Zichru4Life
Bava Basra Daf 161
[speaks foreign language] The first subject on the daft, according to Aviemir Baba, Aedim Syne from the bottom of the steire running upwards. On the previous daft, Aviemir Baba said that Aedim Syne in the back of the get-makushir opposite the text on the front. The Gomara assumes that they saw him one above the other in the same direction as the text in the front. [speaks foreign language] that we should be concerned that the person holding your steire will write whatever he wants at the end of the text inside the steire and saw in forged signatures on the outside of the steire parallel to this added text and he'll claim I did this to increase the number of Aedim in the steire and the steire can be makushim with any of the two signatures without being makayim the ones that I'm azoyev. [speaks foreign language] The Aedim don't sign parallel to the text in front rather they sign from bottom to tap. Second second in the daft, the concerned that he'll cut off part of the steire leaving part of the signature. The Gomara asked that perhaps there'll be a clause in the last line which is harmful to the person that has the steire and he'll cut it off. Even though he'll cut off Rubein the first name of the Aed but it will still be Kosher with the words ben Yakov Aed. The man's is Rubein ben a written opposite one line of text and both will be removed if he cuts off a line leaving him with only Yakov Aed. The Gomara asked that perhaps he'll still be Kosher based on the assumption that Yakov signed the steire. The Gomara answers either that Aed isn't written or it's recognized that this signature is not Yakov. Third second in the daft, there's no concern that his son signs using his father's name even as a symbol. The Gomara asked another Kascha that maybe the son wrote Yakov Aed and he was signing his father's name as covid for his father. The Gomara answers the person doesn't leave his own name and sign his father's name. The Gomara asked maybe he used his father's name as a symbol just like I may write and use various symbols in place of a signature. The Gomara answers the person wouldn't be a mikutsif to make his father's name as a symbol. My Zootr answers he can answer all the Kascha's easily because any star mikutsher that the Aedim do not all conclude on the same line as puzzle. So therefore cutting part of any signature would cut off all of them and that would puzzle the star. Zootr for the life of Masslef Kvesan Mahalov. The first thing in the daft, according to William Raba, Aedim signed from the bottom of the star running upwards. Second Sugi, the concern that will cut off the last line of the star, leaving part of the signature. Third Sugi, there's no concern that his son signs using his father's name even as a symbol. This is from Masslef Kvesan Mahalov as a quiese, a chair. The Aedim signing on a get mikutsher, lying flat on a massive chair, were instructed to sign from the bottom up starting at the end of the text and not to worry about anybody cutting off the bottom because no one in the town named Yakov signs like that and that no one would use their father's name because if he wouldn't sit on his chair, he certainly wouldn't use his name. Quiese reminds of Kvesan Mahalov. The Aedim were instructed to sign bottom up, reminds the first Sugi in the daft. According to William Raba, Aedim signed from the bottom of the star running upwards. We're not afraid that someone's gonna cut off the bottom because no one in the town with the name Yakov signs like that. Reminds of the second Sugi in the daft. The concern that will cut off the last line of the star, leaving part of the signature. And no one would use the father's name reminds of the third Sugi in the daft, there's no concern that his son signs using his father's name even as a symbol.
161