The SEC Spring Meetings start with just a couple of personal observations before we get into the stuff because we just finished the meeting and my notes you hear this. This is the end of my ninth year serving as Commissioner of the Southeastern Conference. Some of you looked up quickly marked it seems pretty remarkable that heading into year 10 once I hit June 1st. And there's been a lot. Obviously it's taken place over the last decade. I looked back to my first media days presentation. I was putting Bob Dylan at the time. Some of you were there. The times they are a change in and that was an understatement as it turns out. That was the understatement of the decade that we got. A lot on our plate this week. A lot of good things ahead of us. I'm second proud to announce that today retires my 14 team SEC logo belt that I have on here today. I thought I retired yesterday but I forgot to tweet about it so I'll be tweeting about it as soon as we finish. Served me well but we're into a new era. It's been nearly three years since we came to the announcement of growth to a 16 team league to go back to August of 21 shortly after that announcement was made. We began inviting both athletic directors, excuse me, to join our athletic directors meetings first remotely and in January 22. Joe and Chris began joining us on a regular basis. Fast forward last year here in Destin. Jay Hartzel and Joe Harris are two presidents from Oklahoma and Texas began meeting with our presidents and chancellors and they've been active since that time. We expect they'll both have a full Destin contingent head coaches, faculty reps, communication directors, senior women administrators here this week. And it's just a sign that we're about to end one chapter and begin another. We have seven student athletes here so you'll see them around the hallways. Just so you know our structure is we have the student athlete advisory committee kind of that long standing all sports conference or excuse me all sports advisory committee. So we'll have some representatives from that. Then we have a football leadership council men's basketball leadership council and women's basketball leadership council. We began those back in 2016 and have seven of our eight chairs and vice chairs. This also marks a summer change as we go from our old CBS relationship into a new relationship with Disney. That's not news. We will be making some news later this week with a set of kick time announcements. Primarily the first three weeks of the season will be announced that should be coming on May 30th. It'll be some other games in there a few surprises probably for the season ahead. And then one of the changes that was part of our focus as we looked at the future of our television relationship way back in 2019 2020 is trying to be more intentional and out ahead of kick off time announcements for our fans. I want to work back. We'll have some six day and 12 day adjustments, but those will be flexes between the afternoon and evening windows. You're going to have a whole primer on this when we go to media days and you'll see it play out. So by mid June, we will announce all of our early window kick off time. So that's the noon Eastern really those kick off times will be between noon and one Eastern. So 11 to noon central. It won't all be right at that noon Eastern time. A little bit of later flexibility depending on the network, particularly the SEC network. We'll have roughly, we'll see if I get this right half of our other flex windows. So we'll designate some games either evening window or afternoon window. I guess you should say afternoon and evening window. Some of those games times can flip a few hours and then they'll be some that are designated for flex. So as we go through the summer, rather than having all of our game subject to that 12 day and six day wait potentially through the season. You're going to know all of our early window kick times. You're going to know those by mid June. We're going to know a set of afternoon and evening kick times subject to some flexibility and then the remaining games will be in that flex afternoon evening. We have a lot more opportunity to communicate with our fans earlier on those kick times. I don't expect a lot of conversation here about football scheduling. You're obviously free to ask not a secret. We have 24 and 25 schedule formats established to date games. We announced our 25 opponents what a couple months ago. We do have 26 and beyond out there. Given all that's happening around us. Dot dot dot scheduling kind of is out there and we continue to talk about it and we'll like we just have some updates. We are going to have a discussion about student athlete availability reporting. So members of our staff have been working on this project really since last summer. I referenced some considerations that we would have. That doesn't mean there's going to be a decision. In fact, you should not expect a decision, but you should expect discussion. That's obviously different than the culture that's existed around much of college athletics over time. Go back to some of my comments, which I know a number of you are fond of doing since you quote myself. You asked questions from six years ago not to James who's not here. I noted we don't want to just rush into something. It's not injury reporting. It's a very different circumstance given some of the privacy issues we have. Yeah, when you start to see the numbers of dollars being bet on legalized sports gambling or on college sports, not just football, but men and women's basketball, volleyball, baseball, I think all of those catch your attention. We have to be thoughtful about how information is managed. It's also a reality that the lives of young people in colleges versus the lives of professional athletes are very different. A lot more exposure to people. A lot more people around our programs that go in and out. Sitting in classrooms is not something that happens to an NFL or a major league baseball participant. But it happens on a daily basis at the college level. We also are pleased to really pleased to welcome Bill Hancock, and Byron Hatch here to talk with our athletics directors and our football coaches about what to expect from the college football playoff. You have honored the bill would spend what is essentially his last full week in the executive director role with us. I want to say heartfelt best wishes and thank you to Bill and Nikki. Bill, she'll be around and work with Rich Clark as he transitions in next week. I look forward to working with Rich, but honored that Bill would choose to spend some time with us. So with that introduction, I'll be happy to do my best to dodge every question you ask and what's about my retiring belt. You mentioned the availability. I thought you retired. I did. You and Jay Guzier, the two worst retirement people that I know. I had an effort retirement. Did you think much talk with the SEC or schools about trying to ban our state's ban prop betting on college athletes? I'm not much some just recognizing that it's out there. We had a conversation here last year about with our student athlete. So we attach the mental health conversation to sports gambling to the pressures that we were learning about. It is a conversation that has taken place at a superficial level. There's a depth to it to come. Obviously, Charlie Baker's been clear about the need for some change. And getting away from the open and the nature of things. Also, though, we're talking about legalized sports gambling. And I saw some numbers that I didn't study up yesterday reading a report about just still staggering numbers of, I guess, unsanctioned sports betting that takes place. So, yeah, it's a conversation, but we haven't gone deep and we haven't started writing letters on the issue. Reading the aftermath of that House settlement. Are you still hoping for congressional antitrust action and more? What would be your level of interest in pursuing some collective bargaining with the athletes? Well, there's six questions there. First, let's go back. There's no aftermath. We are living after an announcement last week about a settlement agreement between plaintiffs, counsel, and defendants. So that's reality. We're not in any aftermath. We're in that process still. That process will be months. In fact, many months ahead of us, subject to court review, subject to an entire legal process. I anticipate plenty of conversation here with our leadership about what that means for our own decision-making. We have the opportunity to play an important role in our own decision-making about the future as opposed to leaving that just to the court system. So that's one component of your question. You have not seen me speaking about antitrust exemptions. And I want to be clear about that. I've been clear before. I have talked about safe harbors, about the ability for us to implement with legal protections, whatever law might be enacted to provide support to student athletes so that we can get out of this cycle of constant litigation. We think, in fact, the position that's been taken as the settlement agreement is meant to deal with as much as we possibly can from a breadth of the issues in front of us that relate to antitrust. That said, I think Congress has still an opportunity to use the structure of this settlement to enact legislation to strengthen the future of college sports. And I hope that those who have said, well, we want to see you college sports involved in decision-making before you come to us for solutions, take seriously, that we are a part of problem-solving. Obviously, we're in an election year. Congress is a challenging place to accomplish a task. And I say that respectfully. I mean, there's a lot on the plates of our House and Senate members. That said, we have 11 teams in the baseball tournament leading to a college world series. We have teams going to Oklahoma City to compete against other conferences in a college world series. We talked about the college football playoff, the final four. This is a national system that deserves national standards, not just state by state, whether it's legislative action to determine rules or attorney general action to determine rules. We need national standards, and that's the rule that Congress plays. To be in collective bargaining, you're going to have to be in an employment situation of not how to student athlete come to me and say, I want to be taxed like an employee. And so there are those who advocate for that reality. That takes me back to a fundamental statement, which is, there's no better time to be a student athlete than right now. In the history of college sports, no better time. And again, they're not calling me saying, I want to be an employee. I want to be taxed like an employee. Those rights advocates, they have freedom of movement. They have freedom of access, name, women's and likeness opportunities. It's a pretty good existence. And we ought to be careful to try to honor that while we think through better ways to support our student athletes in a national competitive structure. Correct. Great. It comes to the revenue sharing aspect, the model that needs to be worked on. When we talk about the Title IX implications with splitting the revenue, how you do so among sports, is there any guidance perhaps based off the settlement of the past pay with the majority of it going to football and basketball players? Is that something that can translate to the new revenue sharing model in the SECN among the A4? If I understand the question, I don't think those comparatives are precise enough. In other words, you're asking the precedent from cost of attendance outcomes for the Alston grant outcomes and how those relate to Title IX and the new settlement model. So we have to see the conclusion of the new settlement model, I think, speaking from a wide perspective, we continue to seek to provide broad based programs. If you ask about what's happened with cost of attendance in Alston grants, our programs provide those broadly between men and women's student athletes. This is a different model, and on the list of work projects includes working towards the outcome of the answer or the question that you're asking. How much, I mean, obviously, Title IX come into that when you discuss this, because one way or another, your young football players say we deserve more than even our men's basketball counterparts, when it's track and feel. How do you go into this knowing this all of the potential legal ramifications? It's a big world out there with a lot of legal ramifications. So we had, what, four or five lawsuits with legal ramifications, and we are going to be diligent in working through the outcomes. All right, I'm dealing with what we've announced from a settlement standpoint. As I indicated earlier, there is no kind of looking back. We're in that process right now, and it will be for months. It's been done already working ahead with the Big Ten and your joint advisory committee. Well, any of our work will be done with the appropriate sensitivity to settlement agreements and antitrust law. We do have joint defense privilege that was part of our communication when that was announced, and I'm not going to pop out there. Our conversations that wouldn't be appropriate or respectful. But every time they are changing. Hang on, Pete. I was just going to ask you to go back to Congress for one second. I know it's a place where you and your legal spend a lot of time. You referenced the prevailing thought that it'd be easier to get help as opposed to some kind of overhaul. Could you walk us through maybe some next steps that are great, and what you'd be looking for, and what do you think is feasible? I don't know if that it's next steps. It's been existence over the last four or five years. And I don't know if you and I have had the conversations. I think generally I've shared dating back to our football championship game press conference. I just come from a couple of days in D.C. that what you've seen is a progression from maybe a little bit of curiosity. There's some who understand too. I think our visits have provided an educational basis where there's now there's a level of conversation, a level of interest. And I would say going forward, it's a continuing repetition of that educational effort. I would welcome action between now and the election. Most people with whom I converse say that's unlikely. And so your educational process will continue post-election. And it will depend on who's in leadership of each party within the House and Senate, where the majority's lying, who occupies the White House. Those realities guide conversation. So as much as it's been unpredictable, I think it will still be unpredictable. Yet we have a responsibility to engage in the education and in the conversation and seeking what I described. And I think what I'm going to do is choose me as some national standards so we can conduct national competition. That's part of Congress's role. Great. Do you want to follow up? Just, it would be narrow now that we have the settlement or the framework of the settlement or it would be narrower. And is that specifically, I guess, what you'd be looking for is just unified national things to get the deep domes out that are popping up with different rules. I said that's possible. I go back to national standards. Yes, the settlement terms would provide a new and specific framework that could be used. But again, I think we all took civics and we know things get attached in trying to have some coalescing around the solution, can try one's patience, but also expand one's thinking. Greg, what are the coaches' concerns? What are they expressed to you about the roster? What are you hearing that you can tell them about that? Well, yeah, I'll tell you exactly what I'd say. I've not talked to our coaches about that other than individually to say, "Hey, slow down, guys." So we had a meeting three weeks ago. Some of you have sources. That's great. I think it's a bit of a threat, a danger that we can't have a conversation about concepts that don't populate themselves outside the room. So then that provokes a reaction. I know other conferences have discussed it. Coaches have been texted our coaches. They get fired up and we said, "Just wait. We're going to have a conversation." That's where it is. That's a concept. And understand that football captures the attention, but we have 21 championships for all of which need to have a level of conversation about that roster piece. Greg, you haven't any clarity on what sort of the Ohio policing piece of this settlement might look like. I mean, how much of that has been clarified to you about your knowledge of what is that actually going to look like and how do you build collectives like that into that? Well, I just reread the settlement terms and the word confidentiality is at the end of it, so we'll see. I was over here. The times are a change. There's thoughts on the fact that there's a player within the SEC now like one of flagship institutions in Georgia suing the active head coach for the University of Florida. Oh, I'm not a fan of lawsuits. That's what I think. Does it just kind of speak to what the new reality, the NIL and everything that everybody from Philly made for it all these guys have to deal with? Yeah, but there have been lawsuits. Is that the only lawsuit involving a coach over the last year won't be the last? We have a legal system and people have rights to pursue what they view as grievances and the legal system sorts that out. Greg, I heard you talk on the SEC network on the baseball tournament. I told you somebody called me for something. You used to throw hard decisions as you implement the settlement. What are some of those hard decisions I had? Well, we'll see. We just set hard decisions. So when you have a shift of revenue up to 22%, things won't remain the same. And that predicts that people are going to have to make decisions that may be a number of wide range of issues that I haven't begun to consider, some of which I can imagine. Some of which I'm certain we'll learn about this week and in the weeks to follow. Greg, what are the conversations been like, I guess over the last three or four weeks in terms of the revenue sharing and how athletic departments are going to come up with that money. And then comes to a point out that it comes to the conference, but also ticket sales merchandise, what not to be able to afford to pay these players and be competitive in the SEC. What are those conversations been like in this week? Well, trying to raise that money is what I'm getting at for some smaller institutions. We don't have smaller institutions. From a budget state university. Well, I think people are going to work to understand the terms of the settlement first. As I said, that's in process. And I intentionally use a broad, we're going to have hard decisions, you don't have that kind of economic shift without decisions having to be made. Have we been granular on that? No, if we talk generally about what might be ahead, we have, and I think there's been more of those conversations taking place rapidly on campus at this point. I see a time where schools over the next, you know, whatever that is, eight to nine months trying to find different ways, whether that be to raise ticket prices and whether that be, and I'm talking about for the future. But coming up with different scenarios for them to be able to afford whatever that salary cap is going to be. I would not want to predict the what. You know, you don't. I think the range of issues will be in front of people. I mean, when we talk about collectives, what is your vision on how they might exist in this future? We'll see. Do you think they have a place? I don't know that my opinion on that matters right now. We'll go through this settlement process to its conclusion. And, again, they're going to be a set of decisions made. So we'll see. Right. What's your confidence level that the revenue sharing model will be in place by August, 2025? What is my confidence level? Well, let's go back to earlier. Let me see if I can explain what's going to happen is we have a settlement agreement that goes through a court process. And if the outcome of that process is the settlement that's accepted in place and that's accepted at this time next year, then we will have a model. But that's not something that I control. Greg, it seems like when an NCAA rule is enforced upon a school, they then encourage state lawmakers or maybe perhaps attorney generals to take action, some kind of action because they don't like how that rule was enforced. This settlement apparently reaffirms several rules that the NCAA has had and maybe will create in the future. Do you trust your schools not to encourage or bend the rules or encourage their politicians to take action going forward? Well, we need to have the settlement terms and even within those settlement terms, the expectation would be that we'll be looking at some of these state laws because they're all written differently. Some of them were written three and four years ago before some of the current approaches were developed. Some of the transparency issues will be needed, so there's going to have to be some change. And yeah, we'll have to have some messaging around what state laws might need to be modified to facilitate that, the onset of the settlement. How? Yeah, now the issues about how things are overseen and accountability, I think those will be part of this new chapter. And my desire would be as we collaborate towards that kind of outcome, that that will reinstate the healthier culture around meeting expectations and when expectations are not met, the ability to provide the right kind of accountability and the right sort of time. How do you view enforcement or for settlement as far as whether it's a new entity created or NCA or outside entity like what do you see it? Well, the reality is I think there are some options, there's some openness to what that might look like, so I'm not going to narrow that at this point. Commissioner, you mentioned nine years. If I was to take a look at your day calendar nine years ago compared to today, how different is it? Yeah, very different. Couple things. One, I didn't go to Washington DC a lot. And I think I've been there five or six times this year with more to come. I had no cell number of a member of the House or Senate. I now have many that may have mine. I think I've shared previously that COVID changed my management style and some of our staff are here. We just had a staff meeting where. Two weeks ago, I said, look, if you think I've been distant, not around focused on things other than you're focused on you are exactly right because of what's going on around. So, where I would be actively over managing the number of issues in 2015-16, I am not nearly as involved in those things. And that's a compliment, again, to people on our staff who, and we just had 11 teams selected the NCAA baseball tournament. We had an enormous crowd through the week. I am not involved in any of that. That's just a credit that that can happen so well to our staff. And I go back through the year and think about that. I had seen, I think, one of the real changes for me is I had, like, been right next to, like, some of my colleagues in the office might slide. And you think that you understand what it will be like. And when Mark Ritt retired, he said, you never know what it's like to sit in the chair until you sit in the chair. And so, an enormous appreciation for people to do these jobs in the Southeastern Conference over the last 90-plus years. But also respect for colleagues who do these jobs and other roles at the college level, giving me a lot of change. Yeah, it's different. They asked me, when I interviewed, I had to write a one, a three, and a ten-year plan. So, like, I get to write a one-year plan, and what's interesting, I've gone back and looked, and I've batted, like, 700, since we're in the baseball softball time. On that one-year plan, you know, you think things, and you get in, and some of it's delayed. The three-year plan, some of that took five years. The ten-year plan just talked about, it talked about change, not predicting this sort of change. You know, I talked about people wanting to come to us to find out how we've been able to sustain success and asking questions. I talked about writers and business people and faculty members. I think the OU in Texas outreach was very much about, you know, wanting to be a part of things because we've done so well. So, even though I couldn't say, like, ABCD in a decade, here's what's going to happen. Some of those big principles I wrote, even then, as part of that interview plan, that played out in kind of real-world sort of ways. Greg, how did you get to that 20% number, and why not more than that? What 20% number? 22. Back and forth. Well, two things. Back and forth with plaintiffs and attorneys and the defense group. The second thing is, that's not like the end. So, there are scholarships. There's Alston grants. There's cost of attendance. There's concierge medical care. Concierge mental wellness care. All kinds of gear. All of those costs borne by the institution. So, that's part of this economic flow, direct economic benefit. Excuse me, but there's a lot more beyond that 22% being provided to young people. Greg, you need to get out of this cycle of litigation without collective bargaining, slash employee, or is there a way to do collective bargaining? You're asking me... Excuse me. You took a breath. You took a breath and I was done coughing. Well, I'm not a prophet. There's an opportunity here, yes. In one way. Well, you're asking... You're really asking about hypotheticals. Like, is this the end? Is somebody else going to? So, the breadth of the settlement is intended to give us a path forward. Provide a level of clarity about the future. That doesn't embed employment automatically. And you go right to collect the bargaining. So, we're in states that don't have collective bargaining on public campuses. There are a set of complexities there that are just not acknowledged. As people write about collective bargaining parallels between college sports and professional sports, that played out over 30, 40, 50 years of lockouts with antitrust lawsuits. And there can be a better way. And there's an opportunity here. But, you know, life, nothing is certain because we're reminded there. I mean, exactly so. You've got no transfer rules at this point. And there's no... Oh, we don't have no transfer recruiting caps. Well, we don't have... We have transfer rules. Now, it doesn't stop the number of times that people transfer. But we do have transfer rules. And you assume... You assume that some kind of bargaining mechanism will resolve that in a different way. But understand the professional league started from the opposite end of the spectrum. Which was complete restriction. You go back and read stories of people who said I'd rather go sell insurance and play, film the blank city. Or for that owner. That's not where we are. So, what I think's not been made clear is the comparative realities between historic professional sports collective bargaining and where we are. And, as I said, those who advocate for rights, there's a pretty good deal on the table right now that doesn't implicate some of the negative aspects or some of the problem. Attic aspects like taxation. So, there's a lot there that has to be unpacked. To assume that it would simply create solutions to some of the challenges that people will raise. Greg, how do you think that a new model will impact player movement transfers? It remains to be seen. Doing managed in different ways. But, we're going to walk through a settlement piece and see what that allows. Because schools can sign contracts with players, you think it could. There's a possibility it would limit it. We'll see. Greg, tell us your part on something. Obviously, 11 teams going into the NCAA baseball. We should have them with the additional taxes and know you might be able to break that record next year. Might be. Should be. You should break that record next year. As far as yesterday, nobody's ever done it. My first observation in the interview was there's no cap on the numbers that's part of the selection criteria. Over the last few years, I have observed generally within meetings that the line of thinking will have to change. I remarked yesterday that you've heard while on baseball, if you don't have 12 or 13 wins, you're not going to be on the board. Well, you could have 11 or 12 wins next year in this league in baseball and be a really, really good team. In fact, if you look at Ole Miss, I didn't check the RPI yesterday, but at the end of the week, they were like 32. And that's where the losing record sort of kind of gerrymandered out because we have this 500 record which says dumb down your non-conference schedule. I don't think we want that. That's not good for the game. People want to challenge themselves at a high level. Midweek, I'm in DC. I'm one of my trips. I pop on the television and Arkansas's hosting Texas Tech for two midweek games. Those are the things we want to encourage. And, you know, we should have high expectations, but it's going to challenge some of the selection thinking. You know, I got beat up during basketball because I talked about pressure on AQs. And I brought the articles and never said take away AQs. But I think we're going to have to be challenged like the Transformation Committee did to say perhaps it's time to expand brackets and provide opportunities. A lot of our colleague conferences invited Division II and Division III institutions in so they can meet minimums so they can exist. Against that reality, we have conferences like ours that have grown to 16 teams. We're a super league of our own big 10s at 18, the ACC is at 18, the big 12s at 16. And so those are highly competitive situations that will have to be understood and evaluated in a way that's probably different than sport committees. The decade ago with smaller conferences and fewer members of Division I overall. When you talk to the ACC baseball coaches, maybe some changes to rules that we've seen this past year when it comes to maybe stickering the bats. How that process goes about as well. How much input have you seen your changes when it comes to sport? Maybe over the past two to three years they were different rules, job and plays compared to where we are now. Like big picture as far as changes in the rules, you know, we created collaborative replay. We the SEC created collaborative replay in 2016 because that's not perfect but a better way to make and support officiating decisions. And I can recall that first season that was used at Auburn, there's a last second play, boundary catch in the end zone. If you remember, the catch was successful even after evaluation. In the stadium booth, what was not picked up on was that the snap had occurred after the clock had expired. And the voice from the replay center said hey, you need to check the clock at the snap because I think one of the hardest expectations is officiating is you take basketball and you bring a bunch of officials who are running around breathing hard sweating. Put them on little jog device and tell them to evaluate. Find the right video first and evaluate it properly while there are 10 or 15 or 20,000 people screaming and coaches staring at them from the sideline. I think that's the worst way to make decisions, just like basic psychology 101 in decision making. And so that's one effort that for us begins Labor Day Week and ended yesterday. We're a seven day a week operation, so that's a change. And I think that's helped provide better outcomes. You look in baseball, I went to a Yankees Red Sox series as we were considering implementation in the summer of 16. I'm a Yankees fan. Up players were clearly wrong. Safe outplayed first that didn't favor the Yankees. Joe Girardi was the manager. I expect he's going to come out on fire and just walked out. Talked for a few seconds. They went to replay overturned that life went on. It took some of the emotions and the heat out of the game. I think even this weekend you see in softball last night, Stanford LSU and even our situation Saturday when you create traps on what we can't do. So what I would like to see is more flexibility around the use of replay, not to make it an officiating circumstance. But let's have some new thinking and not be afraid of technology. Pitch calling for us in baseball. We were first with technology for the catcher's to hear. Now we have wristbands. You look at the two minute warning in football. You look at some of the timing changes. The games still look the same. We put a green base and all of a sudden I've got people that say that's the worst thing I've ever seen and that's the best idea I've ever seen in baseball. It should happen in softball like five years ago given the tightness of the game and the number of plays at first. But we have to move past some of the old way of doing business and we're doing that now with the settlement. You know, in life you don't want to cast off the lines and lose sight of land. That's hard, especially when you have a normal way of thinking, a system that works. But we are constantly being challenged to retain the core of what we do but walk through some uncharted waters. Whether that's playing rules, what's happening around us legally. I think maybe people can criticize you, but we've been slow to adapt, but we've continued to adapt. Whether it's the things we're talking about from a legal settlement, whether it's NCA rules, the NCA's had to adapt and even our playing rules. So I don't know if that gets to the heart of your question, but those are some ad hoc examples. Yeah, we wanted and continually talked about what's ahead. We talked even about numbering situations about alignment and football. I don't think the general fan base realizes the challenge happening at the line of scrimmage with placement of players. Who's eligible, who's not eligible? Some of the NFL rules help clarify that. Those are guys that are veterans, might play 9 and 10 years, and that's all they do. You put a freshman linebacker trying to figure out whether it's movement, which one of those guys is covered up and which one's not covered up. And then you add a hurry up offense to it. That's a pretty big challenge that I think has to continue to be evaluated by the football rules. Let's take one more question here from Dan. I was just getting warmed up. Across a set of sports where the trends in gambling activity justifies that. So I listed the set of sports football, men's women's basketball, baseball, softball, volleyball, I get that list done close to it. Those are on our mind. That doesn't mean it would all be there. Pete? The most ambiguity in the way of the settlement from ages and coaches come from Title IX and revenue distribution. I guess as you're addressing that in this week, what do you plan on telling them in terms of how they can divide? Well, I don't plan on telling them anything. I think that's part of the conversation. The question I was asked earlier about our trends, our trends have been to provide some equity. This is a very different world. I expect a little list of opinions, perspectives, and we've got time to learn those perspectives. And then we're going to have to work through what that means for decision-making standpoint. I think you go back fundamentally. We've won four national championships so far this year. We've got a number of opportunities that had the Rawlin women's sports. We've supported our female athletes in just great ways. Yesterday, we had a set of games. We weren't as successful as we wanted in softball. I think that's who we are. Now, we've got to wrestle with this new piece. And that's what the conversation will help us do. We'll wrestle through it and come out in a healthy manner. Thanks, Greg. Yep, we have credential pick up here at 8 o'clock in the morning.
Southeastern Conference commissioner Greg Sanky spoke at the 2024 SEC Spring Meetings in Destin, Fla. on Monday to discuss recent NCAA legal settlements, name, image, and likeness, and other issues ahead of Texas' new league to kick off the week of festivities. Promo Code “IT1” To Get 2 Months of InsideTexas.com for Only $1: https://www.on3.com/teams/texas-longhorns/join/
Listen to the Podcast:
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3P0cwAUPNZrsNrTOKOfa6x
Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/inside-texas-football/id1721623113
Find Us On Social Media:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/InsideTexas
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/InsideTexas/
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/insidetexas/
https://www.on3.com/teams/texas-longhorns/
