely. He wasn't just a Jew ass liquor. He wasn't just a Judeo Freemason. It was a Jew. And why should that surprise us? After a Jewish orchestrated revolution, you think they're going to allow anybody into power that isn't? Anyways, guys, thanks for joining me. We'll catch you in that video and take care. [BLANK_AUDIO]