Archive.fm

West Michigan's Morning News

Supreme Court Immunity Decision

Fox News Radio's Ryan Schmelz joins WMMN to discuss reactions to yesterday's Supreme Court immunity decision.

Duration:
4m
Broadcast on:
02 Jul 2024
Audio Format:
mp3

Hey guys, it is Ryan. I'm not sure if you know this about me, but I'm a bit of a fun fanatic when I can, right? I like to work, but I like fun too, and now I can tell you about my favorite place to have fun. Shumba Casino. They have hundreds of social casino-style games to choose from, with new games released each week. You can play for free, and each day it brings a new chance to collect daily bonuses. So join me and the fun. Sign up now at ShumbaCasino.com. Sponsored by Shumba Casino, no purchase necessary, VGW Group. Forward, we're prohibited by law, 18-plus terms and conditions apply. Well, as we mentioned, the Supreme Court, Tony, has been in top and bottom of the hour news, saved the immunity ruling for last. This is West Michigan's Morning News. Steve Kelly and Brett McKiddish, Smitty, back with us in the next hour. Ryan Schmels in Washington, D.C. with Fox News Radio. Good morning, Ryan. Hey, good morning. Steve, how are you? So, great thank you. The Supreme Court ruled that former President Trump has some immunity. We're talking official acts, unofficial acts. Talk to us a little bit about what they ruled yesterday. All right, so, yes, they ruled that presidents do have immunity when they're acting their official capacity as president, but they do not have that when they're a private citizen. Now, of course, this one has become a gray area because President Trump's legal team has argued that he was acting in an official act when he was trying to allegedly look into or overturn the election results of the 2020 election. So, that ultimately is going to be up for a lower court to decide, but what I think this ultimately does, and kind of the long-term implications, is that this almost guarantees that this trial is not going to be happening before election day. So, therefore, President Trump can spend more time on the campaign trail, less time in the courtroom. Yeah, so I guess talk to us a little bit more about what reaction we're here. We know that President Biden has come out to say that it's a dangerous precedent, his quote. Yes, and he's not the only one. It's a pretty substantial reaction from Democrats. A lot of them are furious. This kind of is re-ignited calls, and these calls were already pretty loud for the Supreme Court to adopt some type of ethics code. That certainly seems to be something that Democrats are campaigning on or say that they will pursue if they regain control of Congress. You're seeing Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the Congresswoman from New York saying that she is going to be filing articles of impeachment, and then you have another Democrat who is going to be filing a resolution to overturn the decision by the Supreme Court. Obviously, none of this stuff is going to pass right now, but it's quite a substantial reaction from Democrats. I understand that we're not really looking for a reaction that you're not a lawyer, but I also heard that the president may apply this ruling to the Hush Money case, too. Yes, we just got confirmation from a story that was first reported by the New York Times that, yes, they're going to be citing this when it comes to their attempts to delay the sentencing in the Hush Money case. That was just determined not too long ago, so yes, I mean, that case is still going to go through an appeal process. Certainly, I think they'll try to argue presidential immunity, even though this did not happen while he was president. But at the same time, they're still going to use that as a legal argument, and they're apparently going to be trying to use this as a way to re-delay the sentencing as well. So, again, I guess to repeat what you said earlier, this then goes back to the lower court to try to figure out how to apply it to the case that brought it to the Supreme Court in the first place. Correct. That's my understanding. No wonder lawyers make a thousand bucks an hour, because it could mean a lot if it would, if the case had gone, the Jan 6 case had gone to trial before the election. I mean, what kind of fallout could happen after the election, if the president, the former president gets the job, we're out of time, but we'll have lots to talk about moving forward. Ryan Schmells in Washington, D.C. Fox News Radio, thank you. I appreciate it, Steve, thank you.