Beyond The Horizon
ICYMI: Was Covid Created In A Lab?
The theory that COVID-19 was created in a lab suggests that the virus responsible for the global pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, may have originated from a laboratory rather than through natural means such as animal-to-human transmission. Proponents of this theory point to various factors, including the proximity of the Wuhan Institute of Virology to the initial outbreak in Wuhan, China, as well as the fact that the institute was known to be conducting research on coronaviruses, including studies involving gain-of-function research.
As the dust continues to settle around Covid-19 and it's origins, many experts suspect that the virus was created in a lab and unwillingly released due to an accident, while others contend that a Pangolin from a wet market is the culprit that unleashed the pandemic upon us.
In this episode, we take a look at the new evidence proposed by the experts and see what they have to say about the origins of Covid-19.
(commercial at 7:57)
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
Scientist claims 'smoking gun' evidence COVID-19 intentionally created by researchers in Chinese lab (nypost.com)
- Duration:
- 12m
- Broadcast on:
- 27 Jun 2024
- Audio Format:
- mp3
What's up everyone and welcome back to the program. Remember when COVID was still like a thing and people were out here telling you that some pangolin or something was the source of COVID? I never bought the whole entire wet market theory. I always thought that was a bit ridiculous and I always thought the likeliest outcome would be that we'd find out later on down the road that some dickhead scientist was messing around with some kind of stupid-ass virus and ended up creating COVID and it escaped from a lab. Now I've never been of the opinion that it was released on purpose but I certainly think that it escaping from the lab is much more of a likely outcome here or a likely scenario than what we've been told, what we've been gaslit with. I mean, logically speaking, considering just how virulent COVID is and was and the damage that it's still causing, you really think that this formed in nature? I mean it's possible I guess but me being as cynical as I am, I have my doubts about this being a naturally formed disease. And now we have some more scientists coming out and saying that this was created by researchers at a Chinese lab. So let's dive into this article from the New York Post and let's dip our toes in the COVID pool. Headline, scientists claim smoking gun evidence COVID-19 intentionally created by researchers in a Chinese lab. This article was authored by Ronnie Reyes. COVID-19 may have been created in a Chinese lab, a British professor told the UN Wednesday with another expert claiming that evidence of the likelihood has reached the level of a smoking gun. And I know there's going to be people out there that just won't believe it. And a lot of that has to do with people not wanting to go against their own confirmation bias. There were so many people that were lined up along political lines here when it comes to COVID that the whole entire response was ridiculous from everybody basically who was waiting into the conversation. And that's why I very rarely even talked about it. You had a bunch of knuckleheads who were, you know, busy snorting blow off the local dive bar bathroom recently. Then all of a sudden they're hopping on social media and their experts in viruses and shit. You can miss me with all of that. But when we're talking about where this disease where this virus originated, it always seemed the likeliest place was in the laboratory. Richard E. E. Bright, a molecular biologist at Rutgers University, was quoted saying in a new Wall Street Journal article that the virus that killed millions around the world may actually have been manmade at China's Wuhan Institute of Virology. I mean, we have this Institute right here. The disease originates right near where this Institute is. And then you're going to tell me that it was a pangolin. Talk about extreme levels of gaslighting. And look, I'm not saying for sure that it wasn't a pangolin, but I haven't seen enough evidence to prove to me that it was. So I'm going to go with the theory that seems the most likely. And that is some dickhead scientist was in this lab trying to get their captain trips on and instead made this crazy as COVID virus. That should escape somehow. Either one of the techs got bit or the virus came out with them, whatever it is, the virus got out and made its way into the population. But the battle lines are so drawn when it comes to politics in America that you can't go against your political party and say something like that, because you're scared that you're going to be shouted down by the masses. You know, the modern day COVID witch trial burnings that we saw. There was a whole lot of that going on. Wasn't there? Oh, you're going to kill your grandma. You're going to kill so and so. Man, shut up. Those are the very same people that are going to sit out of here and tell you that there is no way that this could have been created in a lab. Do you really think you're pushing the conversation forward when you're censoring people from talking about things like this? Because you're not all you're doing is pushing more people into the camp of thinking that something might be very, very wrong. And while I've never been one of these people to deny that COVID exists, it certainly does. My biggest gripe has been with the way we've responded to its origin and where it came from. What we're so worried about making the Chinese government mad that we can't step up and say, look, this is the deal. And I've been very clear how I feel about the Chinese government. You folks out there might want to talk about Russia this and Russia that, but the real 500 pound gorilla in the room is the Chinese government. And all they want is bad for America and the American people. The sooner folks get that through their head, the better off we're going to be. He cited evidence found in a 2018 document from the lab that talked of making such a virus. The document elevates the evidence provided by the genome sequence from the level of noteworthy to the level of a smoking gun. Ebrite said in the piece by former New York Times editor Nicholas Wade. So again, look, I'm not a scientist. And I won't come out here and make pretend that I'm some kind of virologist or something. And I know, you know, sequences and genomes, but I do know when I'm getting bullshitted. And folks, I feel like we were bullshitted to the umpteenth degree when it comes to the origin of COVID. The papers from the lab cited by Ebrite contained drafts and notes regarding a grand proposal called Project Defuse, which sought to test engineering bat coronaviruses in a way that would make them more easily transmissible to humans. Now, why in the fuck would you want to do that? What sort of benefit does that have to humanity overall? So you have all of these different scientists out here, whipping up all these wild ass weird ass viruses that there's no good reason for them to be whipping them up. So the criticism of these kinds of labs is valid in my opinion. Well, we're going to trust people to whip up viruses like this. And then if something like this escapes, we're gonna really jump right away to say, Oh, it came from a pangolin. I mean, a pangolin really? Can I see that evidence, please? The proposal was ultimately rejected and denied funding by the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. But Wade suggested that their work could have been carried out by researchers in Wuhan, who had secured Chinese government funding. Viruses made according to the Defuse Protocol could have been available by the time COVID-19 broke out sometime between August and November of 2019, wrote Wade, a former science editor of the New York Times. So it's not like it's somebody who is trying to score political points here. This guy was the science editor of the New York Times. My guess is he has a relatively liberal view of the world. So we're not talking about some kind of, you know, chaos agent here. We're talking about the former editor of the science section of the New York Times. This would account for the otherwise unexplained timing of the pandemic, along with its place of origin. Along with the research notes, Wade claimed the specific genetic structure of the coronavirus that allowed it to infect humans served as another strong indication of the virus's laboratory birth. I can't even comment on that because I don't know what he's talking about. I don't know how to make viruses in a lab, but I will tell you this. These jerk-offs are in here making all kinds of crazy shit in these labs. There's no doubt about it. The question is why, and even more so, why are US tax dollars funding it? Whereas most viruses require repeated tries to switch from an animal host to people, SARS COV-2 infected humans out of the box, as if it had been pre-adapted while growing, in the humanized mice called for in the diffused protocol. Wade wrote, "While scientists continue to debate whether the coronavirus pandemic was a natural occurrence or a man-made, Ebrite believed that there was credibility that the work proposed by the now controversial, eco-health alliance led to the development of COVID-19." Following the release of the 2018 documents, which were published by US Right to Know through a Freedom of Information Act request, Ebrite said, "There was clearer evidence that the virus was manufactured in a lab," the Daily Telegraph reported. The 2018 documents contained drafts and notes regarding project diffused and how to synthesize bat coronaviruses to make them more transmissible. Now, this is a topic that I am not really hip-on, right? Not something that I would say that I've spent much time digging into. However, there is somebody that I know who is really hip to this whole entire thing, and her name is Maryam, and I've been on her show before talking about Epstein, so I think I'm going to ask her to come on this show and talk a little bit about what she knows about COVID, and the origin, and the rest of it. Because, obviously, we're not getting the full truth like everything else. And for me, I think that the origin is one of the most important parts about this whole entire pandemic. The researchers proposed introducing appropriate human-specific cleavage sites to the spike proteins of SARS-related viruses in the lab, the same methods several biologists have said could have been used to synthesize the coronavirus that led to the pandemic. According to the documents, the researchers had planned to conduct a portion of the research at the Wuhan lab, where they noted that safety conditions were not up to U.S. standards to the point where they claimed American scientists would likely freak out. So you're confident enough to tell me that a Chinese lab was secure enough that this virus didn't escape. Is that really what you're trying to tell me, or is that your confirmation bias and your politics talking? Because anyone that's just looking at this critically, and from a sterilized perspective, would have a lot of questions. And folks, you better believe your boy has a lot of questions. While COVID-19's origins remain a mystery, Dr. Felipe Lenzos, an associate professor of science at International Security at King's College in London, said the world needed to acknowledge that the possibility exists that the virus was synthesized. At the very least, we have to have the conversation without it being censored, without people trying to call you a denier or this, that, the other thing. And it's bizarre to me that people want to shoot down and shut down the bait so often, and the people that are trying to shut down conversation, the people that are trying to shut down the bait, those are not people that should be in leadership positions when it comes to the government. One of the key hallmarks of a functioning, democracy or republic is "canted debate" where people can talk about the issues and not worry about reprisals from their job or from anybody else. Speaking before the UN in New York on Wednesday, Lenzos presented the work of the independent task force on research with pandemic risks, which calls on scientists the world over to follow stricter regulations lest another worldwide breakout occur, the Telegraph reports. "We have to acknowledge the fact that the pandemic could have started from some research-related incident," Lenzos said. "Are we going to find that out? In my view, I think it's very unlikely that we will. We need to do better in the future," she added. "We are going to see more ambiguous events. There is no doubt about it, and unless we're candid, unless we have these hard conversations now, we're setting ourselves up for a disaster in the future, so I think it's a good idea to talk about this now and get this on the table." Was this virus created in a lab or not? Let's get all the evidence out there, let's get all of the different testimony on the books from all the sides I want to hear from everybody, and let's get to the bottom of it. And hopefully this conversation that these scientists are bringing up here will be the jumping off point for that to occur. Alright folks, that's going to do it for this one. All the information that goes with this episode can be found in the description box.