Beyond The Horizon
ICYMI: The Allegations Made Against Christian Combs (Part 3)
We previously learned that Christian Combs was also named in a lawsuit claiming that he abused a woman who was employed on a yacht that his family rented.
In this episode, we begin our look at that complaint.
(commercial at 8:01)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
combs-conformed-suit.pdf (deadline.com)
- Duration:
- 11m
- Broadcast on:
- 01 Jul 2024
- Audio Format:
- mp3
What's up everyone and welcome back to the program. In this episode we're gonna pick up where we left off with the allegations against Christian Combs. Premises liability and aiding in abetting for defendant as Combs. 87. According to the plaintiff, defendant as Combs chartered the yacht and assumed responsibility for the actions of himself, his guests, and his family. Upon information and belief, defendant as Combs fostered and encouraged an environment of debauchery. There was always a party atmosphere filled with suspected sex workers suspected lace alcohol, violence, insured disrespect of women, and the yacht's crew. 88. Upon information and belief, defendant as Combs did not have any safeguards in place to ensure there were no excessive drug use, no excessive drinking, and no importation of purported sex workers. 89. Defendant as Combs, apparent failure to ensure there was a safe environment on the yacht was intentional. On one occasion, Cristina Quorum, defendant as Combs, chief of staff, instructed plaintiff to ensure that the entire bar area was stocked with De Leon, Tequila, and Sarac Vodka. It was important for defendant as Combs to be surrounded by these bottles. On occasion, defendant as Combs was visibly intoxicated. 90. Plaintiff is unsure if he was hired from drugs, alcohol, or both. Out of nowhere, Cristina Quorum quickly approached plaintiff and ordered her to remove all the Sarac and De Leon bottles. She was informed that redacted and redacted were aborting the yacht. At that point, defendant as Combs exited the room, redacted one, and redacted two, entered the room, and defendant as Combs returned sober, holding his newborn daughter. This all occurred within less than an hour. 91. The incident led plaintiff to believe that defendant as Combs knew right from wrong and had the ability and wherewithal to determine that the environment on the yacht was safe. He intentionally created an unsafe environment that gave license to defendant Sea Combs to believe that he was free to sexually assault the plaintiff. 92. defendant as Combs allowed defendant Sea Combs and his friends to behave carelessly as they observed and mimicked his actions. 93. According to plaintiff on many occasions, she witnessed young girls visiting the boat, staying for less than 30 minutes in a cabin with a guest and leave. This led plaintiff to believe these girls were sex workers 94. According to plaintiff, defendant as Combs routinely engaged in an encouraged open illegal drug use while on the yacht 95. On several occasions, plaintiff witnessed defendant as Combs smoking marijuana while receiving services from the yacht's crew members. He would not allow them to leave as he smoked. And as a result, several crew members had a contact tie 96. According to plaintiff in another incident, defendant as Combs had several women who plaintiff suspected of being sex workers on the yacht. In one incident, a girl was extremely upset and ran to the lower deck, locked herself in the massage room and was hysterically crying. She said she did not feel safe and she wanted to leave. The crew was alerted of this. And at the time Sarah Chapman, one of Sean Combs children's mother was due to have a massage. So plaintiff had to attempt to remove this young woman from the massage room, but she was very reluctant as she felt unsafe. Eventually she left 97. According to plaintiff, on another occasion, defendant C Combs lost a large bag of marijuana and required the crew to search the yacht for it 98. According to plaintiff, on another occasion, while Hulu was filming, defendant as Combs and his friends, including young Miami, were playing a game called Carisha, please, defendant as Combs was dared to expose himself. At that point, defendant as Combs stood up, pulled down his pants and exposed his penis. Plaintiff was standing beside the table and heard the commotion. defendant as Combs mother was sitting beside him. Plaintiff then returned to the pantry and refused to stand by outside of the pantry for the duration of the service period. 99. According to plaintiff, on another occasion during New Year's Eve, defendant as Combs had guests who stayed until late afternoon the next day. A fight broke out between Justin Combs friends. They physically assaulted each other and walked around the boat topless screaming. Plaintiff and the crew felt very uneasy in this environment. At one point, one of the defendants as Combs guests shoved plaintiff's chief steward on the stairs and threw an object across the bar. 100. According to plaintiff on another occasion, she witnessed an argument between a man and a woman. The man was upset and proceeded to physically assault her. 101. According to plaintiff, defendant as Combs, assistant and noted drug mule Brendan Paul once came down to the pantry and was laughing uncontrollably. He told plaintiff that he had to sit and watch defendant as Combs have sex with multiple women. He said that defendant as Combs wanted him present just in case he needed him to get him something while he was in the middle of the act. Plaintiff questioned why Brendan would want to work for defendant as Combs if he was required to do such things. And Brendan replied that defendant as Combs was a good link to have in the industry. 102. According to plaintiff, when defendant as Combs chartered the yacht, she witnessed and served several a list guests on board, including rapper redacted three, redacted four, redacted five, and redacted six, as well as redacted seven and Cuba Gooding Junior. 103. According to plaintiff, Cuba Gooding Junior was extremely unpleasant to serve. He sat at the bar and made derogatory comments to plaintiff. He was visibly intoxicated and she was in the room and witnessed him in appropriately touching producer Rodney Jones, who at the time was working on the love album. 104. As a result of the conduct of as Combs and see Combs, plaintiff continues to suffer serious harm. First cause of action, assault against defendant see Combs. 105. The plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference as though set forth fully at this point, each and every allegation contained herein. 106. On or around December 28, 2022, defendant see Combs assaulted plaintiff by violently grabbing her, groping her legs, breasts, anus, and vagina. 107. He also tried to kiss her and proceeded to kiss her neck, face, and hands 108. Prior to the assault, the defendant see Combs also forced plaintiff to drink alcohol, which he now believes was laced with drugs. 109. defendant see Combs also exposed himself to plaintiff, bearing his naked, erect penis, trying to physically force plaintiff to perform oral copulation. 110. plaintiff was seriously bruised as a result of the attack. 111. plaintiff did not consent to any of the sexual assault or misconduct and was drugged and intoxicated by defendant see Combs. 112. Through the aforementioned acts, defendant see Combs caused harmful or offensive contact with an intimate part of plaintiff's body as defined by California Civil Code Section 1708.5. 113. Through the aforementioned acts, defendant see Combs caused harmful or offensive contact between an intimate part of defendant's body and plaintiff's body as defined by California Civil Code Section 1708.5. 114. Through the aforementioned acts, defendant see Combs caused plaintiff an imminent apprehension of harmful or offensive contact with an intimate part of plaintiff's body and sexually offensive contact with plaintiff resulted 115. As a result of defendant see Combs' conduct, plaintiff has suffered economic injury, all to plaintiff's general special consequential damage in an amount to be proven at trial, but in no event is less than the minimum jurisdictional amount of this court. 116. As a result of defendant see Combs' above described conduct, plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer great emotional distress and was prevented and will continue to be prevented from performing daily activities and obtaining the full enjoyment of life. 117. As described in this complaint, defendant see Combs' conduct was done with oppression, fraud, and or malice, warranting significant damages including punitive damages. The second cause of action, battery, against defendant see Combs. 118. The plaintiff re-alleges and incorporates by reference as though set fully forth. At this point, each and every allegation contained herein 119. Honor around December 28, 2022, defendant see Combs sexually battered plaintiff by violently grabbing her, groping her legs, breast, anus, and vagina. 120. He also tried to kiss her and proceeded to kiss her neck, face, and hands. 121. Prior to the assault, defendant see Combs also forced plaintiff to drink alcohol, which he now believes was laced with drugs. 122. Defendant see Combs also exposed himself to plaintiff, bearing his naked, erect penis, trying to physically force plaintiff to perform oral copulation. 123. Plaintiff was seriously bruised as a result of the attack. 124. Plaintiff did not consent to any of the sexual assault or misconduct and was drugged and intoxicated by defendant see Combs. 125. Through the aforementioned acts, defendant see Combs caused harmful or offensive contact with an intimate part of plaintiff's body as defined by California's Civil Code, Section 1708-5. 126. Through the aforementioned acts, defendant see Combs caused harmful or offensive contact between an intimate part of defendant's body and plaintiff's body as defined by California Civil Code Section 1708-5. 127. Through the aforementioned acts, defendant see Combs caused plaintiff an imminent apprehension of harmful offensive contact with an intimate part of plaintiff's body and sexually offensive contact with plaintiff resulted. 128. As a result of defendant see Combs' conduct, plaintiff has suffered economic injury. All two plaintiffs general special and consequential damage in an amount to be proven at trial, but in no event is less than the minimum jurisdictional amount of this court. 129. As a result of defendant see Combs above described conduct, plaintiff has suffered and continues to suffer great emotional distress and was prevented and will continue to be prevented from performing daily activities and obtaining the full enjoyment of life. 130. As described in this complaint, defendant see Combs' conduct was done with oppression, fraud, and or malice warranting significant damages, including punitive damages. All right, folks, we're gonna wrap up this episode here and in the next episode dealing with the topic, we're gonna pick up where we left off. All of the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.