Beyond The Horizon
Diddy Do It: Adria English And Her Allegations Made Against Diddy (Part 2) (7/8/24)
Adria English, a former porn star, has filed a lawsuit against Sean "Diddy" Combs, accusing him of grooming her into sex trafficking. According to English, she met Combs in 2004 through her boyfriend, who was auditioning for a modeling gig with Combs' company, Sean John. English claims that Combs coerced her into becoming a go-go dancer at his parties and that she was given drugs, including ecstasy, to impair her judgment. She alleges that Combs demanded she have sex with other individuals, including jeweler Jacob Arabov, and that she was sexually assaulted by several people at Combs' parties.
Combs' legal team has denied all allegations, stating that Combs has never engaged in sexual assault or sex trafficking. They argue that the numerous lawsuits against him are baseless attempts to gain money.
In this episode, we begin taking a look at her complaint in full.
(commercial at 7:12)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
English (digitalmusicnews.com
- Duration:
- 12m
- Broadcast on:
- 08 Jul 2024
- Audio Format:
- mp3
What's up everyone and welcome back to the program. In this episode we're picking up where we left off, with the complaint filed by Adria English against Diddy. Procedural Requirements The NYC Victims of Gender Motivated Violence Protection Act 29 The NYC Victims of Gender Motivated Violence Protection Act NYC Gender Motivated Violence Act created a look back window on March 1st, 2023, which runs for two years for survivors of gender-motivated violence, allowing them to sue their abusers regardless of when the abuse occurred. NYC Admin Code Section 10 1105A 30 The NYC Gender Motivated Violence Act revives any claims against a party who commits, directs, enables, participates in, or conspires in the commission of a crime of violence motivated by gender, has a cause of action against such party in any court of competent jurisdiction. NYC Admin Code Section 10 1104 31 The Appellate Division has held that sexual assault is an act of gender-motivated violence under the law as coerced sexual activity is dehumanizing and fear-inducing. Malice or ill will based on gender is apparent from the alleged commission of the act itself. Animice in here's where consent is absent. Priest v. Haggis 180 AD 3D 8394 Appellate Division 2019 32 The above-described conduct of defendant combs, Thomas and Jacob, including but not limited to, defended Jacob's sexual assault of plaintiff, constitutes a crime of violence, and a crime of violence motivated by gender against plaintiff as well as defendant combs direction, enabling, participating, and conspiring in the commission of a crime of violence motivated by gender, as defined by the NYC Gender Motivated Violence Act. 33 Given the extensive media coverage in numerous lawsuits filed in the District of New York, both federal and state, against defendant combs, defendant's BBE, combs enterprises, Jacob, Vibe, PMC, and those and no organizations were put on notice of the sexual abuse and trafficking allegations made against defendant Diddy. 34 Defending combs retains residences in both Florida and California, and upon information and belief is a citizen of the state of California, 35. At all relevant times, defendant combs was a citizen and resident of the state of New York, 36. Defending combs is a rapper and record executive popularly known by the stage names Puff Daddy, Puffy, Puff, P Diddy, Diddy, Brother Love, or Love. Defending combs rose to prominence in the music and entertainment industry over the decades and is regularly referred to as a hip-hop mogul. Defending combs was first accused of acts described in this complaint by his longtime paramour and former BBB artist Cassie Ventura as pictured above on November 16, 2023, 37. Defending combs is a Grammy awarded musician, rapper and producer, 38. And P Diddy founded co-defendants, BBE, SJC, and CGE, 39. Defending Diddy is signed through BBE, some of the biggest stars in music including Rick Ross, Machine Gun Kelly, Notorious B.I.G., New Edition, Mace, Pitbull, Little John, Fabulous, French Montana, and groups like Danity Kane, 112 in total to name just a few. 40. In 2008, defendant Diddy was the first male rapper to get a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. 41. Defending Diddy founded Bad Boy Records in '92 and the company has sold over 500 million records, produced 38 platinum albums, and won multiple Grammy awards according to the official website of Combs Global. 42. In 2022 Forbes estimated that defendant Diddy was one of the wealthiest hip-hop artists in America and that his net worth is over $1 billion. 43. Upon information and belief, defendant Diddy has a long history of committing physical and sexual violence against women and men, both of age and underage, as documented and publicly available in over 9 lawsuits across the country, as well as extensive media coverage on the lawsuits and the allegations made therein. 44. Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Incorporated is a domestic business corporation licensed to do business in New York. 45. Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Incorporated is a domestic business corporation licensed to do business in New York since 1992. 46. Defending Bad Boy Entertainment Holdings Incorporated, BBE, is a music media and entertainment company founded known by defendant Sean Combs. Bad Boy is incorporated and headquartered in New York, New York. 47. Defending BBE has been named in several lawsuits where defendant Combs has been accused of claims of sexual abuse and sex trafficking as every business defendant Combs engages with play a role in his illegal enterprise. 47. LLC. 48. In 1998, Combs founded Sean John, which has retail values of over $450 million. 49. As CEO and President of the company, defendant Combs was representing Sean John when he conspired in sex traffic plaintiff. 50. Sean John Clothing, LLC, is a domestic liability company licensed to do business in New York. 50. Defending Combs Enterprises, LLC, 51. Defending Combs Enterprises has its principal place of business located in New York, 52. Upon information and belief Combs Enterprises, LLC, DBA, Combs Global, 53. Upon information and belief Combs, LLC, is a domestic liability company licensed to do business in New York, 54. Combs Enterprise, LLC, is a business conglomerate founded by defendant Combs, which is prevalent in the music, entertainment, fashion, spirits, and television industries, while including a diverse portfolio of business and investments, including fragrance, marketing, media properties and liquor. Defending Tamiko Thomas, 55. Defending Thomas upon information and belief is a citizen of New York. Defending Thomas upon information and belief was an employee of defendant BBE at all relevant times. 57. Defending Thomas in her employment capacity was responsible for transporting and making payments to individuals like plaintiff in furtherance of a corrupt organization of sex trafficking on behalf of defendant Combs and the beneficiaries of the corrupt organization, including defendants Jacob, Vibe, and PMC. Defending Jacob Arabov, Jacob the jeweler, 58. Upon information and belief, defendant Jacob at all relevant times was a resident of the state of New York, 59. Upon information and belief, defendant Jacob at all relevant times was a citizen of the state of New York, despite being born in Uzbekistan, 60. Defending Jacob was a beneficiary of the corrupt organization, ran by defendant Combs, BBE, Thomas, Vibe, and PMC, and is pictured with plaintiff above, when he knowingly had intercourse with plaintiff who was trafficked for that specific purpose. 61. Defending Jacob in 2008 was sentenced to two and a half years in federal prison regarding a multi-state drug ring, was fined 50 G's and added to forfeit two million to the U.S. government. 62. Prider being in prison, defendant Jacob frequented parties thrown by defendant Combs and BBE or he knowingly participated in the illegal commodification of women via sex trafficking. 63. Upon information and belief, defendant Jacob still runs a business Jacob and company licensed to do business in New York with its headquarters located in New York. Defendant Vibe magazine, 64. Upon information and belief, defendant Vibe runs a magazine licensed to do business in New York. 65. Defending Vibe has had an ongoing relationship with defendant Combs and all of the defendant's enterprises, including BBE, SJC, and CGE, was corrupt and exploitive to plaintiff and to benefit defendant Vibe and other members of the corrupt organization. 66. Defending Vibe's ongoing beneficial relationship with defendant Combs dates back as far as 1993. 67. Defending Vibe further injured plaintiff in an effort to further the corrupt organization when it published plaintiff's picture in the issued picture above without plaintiff's notice or consent written or otherwise. 65. Defending Penske Media Corporation 68. Upon information and belief, defendant PMC is the owner and the parent company of defendant Vibe. 69. Upon information and belief, PMC is a Delaware corporation with its headquarters in California. 70. Defending PMC does business in New York throughout its ownership of defendant Vibe and its distribution of several media outlets that are distributed, marketed, and consumed in this jurisdiction. Defending John and Jane Doze 1 through 10 and organizational Doze 1 through 10. 71. Upon information and belief, plaintiff alleges that defendant Doze 1 through 10, inclusive, are other parties not yet identified who have violated plaintiff by sex trafficking her, conspired, and/or aided and abetted the defendant in sex trafficking the plaintiff through their participation in a corrupt organization that contributed to plaintiff being sex trafficked or having engaged in one or more of the wrongful practices alleged herein. The true names, whether corporate, individual, or otherwise of defendants 1 through 10, inclusive, are presently unknown to plaintiff, which therefore soothes said defendants by such fictitious names and will seek leave to amend this complaint to show their true names and capacities when the same have been ascertained pursuant to CPLR section 1024. 72. Upon information and belief, plaintiff believes all the defendant Doze 1 through 10 are citizens of the state of New York and/or Florida. 73. Upon information and belief, plaintiff believes and thereon alleges that at all times relevant here to each of the defendant organizational Doze 1 through 10 were the agent, affiliate, officer, director, manager, principal, alter ego, and/or employee of defendant coms, BBE, SJC, and/or CME, and was at all times acting within the scope of such agency, affiliation, alter ego relationship, and/or employment, and actively participated in or subsequently ratified and adopted or both each and all of the acts or conduct alleged with full knowledge of all the facts and circumstances, including but not limited to full knowledge of each and every violation of plaintiff's rights and the damages caused to plaintiff thereby. 74. Upon information and belief, plaintiff believes all of the defendant organizational Doze 1 through 10 are businesses licensed and/or doing business in the state of New York and/or Florida. 75. Upon information and belief, plaintiff alleges that defendant organizational Doze 1 through 10, inclusive, are other parties not yet identified who have violated plaintiff by sex trafficking her and/or conspired through their participation in a corrupt organization that contributed and aided and abetted the defendant in sex trafficking the plaintiff, or having engaged in one or more wrongful practices alleged herein. The true names, whether corporate, individual, or otherwise, of defendants 1 through 10 inclusive are presently unknown to plaintiff, which therefore soothes said defendants by such fictitious names and will seek leave to amend this complaint to show their true names and capacities when the same have been ascertained pursuant to the CPLR section 1024. 76. The limitations, Article 16 of the CPLR, do not apply because one or more of the exceptions that are set forth in CPLR section 1601 and/or 1602 apply. All right, we're going to wrap up right here and in the next episode we're going to pick up with plaintiff, Adria English. All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.