Ba'al Busters Broadcast

Duck Tales Dan Conclusion & Saturn Cult Deception

The conclusion of Duck Tales Dan's talk with Danny Jones will be followed by Ammon's commentary and some more highlights or rather insights into the admissions made right in the bible. Plus we'll show, as my book has shown, the underlying Cult of Saturn in the Abrahamic Religions
Signed Copies of my book:
https://www.semperfryllc.com/store/p93/Priestcraft%3A_Beyond_Babylon_%28Signed_Copy%29.html
GET Priestcraft: Beyond Babylon 8.5x11 Paperback, Hardcover, & Kindle: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CNGX53L7/
Barnes & Noble: Priestcraft: Beyond Babylon 416 pages, https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/book/1144402176
KOBO: https://www.kobo.com/us/en/ebook/priestcraft-beyond-babylon

GET COMMERCIAL FREE PODCASTS and Exclusive Content: Become a Patron. https://Patreon.com/DisguisetheLimits

My Clean Source Creatine-HCL Use Coupon Code FANFAVORITE for 5% Offhttps://www.semperfryllc.com/store/p126/CreatineHCL.html
DR GLIDDEN is raising the price July 4th! Lock in the lower rate for Life!! Take Back Your Health NOW! DR PETER GLIDDEN, ND All-Access https://leavebigpharmabehind.com/?via=pgndhealth

Add to the Kristos Family Apocalypse Fund: https://GiveSendGo.com/BaalBusters
DR MONZO Products: https://drmonzo.kartra.com/page/shop
DR MONZO ATB BOOK: https://drmonzo.kartra.com/page/ATBBook
USE CODE: BaalBusters15 for 15% OFF Dr. MONZO’s store items
Dr MONZO AzureWell https://www.azurestandard.com/shop/brand/azurewell/2326 and use code BB5 for 5% Off for Life!
Get KRATOM HERE: https://klaritykratom.com/?ref=BaalBusters

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/ba-al-busters-broadcast--5100262/support.

Duration:: 2h 5m
Broadcast on:: 02 Jul 2024
Audio Format:: mp3

If you're a facilities manager at a warehouse and your HVAC system goes down, it can turn up the heat, literally! But don't sweat it, Granger has you covered. Granger offers over a million industrial grade products for all your operations, including warehouse HVAC maintenance. And even better, they offer access to experts and fast delivery, so you and your warehouse can both keep your cool. Call 1-800-Granger, click Granger.com, or just stop by. Granger, for the ones who get it done. Well, good morning. Happy Monday, everybody. So, a couple things, a couple things before we get started. We're going to continue with DuckTales Dan, Dan McClellan, on the Danny Jones podcast, where he's not making a very good case for biblical scholarship. And then we're going to transition over into a couple of other things. In the next couple of days, we're going to get back into the real Hitler, the real Germany, and all the things that people need to know, be reminded of, and understand so that they stop falling for this deception. The reason why we're going into this Abrahamic thing is because it's tied to the same topic. This deception is great, and I know they've embedded it into us so deeply that we identify with it, we identify with it with our salvation. We can't get much deeper than that, but what is real and what isn't? And if that was a deception itself, wouldn't we want to know? And that's not against God, and it's not against... Well, maybe the messianic idea that you need a savior in the first place, because this empowers you, right? Because that is something that can happen from within, the gnosis that they talked about in the past. And that's something that if you experience it firsthand, you understand that exists. If you don't, because you're constantly surrendering your power to a church or an idea or a concept, you're always going to feel like, "Hey, I'm dirt, and there's nothing magical or special about the human body." Or, "Spirit, it's all about this dude, it's all about this thing." And that's an awfully nice way to control people, is it not? So, I'm going to try to bring on Brightie on, so just bear with me for a second. I was trying to queue up a few things, so I didn't get a chance to do this ahead of time. Let's see what happens if I just put it up now. We want everybody to be able to play, right? Let's do this real quick. Where's my dirt? And then we'll get started here. What did I call this one? What did I call this one? Uh-huh. We're going to talk about the Saturn Cult today. We're going to get into a lot of different things today. It's going to be lots of fun. You'll see. You'll see. Oops. All right, start right there. Let's do that. Ah! Undo. Hold on. There we go. Don't you hate when you hit paste and set a copy? Not a good time. All right. Let's make this quick. Subsaps you. Yeah, I'm pretty sure I can just do this and we'll be rocking and rolling. Hey, so Speak Free Radio, just so you know. Just so you know, if you are watching anywhere, you can go to Speak Free Radio and you can find the podcast there. You can also support your favorite host there as well, which is something that they like. They appreciate it, since usually telling the truth is a very thankless job. And a thankless job with a family is a tough thing to try to balance. By the way, my daughter is going to be turning eight tomorrow. Yeah, I'm super excited for her. And let's see. I'll just put some gibberish in there, hit Add Server, hit a bang. Save changes and we should be ready to rock and roll. I'm Brady on as well. Let's see. I got to give it 10 seconds and then I can hit the Save button. It would be good to go. Nope, not quite yet. Okay, welcome on Brady on, you'll have to go to rumble to catch the couple minutes that you missed. But now the whole gang is here. So yeah, she's going to be turning eight tomorrow. That's awesome July 2nd. So the real, if for those of you out there who do not know this, the real. The real deal, the real. Independence Day was July 2nd took two more days for them to blah, blah, blah, but July 2nd was the actual day. July 4th, they use because that's the solar appealing on where the sun is the most furthest away from the. The earth, according to people who say shit. I don't know if this is just capitalistic bullshit or not, but. There's a pair of helium where it's the closest. And the Epilaeon is when it's the furthest away, which means you're more independent from it, right? So Independence Day. Yeah. It's all celestial thought in my stuff in my opinion, but we'll see. All right. So let's get into it. Dr Peter Glidden last week. This is what I was trying to queue up and find. Let me see if I can get to it. I think he's going to. Now, see, it's somewhere in here. So in the. Let's see. June 13th. I believe it was the June 13th episode with Dr Peter Glidden somewhere after the hour and six minute mark. He asked about. What I thought was going to happen. In the debates. And he said. Mr predictions over here said. I think there's it's going to be a. A disgrace. And he said one of two things would happen. You know, Biden would bumble fumble and fall. And then he would, you know, put his arm around him and be like the, the good guy and like just help him off the stage and just that be the end of it. And then that they would, they would announce that Gavin Newsom. This is what he said that Gavin Newsom would be his, uh, his replacement. Now. Oh boy. Now, if one of your Uber, Alice in the house, because Gavin Newsom is. A freaking carbon copy of, of a governor Jerry Brown. So let me show you something. I can't put it up that way. Okay. All right, let's put it up this way. So it says up here Gavin Newsom is ready for the Biden emergency. This is June 28th. California's governor has fundraising chops, managing skills and campaign infrastructure to step up. So they're already posing him in the media. They're already priming the public with this bullshit. All eyes on Gavin Newsom for a reason. Several actually blah, blah, blah. Was this caption underneath this picture of his horrible face with this little bird nose beak. Uh, when cameras captured California governor Gavin Newsom walking into CNN spin room on spin room. Yeah. On Thursday evening flashing his Hollywood smile before the presidential debate in Atlanta. A few political observers in his home stay rushed to social media with some version of the same annoying. The same annoying to question. Why is he there? Why do you think he's there? Newsom was there to cheer on President Joe Biden for his debate with former President Donald Trump. Biden is confident Newsom told reporters. He's got a record and he's got a vision for the future. The guy doesn't have a vision for like breakfast. He just does what wherever they're pointing him. He's a freaking ping pong ball or a pinball. A couple of painful hours later after the debate in which Biden is. Remember this is Bloomberg. His voice raspy and halting looked every bit of his 81 years. That vision for the future seemed cloudy. Yeah, did it? They didn't give him his shot of adrenaline. They wanted him to look stupid. Biden's pale and frail appearance led to immediate and widespread speculation that he would be pushed to decline the democratic nomination. And that kind of talk in turn leads quickly to Newsom. Well, you know, at least leading lead to big Mike with her dangly bits of the many prominent Democrats with aspirations for higher office. Newsom is arguably the best equipped Marxist scumbag Bolshevik piece of shit that we could find in fundraising chops and managing it. I obviously might have added something there. And as messaging in its campaign infrastructure to set up an emergency. None of these people do what these things themselves. They're a face with a bunch of little J words with a small hats on behind them. 90 minutes, the 90 minutes that Biden spent on stage with Trump live before millions of viewers ultimately served to reinforce what polls have indicated since Biden decided to run for reelection. Most voters believe he is too old to be president. That's putting it mildly. The panic among Democratic Party inside of it. He doesn't do anything. He doesn't need to be there doesn't need to be a person out there. They can put a cardboard cutout. It's not who actually runs the government. There is no government. It's a corporation. It's run by the Federal Reserve. The Fed the FBI is only in existence because that's the. The weaponized enforcers of said reserve to to protect it and its interests. That's why you have a CIA. That's why you have all these things because of that Federal Reserve. They're watching us. We are the enemy because we have been taken over. Hence, that's the reason why you'd be the enemy of the state. That's why you're the domestic terrorist because you have been defeated without any fight. It happened. Well, first happened in 1930 13, but ultimately concluded with the full devastation and enslavement in 1933 during the bankruptcy. But anyhow, that's Bloomberg. I just want to put that point that out there because that was something that Dr. Lydin had said I like almost exactly. So I found that pretty interesting. Okay. If I get rid of Bloomberg, I don't want that student on my screen anymore. I don't want that in my life. A couple of things I don't need. Okay. Let's get into it. Oh, so like I said before, speak free radio. Moneytreepublishing.com. Listen to the words moneytreepublishing.com is where you can go to get the books and the DVDs Blu-ray discs. You can support people from Speak Free Radio there. It's connected, right? You can also go to Speak Free Radio and do the same. And also, if you use code B-A-A-L, you can get a 10% discount on anything that you get there. Now, I'm going to start learning ancient Greek, by the way. And on today, I'm starting my, I'm hoping to go to Thursday fast because I just feel like it. No, no, no, no particular reason. Okay. Let's see. What are we going to put up first? Oh, we got to do our intro. We got to have our intro for DuckTales down here. So, hold on. Good times. [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] [MUSIC] All right. So, for some reason, my logo is not popping up on StreamYard. Once again, something glitching out. So, oh, there it is. It didn't pop up for like 10 minutes, but okay. Fair enough. All right. So, now we go into where we left off. We're going to left off on Friday. Make sure we have it clicked. Where you got DuckTales down. There he is. [MUSIC] Bibles, so here's the name of it again. Those of you who don't recall. [MUSIC] Bible scholar responds to Emmett Hillman, was Jesus Christ a trafficker, Dan McClellan. It's a little bit more complicated than all that. They go through a lot of stuff in a two-hour program. Dan is a quote, unquote, biblical scholar, whatever that means. They only read, well, let's put it this way. They think that ancient Greek means something different when it comes to the Bible, that it's in context and you only can use the Bible to prove the Bible. You can't go outside sources and say, well, he said, outside of the Bible, no, there's no other mention of this before that. Well, the Bible didn't happen or occur or get written in 800 or 900 or 1200 BC. So, you can't say that outside of the Bible, there's no occurrence during that time of these people's names. It's circular argument, well, no, not outside the Bible, there isn't. Well, then there isn't one because that's not when the Bible is written. So, you can't say that. They referred to something that happened back then, so therefore that's the proof. Hey, it's Ryan Seacrest. Life comes at you fast, which is why it's important to find some time to relax a little you time. Enter Chumba Casino with no download required. You can jump on any time, anywhere for the chance to redeem some serious prizes. Treat yourself with Chumba Casino and play over 100 online casino style games all for free. Go to ChumbaCasino.com to collect your free welcome bonus. Sponsored by Chumba Casino, no purchase necessary. VGW Group, void where prohibited by law, 18 plus terms and conditions apply. Even though nobody who would live during that time or any time after that for a thousand years didn't say shit about it. Come on, man. Come on. We need better than that. All right, so here we go. The context, the genre, the way that is amenable to these other medical texts, like just the genre of text is different. Hold on. Something just, you saw what happened. It jumped ahead in a minute for a new apparent reason. Here we go. Is it topical? Or is it something you consume? Right. So this is, anyways, my point, like this is his point of view. You can see where he's coming from. Yeah. And I don't disagree with the fact that they were using whatever they could find to get by, you know, doTERRA is around today because people want to use whatever they can find to try to cure what he owes them. Right. But to use that as an interpretive lens to try to entirely renegotiate what... So here's what he's saying. That in the Greek in a, in a medical text format somehow means something different than what it means when they're using the same pharmacological terms, pharmacia, pharmacon terms in the Bible. Same, same ancient Greek words. Somehow have a different meaning just because the Bible says so and the Bible wouldn't do that. They wouldn't talk about stuff like that. So therefore it must mean something different. That's the whole argument. What? What Christianity was, what Jesus was within early Christianity is like at least be able to use evidence from those texts because... See, stay within our parameters and argue from within this box. Otherwise we don't, we don't recognize the argument. Isn't that convenient? Euripides has no bearing whatsoever on how the author of the Gospel of Mark or how Paul were using... People who are writing in the same time are previous to that who can give you a basis foundation of what these words actually mean. Now they're saying no, that's, that's no bearing. There's no bearing on that. There's mosquito in here. That's shit. The term Christ. If you go look in their text, they're not using it in a way that's, that is amenable to these other medical texts. Like just the genre of text is different. It's not a... So if you say words in a book that says medical texts or if you say it in a book that you decided to wrap together a bunch of stories and letters and say it's the Bible, somehow words have new meanings. Medical texts, you have kind of Greco-Roman bios as part of the book. It's part of what the Gospels are doing and you've got a bunch of epistolary stuff, a lot of paramedic stuff. A lot of words, salad stuff. The context, the genre, the way the words are being used. I don't see any support in there for taking that understanding of the ancient world, which I agree is a valid one and he knows a lot more than I do about medical texts in classical and early Greek literature. But the notion that that just overrules everything in the New Testament. My understanding is that is part of the argument that he's making, that Jesus was... There was some kind of purple stuff that Jesus was rubbing on everybody and everything. Actually, that was part of the Greek Magidul Bapyri. One of the first words that was translated from there was the word purple. Yeah, I think from one of the Herculaneum. Yeah, the Herculaneum strolls. That they use the new technology to read. Right. I think his whole point was that the Bible completely misrepresents what the terms were or changes what the terms actually originally meant, which paints a false narrative of what was actually going on. And that's where I would want to see evidence from the Bible because it's not like when you talk about the original sources, the original texts, they're... I want to see evidence from the Bible where we've already decided that words can't possibly mean that because the Bible certainly simply wouldn't do that. Do you catch this? What's going on here? Not original to the Bible. They're earlier than the Bible. But the Bible would have to be coming, would have to be literarily or conceptually or in some way based on them for them to be the original text when we're talking about the Bible. The biblical texts are, they're using their own traditions. They're using their own, they're using the language in their own way. And the idea of Christ as the anointed one, this one who is to be anointed by God for this special purpose, that predates Christianity. That's in the Septuagint. That's in Greco-Roman period literature. So when we're talking about the original sources for what we see in the New Testament, that's going to be Greco-Roman period Jewish literature. And the usage that is in classical medical literature, that kind of usage, that's not in the Greco-Roman period Jewish literature. And that's, I even, I think I responded to Amund's live stream saying, "Show me a text from early Judaism, early Christianity." That uses the word in this way. Because just because it is used that way in other texts. It's not in the older text. Right, in the classical Greek literature. And there's literature in Greek that is being used contemporary with the New Testament that can use it in these ways as well. Well, I guess his point is that like if you are trying to start a religion and you are trying to develop a way of life and to somehow evolve your society, right, with the religion, this goes back to like Plato's noble lie. You don't want to have it being based on drugs. You want to have some sort of a positive outlook. You want it to be positive. You don't want it to focus on things like this. Maybe they wanted to later when Christianity came about. Maybe they wanted to. They didn't want you to know that it was a Saturn cult that was wrapped up in a box and Dionysus and all the corrupted parts of those types of practices that they repackaged to basically infiltrate and co-opt more minds into worshiping their God. Change it to make it fit a different sort of narrative. Maybe, and I'm sure there were folks who thought of drug use as something positive. I think there certainly would have been an audience for that kind of thing. But there's just no evidence within the literature. The other material remains the history of early Christianity that supports that. Some of the earliest references we have to what the Christians were doing are just reports that they gather they sing hymns and this is a religion for women slaves and they don't do anything wrong but they're just a bunch of superstitious weirdos. Was there a religion for women in slaves? Christianity. That was a tiny, the younger. Medea. This is a patriarchal society. They destroyed the matriarchal society and he's saying that Christianity is a religion for women slaves. Yeah, maybe that's what they sell you but that's not exactly what it is. Oh, really? Yeah. Huh. I think that's funny. In the sense that it makes everybody a slave to the jealous God. Yeah, sure. Why not? Well, he has one of our earliest accounts of Christian meetings. There was a rule that he was supposed to be enforcing that people weren't supposed to be gathering together and he arrested some Christians for doing that and he was like, "We tortured some of the slave girls and all we could get out of them is that they meet together in the morning and they sing hymns to Jesus as to a God and they're just a bunch of superstitious weirdos." Right. I said, "If you'll denounce Jesus, you're free to go otherwise you die." And he wrote to the emperor and said, "I'm doing okay, boss." And he said, "You're doing great, kid." So, yeah, there's just no evidence that Christianity was oriented toward anything like this. Except for all the words in the Bible, the ancient Greek Septuagint that predates the Hebrew Bible. In any of the literature, the only reference we have to- The Hebrew Bible with the words, remember, over 1,700,000 words in ancient Greek. Do you think something might be lost in a translation to a language that only has, at best, 8,000 words? Any kind of drugs in the New Testament is there's a reference to pharmacia, which is- There's a lot more than just a reference to pharmacia. They say things and they contradict themselves an awful lot. A Greek word that- The pharmacia that they don't want is from the median culture. It could be used to refer to potions and poisons and curses and things like that, but also to elixirs and things that you might rub on your forehead or might ingest. But there's a negative reference to people who engage in pharmacia. And these days, you hear just asinine conspiracy theories about it. Listen to this shit. Listen to this shit, everybody. Because that's the source of the word pharmacy, and so a lot of people think- The pharmaceutical industry is there for the Antichrist or something like that. I can't believe that Danny Jones even laughs at that. That discredits him horribly. That's pathetic. They're still using snake venoms and shots right now to change your genetic profile so that you start producing poison inside your own body through the E. coli in the yeast that's pumping out this venom inside of you if you get these shots. And that's not the first thing, ozimpic, which I can pull up if you'd like. That's from Gila monster venom, AZT. That's a shallow sea sponge toxin that murdered a bunch of people. All of this stuff is still rooted in pharmacia, utilizing venoms from various animals. There's nothing that's different except for our perception of it. They are killing you with a eugenics program called alopathy. That's amazing. It's all interconnected, so. Yeah. What is Christianity, like when Christianity was developed, what did they say about the Illucinian mysteries? I don't know that we have much at all about that. I mean, not really. The closest you have, I think, is. There's an awful lot to discuss if you actually look into the Illucinian mysteries. There's been a lot written about it. There are some folks who think there may have been some overlap between Christianity and Mithraism, just because they were kind of both seen in the Saturn cult and Dionysus. This is all the stuff that you get when you are reading the ancient texts. In his mystery cults. And then there's some who think there's kind of a bakkic background to Christianity. There may be some influence from the bakkai on the Gospel of Mark, for instance. Some of the ways that Jesus is represented in some of the gospels, kind of mirror. What is bakkic? The bakkai is a story associated with Dionysus and mysteries and people who dance in frolic and get drunk on wine and stuff. Druged wine in the purple poison. Like that. And the bakkai is this famous piece of literature. And there have been scholars who suggest some of the imagery in some of the Gospel accounts that is riffing on what's going on in the bakkic literature. And some people see particularly in the the Johannine representation of Jesus. So Jesus in the Gospel of John, particularly his relationship with wine. Kind of hints at Dionysus a little bit. So there are some ways some of the writers of the New Testament literature are pulling in some imagery from the Greco-Roman world and some, and from the mythology to try to represent Jesus as kind of the true one who has all this power and is sovereign over all these different aspects of the world. And including the beginning of the Gospel of Mark may be riffing on something called the preen inscription, which is about celebrates the good news, the Gospel of the coming into the world of the God Augustus because it uses a lot of the same terminology. What do you make speaking to Mark? What do you think? That also brings up the question that, you know, talking about Roman victories in the Bible and calling it a Gospel. Why would that be good news? Why would it be good news that they were being defeated by the Romans? Think of Amans interpretation of the scene in the public park where Jesus was arrested at 4 a.m. with the kid. Yeah, that's, I think that's wildly over interpreting things. There's just a kid with like a cloak or some kind of piece of fabric. He claims it was a medical bandage. He claims the Greek word means medical bandage. Like if you have a text where he says so the doctor applied a blank to his wound, you could interpret it as medical bandage. But if you just see the word on its own, it does not mean. Oh, really? Okay. So it's the idea there is that there was a kid who just had something wrapped around and to keep warm and they were like... That was explained in one of Amans, well, multiple presentations that this simply is not the case. Come here, kid. And they grabbed it and he ran off and they were left with the piece of fabric at hand. The only thing you have, yeah. Yeah, so you just see him scurrying away nude. Okay, so there's that nice rainbow wristwatch again. The notion that there was anything sexualized about that or that it had anything to do with drugs or antidotes to drugs and supported by anything at all. And is it true that Jesus said I'm not a laystace? Hello, it is Ryan and we could all use an extra bright spot in our day, couldn't we? Just to make up for things like sitting in traffic, doing the dishes, counting your steps, you know, all the mundane stuff. That is why I'm such a big fan of Chumba Casino. Chumba Casino has all your favorite social casino style games that you can play for free anytime, anywhere with daily bonuses. So sign up now at ChumbaCassino.com. That's ChumbaCassino.com. Sponsored by Chumba Casino, no purchase necessary. V.G.W. Group, void were prohibited by law, 18-plus terms and conditions apply. Um, I don't know which part he's talking about. When the people came to arrest him. He tries to act like he didn't know that this was coming. Pops. When they got there and they had other weapons and he was like in a state of mania, he says. Jesus was like, he was overwhelmed and he was in this state of mania and he said, I am not a laystace. Uh, that's something that can be interpreted a variety of ways as well. It's not. Uh, laystace is a pirate, specifically a child or a human trafficker. It's not indicative of any kind of, uh, all, you know, enhanced or alternate state or anything like that. Doesn't mean he's, because they use a lot. Think about the Jews were involved in like the Phoenicians and stuff like that. They were stealing people. They were stealing the Phryzians. They were stealing the Phrygians. They were stealing children anywhere they could find them. Turning some of them into Unix because Unix had a high value to them. So they were cutting their, you know, what's off, conditioning them. And also applying these drugs to them so that they would be little antidote factories for their rituals, for their, for their rights and rituals, for their mysteries. A lot of words to refer to Jesus being kind of overcome with, with sorrow and grief and things like that. And sometimes they're, they're over interpreted when it's, uh, I think some of the. He specifically asked what laystace means and he's going off into this tangent. And I think translations, uh, should probably relax a little bit. It's, it's more like he said it in this kind of, uh, in this kind of voice, not necessarily. No. So what, what, what I'm was saying. What, what, what passages that, because I can look up the passage and we can. I believe it's Mark 21. I'm not a hundred percent. No idea. It's like, he said, I don't remember. I believe he said it was in Mark. Oh my God. I'm like 14 or 15. I want to say he said. Um, anyways, he said that, um, he says that the word laystace means human trafficker. And he says that human traffickers were also everywhere in that, in that time. Yeah. He says there was pirates, there was traffickers. I mean, even he said Julius Caesar was captured by human traffickers or chill traffickers. And, uh, when Julius Caesar, like he says that, and Julius Caesar's account, he actually calls these guys, laystace, a laysti or something like that. And then he goes and crucifies these guys that, that captured him when he gets. Yeah. And I know there was, there was a lot of. So that, that was an interesting, interesting story that I, I didn't know about. But I guess when he was about 25, Julius Caesar was captured by these lace die and they were holding him for ransom and he, they held him for 38 days. And he told them that, uh, when he was released, he would come back and he would kill them and he made good on his promise. He crucified all of them. Human trafficking going on, because you had, um, you know, the, the society was even more stratified than that it is now. So you had a lot of people who were enslaved and then you had, you had different types of enslaved people. And so, um, yeah, I'm sure there was a lot of that going on, particularly in the, in the more, um, densely populated areas. So, yeah, so his point about that was, you know, why is this guy saying I'm not a lace date? Which means I'm not a human trafficker when this boy is with him and the boy runs away. And then, um, he goes, and then he says, the next day he's crucified in between two other lace days. He says the guys that were crucified next to him were human traffickers. So the, I know that the terms, um, when it's talking about the, so human trafficking wasn't a, uh, from what I know from, uh, first century Rome, human trafficking wasn't one of the, the crimes that was punishable by crucifixion. It was the crime punishable by crucifixion. It was, uh, the word that they, that they use to describe the, the criminals, I think, in the later texts, it calls them thieves, but, but they're, they're breaking. The later texts that cause them thieves is the one that's rewritten from the ancient Greek and he's talking about the Hebrew translation and what they put into modern Bibles so that you don't know this information against their, um, uh, because it was, um, shoot. Maybe you can find that Greek word and we can punch it in that thing again. Yeah. There's a, um, I'm trying to think of the English word. Danny Jones is doing a good job, but I mean, that whole laughing about pharma, pharmacy and pharma con and pharma key and not being, oh, ha, ha, ha. No, no, that's quite literally what's going on in all the symbolism is there too, including the colors, the color blue. That's Babylonian magic right there for cursing people with a disease. Oh, it was basically, um, oh, it's sedition that was punishable by. Sedition. Crucifixion. Yeah. What does that mean? So that's, uh, trying to revolt against the state. Okay. Okay. You're like, like, like, look, this is, this is, if you look at the body language of him, it's, it's acting. He feels like he's on the spot right now. Uh, but the, um, so the, they would have been people who were, were probably, uh, revolutionaries or, uh, people who were attacking, um, the, uh, the Roman rulers or things like that. Um, I know thieves is not, is not right. Go back, Steve, to that long list. Yeah. Um, go down. It says, it says on the right, kind of like what they all mean. Yeah. Plundering. Take a booty spoil. Taken as booty captive. Uh, a robber. There you go. Yeah. Um, it wasn't a late stage to seize to carry off as booty. Keep going. It was like a pirate. I think this is it. One of them said buccaneer, didn't it? Yeah. But I think buckaroo is the right translation there. Um, yeah, it's hard to every pronounce, every, every, every way I can, I can spell it in the English language. It doesn't, but, but you'll, you'll notice with these, uh, with these glosses as well. Cause these, um, lexicons just use glosses, which are, which are basically here. So here's what he's saying. Definitions don't apply to the Bible once again, he's, he's going to say that or equivalent words. Okay. It's not necessarily saying this means when this happens in this context and this color and all this other stuff. Right. It's not a full, um, definition, but, but it's pretty generic. Like a robber, um, can be a lot of different things. And, you know, you might find a, um, if you tell a story about a robber in a specific circumstance. And again, there's all this additional semantic freight that goes along with, with the way the word is used. Like a child who's mostly naked with a bandage on his privates running away. At the same time, he says, I'm not a laystace, you know, like that type of context. That doesn't mean that that is evoked with every single use of the word. Um, but yeah, the, the, I don't think. I'm just watching the body language. I think I know of any, uh, New Testament scholars who've. Who would agree that the. Well, the New Testament scholars wouldn't agree there. They wouldn't even consider that. You get like in this box where we already have decided what things are. We're not going to. Except anything outside of what we've already decided these things mean. Big surprise that they wouldn't consider if they re able to read the ancient Greek and it said something that they weren't expecting that they would reject it. Of course they would. The other two people crucified alongside Jesus were human traffickers. Um, I think it could have been included in the broader notion of a, uh, someone who committed sedition or, or someone who was a, a brigand or something like that. But it certainly didn't specifically refer to human trafficking. And he says that the, but the word he uses that laystace word is the same word that Julius Caesar used for the guys that, uh, captured and kidnapped him and that he crucified. There it is. That's the word right there. This is the Greek actual spelling is funny. It says predator. Yeah. Well, laystace has read it. Yeah, predator pretty much sums it up, doesn't it? Um, let's plug it in. Maybe. Yeah. Let's plug it in. And then, um, we should find the actual passage in, I think it's mark. Right. Look at night. Oh, maybe it's Matthew. I don't know. Anyway, so stick that and help that in there. There we go. Okay. Here you go. If he carried off his booty to be one by force, a pirate or a robber. Yeah. So that, that can refer to an incredibly wide variety of things. Okay. So yeah, a robber highway. No, no. Watch what he does. He goes right to the, this is what the words mean in the Bible. Uh, little app he has on his phone. And then he says, yeah. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. Um, yeah. So they throw in revolutionary there so that they can make it make sense in the, in the context that they want you to see it in. So I think that second sense revolutionary insurrection is that's the kind of sense that would could merit crucifixion. Oh, that's not even here. You said, yeah. Yeah, it's not even here. So the ancient Greek doing accept that as a definition. And then what, what scholars affectionately know as B dag, which is a Greek English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature. So it isolates the usage of these words. He just, so he admits that they isolate the usage of the words based on what they say it's going to mean in the Bible because somehow when you magically put these things together, rapid abiding around it that says Bible, it means something different. In early Christian literature to show how they're being used in those contexts. Yeah, but wouldn't that kind of be a bias translation? If they, if they don't, if they have Jesus is saying he's not a laystace, they wouldn't want Jesus to be saying he's not a predator. They would want him to be saying he's not a revolutionary. Well, they, they look at all the very good Danny Jones. What different places it's used to see to see how it's being used. And I'd be interested to see the chart, the usage of this word to see in what genre of literature and what types of context that is used to refer specifically to so that he can say, well, that's not biblical. That's not a biblical text, so therefore it doesn't apply human traffickers because Robert highwayman bandit that's pretty much anybody who's waiting along the side of the road to the guys that capture Julius. And that's also what the Jews were doing. And that's what they've been known for throughout history is being the bandits on the road, right? Whether they're Khazarians or anywhere else, they're the merchants and thieves, correct? The cutthroats, the foreigners, they're always called the foreigners no matter where they are because they're always the outliers. They're always non assimilators that are always there to basically, ever cynically live off of whomever is the culture that they're, you know, interacting with. User. Wouldn't that be in the same context because he was a lot? The context would indicate it. I mean, the same period in time, I'm sorry. Oh, it would be near the same period of time. It would be, it wouldn't be the same literary corpora. It's not the same literature. And also one of the big differences between what's going on in the literature written by Greek elites and the literature written by early Christians is the Christians are using the coin a Greek common Greek. This is street Greek. It's the Greek that you use as a second language. It's not. These are not people who were raised reading Plato and Aristophanes and all these other people. And so this is, they're more closely related classical Greek over and against the New Testament Greek which is generally referred to as coin a Greek, which means vulgar or common. And so they use words in different ways. And this is one of the main points is that all the literature that I'm on is pointing to is exclusively classical literature or literature from elite Greeks who are literally trained and all that kind of stuff. Are you familiar? Sorry, interrupt you. Go ahead. Well, I was just going to say, I have yet to see a single piece of evidence, actually from Christian literature to indicate that. So once again, those who decide that they are going to be the arbiters of the, you know, retranslations of these words. And he has yet to see them admit that Lestay's means predator will no shit. It's ever being used and anything approximating the way he's describing it. There is an, oh, you found the verse Mark 1451. Yeah. New international version. A young man wearing nothing but a linen garment was following Jesus when they seized him. But what does it say? When does he say his response to the cops? Oh, gosh, where did it go? What was I going to say? Oh, oh, are you familiar with Lucian? Not. So also in the story that, well, the telling that Ammon gives, and I'm not supporting Ammon in anything else that he does. I'm just explaining that this is what he's saying is the text says that they dressed him, they dressed Jesus in purple gown, as I say in the Bible and all this other stuff. They dressed him up like a Lestays and they told the crowd what he was, well, he was caught doing. And that's when the Sanhedrin apparently to their credit, but I don't know if I would go that far. That's when they started getting wild up and saying, you know, he's basically with the same thing that they that they argued Socrates was doing, which was, you know, poisoning the youth. So, I don't know what you make of that, but I also don't think that it should be painting the hues in a good light because what was he? Was Jesus one of them or not? I don't know that people have said he isn't. So the whole point here is, is that I don't think there's a good guy in this situation one way or the other. And it also is kind of interesting that the Romans say, you know, he watches his hands of this, this is something that the people are wanting, unless they set it up that way to where. I'm Victoria Cash, and I want to invite you to a place called Lucky Land, where you can play over a hundred social casino style games for free for your chance to redeem some serious prizes. So what are you waiting for? The best way to discover your luck is to spin. So go to luckylandslots.com. That's luckylandslots.com and get lucky today at Lucky Land. No purchase necessary, VGW group, boy prohibited by law, 18 plus terms and conditions apply. They make it very apparent what he's guilty of so that they don't have to be the ones that say what to do with them because they're going to get the crowd riled up to say what they want to have done. I could possibly see that, but there still seems like to be something else missing in this whole telling right that, well then wouldn't the Romans if they, if, you know, they were pissed off and didn't like lysdays in their, in their territories that they wouldn't need the people, or their opinions to do what they're going to do. I don't know, is it just like, you know, kind of like a propaganda media to the, to the people and, and to get them to, to demand it. It's possible. Not very familiar now. It's been a while. So he wrote, he wrote, Lucian was another example of a writer. I think this was like 150. I could be wrong here. Steve, you have to fact check me on this. I think it was like 150. So here's where he talks about Lucian, Lucian writes in almost the exact same time period that the New Testament is being written. And he's talking awful lot about lysdays and he uses it in the context that is meeting predator child trafficker abductor all the stuff right pirate. Yes, but a pirate who specifically does those things. And he writes extensively on it. So the name, the word means, and it's not, it's not a medical text. So you can't use that argument. He's, he's using it at the same time period that that word would have that meaning in the culture of the Greeks, the colonists, the ones that they're all being influenced by, right? The BC, Lucian was a poet. And he wrote a story about a guy named Alexander, the false prophet, who was a lysdays. And he's using the, he's using the context to how Alexander, the context that Lucian uses to describe this guy Alexander, the false prophet as this terrible, tyrannical lysdays who's trafficking people and, and, and uses using them as like props, and putting them into like prostitution rings and all kinds of stuff. I think he's using that for the main historical context for that passage in Mark where Jesus says I'm not a lysdays. Yeah, that's. So that wouldn't be relevant to what was going on on the ground. And no, Lucian wouldn't, wouldn't be relevant because it's not part of the Bible. So even though that's the name, that's the word that's used during the time period. He says, no, no, no, not part of the world, because it's, it's, we're, we're talking 200 years later, 200 plus years later, and a different. Wait for it though. Wait for what happens here. Part of the world and, and a different type of literature altogether. Can you Google Lucian so we can actually get the real story about what his deal was when that was a nervous laugh, by the way, when he was sorry. Yeah, you need to be able to show that, that this usage is actually going on in, in the text you're looking at. You're asserting where it's occurring, but I, I don't think there's anything in the New Testament that can plausibly. Scroll down about. Yeah, they're all 125 Wikipedia. Okay, so one. Oh, that is, that is CE. What does CE, what does that mean? So that's AD. That's AD, right? So this, so this is a satirist. Yeah. Yeah. So, so this is saying he was 125 to 180 AD. Right. Okay. So roughly about 100 and some 100 years and change after. Well, less than less than that for the actual composition of the Gospels. So there. So he does actually admit that, I guess maybe to Dan's dad, the clothes. Gospels are 75 70 CE to maybe 125 CE. Oh, and that's all speculative to that 70 CE date. Oh, really? Okay. Yeah. So that's so around the same time. Yeah, it's much similar, but. That's also interesting. The Gospels are written then. Mm hmm. And they're talking about this story of Jesus being in a park being arrested at 4 a.m. 100 years later. And Mark, the gospel, which tells me that this whole entire story and maybe the character himself, even if it was a real person, everything that they'd said about him, it wasn't a firsthand account. It's they're adding attributes to a certain person. So even if they're saying something bad about him, you can't really take it that deeply because it seems like they're just building characters to tell their tale. Because it's so far removed from it and the people are so far removed from it. And when we get into Paul, we'll understand that that's also the case there. That it starts to make you wonder like where they coming up with this stuff. That's in. Mark wasn't even there. Right. A bunch of it. Who were there? It was Paul, Peter, Peter, James and John. Peter, James and John. Yeah. So why is it in Mark if he wasn't even there? I don't know. I don't understand this. Well, none of the other Gospels were written by people who were there. None of them are eyewitness accounts. They're all. They're all later people who are basically just committing the tradition to text. Probably because they're getting far enough away from the actual life of Jesus that nobody really has a plausible case to have actually heard the words of Jesus directly from him. So therefore, everything that they put in his mouth isn't accurate. And now it's time to actually commit these words to text because there was an idea initially that Jesus's words had more authority than the scriptures because scripture means written things. So words on a page don't have as much authority as spoken living words. So the whole, you know, you have read that Moses said this. You want to write that down first so that you preserve it, not wait until hundreds of years later before you start doing that. Well, I say this is a way of suggesting that Jesus's words, Trump scripture, but once you get far enough away that nobody can say I, you know, sat on my grandmother's knee and heard the words of Jesus. Now it's, you kind of need the written words to ensure that they actually get preserved, but you still have the continuation. That's backward logic. If it's something that's important, you write it down. In addition of this tradition of what they called the agrafa, the unwritten things. So there were there were traditions about Jesus that weren't written down, but would continue to be communicated orally that were considered to be of special authority because they remained unwritten. So do you think this gives it more merit the fact that this was written, Lucian was around the same time those gospels were written. I don't think so because because there's a context that is. There's a context you see, regardless if it's only pharmaceutical or if it's something like, I don't know, telling a story about lace days. Apparently that just still also means that there's no, there's no binding qualities to those definitions. That is giving that word a more specific sense. Lucian lived in the same areas that the gospel was taking place and well, so they say and being written. So it's not like he was far removed from the culture either. In the absence of a context that indicates what it means. You've got to look at what it means most generically and then try to reason from there what seems why it's being used the way it is being used. Because if I am on a street in San Antonio and I say the word boot, there's an image that's going to pop up into people's heads. It's a generic term, but they're going to come up with a very specific image. It's going to be something like a cowboy boat. If I'm in London and I say boot, they're going to think either of an army boot or the trunk of a car because it's a different context. Same word, but... See, this whole argument is assuming that they're talking from a different, first of all, it's a bad analogy because lace days is pretty specific to what it means. It's not like boot and it's not like gift because in German gift means poison, right? But, you know, which is kind of funny in itself, but that's not what's going on here at all. It's the same language, first of all, that the ancient Greek plus is the same area and it's the same time period. The context is what determines the semantic content that gets evoked for the hearer or the reader of the text and there's just nothing in the New Testament that points. There's nothing in the New Testament that you'll accept that points to it because you're not reading the ancient Greek, which did three days. In this direction. So where did Lucian come from? Was he not in the same area? He's close to the same area. I don't know where he was living when he was writing, but I know he's... Is this where he lived? He was born in Roman Syria, died in Egypt, so it was near the same area. But yeah. Same area, same time. Yeah, but the context is what's most important there. And I got to come up with some more off the cuff examples of... I have to learn how to lie better. Contextual differences and contextual uses of words. And it seems like in his definition, every single definition had something to do with thievery or piracy or robbing. But what was the one that you looked up again? Yeah, predator and revolutionary are quite different. What was the... you said you found a different definition. What was the website you used? That was a lexicon. B-dag. B-dag? Yeah, that's just an acronym. A Greek English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature. Okay. And yeah, there are a bunch of different lexicons for... So that basically just references the Bible, the scriptures, and figures out what the words meant specifically in those scriptures. Well, it's the New Testament and the other Christian literature is usually the writings of the first couple of centuries after the New Testament was written. Okay. But yeah, that's generally considered not a totally isolated, but its own linguistic corpus, the early Christian literature. Because they're all talking to each other and they're sharing a lot of background, a lot of understanding. And they're talking about the same themes and so that's considered its own kind of corpus for analysis. When it comes to the crucifixion of Jesus, what is the conventional understanding of why he died so soon? Because isn't that the consensus that he died quicker than he was supposed to when people get crucified? It takes a long time to come back and break their legs so they drop more and they suffocate. But for him, he died way earlier than he was supposed to. Yeah, that's what it says in one of the texts, that they went to break his legs. He was already dead. Yeah. And I don't know that there's anything historical about that. However, that text is used to show that he was the perfect sacrifice because according to Jewish custom, this... Yeah, let's not forget that this Saturn cult that we're told that's re-wrapped as an Abrahamic religion is all about sacrifice, blood, eating cannibalism and sacrificing your only begotten, your firstborn, to wipe away sins of other people. Basically, God's son is less important to him than a bunch of non-player characters, basically. Like, that doesn't make any sense. If someone told me to do something to one of my children because it's going to save a bunch of assholes, I don't even know. I would tell them to go fuck themselves and probably kill them because that would mean that they were a threat to my family if they're asking me to do something like that. The specific type of sacrifice, you were not supposed to break any of the bones of the animal. And so it was basically a way of telling the story in a way that makes Jesus the fulfillment of prophecy. And I don't think... I don't know that we could demonstrate one way or another that it actually happened that way. Right. Hold that thought. I got to take a leak real quick. We'll come back in five minutes. Oh, thank you. So this guy, he says he's a big fan of Dan. He's got a couple questions. The first one up here. Oh, this is a good one. I appreciate his expertise in setting the sources and his responses to people. Danny Jones, can you please ask Dan McClellan about his views on the people like Billy Carson, whom he has made very critical response videos on YouTube about, and the rise of the simplification of the Sumerian creation stories on the Anunnaki. Does he feel like Billy Carson's teachings are dangerous? And why are people confusing Protestant teachings with Catholic teachings and blaming primary Catholics and not Judaism or Islam for the misunderstandings they have of the creation stories? Does Dan know where the Vatican have their... Well, I can say one thing. Some of the Protestant sects like the Evangelical Christians were created by the converts, the baptized converts of Jacob Frank, 26,000 in total, including Jacob Frank, infiltrated the Catholicism and Christianity, and we get these Evangelical Christians from those people who created those Brethrens, the Adiatic Brethren, the Moravian, the Bohemian, the Plymouth, the exclusive, and then you get John Darby's and school fields out there. That Christian Zionism comes from Sabatine Frankism. They're secret archives. I don't know where the Vatican archives are. I've had friends who've gone and done archival research at the Vatican, but I was never a part of that. But the Anunnaki, the favorite of... Everyone loves talking about the Anunnaki. This primarily the result of... It's primarily coming from Zachariah Sitchin's fanciful translations of the Sumerian literature, and then also trying to... In what recently, a Frenchman by the name of Anton Parks. You slept through your alarm, missed the train, and your breakfast sandwich. Cool. Sounds like you could use some luck. I'm Victoria Cash, and Luckyland is where people go every day to get lucky. At Luckyland, you can play over 100 casino-style games for free for your chance to redeem some serious prizes. Go to Luckylandslots.com and get lucky today. No purchase necessary. PGW Group, boy, prohibited by law. 18-plus terms and conditions apply. Who I think uses such an essence is like, you know, his foundation for validation. To kind of harmonize what's going on in Sumerian and Acadian literature with what's going on in the Bible. There are resonances between the two, but it's kind of trying to weave them together to make it the same historical story. And so you get this idea about aliens coming to Earth, looking for resources. Well, that's what the Kabbalah basically does. It takes all of their demons and turns them into aliens because they want to get you to get all excited about this alien stuff. When really they're promoting their demons. And stuff like that. You made videos responding to Billy Carson's videos? Yeah, Billy Carson's made a lot of videos making ridiculous claims. When he talks about Hebrew, particularly when I was in graduate school, there's a wonderful book by a guy named Lambert called the, I think it's called Babylonian Creation Myth, which is a translation of the main, the main Acadian creation myth. So if somebody wanted a decent translation that was academically sound, that would be the place to go for that. Academically controlled translations. It's what they mean. That's what they mean when they say academically sound or peer reviewed. The controllers controlled it nicely. Yeah, there's, I don't know who it is these days. Okay, but another thing I wanted to talk to you about was it seems to be a controversial idea that there are any pagan influences in Christianity. Is this the case? Yeah, it depends on the degree to which people argue for pagan influence. But yeah, it's controversial. So how much pagan influence do you believe is in Christianity? I think there was probably a little, a lot of people who came into Christianity are coming from other traditions where they're going to keep doing some of the things that they're doing. And like even today, you can visit different parts of the world and Christianity is practice in different ways because of frequently the preservation of indigenous traditions and conventions that they just carried on. And so that's called the grafting and assimilation, right? They have to make it more malleable to the, to the target group. But if as long as the core is be fearful of God and be scared of death, they've got you. Christianity is not a monolith. There's, there are a lot of different ways around the world and throughout time to be a Christian. And in the earliest generations of Christianity, I think there was, there was definitely influence from the Greco-Roman world. A lot of Greek philosophy gets into Christianity. I think there's probably more influence from Greek philosophy than Greek mythology or paganism. But yeah, depends on what you're looking at, whether you're looking at ideas about divine mediation, what the gods are like, where humans come from, morality, all that kind of stuff. So first of all, I don't understand why is that controversial in the first place? Why do, so is the idea that Christianity was just this new thing that developed in its own bubble that was completely in a vacuum from everything else? And why is that so defended? Because most people who identify as Christian believe that this way of life, this whole package is something that was delivered by God. And so they want to minimize the degree by Yael Sabeoth, by Yahweh, by a very, well, let's put this way, the Egyptians viewed Yahweh as set. The God of foreigners, the desert, storms, storm God, oops, oh, there goes Baal. To which social circumstances are influencing it. Most people, most thoughtful people will recognize there's some degree of influence from the world around them. But there are usually a handful of non-negotiable features of their belief that they don't want to, that they want to have dropped ex nihalow from the heavens, that this is pure revelation, this is pure inspiration, there is no borrowing or influence from paganism. So people tend to be pretty sensitive about that. What about the idea of gods that die and resurrect, like Persephone, Osiris, there's a ton of them. So the idea that this is like a discrete category of deity, the dying and rising God comes from a Fraser, from the 19th century. It's an outdated anthropological model that is used to try to, if this is a discrete category, if you can define it by these features, and then Jesus fits the definition, then you can just say, well, Jesus is just one of these other deities, just like these other deities, it's kind of an archetype, it's just the way people create deities. And that also means that Christianity is just kind of a product of the natural interaction of human cognition and the environment around them, which also kind of desacralizes things. So for people who are Christians, they tend to be pretty sensitive about that as well. But scholars these days don't really think of the dying and rising God motif as something that has much analytical value. No analytical value. Not a lot of analytical value like it's, you can point to some parallels. But when it comes to analyzing the rise of Christianity, I think most scholars who study that kind of thing would say the Jesus tradition doesn't seem to have been based on any dying and rising God motif. It more likely the idea of Jesus dying and rising is just a relic of the fact that their Messiah died was executed, and the only way for this tradition to carry on was for his followers to develop this tradition of his return to life. And so the fact that Jesus dies and rises is more incidentally related to the dying and rising God motif than it is inspired by it. So it's more of a coincidence, you think? I think it's more likely that the whole resurrection motif is an outgrowth of Jesus' followers trying to cope than it is with, because usually when people are suggesting Jesus as part of the dying and rising God tradition, this is a part of a mythicist approach, the idea that there was no historical Jesus, that it was all made up, and that it was patterned after the dying and rising God motif. That's usually where that argument is going, that it's there to support mythicism. I think most scholars agree that there was a historical person named Jesus who was an itinerant apocalyptic preacher who was executed by the Roman state, and then shortly afterwards, stories about him having come back to life began to circulate. So, and there are the ways that the tradition doesn't fit the dying and rising God motif, but I think most scholars would say it's more likely incidental. Right, right. The dates that they picked aren't very incidental. Anyway, so that's enough for that. If you guys want to check it out. It's called Bible scholar response to Emmon Hillman was Jesus Christ a trafficker, Dan McClellan. It's on Danny Jones podcast. Okay, we're going to switch over now to Emmon and his response. Now, again, I want to say this and I want to repeat this and I want to make it clear. I see a lot of issues with Emmon. Okay, it's not, this is not a promotion. Say, Hey, look, Emmon's right. I'm in camp and none of that is, none of that is accurate. That's not true. Don't put, don't pin that incorrectly on myself because that is not accurate. He said one time that, you know, nemesis or justice is the killer of Nazis. Fuck him. The other night he mentioned that while he was in college he was reading the Jesuit Anthony Fauci's papers. And that he wanted to give him a shout out thumbs up props for making HIV more acceptable in society and not just a gay disease in all the work that he did to do that. The guy was murdering people with AZT. And this is what he comes up with. He's also the head of what was going on during the murdering with venom shots that were going on. Yeah. And the whole lockdown bullshit, all that. Emmon gave him a thumbs up yesterday. So don't think that I'm camp Emmon but the things that he knows that are of value or what we're going to pull out here so he's going to respond now to what we just saw with a little bit of a I added a couple extra minutes of this retort so that he's animated. He's interesting. No, he's not on drugs but he does have something going on. Perhaps some kind of a drama, some kind of other thing going on but I don't think he does drugs. I think he just has like a hyperactivity or something like that. Very animated but if you saw him in 2018 or heard any of this stuff he was very like shy and stuttering. So something changed. So they've trained him well. He went to special special something training special ops train. I don't know what the hell it's called some kind of school where a lot of the people come out and become CIA agents and feds and stuff like that. So there's a lot, there's a lot of weirdness behind this but you know and you might want to ask yourself what are the, what are the intents, the intent behind this. I just want to know the ancient Greek and I'm going to, since I said that, why don't I just show you this. I believe this is the book. If I'm not mistaken, I believe this is the book that they're using for sorry for you people out there on speak free radio won't be able to see this I'll just say the name of it. It's Greek and intensive course. Second revised edition second. Okay, just as a twice, but it looks like this for those yeah there. 148 pages. The cheapest place I found it was on Amazon. Hey, I have a birthday coming up anyway once I get me that. All right. I will learn ancient Greek and I'll report back. It might take a little while for me to start getting a handle on it but I definitely want to do that. All right. Now let's get back to what we're doing here. Every button twice it's everything's so slow with this. All right, let's get into. Ammons response. And then I have something about the cult of sadder and how this all plays into the Abrahamic trio so. I gotta put that up there too, but I want to I want to kind of keep this organized and get into am in first. Yeah, put this on big screen readjust it so I'm not on it because he should have just saved that in this first place but it doesn't. All right, there we go. Give me the first one. What is that person's I wanted to just quick look at this comment before we get to the Dan clips. One of the most interesting interviews I've ever listened to about all of this this man is dangerous to the current leaders or lit of religions the world over. The common Hillman should be taken very seriously. It sounds ominous, doesn't it? But the point here is exactly is exactly on. I shouldn't be taken. You know, people shouldn't be looking at me, but these texts reveal a completely different world than the religious world that you and I have had pulled over our eyes. It's a new world, baby. Let's look at it through the where the clips did we put the clips in there. Oh, we need another one. She was like shut up. Gekko boy. Gekko we love geckos. He did his PhD under Stavra Kapulu. Oh, right. And that's the modern Greek that I heard in his in his accent, of course, in ancient Greek. I'm about halfway through her book. God. Isn't that amazing? What's your book going to be called? God. We're going to find him tonight. Are you ready? The number of times the sixth century BCE is mentioned, but never a source, right? Right? Sometimes it's mentioned, but never a source. Your guy is full of it. Yeah, thank you. What is that? There was a very important point that I wanted to bring out for people. We do not care about theories. We don't care about word salads. Here we care about what the evidence is showing us the reality. That's exactly what people are hitting on. There's nothing to do with me. It's everything to do with the muse. Oh, right. And that's the modern Greek that I heard in his in his accent, of course, in ancient Greek. I'm about halfway through her book. God. Isn't that amazing? What's your book going to be called? God. We're going to find him tonight. Are you ready? The number of times the sixth century BCE is mentioned, but never a source, right? Right? Number of times it's mentioned, but never a source. Your guy is full of it. Yeah, thank you. What is that? There was a very important point that I wanted to bring out for people. We do not care about theories. We don't care about word salads. Here we care about what the evidence is showing us the reality. That's exactly what people are hitting on. It's nothing to do with me. It's everything to do with the muse. The dragon guards that song. That's it. Hey, there. It is Ryan Seacrest with you. You want to make this summer unforgettable? Join me at Chumbak Casino. It's the summer's hottest online destination. They are rolling out the red carpet with an amazing welcome offer just for you. So don't wait. Dive in now and play hundreds of social casino games for free. Your chance to redeem real prizes is just a spin away. Do you want me sponsored by Chumbak Casino? No purchase necessary. VGW group void were prohibited by law. 18 plus terms and conditions apply. It's the one job. Give it to me. What's the? Oh, let's hit them. Come here. Dan. It's time for them. Let me take a couple of these clips and people. This is not personal. This is not personal. This is professional. This is the guy that you see tonight who went to dozens of professional conferences where people who have been studying ancient Greek and what? All their lives. They come in and they wrestle and you can't mess around, man. You cannot mess around. That's what this is about. I don't want anybody getting taken into the back alley. Good. Let's go for it. Give me a Dan. I want to suck this up. Go and then there are. There's 79,900 like 45 words in Hebrew in the Hebrew Bible alone. So 79,000 79,000. Yeah. So I think he may have heard 80,000 somewhere. He said eight. Yeah. I think he may have mistook 84 eight because they're the Hebrew Bible itself, which is not all of ancient Hebrew like there's. There was a lot of Hebrew writing and speaking outside the Hebrew Bible, but the Hebrew Bible itself has 80,000 different words in it. All right. So who was confused? There we all know it was Ducktales Dan. And he said something that was way off. I don't know where he got 79,995. I don't know where he got those. He pulled those out of some dark black hole somewhere because that's not that look people. What's the point of this? This is not just a game. When you're presenting history to someone and you misrepresent it. That's unsacred. That that's something that's befouling the planet. We have to honor the muse of history. Her name is Cleo Dan. Her name is Cleo. Give us the next one. He did correct me on something there. I said it was limited to classical and early Greek lyrical poetry, but it's also in classical and early Greek medical texts. And he pointed out out so he did. Yeah, now that has absolutely no bearing whatsoever on the claim that that's what it means in the New Testament, but okay, but it is in medical texts. Okay, did you hear the voice of reasoning sneaking in there and the Renaissance champion coming out of Danny Jones? Did you hear that? Yeah, Ducktales Danny is going to continue leading down this road of deception. That's why it's when you take the sources and you cram them in the person's face. That's when that's when you know you're in the right place. You as a classicist have done your job. You've just guarded the sources. We want to hear what you think. Sorry, Dr. P, Dr. L, Oxford, Yale. We don't care in the slightest what you think. We want to know what the evidence is and we want to understand it for ourselves because we're servants of the muse of history. Watch what's happening. A couple more. Let's give a couple more. Go. History means investigation. Isn't that nice? I like that. What is the difference between a classical scholar and a biblical scholar? So a person who studies classics is primarily engaging in the Greek and the Latin literature from the middle of the first millennium BCE down into the first few centuries CE and I use BCE and CE where people use BC and AD. And so classics doesn't really have a ton of overlap, which by the way, that's awfully dumbed down when you start using common error, because that's your biblical scholar who's not using an indominate, which means you're basically rejecting your own concepts of your religion, because before Christ, you're not using that anymore. You're using before common error. So you're eliminating the Christ from it and yet you're calling yourself a Mormon Christian, right? Very interesting. With the Bible, but the people who wrote and transmitted and consumed the New Testament and as well as the Septuagint were also people engaged with classical literature and there's a lot of influence from classics on the Bible. That's not too bad. He's only off about 500 years. So classical philology is the study of Greek and Latin, and our earliest sources are not in the fifth century, right? You've missed half the boat, right? Now, what are you watching happen? This man is an expert who makes his living off of being an expert. Where is the responsibility to the muse? Where's the responsibility that we have? We have an obligation to be accurate and all you nerdy engineers and all you nerdy computer programmers. You all understand that. The mathematicians, that's the draw. Oh, God, we love it. The musicians are even, they don't even understand, right? They're the musicians. I love it. But what's the, he's off in the amount of time that we study, but he also makes it sound like we don't study the Bible, because we just do classical stuff, right? In Dan's mind, in the mind that works at the university, in the mind that works at the seminary, there is a division and space and time between pagans and non pagans. Monus, monus live in their own universe, right? We all know that's not true. And that's why studying the Bible is part of studying classics, right? Okay, isn't it? It's terrible misrepresentation of the actual science. My God, man. That's the kind of sense that would could merit crucifixions. Oh, that's not even here. You said, yeah, where did you find the revolution? So, so I'm looking at what what scholars affectionately know as B-Dag, which is a Greek English lexicon of the New Testament and other early Christian literature. So, it isolates the usage of these words within early Christian literature to show how they're being used in those contexts. Yeah, but wouldn't that kind of be a bias translation? If they if they're Jesus is saying he's not a late state, they wouldn't want Jesus to be saying he's not a predator. Look at Danny Jones, right? He got it. He saw right through it. What's the source that you're using, Dan McClellan. You're using a source that was created by a specific group with specific types of agendas. And those words, you're going to be defined with their agendas in mind. You claim to be a translator, Dan, you should know that. Yeah. So, what do you do? What do you do? You don't listen to those ideas. You go to the text, you go to the sources and you look at them, you say, what do they say? Now, the reason I wanted wanted to harp on this is I want everybody to see this is typical medieval dark age crappery. Classical studies is the antidote to that death of the dark ages to that stuff that oozes oozes all over your equipment, knocks it out, society slows down, stops progressing, starts thanking things that are wild, wild. People around the sun. God created this place. Right? Okay. The antidote is that classical wisdom. And all it is is beautiful, beautiful reason expressed by a language that just I'm sorry. I'm sorry, ladies. I'm sorry, Latin. I'm sorry. She's the most beautiful by far, by far. Now, people are wondering how many total words this Greek have, right? Last time they checked in the TLG, the giant corpus has 1.77 million. They used to say 20 years ago, they used to say, oh, it's probably around 500,000. Now they're saying, well, the TLG, it looks like it's much, much higher. That doesn't surprise anyone. If you've done anything with this gorgeous, gorgeous pageant winner. I'm sorry. I'm sorry. I hate to say that. Right. I really hate to say that. But she wins hands down. And how do you take something that was written in such an expansive language and reduce it into a 7,000 to 8,000 word Hebrew, ancient Hebrew and not lose something in the translation. And it's confirmed to my, to my satisfaction that it was started in Greek. It was a Hebrew back translation after the fact, after the fact, after the Greek one was already created during the Hellnessic period. Hands down. Let's just all recognize that. It's why you have grammar. And I'm talking about the Old Testament, obviously. Even ask questions about your language. Yes, you know you do that in Greek, right? You just don't realize it because you're still in Greek. Right, you speak this bastardized Anglo-Saxon garbledy goop. Listen to that. Listen to my inability to find an Anglo-Saxon word that can reach that distant star and pull her down. Okay, it's going to get gross now. Put your splash bags on. Wait, we got one more, Dan. He last one is Dan. Are you familiar with Lucian? Not very familiar. No, it's been a while. So he wrote us. He wrote Lucian was another example of a writer. I think this was like 250. I could be wrong here. Steve, you have to fact check me on this. I think it was like 150 BC. Lucian was a poet. And he wrote a story about a guy named Alexander the false prophet, who was a laystace. And he's using the context to how Alexander, the context that Lucian uses to describe this guy Alexander the false prophet as this terrible, tyrannical laystace who's trafficking people and using them as putting them into prostitution rings and all kinds of stuff. I think he's using that for the main historical context for that passage in Mark where Jesus says I'm not a laystace. So that wouldn't be relevant to what was going on on the ground in the heart of the world. Because we're talking 200 years later, 200 plus years later, and a different part of the world and a different type of literature altogether. Can you Google Lucian so we can actually get the real story about what his deal was. So, so this is saying he was 125 to 180 AD. Right. Okay. So roughly about 100 and some 100 years and change after. Well, less than less than that for the actual composition of the gospels. So there are gospels are 75 70 CE to maybe 125 CE. Oh, really? Okay. Yeah. So that's so around the same time. Yeah, it's much similar, but so it turns out. Look, you know, there are certain advantages of being able to open portals. Look at how it worked out originally. The thought was, first of all, he didn't know who Lucian was. No, that's pretty, you know, okay, he was only a minor in classical Greek. So he probably didn't have that. He probably had like one semester and it was like a survey. And they probably didn't do Lucian, right? Right. This isn't a dude who's been reading Greek for the last 35 years. Right, or however long he's been out of training. I don't know. I don't know. Um, yeah, but do you hear it? People of Amman you. Do you hear the grade of professional behavior? Do you hear the level of what it is either rising to or falling to? Yeah. Do you hear that? Okay. Lucian, you don't know him. Okay. Well, you think, here's the question that tell me why the late stays in Lucian is so different from the late stays in Jesus's mouth in Matthew and Luke. Tell me, when we talk about the late stays, those two that hung with him, the lay style that are hanging next to him in Mark, that one's in Mark. Tell me, what's the difference? Well, it dances. Look, that's 200 years difference because he thinks, because he doesn't know. Watch how quickly someone in the trench coat is willing to embrace a fabrication. Right. He doesn't know. He's not from the second centuries from BC. He's from the second century AD. Right. And early in that, for that matter. Yeah. What's going to happen then? Well, Dan's going to discover. He's going to discover that he's going to have to scoop up that pile of poop that he just defecated in front of you. Yeah. Okay. Do you want to get your science from someone who is willing to engage? Lucky Land Slots, asking people, what's the weirdest place you've gotten lucky? Lucky? In line at the deli, I guess? Uh-huh, in my dentist's office. More than once, actually. Do I have to say? Yes, you do. In the car before my kids' PTA meeting? Really? Yes. Excuse me. What's the weirdest place you've gotten lucky? I never win and tell. Well, there you have it. You could get lucky anywhere playing at luckylandslots.com. Play for free right now. Are you feeling lucky? No purchase necessary. VGW Group would be rewarded by law 18 plus terms and conditions apply. Fiction. I don't. I don't want somebody like that testifying in court either. This is the classical standard and classical philologists will hold you to this. Don't BS me. I don't want to hear your stupid ideas. What's your text? Yeah, it becomes annoying after a while. But if you want to be an investigator, you have a certain professional standard to uphold. Right? Okay. Fantastic. Fantastic. Let's go to the first of our venture tonight. I just wanted you guys to see this one more time. Just so we can put this baby to rest. 7,000 words. Look, the head of the language academy at Hebrew University who sets the standards for modern Hebrew says ancient. Isn't it funny how modern Hebrew has approximately 33,000 words that 33 just happened to work out that way? And Hebrews only got 7,000 words. Okay. When the United Nations was getting beaten down by rape claims, they said 33,000 rape claims against the United Nations. Right? Fine. So, the disparity between 7,000 and 1 million. The peacekeeping force, of course, is what I'm talking about. And I'm sure they do a plenty of raping right at the UN as well. 770,000. That's what we need to remember and focus on as we're learning. Go. Give me the next one. Here's the passage. We're going to begin with tonight. People, it's that passage from Revelation. I'm just going to translate it up. And I counsel you to go to the marketplace and pick yourself up gold. It's been purified in the fire so you may be rich. And while you're there, pick up a white gown. Throw it upon your nakedness. And what else? You ought to buy a cholierian and in Christ your eyes in order that you may see. That's the text. That's the medicine. It's not separate. The medicine and the religion are the same. Salvation is a medical term. Now, now let's go to that party. I promise you we would go to. Give me the next one. Give it. Okay, so hold on. We're going to pause here for a minute. I'm going to jump over to the Saturn cult stuff real quick so I can get that in and then we'll finish off with this if we have time. It goes on for quite a long time afterwards. So, see what we can fit in here today. Let's go into host logins here. Oh, yeah, I should probably do that. All right, so the one I want to show you here is this one. I don't know, maybe 10 minutes long, something like that. It could be a little longer. It's I don't agree with everything that they conclude in this but enough to make it worth watching. Hold on a second. Do you guys even hear that? Hold on. I got to fix that. Damn it. The cumbersomeness of this crap is ridiculous. Why even put that there? Of course you want to be able to freaking hear it. What the hell? All right, not going to start it over. I'll do that back out and go back in, I guess. All right, let's try this again. Kesha getting Saturn tattooed on her hand. Miley the virus Cyrus getting Saturn tattooed on its body. Katy Perry has Saturn tattooed right on her wrist. We've seen Beyonce on magazine covers right with the Saturn earrings. We've seen a Dell perform at concerts not only wearing the Saturn earrings as well, but also getting Saturn tattooed on her arm. Coincidentally, of course, on her 33rd birthday. The Saturn is the lord of the black robe. Judges wear black robes, Catholic priests. I go into this extensively in my book, "Freeze Craft Beyond Babylon," which I'm sure all of you have by now, and you probably all went to Amazon or Barnes and Noble and picked it up. Because, yeah, you're going to want to know the information that's in here because this all points towards a lot of things that we would have to accept, unfortunately. I don't want this to be true about what we've been brought up on, the religions, but the Abrahamic Jewish deception is a reworking of a Saturn cult. That's a druid facing you right there. Color was black. God's Saturn, in the ancient Phoenician world, was referred to as L-E-L. This is why if you're continuing today to worship the planet Saturn, you become known as an elder. Obviously, this is Jordan Maxwell, who was a Freemason and a big funder of Zechariah Sitchin and a total asshole to Bill Cooper. So, we'll just take the information for what it's worth, but we can throw away the human being. Did you get to be an elder? You got L-L-Lectians. Because you were L-Lectian, now you're one of the L-leads. You have become L-Lavated. Why something we're saving is not what it's taking by our world. For those of you out there who can't read the screen, it says "The Cult of Saturn" and it's showing what looks like a scene from Eyes Wide Shut. In ancient times, Saturn was revered as a supreme deity. It apparently ruled the kingdom of Atlantis and was worshipped by various civilizations. This kind of goes into the Hopa side and thing, because beside it, in order to use whatever you want to call them, the raping of Europa, right? The stealing away into the ocean, the bull, right? That's personified at the EU, the European Union, because somehow that's a good thing, right? The raping of Europa. This worship often symbolized authority and time, playing a crucial role in shaping early religious and cultural practices. In mythology, Saturn is often synonymous with Cronus, the Greek Titan who feared being overthrown by his offspring. This led him to consume each child at birth. The god Saturn, or El, was represented by a black cube and was viewed as a supreme god and ruler of kings, and that he ruled Atlantis and became the divine ancestor of all earthly leaders and earthly kings. Another similar news reports like Prince, King Charles, being related to the ruler, Vlad the Impaler. Who am I actually like, by the way, and I love his tactics. When you have a bunch of scumbags who are little Ottomans or whomever who are a bunch of child raping groomers that raped him when he was captured by them. You put a few of them on a few sticks and it scares away the other 120,000 that we're going about to raid your kingdom. Yeah, hey, if it works, it works. Or how the late Queen Elizabeth II was a direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad. He's a great-class child who can trace his ancestry but to Romania's dark and distant past. The genealogy shows that I'm descended from Vlad the Impalerism, so I'd rather have a bit of a stake in the country. As it were. It stated that Saturn always had a negative, if not evil, significance and prominence. In ancient times, it has been called the Greater Malefic, which was opposed to Jupiter, the Greater Benefit. Saturn is esoterically associated with man's limitations. There he is about to castrate his father Uranus with the little winged bat's sight there. Restrictions, death and decay, hence the relation to Chronos. A representation of the gods Saturn, evolving into the grim reaper with the scyph. An image that we are all familiar with today. Saturn is consequently the celestial body that is the least exposed to the sun's divine light, is associated with the coldness of the principle of evil. And the connection of the one all-seeing eye has persisted throughout the ages and even into today as a form of worship to Saturn. Now what does the worship of the planet or the god Saturn have to do with modern day religions? Well, this belief had apparently originated back thousands of years ago. Apparently from a group called the Cult of El. El was described as the titular head of the Canaanite pantheon. And his most common epithet was the bull, and he was also often portrayed as an old man with a long beard. And in the Old Testament, El is sometimes used as a synonym for Yahweh, unless commonly as the general term for deity. And it's theorized that this Cult of El later on became involved and took roles as the leaders of ancient Egypt, then ancient Rome, and even continued up until this day. Now the main problem I had with researching this topic is the actual amount of information regarding this Cult and its different names that went by throughout the centuries. Same with the Canaanite god El, he apparently goes by many names, Yahweh, Adenai, Shaddai, Shabbat, and Sabat. And I'd just like to say that you get all those names in a really confused way when you read Morals and Dogma. And it's possible that most of the world's religions, but mainly the Abrahamic religions, are still worshiping this god of ancient Mesopotamia. Which would kind of make sense if you'd look into the theory of the Anunnaki and the father of the two main gods, Enchian and Lil. You'd see that? I pulled myself away from this part that I know a little bit about this stuff from what I read to research my books. I think although interesting where they take it is always kind of a strange place that doesn't really have a whole lot to back it up. Anu was the supreme god. And most of the Anunnaki gods on earth have their own cities with their own priests and temples and peoples who worship them. The only way to make sense of these claims that most religions across the earth are sickly worshipping El would be if these religions all came from a- Just keep it simple and call it Saturn and Chronos because that's where it matters. That's where all the symbolism comes from. Common point. It's apparently to keep our realities under control and to keep us praying and giving our energy to this deity. And the way they've apparently done this is with specific groups of people in their respective areas incorporating their Babylonian beliefs into the current population. That was a 1933 World's Fair. Isn't that funny that they did that there? Relations, belief systems of the- And there's our red heifer. Areas they inhabit. Therefore keeping everyone at war with each other and our energies keep going to them instead of us using our energies right to promote peace and prosperous lives. This is apparently supposed to be a way to keep us humanity enslaved on earth and in this realm. Now according to many beliefs when we die our souls are supposed to be returned to the universe to allow us to go to the next stage. But apparently this group commonly recognized today as the cult of Saturn have set these belief systems up, laws, banking, our entire society all for the purpose to give our energy to Saturn. With it often being related to a symbol or symbols that we adhere to all the time and throughout our history. Here's how. The black cube was a mysterious symbol associated with Saturn. Found in different cultures it represents Saturn's influence over time and mortality. This symbol is deeply rooted in religious and esoteric traditions. You know there's a homeless guy laying there next to the cube. And it's often linked to the idea of hidden knowledge. So this cube is the link to the Saturn worship that's hidden within the Abrahamic religions. And it's theorized that the Saturn of cult has been behind every great empire throughout history. And this black cube was one of the representations of Saturn and its worship throughout history. And there are apparently cubes like this or similar in relation to Saturn scattered throughout the planet. And let's not forget black cube is also that what I talk about my book is the quote unquote law firm that defended or had as a client. Weinstein, Weinstein, right? It's not the only thing they do. They bump people off. They're all IDF and ex-IDF and Massad and, you know, Israel intelligence people that make up the black cube. They're his squad more likely. Cube on the North Pole of Saturn known as the hexagon storm. Right in the eye of this massive storm. Now that cannot be a coincidence. How can ancient civilizations have known of the black cube of Saturn? Maybe if the cube was on another planet or hell, even if the cube or hexagonal shaped object didn't exist at all of Saturn. Maybe if this were the case, I wouldn't be looking so deeply into the conspiracy of Saturn worship. Well, here's the other thing too. We also have to accept that NASA is telling us the truth and that these images are real before we can even say, but a cube on its on its point. When you look at it from a in a two dimensional fashion, looking down on it, you're going to see it more of a hexagon shape because it's on its point. So you're seeing, you see what I mean? Yeah, so that's why it's a hexagonal, but it's still the black cube. But once again, I have to ask. And there's the kabah or kabah, which you see in Mecca. This is also something that's written in my book, detailed in here. Peace craft beyond Babylon. How would ancient civilizations have known to associate this shape, the cube or the hexagon with Saturn? This symbol is everywhere. Muslims take a pilgrimage to the kabah in Mecca, a building shaped like a black cube. And they do seven, I believe, circumnaviate relations around it and that they try to get close to the stone, the black stone in Mecca and try to kiss it. But those rotations are representative of the rings, some say. Which they run around the outside of it in concentric circles. Strangely enough, representing the rings of Saturn and could even be seen as representing the hexagon storm on Saturn. But the kabah, a black cube, that house many deity altars, but belong to the chief god Habu, or otherwise known as Ba'al or Ba'al. It's another connection to the worship of Saturn. Jewish people wear the leather boxes called Tefalin on their foreheads as. And I've discussed this in extent to the religious observance. Tefalin are a reminder of God's intervention during the Exodus from Egypt. That never happened. And are worn during weekday morning prayers. They consist of small black leather boxes with straps containing parchment scrolls inscribed with verses from the Torah. This practice is based on the biblical commandment to bind God's word as a sign on your hand. Yeah, that's a, listen, he's going to finish this, but this is what happens when you do literal translations of something that's written cryptically. And then let them serve as a front lip between your eyes. Found in Deuteronomy six, verse five to eight. The Tefalin worn on the head, known as the shell rush, are placed just above the forehead on the midline of the head in accordance with this commandment. So, it seems like both the Muslim and Jewish faith are partaken in Saturn worship? Well, what about Christians? What could possibly be the representation of Saturn and Christianity? I don't remember seeing anything in Christian history that resembles the worship of a cube. But apparently there is. And I've discussed this too, I think it's awesome in my book. It's the cross. The cross is what is revealed when a cube has been opened and unfolded. Man, I feel that the God of the Bible is none other than L set, chronos, father time himself, the grim reaper, and many others. Both Satan and Santa are also derived from Saturn. In fact, Christmas is actually the pagan holiday, Saturnalia. But according to some researchers, Saturn symbolism is everywhere throughout society. They claim that is damn near inescapable. The Lord of the Rings is a reference to Saturn as well as the symbolism behind wedding rings. The halo that is often depicted over the heads of religious figures and art is also a reference to Saturn's rings. There are several corporate logos paying tribute to Saturn as well. From Nike, all the way to Nissan. All of this is to give our energy towards these symbols and images. Because according to the occult, it doesn't matter what people believe a symbol is to them, personally. What matters is the true meaning of it. It's origin. So it doesn't matter if good people with good intentions pour their energy into these celebrities, companies, or religious symbols. If they view the cross or the cube as a positive image of their respective God or belief, their energy and prayers are sent straight to L or the God Saturn. Man, the cult of Saturn may have deceived us all. This cult, made up of many famous individuals in Hollywood. Politics, sports, music, and religion is apparently hoarding esoteric knowledge for themselves and also practicing black magic. So what I've gotten from this belief in Saturn, from these occults, is that a group of people that worshiped the God L, who was the God of Saturn. These members of this society held the keys to power within each of their areas. And you know what this also indicates? Same thing I've been saying before, the quote-unquote Jew Israelite, whatever is, are in fact the canonites, not those who conquered it. That's just a retelling of the history so they can sweep away their past. Some spread to Egypt, Rome, and then the Vatican Church to the Middle East as well. It's stated that they're here to keep our energies and souls trapped here. Our negative energies from stress, pandemics, wars, famine, it's all food or source of energy for these beings or deities that feed off of us. And that includes L and that every major religion on Earth, every major corporation will go. And even members of Hollywood use the symbolism and everything, every major war, the forced poverty, famine, the suppression of technology even. These are all things done or planned by these elite members of the cult of Saturn, or the many secret societies that has taken its roots in this occult belief of Saturn/Satan. And the only way to not be recycled according to the research is to reach a personal ascension, similar to the ancient teachings of the mystery schools, or the Kundalini with all of its chakra points. All right, I think that might be it. Yeah, okay. Cool, we have like three minutes left. That worked out pretty well. I'm going to share the screen with you. Ta-da. All right, guys, so Patreon is getting bigger. Thank you. I'll be putting more stuff on today. Yeah, in it, I put a link to that Greek book if anyone else is interested in learning it. I am interested because I don't want to take Ammon's word for it either. I mean, and that's, I think that would be wise to just learn it. He does him and you, so I mean, maybe you can use as a free way to get through the book, of course, each study type of thing. And they, but I mean, as far as eventually wanting to know what it says yourself would be probably the most intelligent approach. Right. So, yeah, that's pretty, uh, patreon is patreon.com disguise D I S G U I S E the limits. And also there's gifts and go to calm. Uh, backslash. Ball B A L busters. We definitely did that today, didn't we? You guys are the, uh, the investigators, the, the, the historians, those who are on the trail. Give yourself a pat in the back for tuning in and giving us crap about this stuff because it's some heavy topic stuff and it's not always easy for us to have to, uh, you know, digest because who the hell wants to believe that this is all true. Who the hell wants to even consider it, right. And, uh, there was a couple other things that Supreme Court allows White House press social media companies to censor speech. Yeah, blah, blah, we knew that, uh, are there vaccines in our food supply. According to this article, USDA drug manufacturers aren't required to release any information on veterinary drugs and evidence is hard to find. So what do you think they're going to put the crap that they want you to have. And then this one says. Quiet bathroom deal just approved 40 million homes to be seized. This month, the federal housing finance agent, FHA, FHA, the Freddie Mac and Freddie Mac will be offering second leans on homes. Don't take the bait. It will start small, blah, blah, blah. The ones are caps, but if you miss a payment, they take everything that you own. You'll own nothing and be happy is basically what the summary of that is and in the quickest form I could put it in. There you have it. Okay. But yeah, help out the show, get the book. You'll see the description in the video here. And thank you over on Speak Free Radio. Yeah, I know you're signing off now. Enjoy. I believe Giuseppe is coming up next. And then if you look in here in the description, you get signed copies of my book, the Amazon link is there, the Barnes and Noble, the Kobo. And then there's the link for Patreon link for the creatine. I'm going to be putting together a, oh, by the way, I'm putting together a prototype. Hopefully I can make at least 10. Free workout, stimulant free keto. Probably going to have monk fruit for a sweetener in it, but it's going to be a straight. Free workout that if you're going to want stimulant, you're going to get a rapid sugar free energy drink or something like a ghost or something like that. Like I do and it's not going to have a caffeine and hydras in it. You have to buy it in bulk that I've seen so far and I don't. I don't know if I actually even want it in there because other people take their own daily regiment of things. If they're on like a Federer or a Federer in or for around, you know, taking energy drinks, you don't want to have additional stimulants in your pre workout. They make one that does have it in there eventually, but people dry scoop and I don't want that liability of people doing dumb things to hurt themselves. This won't be something that you want to dry scoop. You want to put it in water and mix it or some kind of drink and mix it. All right. And so then there's the Peter Glidden. Oh, by the way, here's the biggest announcement. Dr. Peter Glidden is raising his prices July 4th. If you get in now, you lock it in for life. Okay, look at this link. Leave big pharma behind. Okay. This is the link to get to the membership. You can lock it in for a year and annually get billed. I think it's like 216. And that's the cheapest way to do it, but it's 24 hours a month right now. After the fourth, if you guys are thinking about being a member, it's going to go up to $44. It's going to get 20. It's going to be $20 more. If you lock in now, you're good for life. You don't have to worry about it. Okay. The cheapest it's ever been is what it is right now. And he's changing that. So just know that so that you don't lose out. Okay. There you go. And isn't it funny that square is also another black cube. I just noticed. I don't like square. But I have, they bought out weebly, which is what I used to use. But yeah, Dr. Peter Gloodens on looks like a square website because he's got the cube there. Anyhow, right. Or maybe it's no, maybe it's square space that he's using. I think square space is what he's using. Anyway, so now you know, all this stuff is in here. There's a creative link. There's all the Dr. Monzo links for his stuff and the Azure well standard grand stuff. There's the gifts and go in here at the bottom or towards the bottom and also the all the good stuff. Okay. You'll see it in the links in the description. Appreciate it. Have a wonderful day. See you tomorrow. Did you like the, did you like how I dressed up today? I bet you the people on radio really cared. Bye. Oh, yes. And I'm going to remind me I'm going to be fasting until the least hopefully, hopefully Thursday. Bye. How to have fun anytime, anywhere. Step one, go to Chumba Casino dot com Chumba Casino dot com. Got it. Step two, collect your welcome bonus. Come to top of welcome bonus. Step three, play hundreds of casino style games for free. That's a lot of games all for free. Step four, unleash your excitement. Chumba Casino has been delivering thrills for over a decade. So claim your free welcome bonus now and live the Chumba Life. Visit Chumba Casino dot com. The GW group will purchase a very void overview by law. See terms and conditions, 18-plus.